HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Calgary Flames
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Which Centre Would You Want?

View Poll Results: Which Centre Would You Want The Flames To Pick?
Sean Monahan 16 24.24%
Aleksandr Barkov 42 63.64%
Elias Lindholm 8 12.12%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-27-2013, 01:45 PM
  #1
pckstpr31
Registered User
 
pckstpr31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: CGY
Country: Canada
Posts: 731
vCash: 500
Which Centre Would You Want?

Alright, so I know there is quite a bit of discussion in the entry draft thread, but I thought I'd create a poll just to kind of see what the consensus is. At our position in the draft I think it makes the most sense to draft a centre, and I doubt that Mackinnon falls to where we pick. So, for the sake of this poll, I've only listed Monahan, Barkov, and Lindholm. Who would you want the Flames to pick?


Last edited by pckstpr31: 04-27-2013 at 09:23 PM.
pckstpr31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 01:55 PM
  #2
stlflamesfan
Registered User
 
stlflamesfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 223
vCash: 500
Barkov has always been the player I wanted and will be one very happy Flames fan if we draft him. However I would not be upset if Barkov was off the board and we picked either of them. I would be more upset if we did not pick Barkov and he is on the board.

stlflamesfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 02:01 PM
  #3
herashak
Registered User
 
herashak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,223
vCash: 50
barkov

herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 02:01 PM
  #4
JurassicTunga
Registered User
 
JurassicTunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,423
vCash: 500
If Barkov is there when we are picking, it would be him.

If not, I really like Lindholm.

JurassicTunga is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 02:02 PM
  #5
Volica
Southern AB Dandy
 
Volica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,925
vCash: 790
Barkov, of course, he's the best center available.
Then Lindholm or Monahan would make me happy; both are going to be great NHL'ers

Volica is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 02:25 PM
  #6
InfinityIggy
Moderator
No Longer Flammable
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,897
vCash: 81
Barkov, then I'm torn between the other two. Would be happy with either.

InfinityIggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 02:27 PM
  #7
Calculon
unholy acting talent
 
Calculon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Error 503
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,517
vCash: 50
Of those 3, in the order I would draft them:

1. Barkov
2. Lindholm
3. Monahan

Calculon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 02:47 PM
  #8
Unkki
Registered User
 
Unkki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: Finland
Posts: 565
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calculon View Post
Of those 3, in the order I would draft them:

1. Barkov
2. Lindholm
3. Monahan
That's my list too.

Unkki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 02:48 PM
  #9
GetThePuckOut
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,408
vCash: 50
Barkov is kinda slow, lacks finesse, has a good wrister but overall lacks that wow factor in the times I've seen him. I think he should be a good player but I don't think he's as great as others are making him out to be. The whole 'playing in a men's league' argument that Finn's like to throw around is overrated. Playing well in the the Sm-Liigga isn't as impressive as some make it out.

I like Barkov, but I don't think his ceiling is too high, and though he likely bottoms out as still a good player, I see that as just as likely as him hitting his ceiling.

So I voted Monahan. Not as big but a little swifter. Extremely gritty. Comes up big in tournaments and big games. IMO he's a safer bet and his floor is a little bit higher.

GetThePuckOut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 02:59 PM
  #10
F l a m e s
#winitforgio
 
F l a m e s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Moose Jaw
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,270
vCash: 50
I love how this is a choice.. (potentially).

We actually have the power to draft a stud C! I'd be happy with anyone of them... I really believe Monahan will develop into an amazing 2-way, offensively gifted centre that will eventually be a team captain.

F l a m e s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 03:01 PM
  #11
Trae
____________________
 
Trae's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,376
vCash: 500
1. Barkov
2. Monahan
3. Lindholm

If win the lottery, I want MacKinnon, I don't care that Jones is the consensus number one. I am almost always of the opinion that you take BPA, but we have gone on so long without a center I can't handle it anymore.

Trae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 03:14 PM
  #12
Volica
Southern AB Dandy
 
Volica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,925
vCash: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightBlazer View Post
Barkov is kinda slow, lacks finesse, has a good wrister but overall lacks that wow factor in the times I've seen him. I think he should be a good player but I don't think he's as great as others are making him out to be. The whole 'playing in a men's league' argument that Finn's like to throw around is overrated. Playing well in the the Sm-Liigga isn't as impressive as some make it out.

I like Barkov, but I don't think his ceiling is too high, and though he likely bottoms out as still a good player, I see that as just as likely as him hitting his ceiling.

So I voted Monahan. Not as big but a little swifter. Extremely gritty. Comes up big in tournaments and big games. IMO he's a safer bet and his floor is a little bit higher.
Interesting.
Monahan's Ceiling higher than Barkov's limited ceiling in your eyes eh? Interesting. How many times have you actually seen Barkov play? Better hands, better awareness, higher skill than Monahan; lacks some foot speed, but makes up with his massive frame and body positioning. Barkov's got great net presence, which is great for someone his size, and the skill to back it up as well.

