HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Topics may include the CBA, work stoppages, broadcast contracts, franchise sales, and NHL revenues.

Proposed Schedule

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-02-2013, 12:03 PM
  #1
cbcwpg
Registered User
 
cbcwpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Between the Pipes
Country: United Nations
Posts: 5,857
vCash: 350
Proposed Schedule

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/spo...185408542.html

SCHEDULE STUFF: The NHL has two schedules ready to go. A 52-game schedule beginning on Jan. 12 and a 48-game slate kicking off on Jan. 19. Both schedules would see teams play only against teams in their own conference. The regular season would end in late April and teams would play on average 3.20 games per week. Something like four games one week and three the next.

Based on this, I say cancel it all and come back when your ready to play a full year. Depending upon which team you are a fan of, this schedule is really going to bite.

cbcwpg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:10 PM
  #2
Xref
Registered User
 
Xref's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
vCash: 500
I like it. Hockey 3 to 4 nights a week will be awesome. It's much better than 0 games per week.

Xref is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:12 PM
  #3
rojac
HFBoards Sponsor
 
rojac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Waterloo, ON
Posts: 6,447
vCash: 500
Can you clarify what you see as so wrong about the proposed reduced schedule?

rojac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:13 PM
  #4
Concordski
Knockoff Jets FTW
 
Concordski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 6,972
vCash: 663
48 was on the 1994-95 schedule, that's not bad, 52 would be even better. I don't think teams should play outside of their conference for the regular season anyway, but considering some fans want to see their teams come from out of town, I could understand why people would disagree.

Concordski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:14 PM
  #5
Hutz
Classless User
 
Hutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: South Korea
Posts: 2,159
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbcwpg View Post
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/spo...185408542.html

SCHEDULE STUFF: The NHL has two schedules ready to go. A 52-game schedule beginning on Jan. 12 and a 48-game slate kicking off on Jan. 19. Both schedules would see teams play only against teams in their own conference. The regular season would end in late April and teams would play on average 3.20 games per week. Something like four games one week and three the next.

Based on this, I say cancel it all and come back when your[sic] ready to play a full year. Depending upon which team you are a fan of, this schedule is really going to bite.
What??? That's not at all where I thought you were going... I'll watch a 14 game season where each team only plays one other team 14 times if it means having NHL hockey to watch.

Hutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:14 PM
  #6
Pilky01
@JamesD_TO
 
Pilky01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,488
vCash: 500
What exactly is the problem?

If anything, a schedule where you only play within your conference lends more credibility to the standings.

Pilky01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:14 PM
  #7
Heaton
Moderator
#disapointment
 
Heaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rochester, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 16,931
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Heaton
3 games a week is perfect. Those early dates in October where teams would have 1 game in 8 days is terrible.

Heaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:17 PM
  #8
blamebettman*
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: Norway
Posts: 1,948
vCash: 500
No way they're starting on the 12th. It's already the 2nd and they have no agreement in place. AT BEST the 9th-13th would be a short training camp. Maybe squeeze in 2 pre season games and start on Jan 20th or so.

If we have long series in the playoffs...the season may actually stretch into July, or very close to it

blamebettman* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:19 PM
  #9
No Fun Shogun
Global Moderator
34-38-61-10-13
 
No Fun Shogun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Country: Fiji
Posts: 25,086
vCash: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbcwpg View Post
Based on this, I say cancel it all and come back when your ready to play a full year. Depending upon which team you are a fan of, this schedule is really going to bite.
So, in other words, you'd rather see no schedule at all instead of a schedule you marginally disagree with?

Talk about cutting off one's nose to spite their face....

No interconference play would suck, but not as much as no play at all.

No Fun Shogun is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:21 PM
  #10
JuniorNelson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: E.Vancouver
Country: Australia-Aboriginal
Posts: 4,660
vCash: 50
I'm down with any schedule at all but let me make the observation that this will be another ignored opportunity for this league to do something worthwhile. Instead of using this fragment to become a league with modern travel management they reinforce the idocy that a balanced travel schedule is impossible to achieve.

