HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Vancouver Canucks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Schroeder or Ebbett (UPD: Canucks recall Schroeder from Chicago - Jan 22)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-18-2013, 06:20 PM
  #301
thepuckmonster
Moderator
HFBoards: Night's Watch
 
thepuckmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
Source? That would mean a 25 man roster which is obviously impossible.
I've read a bunch of **** on Twitter about it, could be wrong IDK.

Also, if you all actually think AV is going to carry 12 forwards and 9 dmen, chill out. You know what happens to out D and their stockpiling. 2 of Barker, albets or Vandemeer will get sent down. There's no re entry now so Schroeder can be put in tomorrow if there's space for him.

thepuckmonster is online now  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:20 PM
  #302
Bobby Lou
We Surrender
 
Bobby Lou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Crease
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,350
vCash: 500
I don't understand why anyone would suggest waiving Ebbett ... that is completely ridiculous when you have actual scrubs kicking around who probably won't play short of injury.

Bobby Lou is online now  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:21 PM
  #303
Britton
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,328
vCash: 500
This move could have been facilitated by the fact that Kassian has been battling back spasm's. Perhaps they are waiting to see if he's good to go on the weekend without losing anyone to waivers. If he continues to suffer from them he can go on IR and Schroeder can come back up, if he doesn't they can send one of the d-men down after the weekend and get him back up. Didn't AV say anyway that running with 12F and 9D isn't viable long term anyway?

Britton is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:22 PM
  #304
ItsAllPartOfThePlan
Registered User
 
ItsAllPartOfThePlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,165
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectrefire View Post
I still don't understand the logic of icing a ****tier line-up, just so you can keep a guy like Cam Barker in the system...
We don't even know that yet....

ItsAllPartOfThePlan is online now  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:23 PM
  #305
Spectrefire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 455
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsAllPartOfThePlan View Post
We don't even know that yet....
True. Hopefully we're all wrong tomorrow and Schroeder will be in the line-up and Barker can go to whatever hellhole he came from.

Spectrefire is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:25 PM
  #306
pitseleh
Registered User
 
pitseleh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,645
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepuckmonster View Post
I've read a bunch of **** on Twitter about it, could be wrong IDK.

Also, if you all actually think AV is going to carry 12 forwards and 9 dmen, chill out. You know what happens to out D and their stockpiling. 2 of Barker, albets or Vandemeer will get sent down. There's no re entry now so Schroeder can be put in tomorrow if there's space for him.
They need to get waived before being sent down, which takes 24 hours. The only way Schroeder gets in the lineup tomorrow is if someone gets hurt or the team makes a trade between then and now.

pitseleh is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:26 PM
  #307
Stonz
Registered User
 
Stonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,162
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectrefire View Post
True. Hopefully we're all wrong tomorrow and Schroeder will be in the line-up and Barker can go to whatever hellhole he came from.
Yeah, you're right. No overreacting going on at all.


Stonz is online now  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:27 PM
  #308
Huntershin Karuk
Horvat is Horfat
 
Huntershin Karuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,639
vCash: 500
I hope so. The kid deserves to be here and it's way more exciting watching youth than it is watching a finished product.

Huntershin Karuk is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:27 PM
  #309
opendoor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,223
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepuckmonster View Post
I've read a bunch of **** on Twitter about it, could be wrong IDK.
Booth and Kesler aren't on LTIR, so maybe that's what you saw. But they're definitely on IR because there's 23 other players on the Canucks' roster not including them.

Basically someone has to come off the roster for Schroeder to get back on. It could easily happen in the next few days if someone gets waived, but chances of him getting on tomorrow are quite slim and as Pitseleh mentioned that can only happen through an injury or a trade.

opendoor is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:30 PM
  #310
Spectrefire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 455
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonz View Post
Yeah, you're right. No overreacting going on at all.

Hey now, we all hated Barker before this whole Schroeder mess

Spectrefire is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:31 PM
  #311
Land O Lakes
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 157
vCash: 500
Schroeder and the NHL:


Land O Lakes is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:45 PM
  #312
craigcaulks*
Registered Luser.
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Van!
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoolChamp View Post
oh knows we can't lose ebbett to waivers, that would be tragic. How could this team compete without Ebbett?
Why would we want to lose ANY forwards right now? My god kids, this is simply an accounting transaction.

craigcaulks* is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:46 PM
  #313
Moore Money
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,889
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigcaulks View Post
Why would we want to lose ANY forwards right now? My god kids, this is simply an accounting transaction.
oh knows we cant lose Barker! better?

