HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

Brian Leetch or Al MacInnis?

View Poll Results: Well
Leetch 14 15.91%
Mac 74 84.09%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-03-2012, 01:02 AM
  #1
Puckgenius*
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: At the rink
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,558
vCash: 500
Brian Leetch or Al MacInnis?

Who was better? I say Macinnis, 100mph slapper with a heavy wooden stick and had the physical game of Adam Foote.

Puckgenius* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 01:30 AM
  #2
Rhiessan71
Just a Fool
 
Rhiessan71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Guelph, Ont
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,988
vCash: 500
I go with Mac on this.

Mac had more longevity and Leetch's career was a bit of a roller coaster.


Can't say I agree with Mac having a physical game like Foote though.
Mac wasn't any where close to being as aggressive or as punishing as Foote was.

Rhiessan71 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 02:05 AM
  #3
Oshie97
Registered User
 
Oshie97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,365
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhiessan71 View Post
I go with Mac on this.

Mac had more longevity and Leetch's career was a bit of a roller coaster.


Can't say I agree with Mac having a physical game like Foote though.
Mac wasn't any where close to being as aggressive or as punishing as Foote was.
I agree, he was not as physical as Foote but he was not soft either. He was just more likely to strip the puck away then knock a guy off of it. Either way he was better than Leetch, who was a pretty good d-man in his own right. I miss MacInnis, don't think I'll ever see a player play quite like him.

Oshie97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 07:51 AM
  #4
tony d
Thanks for memories
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 34,832
vCash: 500
This close but Al MacInnis.

__________________
tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 10:19 AM
  #5
MadArcand
We do not sow
 
MadArcand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pyke
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 4,546
vCash: 500
Not close at all as far as I'm concerned. MacInnis by a mile.

MadArcand is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 10:31 AM
  #6
Mike Farkas
Hockey's Future Staff
Moron!
 
Mike Farkas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 5,028
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadArcand View Post
Not close at all as far as I'm concerned. MacInnis by a mile.
Yeah, as far as all-time greats go, I kind of lean this way...I didn't care much for Leetch's defensive game overall...MacInnis could do more than Leetch and be better at it for the most part...Leetch was really good, but MacInnis was better in my mind...

Mike Farkas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 01:59 PM
  #7
Big Phil
Registered User
 
Big Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,387
vCash: 500
MacInnis had a lot more staying power. Leetch could rush the puck better, and even late in his career he would make the opposition nervous on a rush. As late as the 2002 Olympics I feared Leetch. MacInnis was just good for two decades with little drop in play. In 2003 he was a 1st team all-star and then retired after 2004.

MacInnis is arguably the best player in NHL history (with the exception of both Hulls) to use his hard shot effective in the context of the game. Lots of players have booming shots, but not all of them have a low and accurate shot that created havoc.

Big Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 02:18 PM
  #8
Psycho Papa Joe
Porkchop Hoser
 
Psycho Papa Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cesspool, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,357
vCash: 500
Rushing the puck and passing I'll give to Leach. Everything else, Al Mac.

Both were great talents but I'll have to go with Mac here.

Psycho Papa Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 02:36 PM
  #9
HockeyFan100
Welcome to COL!
 
HockeyFan100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,756
vCash: 500
Big Mac for me.

HockeyFan100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 02:39 PM
  #10
Scimitars of Drizzt
New York Rangers!
 
Scimitars of Drizzt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 195
vCash: 500
Haha, I guess I'm one of the very few who would have to go with Leetch. It's definitely very close

Scimitars of Drizzt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 02:40 PM
  #11
JackSlater
Registered User
 
JackSlater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,936
vCash: 500
I would rather have Leetch in the neutral zone, and that's about it. It helps that MacInnis developed into one of the NHL's best defencemen defensively, while Leetch never really improved significantly in this area.

JackSlater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 02:41 PM
  #12
agentblack
Registered User
 
agentblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 2,289
vCash: 70
Leetch!

agentblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 04:16 PM
  #13
Big Phil
Registered User
 
Big Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,387
vCash: 500
Just wondering, the poll is slanted significantly in MacInnis' favour. Very few have voted Leetch. Can the ones who picked him elaborate as to why? (not that you can't have a decent case)

Big Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 04:20 PM
  #14
thom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,000
vCash: 500
Very Very close but I will go with Al because of his physical and mean streak

thom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 04:33 PM
  #15
PierreMcGuire*
How dissapointing
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Delta, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,750
vCash: 500
MacInnis.

PierreMcGuire* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2012, 12:39 PM
  #16
Preisst
Party On!!
 
Preisst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Western Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,178
vCash: 500
I say MacInnis for the simple reason that in my opinion he was a better player.

Preisst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2012, 01:41 PM
  #17
vadim sharifijanov
Registered User
 
vadim sharifijanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,956
vCash: 500
not sure what people mean by macinnis' mean streak. i don't ever remember him being particularly physical, at least in comparison to his teammates mccrimmon, macoun, nattress, murzyn, or even suter.

but other than pure peak, i also can't see an argument for leetch. and even then, i don't think '94 leetch was any better than '89 macinnis. on top of that, leetch was an excellent rusher but i don't think i'd put him up there as the best of all time; he's definitely behind orr and coffey. whereas macinnis does have that one defining skill that is in the argument for GOAT status-- as a PP QB, he is the best i've ever seen, with only bourque as a contender. but then i didn't see the great QBs pre-80s.

when i weigh the entirety of macinnis' career against leetch's, i don't think it's close. especially given that macinnis evolved over his career and arguably had his best all-round season in '03, at the very end of his career, while leetch peaked early and then regressed in his late 20s when most defensemen would be hitting their peaks.

vadim sharifijanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 12:00 AM
  #18
mrhockey193195
Registered User
 
mrhockey193195's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,330
vCash: 500
Leetch, but I am very biased as a Rangers fan. I also think that Leetch's defensive game gets very underrated around here.

