HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

CBJ and EDM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-10-2013, 11:39 AM
  #1
rockinghockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,049
vCash: 500
CBJ and EDM

I am taking a look at both teams and I think that these two teams can make a very good trading partner.

CBJ are actually pretty deep with dmen and that is what EDM could use.

I know that Howson has always like Hemsky and Hemsky has proven to be healthy by the amount of games that he has played at the end of last year and this year over seas.

Hemsky would give CBJ a winger that has major skill and is only 28.

Which dman would CBJ give up for him?

rockinghockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 11:42 AM
  #2
Fro
Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
 
Fro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Beach, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 18,657
vCash: 500
been waiting for this thread to start again...do not want

Fro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 11:46 AM
  #3
Nikita Filatov
Registered User
 
Nikita Filatov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 650
vCash: 500
Goloubef+
Maybe Savard, I don't want to see that though.
If Hemsky shows some promise this year and our kids keep developing there might actually be something that could be done around Wiz/Hemsky but Wisniewski is needed until shown expendable by other assets.

Nikita Filatov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 11:46 AM
  #4
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,226
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fro View Post
been waiting for this thread to start again...do not want
Yeah, who needs offense when you have no goaltending?

Seriously though, Howson has always liked Hemsky, that's well known. So regardless of whether or not fans "want", I'm sure managment would have interest, probably not at the price Edmonton would want though.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 11:58 AM
  #5
Fro
Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
 
Fro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Beach, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 18,657
vCash: 500
Who needs offense? of course we do...just need someone who isn't one accident away from being Kristian Heuselius part 2

Fro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 12:08 PM
  #6
Saad Panda
Farewell, Starman
 
Saad Panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Country: Lebanon
Posts: 11,474
vCash: 500
If the price is right I'd love Hemsky. But the price probably isn't right.

Saad Panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 01:21 PM
  #7
SuperGenius
Moderator
For Duty & Humanity!
 
SuperGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,280
vCash: 50
I'd rather Paajarvi be involved, honestly.

SuperGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 01:33 PM
  #8
Crede777
Deputized
 
Crede777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 9,870
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ludicrous Speed View Post
If the price is right I'd love Hemsky. But the price probably isn't right.
This. I don't see Columbus giving up one of their top-4 if they are trying to build defense first (they are).

Edmonton doesn't really need any defensive prospects, they have those. The only player that makes sense is Ryan Murray and I am sure Howson wouldn't trade him for Hemsky (or a package with Hemsky as the main piece).

Methot + NYR 1st or LA 1st + someone like Calvert or Goloubef would have been the package but he was moved for Foligno.

Edmonton should try a top-6 of RNH, Hall, Yakupov, Eberle, Hemsky, and Jones (?) before they really do anything.

Columbus is kinda the same way, see what they have.

Crede777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 01:35 PM
  #9
GoldenTicket
Registered User
 
GoldenTicket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In your bushes
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,965
vCash: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperGenius View Post
I'd rather Paajarvi be involved, honestly.
Why not take them both?

GoldenTicket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 02:06 PM
  #10
Draiskull
Registered User
 
Draiskull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 17,397
vCash: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crede777 View Post
This. I don't see Columbus giving up one of their top-4 if they are trying to build defense first (they are).

Edmonton doesn't really need any defensive prospects, they have those. The only player that makes sense is Ryan Murray and I am sure Howson wouldn't trade him for Hemsky (or a package with Hemsky as the main piece).

Methot + NYR 1st or LA 1st + someone like Calvert or Goloubef would have been the package but he was moved for Foligno.

Edmonton should try a top-6 of RNH, Hall, Yakupov, Eberle, Hemsky, and Jones (?) before they really do anything.

Columbus is kinda the same way, see what they have.
The bolded is a lot to give up for Hemsky but since you are open to giving up multiple 1sts how about Aucoin + LA 1st + NYR 1st for Hemsky ?

Draiskull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 02:07 PM
  #11
Vankiller Whale
Fire Benning
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 28,838
vCash: 1800
Wiz for Hemsky.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 02:21 PM
  #12
Crede777
Deputized
 
Crede777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 9,870
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petro Points View Post
The bolded is a lot to give up for Hemsky but since you are open to giving up multiple 1sts how about Aucoin + LA 1st + NYR 1st for Hemsky ?
You read that wrong. It was either/or.

Crede777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 02:38 PM
  #13
lakai17
Registered User
 
lakai17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,924
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperGenius View Post
I'd rather Paajarvi be involved, honestly.
same here.

lakai17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 02:47 PM
  #14
TSA0402
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,806
vCash: 500
I dont see a fit. Columbus top 4 d-men are pretty much set and played well together to end the season. Hemsky is too much of a risk for a guy like John Moore.