Moore Money is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:49 PM
  #314
craigcaulks*
Registered Luser.
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Van!
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepuckmonster View Post
Booth and Kesler arent officially on the IR yet. So yeah, there's a spot for him.
Booth is listed on IR on CDC.

craigcaulks* is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:50 PM
  #315
Scottrockztheworld*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,301
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigcaulks View Post
Booth is listed on IR on CDC.
TSN ticker has Kesler on IR

Scottrockztheworld* is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:51 PM
  #316
craigcaulks*
Registered Luser.
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Van!
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,000
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoolChamp View Post
oh knows we cant lose Barker! better?
A bit better, yes.

It's going to be ok.

craigcaulks* is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:52 PM
  #317
MS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 12,580
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoolChamp View Post
I don't think this is on AV. he's not that stupid. I think gillis is actually afraid of losing Ebbet on waivers
Ebbett to me isn't the issue. If we want to keep him around, fair enough. He's decent proven forward depth.

The issue is that we're keeping around utter tripe like Volpatti and Barker. Two roster spots on basically useless garbage.

MS is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:58 PM
  #318
pahlsson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,470
vCash: 500
sorry if this was answered already but is this merely a matter of being over the 23 man limit and thus having to send down the only waiver exempt player or is there something else to it here

pahlsson is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 06:59 PM
  #319
Balls Mahoney
The Tryamkin Era!!!
 
Balls Mahoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: +44 1252 230 607
Country: United States
Posts: 12,344
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS View Post
Ebbett to me isn't the issue. If we want to keep him around, fair enough. He's decent proven forward depth.

The issue is that we're keeping around utter tripe like Volpatti and Barker. Two roster spots on basically useless garbage.
I don't get the knocks on Volpatti. He's the toughest guy in the organization and he's proven to be a decent fourth liner who can add grit, decent defensive play and not embarrass himself or the team taking a regular shift.

Barker on the other hand makes absolutely no sense to me, especially with a much better NHL player in Vandermeer on the roster making him largely redundant.

Balls Mahoney is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 07:07 PM
  #320
Proto
Registered User
 
Proto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,476
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS View Post
Ebbett to me isn't the issue. If we want to keep him around, fair enough. He's decent proven forward depth.

The issue is that we're keeping around utter tripe like Volpatti and Barker. Two roster spots on basically useless garbage.
It's classic AV. I'm over it now. He makes dumb personnel decisions every year and usually compounds them throughout the season.

Just wait until he starts tinkering with D pairings to "get ready for the playoffs"

Proto is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 07:09 PM
  #321
Canucker
Registered User
 
Canucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Prince Rupert, BC
Posts: 18,502
vCash: 500
Hmmm...

The coach is an idiot
Gillis is taking this team backwards
The 2nd line is ****!
Cam Barker is our 9th defenseman!
Luongo is still here!
Andrew Ebbett has an NHL job!
David Booth is injured and kills bears
Mason Raymond is horrible (at least he was prior to yesterday's scrimmage)
Ballard makes too much for a 3rd pairing D-man!



ZERO games played.

Must be the Canucks board.

Canucker is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 07:20 PM
  #322
Orca Smash
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,403
vCash: 500
Really thought schroeder deserved the chance, given it was either ebbett or schroeder, i feel like he has a far higher upside and is already the better player. He deserved a chance.

Orca Smash is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 07:22 PM
  #323
Canucker
Registered User
 
Canucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Prince Rupert, BC
Posts: 18,502
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orca Smash View Post
Really thought schroeder deserved the chance, given it was either ebbett or schroeder, i feel like he has a far higher upside and is already the better player. He deserved a chance.
And he still might get it.

Canucker is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 07:24 PM
  #324
Orca Smash
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,403
vCash: 500
Really, how?


I have not been following that closely today, i just seen kuzma kicking his heels together ebbett was chosen over schroeder. And that he was the final cut.

Orca Smash is offline  
Old
01-18-2013, 07:24 PM
  #325
keslerburrows
Registered User
 
keslerburrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vernon, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,749
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canucker View Post
And he still might get it.
NOOOO!111!! AV IS TO DUMMM!!!111!!!111111!!!!11!




keslerburrows is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.