I agree, Stone's arguably the 2nd best winger we have out of the guys you have listed. Maybe add Zibanejad too who I believe is expected to play RW in the NHL.
Yep Stone will be counted on in a much bigger role in Bingo,if the nhl season starts.Silfverberg will be in the nhl and the other two are next years crop
Yep Stone will be counted on in a much bigger role in Bingo,if the nhl season starts.Silfverberg will be in the nhl and the other two are next years crop
Yeah, I'd have the Sens as the 3rd best group. Behind St. Louis and Washington at 1 and 2. We lack a top-end guy but we have great depth.
Yeah, I'd have the Sens as the 3rd best group. Behind St. Louis and Washington at 1 and 2. We lack a top-end guy but we have great depth.
Power at wing doesnt get you far really ,not too long ago we had three of the best in the nhl hossa,havlat and alfie.I like how this team is being built ,with top end goaltending ,dynamic mobile defensemen and great depth at center.We look pretty good moving forward one or two more good drafts and we should be there
Yeah, I'd have the Sens as the 3rd best group. Behind St. Louis and Washington at 1 and 2. We lack a top-end guy but we have great depth.
I'd have to look over the three guys not named Zibanejad and Silfverberg. With that said I wouldn't definitively put them in third. Probably in consideration though. I like Detroit and Anaheim's depth a lot.
I'd have to look over the three guys not named Zibanejad and Silfverberg. With that said I wouldn't definitively put them in third. Probably in consideration though. I like Detroit and Anaheim's depth a lot.
3to 10 for me ,there are some really good crops out there,Ottawa wont have their best one if the nhl starts .Silfvrberg is nhl ready
Heh, same here. Nyquist has been ready for awhile now.
And Tatar should be up here, but Holland's too loyal to buyout somebody in order to make the space for him.
An extra season for Tatar isnt a bad thing,Nyquist is there and should be in the nhl when it returns.Thats the thing about these lists some have higher rated 19 year olds. But how many of these kids will make the jump? my guess is not many
Blues pretty easily when you add Jaskin to the group. Tarasenko can do everything, Schwartz is a crafty playmaker with great vision, Rattie is a pure shooter, and Jaskin is a prototypical power forward that uses his body to protect the puck.
Also, if there's anyone I missed or who you don't think should be on there, just ask and I'll update it. I went through HF and added the top 3-5 wingers for each team based on their rating.
As a Canuck fan, I'd prefer to see Darren Archibald listed over Grenier, but that's a pretty minor quibble.
Didn't think the Canucks would do well here, but looking at the list they're pretty average.
Went with St. Louis, hard not to like Tarasenko, Schwartz, Rattie and Jaskin. Washinton are close, except I just not sure that Kuznetsov will come over, and if he doesn't they fall WAY down the list.
Don't forget Hartikainen. Very underrated guy who's a lock to be a top 9 in the NHL, possibly top 6 if the stars align. Paajarvi is younger than Hartikainen and several other prospects on the list. The number of games played in the NHL is not the best criteria in this case, since the question is WHICH TEAM team has the best group of prospect wingers.
I'm not sure you understand what people mean when they talk about a prospect. A prospect is a player who hasn't yet made the NHL, though generally people will still consider a player a prospect if they've played a small number of NHL games here and there (without truly making the team full time). People have slightly varying criteria, but MPS played 80 NHL games in 2010/11, and 41 in 2011/12, he has "graduated" by more or less any criteria you could use.