Also, he's the number one European skater in international rankings... probably for a good reason.

Also kind of a backwards argument with the SM-Liga comment.
If you think it's negligible that Barkov is putting numbers against men, how can it also not be negligible to say that guys in the CHL are putting up numbers against teenagers? Also, when he went to the WJC, when he was playing against guys that were mostly older than him (he's one of the youngest in the draft this year, btw), he also performed well lol?

I really like Monahan, don't get me wrong here. However, I think once some of the people who have never seen him play heard he's like Jonathan Toews, they all got massive boners about him. Listen, since like 2010, at each draft, it seems that a Toews comparison gets thrown around for a two way center in the first round. It's just the nature of the beast, it's because Toews makes it look so effortless giving all his effort; it's why every draft people think they have the next one of him.

Volica is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 03:30 PM
  #13
herashak
Registered User
 
herashak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,223
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volica View Post
Interesting.
Monahan's Ceiling higher than Barkov's limited ceiling in your eyes eh? Interesting. How many times have you actually seen Barkov play? Better hands, better awareness, higher skill than Monahan; lacks some foot speed, but makes up with his massive frame and body positioning. Barkov's got great net presence, which is great for someone his size, and the skill to back it up as well.

Also, he's the number one European skater in international rankings... probably for a good reason.

Also kind of a backwards argument with the SM-Liga comment.
If you think it's negligible that Barkov is putting numbers against men, how can it also not be negligible to say that guys in the CHL are putting up numbers against teenagers? Also, when he went to the WJC, when he was playing against guys that were mostly older than him (he's one of the youngest in the draft this year, btw), he also performed well lol?

I really like Monahan, don't get me wrong here. However, I think once some of the people who have never seen him play heard he's like Jonathan Toews, they all got massive boners about him. Listen, since like 2010, at each draft, it seems that a Toews comparison gets thrown around for a two way center in the first round. It's just the nature of the beast, it's because Toews makes it look so effortless giving all his effort; it's why every draft people think they have the next one of him.
he probably thinks cause granlund strugled coming over that barkov will.

herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 03:32 PM
  #14
GetThePuckOut
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,408
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volica View Post
Interesting.
Monahan's Ceiling higher than Barkov's limited ceiling in your eyes eh? Interesting. How many times have you actually seen Barkov play? Better hands, better awareness, higher skill than Monahan; lacks some foot speed, but makes up with his massive frame and body positioning. Barkov's got great net presence, which is great for someone his size, and the skill to back it up as well.

Also, he's the number one European skater in international rankings... probably for a good reason.

Also kind of a backwards argument with the SM-Liga comment.
If you think it's negligible that Barkov is putting numbers against men, how can it also not be negligible to say that guys in the CHL are putting up numbers against teenagers? Also, when he went to the WJC, when he was playing against guys that were mostly older than him (he's one of the youngest in the draft this year, btw), he also performed well lol?

I really like Monahan, don't get me wrong here. However, I think once some of the people who have never seen him play heard he's like Jonathan Toews, they all got massive boners about him. Listen, since like 2010, at each draft, it seems that a Toews comparison gets thrown around for a two way center in the first round. It's just the nature of the beast, it's because Toews makes it look so effortless giving all his effort; it's why every draft people think they have the next one of him.
Monahan gets compared to Toews because he plays exactly like him. Players have been compared to him, but none of them are as close to him in style as Monahan is.

Hockey IQ, and awareness, and net front presence, is pretty much a wash between Monahan and Barkov.

I've seen both guys play about a dozen times each. And there aren't many effective NHLers as slow as Barkov. Yeah he's bigger than Monahan, but Monahan isn't small either. Speed though is what can make or break players at the NHL level and like Granlund, it could be a huge obstacle for Barkov while trying to translate his game. FEL isn't nearly as fast and the NHL speed could hinder Barkov's offense and his defense.

I haven't seen much of Lindholm however, but if his offensive abilities are as good as some are saying, I'd perhaps be inclined to take him over both players.

GetThePuckOut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 03:33 PM
  #15
Unkki
Registered User
 
Unkki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Country: Finland
Posts: 565
vCash: 500
I like a lot of Barkov. He's got some Russian blood from his father, which gives hime more artifice, but at the same time he has grown in Finland so there's no Russian factor with Sasha. Attitude is fine with him too, so I would be happy to see him to carry Flames-jersey.

Unkki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 03:33 PM
  #16
Volica
Southern AB Dandy
 
Volica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,925
vCash: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by herashak View Post
he probably thinks cause granlund strugled coming over that barkov will.
Yeah, that Granlund kid; what a bust

Volica is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 05:00 PM
  #17
nuck
Flatfoot
 
nuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Country: Greenland
Posts: 5,688
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by herashak View Post
he probably thinks cause granlund strugled coming over that barkov will.
Shades of Jokinen?

