HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2

Hawks vs Sharks 7 game series right now

View Poll Results: Who Wins?
Hawks in 4 6 3.66%
Hawks in 5 14 8.54%
Hawks in 6 46 28.05%
Hawks in 7 20 12.20%
Sharks in 4 6 3.66%
Sharks in 5 9 5.49%
Sharks in 6 33 20.12%
Sharks in 7 30 18.29%
Voters: 164. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-27-2013, 09:25 PM
  #1
illpucks
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,644
vCash: 500
Hawks vs Sharks 7 game series right now

Both Teams are on fire. Who would win if they had a 7 game series right now?

illpucks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 09:28 PM
  #2
ottawa
Avatar of the Year*
 
ottawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,316
vCash: 69
Hawks in 6...why? Because Kane is my favourite player outside the habs

__________________
http://img63.photobucket.com/albums/v191/SpiderManNL/24cups.gif
ottawa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 09:33 PM
  #3
AKL
#AnyoneButThem
 
AKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Granduland
Country: Nauru
Posts: 8,133
vCash: 50
Sharks. Goaltending is pretty much a wash I guess. Sharks are deeper though I think.

AKL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 09:35 PM
  #4
Sky04
Registered User
 
Sky04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,065
vCash: 500
I'd go with the Sharks in this regard, Thornton averaging 3 points a game with Marleau averaging 2 goals per game is just ridiculous.

Sky04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 09:36 PM
  #5
Fire Julien
Registered User
 
Fire Julien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bergen
Country: Norway
Posts: 20,265
vCash: 500
Hawks have the intangibles.

Fire Julien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 09:52 PM
  #6
Kitten Mittons
Registered User
 
Kitten Mittons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco
Country: Armenia
Posts: 47,794
vCash: 500
Without Burns, Hawks in 7.

Kitten Mittons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 09:53 PM
  #7
STC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 746
vCash: 500
This is as no brainer as no brainers get. Hawks are proven winners who already swept the Sharks out of the playoffs en route to a Stanley Cup whereas Sharks are proven playoff chokers.

Hawks in 4. AINEC.

STC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 09:54 PM
  #8
Leidi J
Registered User
 
Leidi J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Grd Rapids, Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 3,900
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by STC View Post
This is as no brainer as no brainers get. Hawks are proven winners who already swept the Sharks out of the playoffs en route to a Stanley Cup whereas Sharks are proven playoff chokers.

Hawks in 4. AINEC.
this wins for the stupidest thing i've read tonight. Congratulations

Leidi J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:01 PM
  #9
MrFunnyWobbl
Why?
 
MrFunnyWobbl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: My House, Duh.
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,662
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to MrFunnyWobbl
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigPAVELSKI View Post
this wins for the stupidest thing i've read tonight. Congratulations
He has a point, although an odd context.

I'll take the hawks in 7.

MrFunnyWobbl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:01 PM
  #10
Ninja Hertl
formerly sharkohol
 
Ninja Hertl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Yay
Country: United States
Posts: 5,422
vCash: 500
sharks don't have Burns, so hawks in 6.

Ninja Hertl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:02 PM
  #11
WarriorOfGandhi
Was saying Boo-urns
 
WarriorOfGandhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Country: Scotland
Posts: 14,748
vCash: 500
the difference between both clubs is by no means large but I'd take the team with Niemi in net over the team with Crawford

WarriorOfGandhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:03 PM
  #12
JayKing
Go Habs Go
 
JayKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,148
vCash: 135
Hawks in 6. Deeper offense + too many injuries for the Sharks.

JayKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:10 PM
  #13
VerySuperFamous
Registered User
 
VerySuperFamous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kelowna, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,160
vCash: 500
Hawks in 6. If Burns was back already Sharks in 5-6.

