HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2008 Draft bore little fruit for the Toronto Maple Leafs

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-28-2013, 02:15 PM
  #1
HF Article
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Country:
Posts: 7,745
vCash: 500
2008 Draft bore little fruit for the Toronto Maple Leafs


With interim GM Cliff Fletcher at the helm (prior the arrival of Brian Burke) the Toronto Maple Leafs made eight selections at the 2008 NHL-Entry Draft including a coveted top-10 selection.



The mantra at the time for Fletcher was to add more size and skill to the Maple Leafs system. They did so by adding eight players who all measured in at over 6'2 feet. Fletcher swung for the fences on a few picks, and made a move to secure a top-five selection which would end up being tough-stay-at-home defender Luke Schenn.

Fletcher selected players from a mix of positions and various leagues.… read more



More...

HF Article is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 02:31 PM
  #2
pooleboy
#tankformcdavid
 
pooleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ontario
Posts: 5,879
vCash: 500
This should be fun and exciting

Schenn got us jvr which imo is a signifigant piece in the long term for this team. However gardiner is looking really good for us (2008 draft) and colborne is still in our system

pooleboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 02:32 PM
  #3
Hurt
Registered User
 
Hurt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,485
vCash: 500
Well we traded Pateryn along with a pick for Grabovski (I believe it was Pateryn) and Hayes turned in to Brad Ross who could be a decent player in a couple of years

__________________
Shoot me a PM with your concerns. Also, come visit us in the Science Forum!
Hurt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 02:38 PM
  #4
416Leafer
Registered User
 
416Leafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,348
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hurt View Post
Well we traded Pateryn along with a pick for Grabovski (I believe it was Pateryn) and Hayes turned in to Brad Ross who could be a decent player in a couple of years
Yep. So the value could turn out ok draft-wise between JVR, part of Grabovski's value, and Ross.

But in terms of who we actually drafted, it was a really weak haul, especially considering we had a 5th overall pick.

416Leafer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 02:39 PM
  #5
ErnieLeafs
LOVE & LIVE the Game
 
ErnieLeafs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Windsor, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,173
vCash: 500
Our draft was a complete failure in '08.

What we traded afterwards doesn't have an effect on how we drafted.

ErnieLeafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 02:45 PM
  #6
johnny_rudeboy
Registered User
 
johnny_rudeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Karlstad
Country: Sweden
Posts: 12,165
vCash: 500
Well that was depressing.

Read this as well. Made me a bit happier.

http://www.hockeysfuture.com/article...-league-level/

johnny_rudeboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 02:53 PM
  #7
BertCorbeau
Moderator
 
BertCorbeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,815
vCash: 500
Not to mention drafting Schenn has netted us JVR ... A little early to be jumping to conclusions on this draft

BertCorbeau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 03:01 PM
  #8
416Leafer
Registered User
 
416Leafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,348
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErnieLeafs View Post
Our draft was a complete failure in '08.

What we traded afterwards doesn't have an effect on how we drafted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny_rudeboy View Post
Well that was depressing.
To be fair, any review of Toronto draft history of the last 10 years is depressing...

2006 was a good draft, it arguably produced an NHLer with every pick.

But in terms of quality? Over a 10 year span, the top top players that we have picked in terms of how they've performed in the NHL are Rask (traded) and probably Steen (traded).

Over 10 years, the majority of teams would have drafted 1-2 franchise players, a couple more first line / second line players, etc. We drafted one starting goalie, and a good two-way 2nd line guy as our very best picks since ~2001/2002...

Granted, we don't know the results from 2009 onwards yet, and a guy like Rielly obviously looks pretty good.

416Leafer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 03:04 PM
  #9
FlareKnight
Registered User
 
FlareKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,648
vCash: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by 416Leafer View Post
Yep. So the value could turn out ok draft-wise between JVR, part of Grabovski's value, and Ross.

But in terms of who we actually drafted, it was a really weak haul, especially considering we had a 5th overall pick.
It really depends on how you look at it. You can't really call them a weak haul if you get those guys in return for them. True enough that none of the guys we picked will directly benefit the Leafs by playing for them.

Yet, at the same time not sure an article can say the 2008 draft did nothing for us. I'd say that Gardiner is a pretty good guy to get out of that draft. We'll see what Colborne turns into as well.

I mean sure if you want to write an article about how the Leafs picks turned out it wasn't all that good. But the 2008 draft did benefit the Leafs in a few ways.

FlareKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 03:13 PM
  #10
416Leafer
Registered User
 
416Leafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,348
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlareKnight View Post
It really depends on how you look at it. You can't really call them a weak haul if you get those guys in return for them. True enough that none of the guys we picked will directly benefit the Leafs by playing for them.

Yet, at the same time not sure an article can say the 2008 draft did nothing for us. I'd say that Gardiner is a pretty good guy to get out of that draft. We'll see what Colborne turns into as well.
Depends what you're trying to measure.

If you're trying to measure the GMs / Scouts decisions at the draft table on that day, you have to look at who they drafted that day.

If we have mostly the same scouting staff since that time, this type of method can be used to evaluate our scouting staff.

Despite not having that many top picks, we still haven't picked any true gems for 10+ years. We haven't drafted any franchise players, top line players, etc outside of the 1st round in a LONG time, probably since Kaberle. We've had some decent guys, Kulemin, Gunnarson, Frattin, Reimer, etc in the later rounds. But no real impact players.

