HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Vancouver Canucks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Cody Hodgson the top pick in Vancouver Canucks' 2008 draft class

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-03-2013, 01:15 PM
  #1
HF Article
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Country:
Posts: 7,075
vCash: 500
Cody Hodgson the top pick in Vancouver Canucks' 2008 draft class

 
Two players from the Vancouver Canucks 2008 NHL Draft remain in the system, defenseman Yann Sauve and center Prab Rai. Of the two, Sauve is the only one to get a taste of NHL hockey action, with a five game call-up in 2010. Perhaps one of the more prolific and discussed players drafted by the Canucks, Cody Hodgson’s arrival in 2008 provided local sports pages with material aplenty. Just as some drafts bring hope and anticipation, Vancouver's 2008 draft brought drama and intrigue, culminating in one of the biggest and most shocking trades in the NHL during the 2011-12 season.… read more



More...

HF Article is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 02:19 PM
  #2
Wisp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,990
vCash: 500
Yeah, that draft was a disaster.

2009 is looking waaaaay better for us.



edit: looking at the last few draft years, there's a little more uncertainty, but 2011 is looking pretty good, too. I wonder why Gillis decided to torch 2010.

Wisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 02:34 PM
  #3
Bleach Clean
Registered User
 
Bleach Clean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,297
vCash: 500
16 players past the first round in the 2008 draft can even be said to be NHLers. 16 total.


I'd say VAN did alright by getting Hodgson. Could have been a lot worse.

Bleach Clean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 02:41 PM
  #4
crazy Kassian
The North Remembers
 
crazy Kassian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,577
vCash: 500
We could've done worse... Like moving up to draft Luke Schenn

Essentially, we got what was considered a steal at the time in Cody Hodgson with the 10th overall pick which lead to Kassian

crazy Kassian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 02:44 PM
  #5
jigsaw99
Registered User
 
jigsaw99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,867
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleach Clean View Post
16 players past the first round in the 2008 draft can even be said to be NHLers. 16 total.


I'd say VAN did alright by getting Hodgson. Could have been a lot worse.
we better... that was our highest pick since crosby draft.

jigsaw99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 03:09 PM
  #6
Tim Murray
HoF Turd Shiner
 
Tim Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 4,413
vCash: 500
Wrong thread boys, sorry

Tim Murray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 06:00 PM
  #7
Wisp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,990
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregor View Post
Wrong thread boys, sorry
It's cool. Fun to discuss drafting years.

Wisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 06:10 PM
  #8
StrictlyCommercial
Registered User
 
StrictlyCommercial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,633
vCash: 500
Bold to claim that Prab Rai is still a prospect and not a bust. (Sauve is also a few months away from making that transition).

StrictlyCommercial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 06:16 PM
  #9
Fat Tony
Registered User
 
Fat Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,419
vCash: 500
Hodgson picks up 3 points today. Yes, I'm aware of who is linemates are.

Fat Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 06:33 PM
  #10
parabola
Global Moderator
novus ordo seclorum
 
parabola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ಠ_ಠ
Posts: 40,726
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Tony View Post
Hodgson picks up 3 points today. Yes, I'm aware of who is linemates are.
Keeping pace with Kassian. Good for him.

__________________
parabola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 06:35 PM
  #11
Fat Tony
Registered User
 
Fat Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,419
vCash: 500
Hodgson is ahead. 9 points in 9 games.

Fat Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 06:41 PM
  #12
Wizeman*
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,624
vCash: 500
So the real motive finally emerges. Turn this into a Cody Hodgson shudnt be traded vs shud be traded relive the past spite thread.

Great job.

Wizeman* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 07:39 PM
  #13
Todds Chiropractory
Registered User
 
Todds Chiropractory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,160
vCash: 50
No matter how successful a career Hodgson has it doesn't change anything so we shouldn't be worried about these comparisons for who is "ahead" in the trade. Hodgson wanted out, and wouldn't have gotten the opportunity in Vancouver that he has in Buffalo, so we should just be happy that we got a up and coming young player as good as Kassian is in return for him. Hodgson seemed like a good kid to me and I hope he goes on to become a star center in this league.

Todds Chiropractory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 08:44 PM
  #14
Shareefruck
Registered User
 
Shareefruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,233
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuckaholic19 View Post
No matter how successful a career Hodgson has it doesn't change anything so we shouldn't be worried about these comparisons for who is "ahead" in the trade. Hodgson wanted out, and wouldn't have gotten the opportunity in Vancouver that he has in Buffalo, so we should just be happy that we got a up and coming young player as good as Kassian is in return for him. Hodgson seemed like a good kid to me and I hope he goes on to become a star center in this league.
The comparisons are worth bringing up just to tame the bias we show towards guys on our team vs. guys who leave (all the guys touting how they'd rather have Kassian/Schroeder than Hodgson).

It's unfortunate and probably was unavoidable, but hypothetically, I'd still probably take Hodgson on my team over Schroeder/Kassian at this point in time (although Kassian is making it very very interesting)

Shareefruck is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 08:50 PM
  #15
timw33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Victoria
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,763
vCash: 500
Ugh, Morgan Clark.

And there were some great prospects taken in the 2nd round after Sauve: Schultz, Wierchoch, Stepan, Robak, Hamonic, Dalpe.

timw33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 08:50 PM
  #16
Tiranis
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 20,956
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shareefruck View Post
The comparisons are worth bringing up just to tame the bias we show towards guys on our team vs. guys who leave (all the guys touting how they'd rather have Kassian/Schroeder than Hodgson).

