HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

Rielly ranked #1 of 2012 draft class in TSN (Craig Button) Top 30 NHL Prospects

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
12-29-2012, 11:50 PM
  #801
zeke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,803
vCash: 500
It's embarassing that you'd even ask for one, but even then, i gave you one from the first result on a google search.

Please understand, this is common knowledge to anyone who has ever watched this tournament.

This is not a matter of debate, and the more you bring it up, the more ignorant you look.

zeke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 12:00 AM
  #802
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeke View Post
It's embarassing that you'd even ask for one, but even then, i gave you one from the first result on a google search.

Please understand, this is common knowledge to anyone who has ever watched this tournament.

This is not a matter of debate, and the more you bring it up, the more ignorant you look.
We've already been over that quote doesnt insinuate that the younger players deserved the spots.

Please find a quote that explicitly states that Team Canada plays worse players ahead of better players as a common practice.

Or continue dancing like you have been for pages now.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 12:04 AM
  #803
zeke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,803
vCash: 500
Ok, so surprisingly, it seems like more than one fan here is unaware of the common knowledge that this is considered a tournamnet for 19 year olds.

(remember, this does not mean that coaches sabotage their own teams by playing lesser players, but that it is simply tougher for 17 and 18 year olds to earn spots).

So fine, I'll spend the time to find some quotes for you....I'll do one more search this one will be: WJC Canada "tournament for 19 year olds", and I'll read you all the relevant quotes from just the first page of the google results.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=605423

Quote:
NHL Central Scouting Director Dan Marr is quick to note that expectations of those young players are usually tempered.

"There's a lot of value if a [draft-eligible] player is able to play a regular role and contribute to the team," Marr told NHL.com. "But just the fact he's selected and chosen for the team is a positive for that player. I think what everyone needs to keep in mind and what NHL scouts understand is that this is a tournament for 19-year-olds, so just the fact a 17- or 18-year-old is selected is very impressive in itself.

"It's difficult for an 18-year-old to go in there and excel because it is a 19-year-old tournament."
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/...mp-roster.html

Quote:
"While the world junior championships are considered tournament for 19-year-olds, the selection camp will include 17-year-old forwards Nathan McKinnon and Jonathan Drouin of the Halifax Mooseheads."
http://www.thehockeynews.com/article...ft-stocks.html

Quote:
"Though the World Junior Championship is widely regarded as a tournament for 19-year-olds, this year in particular has featured some of the top draft eligible talent available for 2012. These youngsters were given a huge stage to showcase their skills and the results heading into the final games have been mixed to be sure. ...."
http://m.theglobeandmail.com/sports/...service=mobile

Quote:
"Yakupov is much watched by NHL scouts, but his performance here is a reminder that no matter what a player’s pedigree or upside may be, the world under-20 championship is a tournament for 19-year-olds. Evgeny Kuznetsov, the team captain and the player who managed a nine-point night against Latvia in the preliminary round, is far and away Russia’s best player."
http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index...of-the-year&ca

Quote:
"The annual IIHF World Junior Hockey Championship (WJHC) has been traditionally known as a tournament for 19-year-olds to shine and compete against the best teenage players in the world. "

now can we stop the silliness?

zeke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 12:09 AM
  #804
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeke View Post
Ok, so surprisingly, it seems like more than one fan here is unaware of the common knowledge that this is considered a tournamnet for 19 year olds.

(remember, this does not mean that coaches sabotage their own teams by playing lesser players, but that it is simply tougher for 17 and 18 year olds to earn spots).

So fine, I'll spend the time to find some quotes for you....I'll do one more search this one will be: WJC Canada "tournament for 19 year olds", and I'll read you all the relevant quotes from just the first page of the google results.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=605423



http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/...mp-roster.html



http://www.thehockeynews.com/article...ft-stocks.html



http://m.theglobeandmail.com/sports/...service=mobile



http://hockey.dobbersports.com/index...of-the-year&ca




now can we stop the silliness?
19 year olds are typically better than 17 year olds.

I don't see a quote suggesting that these 17 year olds are better than their older counterparts.

This is all just a big conspiracy theory from you.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 12:11 AM
  #805
zeke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,803
vCash: 500
Why are you re-writing what I said to try and win an internet argument? why are you asking me to find quotes to support something I never said?

You were wrong.