If we get an impact player with a top 5 draft choice, i don't necessarily attribute that to good scouting either. So if Rielly turns out to be a great player, I don't think the scouting staff deserve a ton of credit compared to if they unearthed that type of player with a 2nd round or later pick.

416Leafer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 03:15 PM
  #11
Eyedea
The Legend Continues
 
Eyedea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Greece
Posts: 12,981
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 416Leafer View Post
Over 10 years, the majority of teams would have drafted 1-2 franchise players, a couple more first line / second line players, etc. We drafted one starting goalie, and a good two-way 2nd line guy as our very best picks since ~2001/2002...
Yeah those days during the near end of Muskoka Five gave us not only a mediocre team, but mediocre prospects.

If only we iced Rico Fata's and Kyle Calder's so we could actually get elite players through the draft.

Eyedea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 03:36 PM
  #12
Spazmatic Dan
Force Beyond Measure
 
Spazmatic Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chatham, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,345
vCash: 500
And 2008 was .. what did Pierre McGuire call it? "Let the rebuild begin because now its coming to Toronto!".


Yeah, that didn't quite work out the way we hoped.

5 years later and we're actually in a worse place in the standings (last year). Better young players no question, but quite a ways to go yet.

Here's hoping!

Spazmatic Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 03:38 PM
  #13
Brewsky
King Of The Ice Mugs
 
Brewsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: King County
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,104
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Brewsky Send a message via AIM to Brewsky Send a message via MSN to Brewsky Send a message via Yahoo to Brewsky Send a message via Skype™ to Brewsky
How do you suck for 10 years and have nothing to show for it.

Asset management 101.

Like...the ****...too depressing man!

Brewsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 03:46 PM
  #14
deuce457
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 362
vCash: 500
anyone drafted lower than the 3rd round and doesnt make it, should not be called a 'Bust', like they are being portrayed in the article.

If someone had the time to go back through numerous drafts and count the number of 4th - 7th round picks that actually make the NHL, its probably somewhere around 5% of the players if not less.

deuce457 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 04:00 PM
  #15
Woodman19
#TeamBernier
 
Woodman19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,251
vCash: 500
Is it really that shocking? If the Leafs had good drafts they would not be in the position they are in now.

Woodman19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 04:22 PM
  #16
Interactif
Registered User
 
Interactif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 30,813
vCash: 500
Leafs did better than the Redwings in 08, however, Fletch moving up to get Schenn was a bad move. Blew a pick there.

Interactif is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 04:29 PM
  #17
ErnieLeafs
LOVE & LIVE the Game
 
ErnieLeafs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Windsor, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,173
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interactif View Post
Leafs did better than the Redwings in 08, however, Fletch moving up to get Schenn was a bad move. Blew a pick there.
Really?

Nyquist is just about to make his step into the NHL, so the jury is still out, and Thomas McCollum is a developing goalie.

It won't be hard for Nyquist to surpass Schenn in his role and effectiveness...

ErnieLeafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 04:30 PM
  #18
Stephen
Registered User
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 32,526
vCash: 500
Luke Schenn pick - an example of how inept our scouting, management and coaching braintrust are individually and in tandem, and how anti-tanking just bites you in the arse, considering Doughty, Stamkos, Pietrangelo all went a few picks before.

Trading up to get Schenn was terrible. Hopefully JVR makes up for all this.

Jimmy Hayes - wasted on Brad Ross, who, let's face it, is a long shot to make the NHL given his inability to crack an AHL lineup.

The rest? Not worth typing out.

Stephen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 04:36 PM
  #19
Ash35
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 765
vCash: 500
Drafting Schenn that high was ridiculous. When was the last time a "defensive" defencemen was drafted in the top 10 and he turned out to actually be worth wasting that high of a pick?

Ash35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 04:54 PM
  #20
alcanalz
whys and wherefores
 
alcanalz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,784
vCash: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash35 View Post
Drafting Schenn that high was ridiculous. When was the last time a "defensive" defencemen was drafted in the top 10 and he turned out to actually be worth wasting that high of a pick?
Karl Alzner.

alcanalz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 04:56 PM
  #21
Phatic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 430
vCash: 500
this was THE WORST DRAFT YEAR IN LEAF HISTORY! so many beautiful names passed up... sad day

Phatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 04:58 PM
  #22
bobbyflex
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,392
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash35 View Post
Drafting Schenn that high was ridiculous. When was the last time a "defensive" defencemen was drafted in the top 10 and he turned out to actually be worth wasting that high of a pick?
wasn't Griffin Reinhart just drafted 4th overall ?

bobbyflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 05:06 PM
  #23
Interactif
Registered User
 
Interactif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 30,813
vCash: 500
This wasn't the best draft for the Leafs, I know Leafs were high on Hodgson, I wonder if Fletcher or others wanted Schenn, and moved to get him. Will have to snoop around to gauge this one. I want to give the benefit of the doubt here, but without knowing how this went down, we are left speculating. I always wondered if someone threw an aubible at the draft table.

Interactif is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 05:09 PM
  #24
JAMmer124
Independent Living
 
JAMmer124's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Welland, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,409
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyflex View Post
wasn't Griffin Reinhart just drafted 4th overall ?
Look at who drafted him. Nuff said.

JAMmer124 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-28-2013, 05:32 PM
  #25
Rockinz
Leafs 4 the cup
 
Rockinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Leaf Land
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,111
vCash: 500
Cliff made that move for Schenn to make a splash...

I always felt we should of stood pat instead of giving up 7th OV + 2nd + 3rd for Schenn at #5... Too much for only 2 spots IMO

Wanted Hodgson or Wilson at #7

Rockinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.