HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Prospects
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Prospects Discuss hockey prospects from all over the world and the NHL Draft.

Tampa Bay Prospect Pool - Underrated?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-11-2012, 07:04 AM
  #51
Smallz
Registered User
 
Smallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,203
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccupySheen View Post
if Conacher was a Ranger/Leaf/DRW etc he would be getting overhyped senselessly around here make no mistake about it
Conacher is very solid don't get me wrong but tons of players have put up big numbers in the AHL in the past with little or nothing to show for it in the NHL

Not saying that will be the case with Conacher, I simply just want to reserve judgement in calling him a stud and future lock until he does more than put up good numbers in the AHL

Smallz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-11-2012, 09:25 AM
  #52
AKL
#AnyoneButThem
 
AKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Granduland
Country: Nauru
Posts: 8,047
vCash: 50
I'm not sold on TB's prospects as underrated. Vasilevski looks like he could be a stud, but at the same time, goaltenders are so hard to predict.

Then with Panik, Kucherov, Namestnikov and Conacher, you have what could turn into solid scoring depth, but no one who screams star.

Then on defense your top two are primarily offensive defensemen who are average defensively, and project as 2nd pairing and powerplay guys.

AKL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-11-2012, 12:07 PM
  #53
Jacko95
Registered User
 
Jacko95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Country: Germany
Posts: 2,433
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by J StClair28 View Post
I'm not sold on TB's prospects as underrated. Vasilevski looks like he could be a stud, but at the same time, goaltenders are so hard to predict.

Then with Panik, Kucherov, Namestnikov and Conacher, you have what could turn into solid scoring depth, but no one who screams star.

Then on defense your top two are primarily offensive defensemen who are average defensively, and project as 2nd pairing and powerplay guys.
Panik and Kucherov will ether bust or be stars. Kucherov can only score big time, but he will never be a power-forward or a guy that fights...

Jacko95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-11-2012, 01:37 PM
  #54
RussianGuyovich
Hella Ennui
 
RussianGuyovich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ellenton
Country: United States
Posts: 1,989
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to RussianGuyovich
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacko95 View Post
Panik and Kucherov will ether bust or be stars. Kucherov can only score big time, but he will never be a power-forward or a guy that fights...
personally i think that they will either be: busts, stars, or somewhere slightly in-between.

sorry for this controversial opinion

RussianGuyovich is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.