And about something you really shouldn't have been wrong about.

and it was really silly of you to keep bringing it up over and over again.

zeke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 12:11 AM
  #806
ULF_55
Global Moderator
 
ULF_55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mountain Standard Ti
Posts: 50,202
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeke View Post
Ok, so surprisingly, it seems like more than one fan here is unaware of the common knowledge that this is considered a tournamnet for 19 year olds.
Also why Jones looking ordinary against the Russians isn't a huge deal. Certainly, he was only about 18 days away from being a 2012 pick, but he's still just 18.

__________________
Woodlief
using his big frame to create space and his skating ability to find open lanes to drive the net. He stands 6-3 and is a natural goal scorer with plenty of confidence.

He's a scout's dream in the way he prepares himself and plays an unselfish game, making smart decisions with the puck. With his bloodlines, he certainly understands what it will take to make it at the next level.
ULF_55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 01:12 AM
  #807
Gutchecktime
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie View Post
all you're doing is throwing out hypotheticals too. neither of us have any real knowledge of what's going on.
I'm not throwing out hypotheticals based on how the game went because - and this is key - I watched the game. There is no "maybe he had a bad shift" and that's why he didn't play much in the third.

Quote:
if you feel the coach isn't trying to lose, you must think he's simply too stupid to realize what he has in rielly. you think that's really a good possibility? keeping in mind its not just spott, but the team's assistant coaches, scouting staff, and entire wjc hockey canada brass. nobody may have told the coach how good rielly is? after seeing him so often over the past few months, they still haven't clued in?
If, after a goal and two assists in the second period, a coach can't figure out to increase that player's minutes in the third period, well then yes, I start to question if maybe he's too stupid to see what he has in Rielly. In two in a half hours, I suppose we'll see if it continues vs. the United States. My feeling is that if Spott seems to refuse to play him at even strength vs Germany and Slovakia, he likely will vs USA and Russia. But I think that would be a mistake.

Gutchecktime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 01:16 AM
  #808
Gutchecktime
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomber0104 View Post
If they feared playing their top end forwards they wouldn't willingly send them over the boards to match up against him would they?

That would be pretty stupid of a coach...to put his top offensive weapons against a player that would just shut them down, in theory. Doesn't make sense right?

I dont think you understand what "last/home change" means

Very elementary hockey term.
There's really NO evidence to suggest they do - and if they do, it's a very, very poor strategy since Rielly is least often on the ice for goals against.

Gutchecktime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 01:40 AM
  #809
charliolemieux
Yes I am.
 
charliolemieux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,377
vCash: 50
All I am going to point oiut is that Rielly is by far the best player on his team.

Therefore he should be getting a tonne of TIO.

charliolemieux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 02:20 AM
  #810
TheLeastOfTheBunch
Registered User
 
TheLeastOfTheBunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,753
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutchecktime View Post
There's really NO evidence to suggest they do - and if they do, it's a very, very poor strategy since Rielly is least often on the ice for goals against.
.I'd love to see some proof about how "some junior coaches" love putting out their top lines against Rielly. Whether or not he's seen MJ play, it's still a stretch considering MJ right now is playing with 3/4 different '95s and '96s on their blue line.


Last edited by TheLeastOfTheBunch: 12-30-2012 at 02:30 AM.
TheLeastOfTheBunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 03:04 AM
  #811
Gutchecktime
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,859
vCash: 500
Mark Masters ‏@markhmasters
Canada d pairings v USA: Harrington-Hamilton; Reinhart-Ouellet; Rielly-Wotherspoon; Murphy

Frustrating.

Gutchecktime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 03:16 AM
  #812
zeke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,803
vCash: 500
well, if those are right, seems like at least murphy has been demoted.

zeke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 03:52 AM
  #813
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutchecktime View Post
Mark Masters ‏@markhmasters
Canada d pairings v USA: Harrington-Hamilton; Reinhart-Ouellet; Rielly-Wotherspoon; Murphy

Frustrating.
I really thought he'd crack the second pairing with Ouellete.

Looks like Murphy and Reinart are getting split duty to play with the super steady Detroit prospect.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 03:57 AM
  #814
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Rielly on 1st unit PP with Ouelette.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 04:03 AM
  #815
Gutchecktime
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomber0104 View Post
Rielly on 1st unit PP with Ouelette.
The first unit is still that Hamilton Murphy pairing, it looks like. They had just been on the ice.

