Would you prefer Crawford bounces back, has an amazing year with the best statistics of any goalie in the game, or would you prefer to be "right" and have him fail so you can complain about it the whole time and say "I told you so"?
Same question with Stalberg as well.
I would prefer he bounce back but I have doubts he can do it
As for Stalberg ,,, I would love to be wrong and see him score 40 goals
Never wish for people to do bad outside of Cade McNown with Bears in yr 2 ,,, Guy was absolute piece of garbage on and off the field
Then what was the point of bringing up Frolik, a bottom 6 forward. He does not have nearly as an important role to play. U can afford more leeway with a bottom 6 forward then u can with a starting goalie.
I am talking about how certain people evaluate players and situations and was juxtaposing two underachievers and the opinion of a certain poster on them; the point was to show the incongruities between both evaluations and if you have been reading here long enough you would know why I picked Frolik.