VerySuperFamous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:11 PM
  #14
Barrie22
Shark fan in hiding
 
Barrie22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,036
vCash: 500
hawks 6-0
sharks 5-0

hawks 22 goals for
sharks 23 goals for

hawks 13 goals against
sharks 8 goals against

hawks power play 25.9% (10th in the league)
sharks power play 37.5% (1st in the league)

hawks penalty kill 95.6% (2nd in the league)
sharks penalty kill 78.3% (17th in the league)

Barrie22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:14 PM
  #15
Leidi J
Registered User
 
Leidi J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Grd Rapids, Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 3,900
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFunnyWobbl View Post
He has a point, although an odd context.

I'll take the hawks in 7.
a point? not sure how a playoff series almost 4 years ago has anything to do with now. the teams are soooo different. hell the goalie for one is now the goalie for the other. you're welcome to think the hawks would beat the sharks, but you're logic is flawed.

Leidi J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:15 PM
  #16
Moore Money
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,668
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrie22 View Post
hawks 6-0
sharks 5-0

hawks 22 goals for
sharks 23 goals for

hawks 13 goals against
sharks 8 goals against

hawks power play 25.9% (10th in the league)
sharks power play 37.5% (1st in the league)

hawks penalty kill 95.6% (2nd in the league)
sharks penalty kill 78.3% (17th in the league)
this all means nothing head to head. Hawks are a bad matchup for the sharks. Hawks for sure.

Moore Money is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:17 PM
  #17
SillyRabbit
Trix Are For Kids
 
SillyRabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,178
vCash: 500
People are overrating Burns, he's not that big of a factor.

I'd take Hawks in 6.

If Burns was in the lineup i'd still take Hawks in 6.

SillyRabbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:17 PM
  #18
Billy Mays Here
Optimistic Pessimist
 
Billy Mays Here's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 14,412
vCash: 827
Marleau and Thornton would light up Emery and Crawford. Sharks in 6.

Billy Mays Here is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:25 PM
  #19
Barrie22
Shark fan in hiding
 
Barrie22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,036
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoolChamp View Post
this all means nothing head to head. Hawks are a bad matchup for the sharks. Hawks for sure.
last years season series, won by the sharks. 2-1-1.
2010-11 season series, won by the sharks. 3-1-0
2009-10 season series, won by the hawks. 1-2-1

Barrie22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:27 PM
  #20
MessierII
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,908
vCash: 500
Hawks in 7 sharks are red hot right now but Jonothan Toews plays for the Hawks.

MessierII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 10:57 PM
  #21
STC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 746
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigPAVELSKI View Post
this wins for the stupidest thing i've read tonight. Congratulations

What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.

STC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 11:04 PM
  #22
Sky04
Registered User
 
Sky04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 9,065
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by STC View Post
What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.
Everything you said is ridiculous, and further proves you don't know what your talking about at all. I'd stop posting for a bit, watch some games then maybe after thinking about what you write before you post it, come back.

"sharks are chokers"- already nullifies any credibility you have, hawks have hoisted the SC? oh right, why don't they beat Vancouver every time in the playoffs then? Good logic A+ right there.

Sky04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 11:05 PM
  #23
Clowe Me
Registered User
 
Clowe Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 530
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 23,125
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by STC View Post
What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.
The Blackhawks have also lost their past 2 playoff series'. By your logic, they are proven losers and jokes.

Clowe Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 11:10 PM
  #24
Arrch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NorCal
Country: United States
Posts: 4,449
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by STC View Post
What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.
Which Shark peed in your Cheerios this morning?

Arrch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-27-2013, 11:17 PM
  #25
Dominate Kesler
Registered User
 
Dominate Kesler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 812
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by STC View Post
What did I say that was incorrect?


Is it not true that the Sharks are a team full of playoff chokers who will no doubt choke again this spring?

And is it not true that most of the key players on the Hawks have already hoisted the Cup?

Easy sweep for the Hawks, Sharks are a joke and have been for a very long time.
Stop acting like the Blackhawks as a franchise are dominant in the post season.

You do realize you got bounced in the first round the past 2 seasons right? How about all those years before you finally manage to win one?

Also, Crawford is seriously awful. That's a huge advantage the Sharks have over the Blackhawks. At least Niemi is average to above average.

Dominate Kesler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.