HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Hawks-Avalanche

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-10-2012, 08:50 AM
  #51
Bender
TheHockeyProspector
 
Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,948
vCash: 7658
Quote:
Originally Posted by supert View Post
What would the Avs want from the Oilers
It's tough because Smid and Petry are both franchise, #1 d-men and untouchable. [Sorry, had to do it]

Seriously though, I don't see the Avs trading with the Oilers considering they are going to be an up and coming young team competing with the Avs for the next 8-10 years.

Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 08:51 PM
  #52
Morlesio14*
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: The 416
Country: North Korea
Posts: 776
vCash: 500
Cool trade, but ROR is simply worth more.

How about
McNeil, leddy, 3rd rounder to Chicago for ROR

Morlesio14* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 09:56 PM
  #53
HockeyFan100
Welcome to COL!
 
HockeyFan100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,768
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84 View Post

Ryan O'Reilly


Nick Leddy

HockeyFan100 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 10:49 PM
  #54
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,223
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by S E P H View Post
Love Leddy, but ROR is so much more.

Seabrook for ROR +
That + would have to be something big, at least a 1st rd pick.

Hawkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 11:02 PM
  #55
WarriorOfGandhi
Was saying Boo-urns
 
WarriorOfGandhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Country: Scotland
Posts: 13,581
vCash: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkaholic View Post
That + would have to be something big, at least a 1st rd pick.
done and done

WarriorOfGandhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 11:04 PM
  #56
Avs44
Registered User
 
Avs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 7,589
vCash: 3319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkaholic View Post
That + would have to be something big, at least a 1st rd pick.
ROR+1st for Seabrook? Deal.

Avs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 11:33 PM
  #57
CoachBadkitten
Matt Hunwick
 
CoachBadkitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,043
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkaholic View Post
That + would have to be something big, at least a 1st rd pick.
I'd do that.

CoachBadkitten is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 11:36 PM
  #58
TurdFerguson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 765
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkaholic View Post
That + would have to be something big, at least a 1st rd pick.
You had better mean the 1st rounder from 09 or 11

TurdFerguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 11:50 PM
  #59
Avs44
Registered User
 
Avs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 7,589
vCash: 3319
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurdFerguson View Post
You had better mean the 1st rounder from 09 or 11
Ok, now that is just stupid...Duchene/Landeskog+ROR for Seabrook? but again, you're the guy who apparently thought we were going to lose RORs rights and he would be a UFA, so I'll let it pass...

Avs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 11:58 PM
  #60
TurdFerguson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 765
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avs44 View Post
Ok, now that is just stupid...Duchene/Landeskog+ROR for Seabrook? but again, you're the guy who apparently thought we were going to lose RORs rights and he would be a UFA, so I'll let it pass...
Not claiming its a fair trade or even close. Just saying that the other one was awful.

TurdFerguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 12:09 AM
  #61
Avs44
Registered User
 
Avs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 7,589
vCash: 3319
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurdFerguson View Post
Not claiming its a fair trade or even close. Just saying that the other one was awful.
So you follow up a bad proposal with something even worse? Yes, that makes sense. From a Hawks fan nonetheless? It was not even an Avs fan. Clearly making an even worse proposal balances things out. Adding last years 2nd overall pick and calder winner should make everything right!!

Avs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 06:45 AM
  #62
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 11,137
vCash: 239
I have to believe Chicago would move Keith before Seabrook, Seabrook has looked better the last couple years imo.

In fantasy land, I'd move O'Reilly + Elliott/Barrie + 2nd/3rd for Keith.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 09:15 AM
  #63
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,223
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avs44 View Post
ROR+1st for Seabrook? Deal.
At least, as in, probably add even more.

..and I would say it have to be contigent on the Av's having a top 10 pick.

Hawkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 09:23 AM
  #64
Bender
TheHockeyProspector
 
Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,948
vCash: 7658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkaholic View Post
At least, as in, probably add even more.

..and I would say it have to be contigent on the Av's having a top 10 pick.
Right, I get where you're coming from but...nah. I wouldn't even give up that first. My fellow Av fans can make that deal if they want but I would much rather keep RoR at age 21, then 3 years of Seabrook and then.....? Does he re-sign with the Avs? For SURE??? No one knows.

So unless we're challenging for a Stanley Cup within the next 3 years which is a possibility but I wouldn't say that it's a certainty, I'm not making that deal.

I'm addressing holes in our lineups with good trades and good free agent signings but I'm certainly not creating a hole just to fill another.

Now if we HAVE to trade RoR, that's another matter entirely but I'm pretty sure he'll be back with the Avs, signed to a long-term contract once the season starts...(if it starts).

Bender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 10:17 AM
  #65
zytz
lumberjack
 
zytz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,798
vCash: 500
In what world are the Hawks trading away Seabrook.... for pretty much anything?

zytz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 12:47 PM
  #66
GaryU
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Schaumburg,Il
Posts: 2,915
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PinkEye View Post
If ROR is going somewhere for a D I'd want OEL or Enstrom.
Pretty sure you'd have to add for either of those, too.

GaryU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 01:35 PM
  #67
Avs44
Registered User
 
Avs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 7,589
vCash: 3319
Quote:
Originally Posted by PinkEye View Post
If ROR is going somewhere for a D I'd want OEL or Enstrom.
PHX would never even consider OEL for ROR, and I highly doubt Winnipeg would trade us Enstrom either, even if we added. I love ROR, but he's not worth that much. Especially OEL.

Avs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.