HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Ben Bishop to Oilers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-11-2013, 11:11 PM
  #1
oilers4life5
Registered User
 
oilers4life5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: City of Champions
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,664
vCash: 958
Ben Bishop to Oilers

What would Ottawa want for Bishop to the Oilers?

oilers4life5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:15 PM
  #2
saskriders
Can't Hold Leads
 
saskriders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Auckland
Country: New Zealand
Posts: 21,462
vCash: 750
Defense, the only guys I would be interested in would likely be too expensive though (J Schultz, and Klefbaum)

saskriders is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:15 PM
  #3
Leafs For Life*
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,636
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilers4life5 View Post
What would Ottawa want for Bishop to the Oilers?
Dubnyk is more proven. Why do you want Bishop?

Leafs For Life* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:19 PM
  #4
Qward
Because! That's why!
 
Qward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Behind you, look out
Posts: 14,395
vCash: 500
Cause he is better

Qward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:22 PM
  #5
SDig14
Registered User
 
SDig14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,348
vCash: 500
I prefer Dubnyk, no thanks. Let Dubnyk carry the ball the next 2 years until his deal is up, and if he can't get it done then go get a proven guy.

SDig14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:24 PM
  #6
Altimus
Probably drunk
 
Altimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kanata
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,222
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Altimus Send a message via MSN to Altimus
Parting with him kills our Backup/AHL depth. He will remain a Senator til at least the trade deadline at which point all options will be weighed. We strongly suggest moving your hopes and dreams elsewhere as we acquired him to address our own goaltending needs.

And if we were to move any assets to acquire a Dman, free agency would be first, then we would consider trading a forward prospect.

Altimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:29 PM
  #7
Benjamin
Life is suffering
 
Benjamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: /
Posts: 28,503
vCash: 133
An NHL defenseman, similar age and top 4 upside.

Benjamin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:36 PM
  #8
Sparky1977
Registered User
 
Sparky1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 39
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilers4life5 View Post
What would Ottawa want for Bishop to the Oilers?
Edmonton is not in the market for a goalie....a good blog here from Richard Cloutier:

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Richa...diot/131/48374

Edmonton takes a pass on Bishop this time (unless Murray gives him to us for a bag of pucks)

Sparky1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:38 PM
  #9
ManByng
It's Me OilTastic
 
ManByng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
Dubnyk is more proven. Why do you want Bishop?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qward View Post
Cause he is better
no he's not.

ManByng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:05 AM
  #10
Prongo
Beer
 
Prongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 16,907
vCash: 500
Well he got traded for a second rounder. I would say with Anderson and Lehner there he could be moved. I don't know about AHL depth, but I would think a second rounder + maybe a 4th would get him if he was on the market. 2nd rounder and a low level prospect maybe.

Prongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:09 AM
  #11
McManked
Ooh to be a Gooner
 
McManked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,519
vCash: 535
I'd trade Bishop for a 2nd + Teubert.

McManked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:18 AM
  #12
LV
TML forever
 
LV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,941
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manked View Post
I'd trade Bishop for a 2nd + Teubert.
and I'd trade Scrivens for Crosby, too bad it doesn't work like that.

LV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:23 AM
  #13
vdB
Registered User
 
vdB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,458
vCash: 500
Bishop for a 2nd + Teubert is a complete win-win and you know it.

vdB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:30 AM
  #14
SDig14
Registered User
 
SDig14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,348
vCash: 500
Hopefully Dubnyk plays well over this shortened season, or else we will have to listen to goaltending rumours all summer again.

I can't see them doing anything before his deal is done in 2 years, after that it's wide open unless Dubnyk solidifies himself.

SDig14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:30 AM
  #15
Here I Pageau Again
Registered User
 
Here I Pageau Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,139
vCash: 500
Seems odd that Oilers would want Bishop. And odd that Sens would trade Bishop before the season.

No thanks, from both ends, most likely.

Here I Pageau Again is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:44 AM
  #16
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,226
vCash: 500
We have no need for Bishop. We have Dubnyk, who's better right now, and if Khabiboulin goes down, we have Yann Danis, who was AHL goalie of the year last year, to fill in for a couple of games as backup. This year, back up goalies are only needed to fill in the odd game and to fill in if injuries happen. I wouldn't see the need in trading for a goalie who would probably not play 10 games this year.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:48 AM
  #17
BOLD MacT Trade
GoldMoldisMacTBold
 
BOLD MacT Trade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bottom of Conference
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 641
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdB View Post
Bishop for a 2nd + Teubert is a complete win-win and you know it.
I agree 100%

BOLD MacT Trade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:52 AM
  #18
Aceonfire*
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,288
vCash: 500
Lehtonen, Thomas and Backstrom are all UFAs this summer. I doubt they could land any of the 3. But it is still easier than giving up prospects.

Aceonfire* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:55 AM
  #19
Wham City
Registered User
 
Wham City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Whistler
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,312
vCash: 500
Your first.

Wham City is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 01:04 AM
  #20
Prongo
Beer
 
Prongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 16,907
vCash: 500
Why would Bishop command a first when he was just traded last year for a second rounder??

Prongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 01:04 AM
  #21
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,226
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wham City View Post
Your first.
Bishop isn't worth a potentially high first. A low first, maybe, but we can't guarantee a low first round pick.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 01:36 AM
  #22
Qward
Because! That's why!
 
Qward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Behind you, look out
Posts: 14,395
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prongo View Post
Why would Bishop command a first when he was just traded last year for a second rounder??
buy low, sell high

Qward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 01:46 AM
  #23
jumptheshark
McDavid Headquarters
 
jumptheshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lord of HFBOARDS
Country: United Nations
Posts: 69,102
vCash: 1556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qward View Post
buy low, sell high
Bishop played ten games last year and did not do anything much to raise his value that much higher. If Bishop gets you a first then Jason Riemer is worth 3 first rounders

__________________
**Avatar approved by the powers that be***
jumptheshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 01:51 AM
  #24
Qward
Because! That's why!
 
Qward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Behind you, look out
Posts: 14,395
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jumptheshark View Post
Bishop played ten games last year and did not do anything much to raise his value that much higher. If Bishop gets you a first then Jason Riemer is worth 3 first rounders
And if such a player existed, I am sure he would be worth that.

Qward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 01:55 AM
  #25
CoachBadkitten
Matt Hunwick
 
CoachBadkitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 5,416
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jumptheshark View Post
Bishop played ten games last year and did not do anything much to raise his value that much higher. If Bishop gets you a first then Jason Riemer is worth 3 first rounders
Agreed. Whoever Jason Riemer is.

CoachBadkitten is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.