As for Paajarvi, a definite no. Too many top nine forwards, don't even imagine there would be room for Paajarvi.

I like the idea of trading one of Moore/Savard/Erixon for a young forward in similar situation, but not Paajarvi.

TSA0402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 02:53 PM
  #15
McCanovin
1% is the new 11.5%
 
McCanovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 780
Posts: 4,989
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSA0402 View Post
I dont see a fit. Columbus top 4 d-men are pretty much set and played well together to end the season. Hemsky is too much of a risk for a guy like John Moore.

As for Paajarvi, a definite no. Too many top nine forwards, don't even imagine there would be room for Paajarvi.

I like the idea of trading one of Moore/Savard/Erixon for a young forward in similar situation, but not Paajarvi.
I'd imagine Jackets would be in the playoffs with top 4 d-men are all set with too many top nine forwards.

McCanovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 02:55 PM
  #16
Vankiller Whale
Fire Benning
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 28,838
vCash: 1800
Quote:
Originally Posted by canovin View Post
I'd imagine Jackets would be in the playoffs with top 4 d-men are all set with too many top nine forwards.
I think the problem is none are 1st line calibre...and goaltending.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:02 PM
  #17
ManByng
It's Me OilTastic
 
ManByng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fro View Post
been waiting for this thread to start again...do not want
me too! do not want Columbus leftovers!

but seriously, with Methot gone to Ottawa in the Nick Foligno trade , John Moore would be tempting.

ManByng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:07 PM
  #18
rockinghockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,049
vCash: 500
Out of the following dmen which ones would you move Tyutin, Nikitin or Moore. I know Moore is not proven yet but he is a big dman that hits and that is what EDM needs. He can start out on the 3rd pairing with either Whitney or Schultz.

rockinghockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:13 PM
  #19
Fro
Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
 
Fro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Beach, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 18,657
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockinghockey View Post
Out of the following dmen which ones would you move Tyutin, Nikitin or Moore. I know Moore is not proven yet but he is a big dman that hits and that is what EDM needs. He can start out on the 3rd pairing with either Whitney or Schultz.
none for Hemsky...

Fro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:15 PM
  #20
Crede777
Deputized
 
Crede777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: United States
Posts: 9,870
vCash: 500
Moore isn't super physical. And with Schultz, Klefbom, Teubert, etc. I think Edmonton has good defensive prospects.

I would move Nikitin but that may just be me. Many Jackets fans love him and think he turned the corner upon being paired with Tyutin. We will see.

As I said, the player for Edmonton was Methot. He is big, physical, defensively sound, can skate the puck, and can log a lot of minutes. Put him with Schultz or Whitney.

Crede777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:19 PM
  #21
judge301
Registered User
 
judge301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 491
vCash: 500
I'd rather people look into the actual depth of the Oilers prospect pool on defense before making a weekly thread suggesting they have no talent at the position. It's like a stuck record. I'm not suggesting there isn't room for an addition at all. Just saying there is alot more there than many think and have repeated for the last number of years like lemmings.

judge301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:40 PM
  #22
lakai17
Registered User
 
lakai17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,924
vCash: 50
what is the value of Nikitin to Edmonton?

lakai17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:46 PM
  #23
rockinghockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,049
vCash: 500
What type of deal could be made for Yak, he would be a very nice top line player.
Johansen, Nikitin,and NYR or LA 1st.

rockinghockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:50 PM
  #24
blinkman360
Norris
 
blinkman360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lawn Guyland
Country: United States
Posts: 10,481
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockinghockey View Post
What type of deal could be made for Yak, he would be a very nice top line player.
Johansen, Nikitin,and NYR or LA 1st.
I'd imagine that would actually be tempting for Edmonton.

blinkman360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-10-2013, 03:55 PM
  #25
roboninja
EYG
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,305
vCash: 1152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crede777 View Post
This. I don't see Columbus giving up one of their top-4 if they are trying to build defense first (they are).

Edmonton doesn't really need any defensive prospects, they have those. The only player that makes sense is Ryan Murray and I am sure Howson wouldn't trade him for Hemsky (or a package with Hemsky as the main piece).

Methot + NYR 1st or LA 1st + someone like Calvert or Goloubef would have been the package but he was moved for Foligno.

Edmonton should try a top-6 of RNH, Hall, Yakupov, Eberle, Hemsky, and Jones (?) before they really do anything.

Columbus is kinda the same way, see what they have.
Gagner is #2C. Jones plays the 3rd with Horcoff & Smyth usually.

roboninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.