Gutchecktime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 04:05 AM
  #816
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutchecktime View Post
The first unit is still that Hamilton Murphy pairing, it looks like. They had just been on the ice.
Went to them first...but yeah they could have been resting.

Id go back to them

Hamilton looks like junk so far.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 04:08 AM
  #817
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutchecktime View Post
There's really NO evidence to suggest they do - and if they do, it's a very, very poor strategy since Rielly is least often on the ice for goals against.
Yeah, there's no line matchup stats on the internet.

That requires you to watch the games.

And coaches don't make decisions based on +/- statistics, they go by what they see on the ice.

Sorry but Edmonton, one example, LOVES rolling out St Croix and Lazar against Rielly and Brown.

Don't ask me why, just reporting what I am witnessing.

One things for sure...the coach isnt using those forwards so he can be disadvantaged with his home change.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 04:20 AM
  #818
Gutchecktime
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomber0104 View Post
Yeah, there's no line matchup stats on the internet.

That requires you to watch the games.

And coaches don't make decisions based on +/- statistics, they go by what they see on the ice.

Sorry but Edmonton, one example, LOVES rolling out St Croix and Lazar against Rielly and Brown.

Don't ask me why, just reporting what I am witnessing.

One things for sure...the coach isnt using those forwards so he can be disadvantaged with his home change.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that if the WHL coaches intentionally try to get their top lines out against Rielly, it's not a strategy that appears to be working very well given that box scores seem to indicate he's not on the ice for many goals against relative to his ice time. Purposely putting your top line against the other team's best defenseman seems like a ****** strategy to me.

Gutchecktime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 04:27 AM
  #819
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutchecktime View Post
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that if the WHL coaches intentionally try to get their top lines out against Rielly, it's not a strategy that appears to be working very well given that box scores seem to indicate he's not on the ice for many goals against relative to his ice time. Purposely putting your top line against the other team's best defenseman seems like a ****** strategy to me.
Best offensive defenceman...note...not necessarily the best defensive.

A coach wouldnt put his players in positions to fail.

He's given up a fair amount of goals against.

Can't just look at the stat sheet for all your info.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 04:41 AM
  #820
Gutchecktime
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomber0104 View Post
Best offensive defenceman...note...not necessarily the best defensive.

A coach wouldnt put his players in positions to fail.

He's given up a fair amount of goals against.

Can't just look at the stat sheet for all your info.
Name him.

And if you live in Ontario, are you paying for these games?

Gutchecktime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 04:54 AM
  #821
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gutchecktime View Post
Name him.

And if you live in Ontario, are you paying for these games?
Up until a few weeks ago Joel Edmundson was the shutdown d-man.

I'm not paying but I have a friend who is and i bum access and tune in to game from time to time, outside regular broadcasting.

Stat sheets dont tell you anything .

You gotta watch to have a credible opinion.

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 05:01 AM
  #822
diceman934
Registered User
 
diceman934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NHL player factory
Posts: 2,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomber0104 View Post
Up until a few weeks ago Joel Edmundson was the shutdown d-man.

I'm not paying but I have a friend who is and i bum access and tune in to game from time to time, outside regular broadcasting.

Stat sheets dont tell you anything .

You gotta watch to have a credible opinion.
Well I watch the games live......and Morgan is the top D man on their PK.....you are not watching nothing if you are making this claim.

diceman934 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 05:03 AM
  #823
Bomber0104
Boom
 
Bomber0104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Iraq
Posts: 6,278
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by diceman934 View Post
Well I watch the games live......and Morgan is the top D man on their PK.....you are not watching nothing if you are making this claim.
Wasnt talking about the PK there bud

Bomber0104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 05:08 AM
  #824
Kadri43
Registered User
 
Kadri43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: noneofyourbusiness
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,405
vCash: 500
Is there something Spott is seeing in Rielly that nobody else does? He plays Murphy who has been garbage over Rielly who is clearly better. Rielly is even good in his own end. I do not get this preferential treatment.

Kadri43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 05:14 AM
  #825
diceman934
Registered User
 
diceman934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NHL player factory
Posts: 2,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomber0104 View Post
Wasnt talking about the PK there bud
Morgan is being played as their top D man.....period in all situations. I know the D man coach Mike Vandenberghe and watch many games live.
Mike is a former Hounds Jr Coach and one of reasons that Moose Jaw drafted him, he simply puts Morgan on the ice against all the teams best players and he gets a huge amount of ice time.

diceman934 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.