Top-ranked European skater in the draft. Maintained that ranking from mid-season. He scored five goals for Finland at the World Junior Championships. Also competed at the 1997 World Championships, where he was the youngest player. Was youngest player on IFK Helsinki, but centered the first line. Described by scouts as offensive-minded, Jokinen plays the game with emotion. Unselfish, creative player who said, "I like to hit and play physical." His Finnish coach was former NHLer Mike Eaves. Plays with a lot of confidence.

If Barkov played like Olli did up to 2006-2007 there wouldn't be too many complaints. Size without a lot of strength, and skating needing to be improved are frequent complaints for top prospects if not the very best like Malkin and Ovi.

I really want for them to have a shot at one of Drouin or MacKinnon. I don't have faith in Monahan as a 94 who did not ramp up his game as some others have for their draft year, nor am I comfortable about using a top 5 pick on a player who is not already an NHL skater. If I have to choose between the two, it would be Barkov, mostly because he is a year younger so he might have a bit more physical development in him.

nuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 05:20 PM
  #18
F l a m e s
#winitforgio
 
F l a m e s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Moose Jaw
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,270
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuck View Post

I don't have faith in Monahan as a 94 who did not ramp up his game as some others have for their draft year, nor am I comfortable about using a top 5 pick on a player who is not already an NHL skater. If I have to choose between the two, it would be Barkov, mostly because he is a year younger so he might have a bit more physical development in him.
I've heard a few people mention "Monahan didn't step up his game, look at his stats this year compared to last." It's simply wrong! Way to make judgements/assumptions of a stat-sheet.

Monahan night in / night out, was the best player on the 67's. That team was absolutely brutal losing guys like Toffoli, Ceci, Prince, McFarland, Graovac, etc. It was an extremely abrupt high to low situation in Ottawa, and Monahan did his best to hold that team together.

Fights, hits, scores, wins faceoffs, grinds, leads... He does everything for that franchise!
I'm sure MacKinnon wouldn't do as good in Ottawa as he would in Halifax. It's called a support staff.

F l a m e s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 05:41 PM
  #19
100 Third Graders
BBQ Anyone?
 
100 Third Graders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 31,448
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calculon View Post
Of those 3, in the order I would draft them:

1. Barkov
2. Lindholm
3. Monahan
swap 2 and 3 for me

100 Third Graders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 06:42 PM
  #20
tyflames
Registered User
 
tyflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,750
vCash: 250
Barkov is undoubtedly better. But based on where we will pick I went Monaghan

tyflames is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 07:23 PM
  #21
F l a m e s
#winitforgio
 
F l a m e s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Moose Jaw
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,270
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyflames View Post
Barkov is undoubtedly better. But based on where we will pick I went Monaghan
You've called him this in other threads...

It's Monahan.

F l a m e s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 07:54 PM
  #22
Volica
Southern AB Dandy
 
Volica's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,925
vCash: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by wally31 View Post
Fights, hits, scores, wins faceoffs, grinds, leads... He does everything for that franchise!
I'm sure MacKinnon wouldn't do as good in Ottawa as he would in Halifax. It's called a support staff.
I'm sure he'd still put up monster numbers, just like Monahan. Remember, Halifax blew really hard until MacKinnon lead them in scoring as a 16-17 year old in his first year on a team that was more or less the same as the one that won I think under 25 games the year before.

Monahan is, unquestionably, the 4/5th best forward available in this draft. There no reason to put him down, or to downplay what he's managed to do on a dud of a team. He's an excellent player, that has the chance to be a major NHLer. From the games I've seen of his, and from his interviews; he's a hockey guy that could be a great player in the league.
Saying that. There's a reason Barkov is considered to be one of the top 3 forwards available this draft. They both have the ability to be dominant NHLers, Barkov's more ready and probably has the better offensive game to him. Monahan could easily be ready, and from his interviews, he's a coaches dream... a young kid who wants to secure the defensive end before he goes on offense; and had future captain written all over him.

Are there risks for both? Of course. Barkov's skating might never get there, and Monahan might not be able to play against people over 21 years old the same way he does. Both are dedicated to the game, and both have the ability to be stars. In different ways of course. Barkov with more flash, Monahan as a quiet leader.

At the end of the day,
Barkov > Monahan=Lindholm for me. The > is also quite small, but it's definitely there. All three of these kids will be great players, in their own right, is my belief.

Also, if people haven't checked out Lindholm's play, I put a WJC video in... the season wrap up thread. He's really fun to watch.

Volica is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 09:14 PM
  #23
tyflames
Registered User
 
tyflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,750
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by wally31 View Post
You've called him this in other threads...

It's Monahan.
I actually thought that was how you spell it.
My bad

tyflames is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 09:29 PM
  #24
The Hendog
Registered User
 
The Hendog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 374
vCash: 500
I want Barkov but I think he will be gone when we pick so Monahan it is!

The Hendog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 09:35 PM
  #25
MuffinMerc
Come watch TV
 
MuffinMerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,048
vCash: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hendog View Post
I want Barkov but I think he will be gone when we pick so Monahan it is!
Here's hoping Weisbrod is thinking the same thing.

MuffinMerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.