I'm good with Marinelli, but I believe he'll follow Lovie wherever he goes.
Not at all. Buddy Ryan's son. High pressure, blitzing, innovative defense. No more sit back and watch people gash us up the seams and underneath.
They're saying on the radio that with Treisman and the Seattle OC (drawing a blank on his name right now) that Marinelli would stay, based on what they have heard.
I'm good with Marinelli, but I believe he'll follow Lovie wherever he goes.
Well, he's under contract for the 2013 season, so he won't follow Lovie till next season at the earliest. Also, it's not guaranteed Lovie lands a HC gig this season, or even next, so there may not be a place to follow him too.
I also would have loved him as a DC... The guy is aggressive, and the only reason their defense fell apart was because of injuries.
Yep, another reason to point and laugh at the Cowboys and Jerry Jones. He keeps making the wrong moves. If you fire anyone, you fire Garrett. But he gets rid of Rob Ryan instead, and the Rams get a great pickup for an up-and-coming defense.
I'm happy it's definitely going to be an offensive coach. If I was picking from the 3, it would definitely be Arians but Emery gets to talk to these guys so whatever he picks is good with me.
Toub is leaving for sure which sucks but I'll be happy if Marinelli stays.
What if did something where we offered a top special teams coach, perhaps Armstrong, Associate Head Coach? That's what I would do. Big shoes to fill with Toub.
Not at all. Buddy Ryan's son. High pressure, blitzing, innovative defense. No more sit back and watch people gash us up the seams and underneath.
Who cares if he is Buddy Ryans son, he is a loud mouth moron who hasn't schemed a defense that finished in the top 10 and last year he coached a Dallas defense was 19th in yards allowed and 24th in PPG. The Bears where 5th in yards allowed and 3rd in PPG. Why take a top 5 defense and turn it into a bottom 10 defense.
Who cares if he is Buddy Ryans son, he is a loud mouth moron who hasn't schemed a defense that finished in the top 10 and last year he coached a Dallas defense was 19th in yards allowed and 24th in PPG. The Bears where 5th in yards allowed and 3rd in PPG. Why take a top 5 defense and turn it into a bottom 10 defense.
Everyone thinks the grass is greener on the other side wrt defenses. If we had the 3-4 the last few years I'm sure people would want to switch to a 4-3.
The 3-4 man scheme isn't some miracle defense that stops everything. Instead of quick slants, tight end seam routes, zone flooders, etc, you get double moves for big touchdowns, big yardage pass interference calls, amongst other things. Each has their own strengths and flaws.