All this talk of moving forward and evolving the league and growing the brand is just talk until something is actually done to further those goals. This league relies on thier fan's love of the game to excuse utter incompetence.

JuniorNelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:21 PM
  #11
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 55,623
vCash: 500
See news thread, but it's possible there could be an agreement this evening.

In that case, a couple of days to ratify, and lockout could end circa 1/5, with camps opening 1/7 or so, with season starting circa 1/15.

In the bulk of the schedule, most teams have a game every 1.75 days on average, so "every other day" with a few back-to-backs can easily mean 3 to 4 games/week.

It would be pushing, but not overly so.

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:21 PM
  #12
Gm0ney
Registered User
 
Gm0ney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,630
vCash: 1300
Quote:
Originally Posted by blamebettman View Post
No way they're starting on the 12th. It's already the 2nd and they have no agreement in place. AT BEST the 9th-13th would be a short training camp. Maybe squeeze in 2 pre season games and start on Jan 20th or so.

If we have long series in the playoffs...the season may actually stretch into July, or very close to it
There will be no pre-season games, just a mini-camp and then straight into the regular season.

Gm0ney is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:22 PM
  #13
blamebettman*
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Country: Norway
Posts: 1,948
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by No Fun Shogun View Post
So, in other words, you'd rather see no schedule at all instead of a schedule you marginally disagree with?

Talk about cutting off one's nose to spite their face....

No interconference play would suck, but not as much as no play at all.
it would suck for sun belt teams. Phoenix/Florida for instance loves it when the Bruins, Rangers, Habs, Leafs, Hawks, Wings etc come to down since all the transplants from real hockey cities actually fill the building.

Also think about teams in the northeast corridor. Under the 48-52 game schedule a team like the Devils may spend an entire month just travelling to Boston, NYI, NYR, Philly, Pittsburgh, Washington, Montreal. Very easy "road trips"

blamebettman* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:24 PM
  #14
cbcwpg
Registered User
 
cbcwpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Between the Pipes
Country: United Nations
Posts: 5,857
vCash: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by rojac View Post
Can you clarify what you see as so wrong about the proposed reduced schedule?
Being reduced isn't the problem, it's the fact that the schedule isn't even close to being balanced. At this point in time, some teams are going to have a lot harder time making the playoffs in their conference VS the teams in the other conference. JMO but I see the Eastern Conference being a more difficult group of teams VS the teams in the Western Conference.

Doesn't really matter I guess if you don't mind winning the Cup and always having an Astrix besides your name.

Another issue is that a lot of people out west grew up watching and being fans of the Eastern teams, and they would like to see them.

cbcwpg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:25 PM
  #15
No Fun Shogun
Global Moderator
34-38-61-10-13
 
No Fun Shogun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Country: Fiji
Posts: 25,086
vCash: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by blamebettman View Post
it would suck for sun belt teams. Phoenix/Florida for instance loves it when the Bruins, Rangers, Habs, Leafs, Hawks, Wings etc come to down since all the transplants from real hockey cities actually fill the building.
Sure, but the Yotes will still get the Hawks and the Wings and the Panthers will still get the Leafs, Habs, Rangers, and Bruins, so.... big whoop?

Plus, if anything, you'd think that having less games would be beneficial to all teams as it'd decrease supply while keeping demand at likely the same level.

No Fun Shogun is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:26 PM
  #16
Doctor No
Registered User
 
Doctor No's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 23,221
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbcwpg View Post
Being reduced isn't the problem, it's the fact that the schedule isn't even close to being balanced. At this point in time, some teams are going to have a lot harder time making the playoffs in their conference VS the teams in the other conference. JMO but I see the Eastern Conference being a more difficult group of teams VS the teams in the Western Conference.

Doesn't really matter I guess if you don't mind winning the Cup and always having an Astrix besides your name.
How is the schedule not even close to balanced?

Doctor No is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:31 PM
  #17
rojac
HFBoards Sponsor
 
rojac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Waterloo, ON
Posts: 6,447
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbcwpg View Post
Being reduced isn't the problem, it's the fact that the schedule isn't even close to being balanced. At this point in time, some teams are going to have a lot harder time making the playoffs in their conference VS the teams in the other conference. JMO but I see the Eastern Conference being a more difficult group of teams VS the teams in the Western Conference.

