HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Edmonton Oilers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Comrie's Trade Value

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-20-2003, 05:56 AM
  #1
Lowetide
Registered User
 
Lowetide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,281
vCash: 500
Comrie's Trade Value

It's been an interesting read in the last few days in regard to what young Mike Comrie might fetch in a trade. I have to admit to being somewhat shocked by some suggestions (Kovalchuk) and underwhelmed by others.

One of the problems with getting a fair idea of his value is that Comrie is constantly called things like "a solid #2 center" which implies he's at the very best the NHL's 31st best centerman.

Not so. Even last season when he was injured, Comrie's totals put him 89th in league scoring, 34th among centermen (this according to McKeen's definition of centermen. There are likely some guys who play on the wing more often, but we'll go with that). Among the centermen ahead of him were Mike York (88th), Daymond Langkow (86th), Chris Drury (81st), Radek Bonk (80th) and Scott Gomez (77th).

I think it's fair to say that Mike Comrie is a top line centerman by the strictest definition. He's among the 30 best players in the league at his position. Agreed?

Okay, so if we can agree on that, where do we peg his value? Is he better than ALL of the players listed above? Let's take the list above and go through it one by one.


Is he better than Mike York? Hmmm. Comrie's best season (33-27-60) and York's finest (20-41-61) are fairly similar, and York has more dimensions to his game than does Comrie. If there was an expansion draft, and they were both available, I'd take York.

Next up is Daymond Langkow. He's three years older, and bigger. Langkow has been discussed so often on this forum it seems like he's an Oiler at least in spirit. He's had offensive seasons that wouldn't look out of place alongside Comrie's, and has blossomed the last 4 seasons. Still, Comrie's offense is a little stronger, and Langkow is at an age where he may have peaked. I'd call this a draw too.

Chris Drury is a more versatile player than Comrie, but Comrie has a little more ability with the puck imo. Drury's best offensive seasons (24-41-65 in 00-01) are about where Comrie is, but Drury hasn't stepped forward since that season. We don't know that Comrie will, but it's a bet I'd take. So, considering that Drury has more tools, we'll call this a draw.

Radek Bonk is 4 years older than Comrie, and making a whack of cash (3.2) by Oilers standards. Still, when compared to Comrie, Bonk's wide range of skills exceeds Comrie's abilities imo. Bonk is a big man, is very smart without the puck and has been known to get physical. His PPG totals over the last three seasons (.77,.85,.80) are better than Comrie's (.74,.73,.54). Of the players on this list, Bonk is clearly the best imo.

Scott Gomez is the same age as Comrie, and although bigger he's no tiger. Gomez has fallen off as a scorer since Alex Mogilny left, and is probably not quite Comrie's equal as an offensive player. He, like Comrie, doesn't have alot of secondary skills that add value to his game. I'd say Comrie is a touch better.

So, by my estimate, Comrie is not the equal of Bonk, but is a better player at this time than Gomez. He's on par with Drury, Langkow and York, although York has a slight edge.

Is that fair? If you picked up the paper and saw that Comrie had been dealt for Daymond Langkow or Scott Gomez, would that be out of whack?

Lowetide is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 06:47 AM
  #2
Walsher
Registered User
 
Walsher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,339
vCash: 500
Good insights on this point! Personally, I think that there is no way the Oiler's will deal Comrie now or in a few years. His potential is unlimited as shown by his last couple seasons even though injuries slowed him last year. Langkow to me would be a good pickup but IMO Daymond has maxed out or close to maxed out his potential. He has been in the league a while now and his style will only allow him to go so high offensively - defensively a different story. I would equate Gomez much closer than Langkow. Gomez has lots of upside. He is young, skilled, and extremely experienced even though he is young. If you could add a guy with youth to an Oilers team lacking any cup rings other than in the pressbox and coaching staff it would have to be a good influence. BUT Comrie is still much more skilled and suited for an Oilers game. To me the only deal that would provide the Oilers with what they need (young, cheap, fast, skilled, big centerman) would be a deal to San Jose for Marleau. He could have been available in the past but now he is set to become one of the elite players in the league IMO. In essence there is nothing available that would up grade from Comrie without increasing payroll substantially. That said I would not expect any moves. His value right now is nothing compared to what it can be in the future.

Walsher is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 06:55 AM
  #3
Lowetide
Registered User
 
Lowetide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,281
vCash: 500
Agree completely Walsher, the BEST result is that Comrie stays here and the Oilers win with him. I keep dropping by the Oilers site and tsn hoping there's a headline COMRIE SIGNS!