Both these guys are easily in the 20-30 range of greatest defensemen on my list...perhaps even a little bit higher.

mrhockey193195 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 12:37 AM
  #19
Ohashi_Jouzu
Registered User
 
Ohashi_Jouzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax
Country: Japan
Posts: 21,630
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vadim sharifijanov View Post
not sure what people mean by macinnis' mean streak. i don't ever remember him being particularly physical.
Oh, he was physical. Not many players stayed very long in areas they "weren't allowed", for example. But the bigger thing, I think, is that not too many impacts shook a leaf from the oak that was MacInnis (I sometimes need to be reminded that he was "only" 6'2" 200 lbs). Kind of the passive aggressive version of physical, lol. And he was a give-and-take, really chippy player when pushed. I don't think there was any better example of this than the entire season leading up to them beating the Habs for the Cup. Lots and lots of minor penalties (only 1 fight, I think), and I don't think too many of them were love taps, or holding the stick, if you catch my drift.

Ohashi_Jouzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 12:53 AM
  #20
Morgoth Bauglir
Master Of The Fates
 
Morgoth Bauglir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,067
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vadim sharifijanov View Post
whereas macinnis does have that one defining skill that is in the argument for GOAT status-- as a PP QB, he is the best i've ever seen, with only bourque as a contender. but then i didn't see the great QBs pre-80s
On You Tube you can see some Habs games from the '70s in their entirety. Look for #5 on the power-play: Guy Lapointe

Morgoth Bauglir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 01:52 AM
  #21
Hawkman
Moderator
 
Hawkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,182
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrhockey193195 View Post
Leetch, but I am very biased as a Rangers fan. I also think that Leetch's defensive game gets very underrated around here. Both these guys are easily in the 20-30 range of greatest defensemen on my list...perhaps even a little bit higher.
The board ranked them 18th and 23rd.

Quote:
18 2 Al MacInnis 6'2" 204 1963 1981-2004 Canada
19 4 Scott Stevens 6'2" 215 1964 1982-2004 Canada
20 44 Chris Pronger 6'6' 220 1974 1994-Present Canada
21 4 Bill Gadsby 6'0' 180 1927 1946-1966 Canada
22 21 Börje Salming 6'1" 193 1951 1970-1993 Sweden
23 2 Brian Leetch

Hawkman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 09:56 AM
  #22
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,578
vCash: 500
Leetch had the higher peak, there is no question of that. But MacInnis' peak was close to that level, his prime was long, and he maintained a high level of play for a very long time. Leetch's play outside of his peak/prime was at a significantly lower level.

This is like comparing Paul Coffey and Ray Bourque. The same exact paragraph can be applied.

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 11:04 AM
  #23
Kloparren
Hth
 
Kloparren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,449
vCash: 500
This is gona be Karlsson vs someone like Pietrangelo in a couple decades.

Kloparren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 03:52 PM
  #24
Fred Taylor
The Cyclone
 
Fred Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,830
vCash: 500
This is closer than the poll results indicate, but it's still MacInnis.

Fred Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 04:57 PM
  #25
vadim sharifijanov
Registered User
 
vadim sharifijanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,956
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohashi_Jouzu View Post
Oh, he was physical. Not many players stayed very long in areas they "weren't allowed", for example. But the bigger thing, I think, is that not too many impacts shook a leaf from the oak that was MacInnis (I sometimes need to be reminded that he was "only" 6'2" 200 lbs). Kind of the passive aggressive version of physical, lol. And he was a give-and-take, really chippy player when pushed. I don't think there was any better example of this than the entire season leading up to them beating the Habs for the Cup. Lots and lots of minor penalties (only 1 fight, I think), and I don't think too many of them were love taps, or holding the stick, if you catch my drift.
maybe i remember him as less physical than he really was due to his very physical teammates. in st. louis too, it's tough to stand out as a physical guy next to pronger and jackman.

Quote:
Originally Posted by eva unit zero View Post
Leetch had the higher peak, there is no question of that. But MacInnis' peak was close to that level, his prime was long, and he maintained a high level of play for a very long time. Leetch's play outside of his peak/prime was at a significantly lower level.
can we really conclusive say leetch had the better peak?

in their best years, both finished 9th in points, 3rd in assists. macinnis had 103 points, leetch had 102. both also had a conn smythe within two seasons of the 100 point year. so if we are counting peak as best 2-3 year spike, macinnis has a career-defining playoff run, followed by two years where he was the consensus second best defenseman in the league after bourque, at top four all-time guy at his absolute peak (ridiculously close 2nd and 4th hart finishes in those two years for bourque).

leetch's best 2-3 year stretch has a doughnut hole in the middle. he was hurt, not his fault; and his team, which would win presidents trophies before and after that year, didn't even make the playoffs in '93 so it shows how valuable he was. but then he wasn't really in the running for the norris in '94; in fact, he wasn't even definitely the best defenseman on his team (he finished 3rd in all-star voting, barely ahead of zubov; zubov finished 3rd in norris voting, a little ahead of leetch who was 4th). so even with the norris, i find it really hard to say that leetch from '92-'94 was better than macinnis from '89-'91 win any degree of certainty.

vadim sharifijanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.