Doesn't really matter I guess if you don't mind winning the Cup and always having an Astrix besides your name.

Another issue is that a lot of people out west grew up watching and being fans of the Eastern teams, and they would like to see them.
Actually, I don't think I understand your point about Eastern and Western conferences at all. Why is it any harder for an Eastern Conference team to make the playoffs in a 48 game schedule playing only against other Eastern Confernece teams than it would be for that team to make the playoffs in an 82 game schedule against both conferences?

Does anyone ever really complain about (or put an asterisk beside) New Jersey's win in 1995?

rojac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:33 PM
  #18
Lorenzo1000
Registered User
 
Lorenzo1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 585
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbcwpg View Post
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/spo...185408542.html

SCHEDULE STUFF: The NHL has two schedules ready to go. A 52-game schedule beginning on Jan. 12 and a 48-game slate kicking off on Jan. 19. Both schedules would see teams play only against teams in their own conference. The regular season would end in late April and teams would play on average 3.20 games per week. Something like four games one week and three the next.

Based on this, I say cancel it all and come back when your ready to play a full year. Depending upon which team you are a fan of, this schedule is really going to bite.
What is this a surprise or something? I've been hearing this for quite a while now. As far as conference play goes I like it and I don't understand how it isn't balanced either? No details of how it will be set up. How many games against division opponents versus other conference teams?

Lorenzo1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:35 PM
  #19
Xref
Registered User
 
Xref's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
vCash: 500
One other thing to consider; there are roughly 300 players without a contract. This doesn't give teams/players much time to get deals done. Should be an interesting yet chaotic week next week (if a deal actually comes through this week)!

Xref is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:36 PM
  #20
Xref
Registered User
 
Xref's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rojac View Post
Actually, I don't think I understand your point about Eastern and Western conferences at all. Why is it any harder for an Eastern Conference team to make the playoffs in a 48 game schedule playing only against other Eastern Confernece teams than it would be for that team to make the playoffs in an 82 game schedule against both conferences?

Does anyone ever really complain about (or put an asterisk beside) New Jersey's win in 1995?
Pretty much all Ranger fans, lol.

Xref is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:39 PM
  #21
rojac
HFBoards Sponsor
 
rojac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Waterloo, ON
Posts: 6,447
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xref View Post
Pretty much all Ranger fans, lol.
lol. True enough. But they would have complained just as much if it had happened after an 82 (or 84*) game season.


* If a settlement had been reached before the lockout, one cannot really say whether or not they might have kept the 84 game season (with two neutral site games) used in 1992-93 and 1993-94.

rojac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:42 PM
  #22
Lazyking
Never Forget
 
Lazyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 3,589
vCash: 500
I don't see the problem. Sure, if you want to see the Rangers in LA or against Detroit that's out but less travel for the players is a good thing in a crammed season.

Lazyking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:42 PM
  #23
Brodie
watcher on the walls
 
Brodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 12,160
vCash: 500
it sucks for Winnipeg fans, basically. That's the vibe I'm getting from the thread.

Brodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:43 PM
  #24
Lazyking
Never Forget
 
Lazyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Connecticut
Country: United States
Posts: 3,589
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brodie View Post
it sucks for Winnipeg fans, basically. That's the vibe I'm getting from the thread.
not if they swap WPG and Columbus still.

Lazyking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 12:45 PM
  #25
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North of the Tank
Country: United States
Posts: 55,623
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbcwpg View Post
Another issue is that a lot of people out west grew up watching and being fans of the Eastern teams, and they would like to see them.
Until there's a full season schedule with each team visiting (at least once) every NHL venue, there will be folk who don't see some of the other conference teams.

Putting that on the other foot, no one in the Eastern Conference will have a chance to beat the defending Stanley Cup champs, nor see the wunderkind Oilers.

Unless it's on TV.


(Rumor is the league may make NHL Center Ice "free" for the season.)

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.