HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > Fantasy Hockey Talk > EA Sports NHL
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
EA Sports NHL Discussion forum for EA Sports NHL video games.

Lundqvist and/or the Rangers in NHL13.. bad?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-03-2012, 06:44 AM
  #1
Realize
Registered User
 
Realize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Germany / Aachen
Country: Germany
Posts: 492
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Realize Send a message via MSN to Realize Send a message via Skype™ to Realize
Lundqvist and/or the Rangers in NHL13.. bad?

Hey there,

I am playing many games online against others an I am wondering that, whenever I play the Rangers, I get many silly goals ofter Lundys shoulder.

I play with LAK, SJS and NYR generally, and I only have problems when playing the rangers.
Does anyone else feel that the Rangers, even if they have a really good goalie and defense are a crappy defensive Team in NHL 13?
It's just frustrating when your enemy makes 3 goals on 5 shots over the shoulder of Lundqvist ..

LAK and SJS don't have that problems most the time, even if their playstyle in NHL is much more offensive ...

Realize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2012, 07:06 AM
  #2
xX Hot Fuss
Registered User
 
xX Hot Fuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,870
vCash: 500
Short goalies have a tough time in NHL 13. It's been this way since NHL 11. They're so exposed to high writers its ridiculous.

78 overall Markstrom is disgustingly good because he's 6'6"

xX Hot Fuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2012, 07:25 AM
  #3
Realize
Registered User
 
Realize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Germany / Aachen
Country: Germany
Posts: 492
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Realize Send a message via MSN to Realize Send a message via Skype™ to Realize
Quote:
Originally Posted by xX Hot Fuss View Post
Short goalies have a tough time in NHL 13. It's been this way since NHL 11. They're so exposed to high writers its ridiculous.

78 overall Markstrom is disgustingly good because he's 6'6"
Ah okay, I didn't care about the size of a goalie..
So - that explains many silly goals I took
I could throw the controller against the wall so many times. Just sucks

It's 6'1" for Lundqvist against.... 6'1" for Quick. And in my opinion, Quick is much better in NHL 13 .. (just a personal feeling)

Realize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2012, 07:31 AM
  #4
Gary83*
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,287
vCash: 500
All I have to add to this thread is Cam Ward is absolutely terrible in NHL13. I literally can't believe some of the pucks/dead rebounds that he doesn't even attempt to grab/cover. High wrister from the slot against Ward=goal every time.

Gary83* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2012, 07:31 AM
  #5
xX Hot Fuss
Registered User
 
xX Hot Fuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,870
vCash: 500
Quick is "quicker" than Lundqvist in game and in real life. Lundqvist in real life sees shots really well but it's countered by that height factor. Quick's mobility helps balance out his height more than Lundqvist.

xX Hot Fuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2012, 08:14 AM
  #6
Realize
Registered User
 
Realize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Germany / Aachen
Country: Germany
Posts: 492
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Realize Send a message via MSN to Realize Send a message via Skype™ to Realize
Quote:
Originally Posted by xX Hot Fuss View Post
Quick is "quicker" than Lundqvist in game and in real life. Lundqvist in real life sees shots really well but it's countered by that height factor. Quick's mobility helps balance out his height more than Lundqvist.
Thanks.
I hate playing against Crawford somehow .. and Kiprusoff makes me angry very often

It's very strange that many shots from the wide left or right go in, too - doesn't matter which goalie.

The biggest frustrating factor is, that goalies even don't react on passes which are made through the goal line.. it's a 99% sure goal

Realize is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2012, 11:20 AM
  #7
Gibbs18
Registered User
 
Gibbs18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Elmer, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 948
vCash: 500
Quick has been horrible in my gm connected league. Hes always had a sub .900 save % for me lol

Gibbs18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2012, 11:48 AM
  #8
SaNcAlandariel
Registered User
 
SaNcAlandariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 288
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibbs18 View Post
Quick has been horrible in my gm connected league. Hes always had a sub .900 save % for me lol
Smith and Niemi have been pretty good for me. Although in my other league, Kipper was terrible for me.
How many shots does your Quick face on average?

SaNcAlandariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-03-2012, 01:01 PM
  #9
VinnyC
vancity, c-bus, 'peg
 
VinnyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 新香
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,791
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibbs18 View Post
Quick has been horrible in my gm connected league. Hes always had a sub .900 save % for me lol
Really? In my league a .928 Quick was the one reason I managed to get the Kings to the playoffs.

...although I got swept by the Canucks

VinnyC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.