Lowetide is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 08:11 AM
  #4
hockeyaddict101
Registered User
 
hockeyaddict101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 19,905
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowetide
Agree completely Walsher, the BEST result is that Comrie stays here and the Oilers win with him. I keep dropping by the Oilers site and tsn hoping there's a headline COMRIE SIGNS!
Me too, but I have the feeling he did ask to be traded. Lowe didn't deny it when he was asked at the press conference, I believe his response was that he wasn't going to comment.

I hope I am completely wrong on this one because I hope too he signs!

hockeyaddict101 is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 08:15 AM
  #5
Walsher
Registered User
 
Walsher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,339
vCash: 500
If Lowe is smart he won't trade him. His value is so low compared to what it will be. Comrie has no legs to stand on - he will crack before the Oilers do. No arbitration rights, not a ufa, only been in the league a couple full seasons, in his home town with everyone pressuring him to sign. Guaranteed he will sign - even if it is a one year deal to get through cba. To trade Comrie would be foolish.

Walsher is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 08:52 AM
  #6
speeds
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St.Albert
Posts: 6,823
vCash: 500
got to agree Walsher, I wonder if, in theory, it comes to the point where you know things won't work out long term, they'd probably be better off to get him signed to a one year deal, play the hell out of him - let him build up his stats - and move him at the trade deadline???

speeds is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 08:59 AM
  #7
Hemsky01
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 255
vCash: 500
Well I've read about a 1000 opinions (from here to oilfans) on Mikey and here is my two cents worth. Nobody that anyone here has mentioned (outside of maybe Simon Gagne) would make up for the whole in the lineup that Comrie leaves. And lets not forget, he scored 50 plus points in a year where he missed a pile of game and in a year where we would all agree he didn't nearly play his best hockey. He lead the Oilers with 6 game winning goals in a year where everyone seems to think he sucked. If that is what they call the dread sophmore jinx, I want to see what this guy can do. A friend of mine played with Comrie in Kootney and said he was one of the most motivated guys he had ever seen. I'm sorry. I'm not say KLowe is doing the wrong thing by not giving him the money he's asking for but there is no way Comrie goes anywhere without a legit young star coming back. In my books, Comrie will be a 80 - 90pt. player some day.(The Briere comparisons are laughable) I'm not saying his trade value is that of a 80 - 90 pt player, just that that is his potential. I would take him over Datsyk, Zetterberg but again, that is just my opinion. Hope Lowe doesn't trade him because what he could get for him now would never be enough.

Hemsky01 is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 09:16 AM
  #8
Mr Sakich
Registered User
 
Mr Sakich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Motel 35
Posts: 8,100
vCash: 500
the thing about comrie is that it is more than just points that set his value. This is a young man who didn't back off the challenge of being a 1st line centre in his first full year in the nhl ( in his hometown ). Most kids would have froze or choked on that. It is not like minny where the fans are happy if you show up. IN edm, they demand a winner.

He was born a millionaire but yet managed to make the nhl as a 5'9" player. That tells me he has guts to spare. At any time during his hockey career, he could have given up and gone home to daddy's millions. IMO, it is much harder for a rich kid to succeed in sports than it is for a ghetto black kid because the rich kid has alternatives.

He has put up better numbers than havlat and very close to gaborik. IMO, he will end up being better than gaborik because he will never quit trying. That is his trade value.

Mr Sakich is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 10:22 AM
  #9
Lowetide
Registered User
 
Lowetide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,281
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thor dyck
He has put up better numbers than havlat and very close to gaborik. IMO, he will end up being better than gaborik because he will never quit trying. That is his trade value.
imo Havlat's quite abit ahead of Comrie. He's bigger and despite playing on the 3line and getting fewer minutes Havlat keeps getting better. His three year ppg totals (.58,.69,.88) show tremendous growth. Comrie is no slouch (.54.,.73,.74) but is getting more minutes (17.5 for Comrie and 16.2 for Havlat) and has superior linemates.

Gaborik is also better than Comrie. His ppg totals (.51,.86,.80) and goal totals (18,30,30) have come on a team that is dedicated to keeping the score low. Gaborik is 18 months younger than Comrie, and has scored 78 goals to Comrie's 61. Gaborik is right at the very top of the NHL's young players imo, just behind Heatley.

I don't think Comrie is on par with these two. Helluva player, though, and I hope he signs soon.

Lowetide is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 10:32 AM
  #10
G-Double
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: left coast
Posts: 979
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to G-Double
on the intial post, i don't think that it is fair to say that the top 30 scoring center are actually the top 30 centers in the league and by defaul, those 30 are all ifrst line centers because there are 30 teams in the league. Some teams don't have first line centers and others have 2 possibly 3, one of which is playing the wing.

I know some guys who played with and knew him when h was at michigan and while you can say he was motivated he was also a pompous a-hole, something i've heard numerous times. I thought it was fiunny earlier in the year in one of Guy's interviews when he asked Stoll about his relationship with comrie, beacuse i see thre two o them as being complete opposites off the ice.