It's unfortunate and probably was unavoidable, but hypothetically, I'd still probably take Hodgson on my team over Schroeder/Kassian at this point in time (although Kassian is making it very very interesting)
Why wouldn't you rather have the guy who has the most goals on his team and isn't depending on his two linemates to inflate his point totals? Hodgson has 9 points, well Vanek and Pominville have 19 and 13. It's pretty clear who's leeching off others on that line. It's remarkable to me that you would actually willingly take Hodgson who is a year older and downright horrible defensively. Players like him (soft, slow, one-dimensional with attitude issues) are quite literally worthless when fully developed as could be seen by what Roy and Ribeiro fetched in a trade.

Tiranis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 08:52 PM
  #17
Todds Chiropractory
Registered User
 
Todds Chiropractory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,160
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shareefruck View Post
The comparisons are worth bringing up just to tame the bias we show towards guys on our team vs. guys who leave (all the guys touting how they'd rather have Kassian/Schroeder than Hodgson).

It's unfortunate and probably was unavoidable, but hypothetically, I'd still probably take Hodgson on my team over Schroeder/Kassian at this point in time (although Kassian is making it very very interesting)
Yea but you can't make hypothetical situations to make evaluations about a real hockey teams decisions. Hodgson couldn't have been successful stuck in a 3rd line role. So it wasn't a choice of Schroeder/Kassian or Hodgson. It was more likely a choice between moving either Hodgson or Kesler.

Todds Chiropractory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 08:59 PM
  #18
timw33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Victoria
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,763
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wisp View Post
Yeah, that draft was a disaster.

2009 is looking waaaaay better for us.



edit: looking at the last few draft years, there's a little more uncertainty, but 2011 is looking pretty good, too. I wonder why Gillis decided to torch 2010.
It's only really because we ditched the 1st to pick up Ballard, and we traded away our 2nd and 3rds, I believe for Bernier?

timw33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 09:02 PM
  #19
Fat Tony
Registered User
 
Fat Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,419
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiranis View Post
Why wouldn't you rather have the guy who has the most goals on his team and isn't depending on his two linemates to inflate his point totals? Hodgson has 9 points, well Vanek and Pominville have 19 and 13. It's pretty clear who's leeching off others on that line. It's remarkable to me that you would actually willingly take Hodgson who is a year older and downright horrible defensively. Players like him (soft, slow, one-dimensional with attitude issues) are quite literally worthless when fully developed as could be seen by what Roy and Ribeiro fetched in a trade.
I think your post demonstrates what Shareefruck is saying in the post you quoted.

Hodgson is playing well. He's even skating well from what I've seen.

Fat Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 09:04 PM
  #20
Fat Tony
Registered User
 
Fat Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,419
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by timw33 View Post
It's only really because we ditched the 1st to pick up Ballard, and we traded away our 2nd and 3rds, I believe for Bernier?
Gillis had the option of giving up the 2011 1st rounder instead but gave up the 2010. I guess he didn't see anyone he liked enough.

Fat Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 09:08 PM
  #21
Lonny Bohonos
Kassian = P.A.G.A.N
 
Lonny Bohonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: United Nations
Posts: 7,804
vCash: 500
Kassian has owned more of the 200 x 85 than any other canuck this year. Both sides of the red line. Something Hodgson never has and likely never will do.

Lonny Bohonos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 09:12 PM
  #22
Mr. Canucklehead
Mod Supervisor
Kitimat Canuck
 
Mr. Canucklehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kitimat, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,532
vCash: 500
Ignoring the Cody vs. Zack debate...

That draft - outside of the Hodgson pick - was abysmal. Not one legitimate prospect in the bunch. 2009 is looking much, much, much better. Also, thank goodness for some of our shrewd UFA signings.

Mr. Canucklehead is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 09:16 PM
  #23
Tiranis
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 20,956
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Canucklehead View Post
Ignoring the Cody vs. Zack debate...

That draft - outside of the Hodgson pick - was abysmal. Not one legitimate prospect in the bunch. 2009 is looking much, much, much better. Also, thank goodness for some of our shrewd UFA signings.
IMO you can clearly see the difference in scouting and drafting strategy from 08 to 09. 08 was the draft that Gillis had no time to impact outside of the 1st round and was basically fully Nonis' doing. At least we didn't get Kyle Beach in the first round.

Tiranis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 09:18 PM
  #24
Lonny Bohonos
Kassian = P.A.G.A.N
 
Lonny Bohonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: United Nations
Posts: 7,804
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiranis View Post
IMO you can clearly see the difference in scouting and drafting strategy from 08 to 09. 08 was the draft that Gillis had no time to impact outside of the 1st round and was basically fully Nonis' doing. At least we didn't get Kyle Beach in the first round.
*shudders* Beach thank **** we didnt.

A bust whos managed to do nothing but cause **** amongst his own.

Lonny Bohonos is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-03-2013, 09:20 PM
  #25
Mr. Canucklehead
Mod Supervisor
Kitimat Canuck
 
Mr. Canucklehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kitimat, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,532
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiranis View Post
IMO you can clearly see the difference in scouting and drafting strategy from 08 to 09. 08 was the draft that Gillis had no time to impact outside of the 1st round and was basically fully Nonis' doing. At least we didn't get Kyle Beach in the first round.
Very true, and thank heavens about Beach. Even when Hodgson was left on the board, I still thought we might take Beach given all the talk that the Canucks had done about him before hand.

Mr. Canucklehead is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.