I know that it was a few years ago, but how can you pick Parise and Suter who haven't won anything (not that I'm doubting the fact that they're great) over the guys that were #1 and #2 for the Conn Smythe? This was also the same year that Keith won the Norris and Toews was the best forward at the Olympics. I know Keith hasn't quite returned to the Norris-level play, but I mean, absolute best case scenario for the Wild duo is that they accomplished what Toews and Keith already did.
i picked teows and keith. parise is good, but he needs good line mates to be good. he cant carry a line. plus, all of his goals are rebound goals. so he needs people who can get pucks on net to acheive. while teows is more of a balanced player. id take teows and keith any day.
Last edited by lboogie42*: 12-01-2012 at 04:54 PM.
According to HF Weber, Suter, and Rinne are all overrated and yet the Predators are making the playoffs every year. Somewhere along the line somebody on that team has to be good.
What are you talking about? The general consensus here is that Weber is the #1 or #2 defensemen in the league, Rinne is the #2 or #3 goalie in the league and Suter is a top 5 or top 10 defensemen in the league.