Anyway, Comrie is good, would he be tgis good if he weren't spoiled with everything that the Oilers org has given him? Did he deserve it or was he fortunate enough to sstep into a situation that allowed it all to fall into place?? I think comrie would have a bit of a rude awakening going somwhere else to play on a 2nd line, where his wingers were not the best players on the ice and the defensive pairing behind him was more like the 3/4 and not the 1-2...

Disclaimer...i have more to say but i'm typing and i can't see the letters until i post it, hence all the mispellings and 3rd grade jibberish.

G-Double is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 10:57 AM
  #11
Chayos
Registered User
 
Chayos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Whitehorse, Yukon
Posts: 2,693
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thor dyck
the thing about comrie is that it is more than just points that set his value. This is a young man who didn't back off the challenge of being a 1st line centre in his first full year in the nhl ( in his hometown ). Most kids would have froze or choked on that. It is not like minny where the fans are happy if you show up. IN edm, they demand a winner.

He was born a millionaire but yet managed to make the nhl as a 5'9" player. That tells me he has guts to spare. At any time during his hockey career, he could have given up and gone home to daddy's millions. IMO, it is much harder for a rich kid to succeed in sports than it is for a ghetto black kid because the rich kid has alternatives.

He has put up better numbers than havlat and very close to gaborik. IMO, he will end up being better than gaborik because he will never quit trying. That is his trade value.
IMO Comrie is in the league with Drury, Lankow, Datsyuk, Gomez, Morrison. What his trade value is right now is tough to tell epsecially with the clamp down teams have on spending. My preference would be for the oil to keep him unless you can get value. If we could get good value for him then i say move him so our top 6 doesn't have 2 Shrimps in it. I think the evaluation of him versus mike york is pretty close and so we have a plyer ready to step in and replace Comrie. York would not be a downgrade and the player we would get back would be pretty good too.

I think the best solution is Trading Mike Comrie for a D-man so that we have a solid d-core for this coming season and years to come. We have player who could step up to a top 6 role to replace MC but we have no d-men ready to step into a top 4 role on D to replace Smith or staois.

I think this decision is a slam dunk if we can get good value for him

Chayos is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 11:27 AM
  #12
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Registered User
 
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,646
vCash: 500
Solid post LT, I'd take Comrie over York just because of the type of player I prefer, but other than that, agree totally.


Chayos: Who exactly is this top-six player that's ready? I sure don't see anyone in the next 2-3 years.

LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 03:21 PM
  #13
fedabiblio
Registered User
 
fedabiblio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 180
vCash: 500
You think it would be possible to get Spezza out of Ottawa for young Comrie? Maybe Moreau and Comrie for Spezza?

fedabiblio is offline  
Old
09-20-2003, 03:26 PM
  #14
s7ark
Moderator
TheWorstEver
 
s7ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,195
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fedabiblio
You think it would be possible to get Spezza out of Ottawa for young Comrie? Maybe Moreau and Comrie for Spezza?
Sen fans turn murderous when talk turns to Spezza leaving town... That trade proposal has been bashed around previously on these boards and was shot down by all Senator fans.

That being said, i really think it is a solid proposal... But it will never happen

s7ark is offline  
Old
09-21-2003, 02:54 PM
  #15
TkachevYak2Slepy
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Saskatoon
Country: Canada
Posts: 880
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowetide
imo Havlat's quite abit ahead of Comrie. He's bigger and despite playing on the 3line and getting fewer minutes Havlat keeps getting better. His three year ppg totals (.58,.69,.88) show tremendous growth. Comrie is no slouch (.54.,.73,.74) but is getting more minutes (17.5 for Comrie and 16.2 for Havlat) and has superior linemates.

Gaborik is also better than Comrie. His ppg totals (.51,.86,.80) and goal totals (18,30,30) have come on a team that is dedicated to keeping the score low. Gaborik is 18 months younger than Comrie, and has scored 78 goals to Comrie's 61. Gaborik is right at the very top of the NHL's young players imo, just behind Heatley.

I don't think Comrie is on par with these two. Helluva player, though, and I hope he signs soon.
I consider his current value equivalent to the team to that of Lightnings Martin St. Louis
with more long range potential being so young.
Not having the insight of whats he is asking, we can only speculate
its a overinflated contract comparable to that signed by TB Brad Richard.
Nevertheless, sign him with performance bonuses or TRADE him ..don't drag this out
Having Comrie locked out ( not participating in training camp)
does not make sense. It hurts the entire team and his trade value, period.
He is 22 and the oil are better team with him than without him.
Sign him and if he doesn't meet expectations for dollars
spent , then bundle him and trade him for what the market will offer, come march ...

TkachevYak2Slepy is offline  
Old
09-21-2003, 05:48 PM
  #16
Dr_Gonz0
Registered User
 
Dr_Gonz0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,235
vCash: 50
My take on the Comrie trade is this. If Smyth works as our #1 centre, then we want a good defensively strong 2way centre for our 2nd line, so my proposal is this:

Comrie + a 4th rounder for Handzus and Woywitka

Dr_Gonz0 is offline  
Old
09-21-2003, 07:52 PM
  #17
FacelessButcher
Registered User
 
FacelessButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,201
vCash: 500
Two of the better looking possible comrie trades in Legwand and Boyton look slightly less promising now as both have sustained an injury.Boyton hamstring and Legwand hip pointer.

FacelessButcher is offline  
Old
09-21-2003, 11:55 PM
  #18
Chayos
Registered User
 
Chayos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Whitehorse, Yukon
Posts: 2,693
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Solid post LT, I'd take Comrie over York just because of the type of player I prefer, but other than that, agree totally.


Chayos: Who exactly is this top-six player that's ready? I sure don't see anyone in the next 2-3 years.
We have horcoff or Reasoner ready to step into the 2nd line center role and York as !st line center to replace comrie. That would leave us with a top 6 of


Smyth York Hemsky
Isbister Horcoff Dvorak.


or Reasoner instead of Dvorak. I think you have to give top 6 minute to a player for him to become one they just don't step into that role without being prodigy's. We as a team would be better served getting a D-man for Comrie. We have drafted centers 2 years running so we have to be ready for the season of 2005 and we haven't got anyone close to being ready on Defense

Chayos is offline  
Old
09-22-2003, 12:13 PM
  #19
Master Lok
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,901
vCash: 500
Let Comrie sit. His trade value will NOT drop very much. He's young and has no arbitration rights. In short, the Oilers have MC by his jockstrap. The only way for them to let the jockstrap go is if the Oilers get into an early season slump.

Master Lok is offline  
Old
09-22-2003, 12:57 PM
  #20
FlyerFire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,188
vCash: 500
Comrie modest proposal

let me say first,i REALLY like the OILERS,they are not my favorite team but i like them very much.i like them for the fact that they can win with a small payroll(Ottawa also) and are always tough to beat,period.when the Great one was there they beat my FLYERS,but i won't hold grudges that was a great team.so i'd propose a trade(and please be gentle).i know the Oil could use size up the middle.How about K.Primeau and a 1st for Comrie or maybe Primo,1st, and SIKLENKA(6'5 wing) or MCNEIL(6'2 minor center) i am not trying to get a top heavy deal-just fair value. any possibilities?MAYBE add VANDERMEER,or THERIEN (2 good sized defenders instaed of Siklenka or Mcneil?

FlyerFire is offline  
Old
09-22-2003, 01:06 PM
  #21
creative giant*
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 3,543
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebellionhellion2002
How about K.Primeau and a 1st for Comrie or maybe Primo,1st, and SIKLENKA(6'5 wing) or MCNEIL(6'2 minor center) i am not trying to get a top heavy deal-just fair value. any possibilities?MAYBE add VANDERMEER,or THERIEN (2 good sized defenders instaed of Siklenka or Mcneil?
put in handzus instead of primeau and i'd take it

creative giant* is offline  
Old
09-22-2003, 01:09 PM
  #22
theoil
Registered User
 
theoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,155
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by creative giant
put in handzus instead of primeau and i'd take it
Not that I want Primeau either but can we PLEASE stop with the Handzus to Edmonton proposals. PLEASE

theoil is offline  
Old
09-22-2003, 01:16 PM
  #23
FlyerFire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,188
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by creative giant
put in handzus instead of primeau and i'd take it
if i were the Oil i would too.don't think Hitchcock will tho.what about if the Flys picked up most of salary?you can see my not wanting to deal zus,huh?i like primo and all but zus is better,IMO,younger and cheaper.

FlyerFire is offline  
Old
09-22-2003, 01:33 PM
  #24
Ryno
BEHOLD!!
 
Ryno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: G.P
Country: Canada
Posts: 529
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebellionhellion2002
if i were the Oil i would too.don't think Hitchcock will tho.what about if the Flys picked up most of salary?you can see my not wanting to deal zus,huh?i like primo and all but zus is better,IMO,younger and cheaper.
Unless you're picking up ALL of the salary, Primeau stays in Philly.

$5 million dollars? Yuck.

Ryno is offline  
Old
09-22-2003, 02:08 PM
  #25
Master Lok
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoil
Not that I want Primeau either but can we PLEASE stop with the Handzus to Edmonton proposals. PLEASE
Agreed, Handzus is a terrible deal for Comrie.

Master Lok is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.