HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Pit/col

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-05-2013, 06:00 PM
  #1
DoctrSteveBrule
BrooksOrpeck
 
DoctrSteveBrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,604
vCash: 500
Pit/col

I don't know much about Ryan O'Byrne and how he is received in Colorado but I like his game and I think he could bring what the pens need on D right now if they want to move Despres for a winger at the deadline. Again, I really don't know anything about his value but with all of Colorado's injuries, they surely have some holes in the top 6.

A tweener guy like Kennedy or Tangradi could be useful in a temporary top 6 role and could be moved down once they get healthy.

so how about

Kennedy for Ryan O'Byrne

or

Tangradi + 3rd for Ryan O'Byrne



thoughts?

DoctrSteveBrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 06:03 PM
  #2
Prairie Habs
Registered User
 
Prairie Habs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,488
vCash: 500
"These guys aren't good enough to play in our top 6 despite the fact that we have been looking for top 6 wingers years. They should be good enough for you though."

I don't think the value is actually that bad, I just laughed at the idea of selling Kennedy and especially Tangradi as top 6 players.

Edit: thought it was Tangradi + 2nd. Its not as close as with a 3rd.

Prairie Habs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 06:04 PM
  #3
BrickAHL
Go JML Go!
 
BrickAHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,321
vCash: 0
The Kennedy trade would be great.

BrickAHL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 06:04 PM
  #4
Crisp Breakout
Registered User
 
Crisp Breakout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 2,891
vCash: 50
I'd take the Kennedy deal.

Crisp Breakout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 06:05 PM
  #5
DoctrSteveBrule
BrooksOrpeck
 
DoctrSteveBrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,604
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prairie Habs View Post
"These guys aren't good enough to play in our top 6 despite the fact that we have been looking for top 6 wingers years. They should be good enough for you though."

I don't think the value is actually that bad, I just laughed at the idea of selling Kennedy and especially Tangradi as top 6 players.
I specifically crowned them as top 6 fill ins and 3rd liners for a reason haha.

I mean Kennedy has scored 20+ each of the last 2 years and Tangradi is really no different then Palushaj, who they likely acquired for the same purpose

DoctrSteveBrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 06:06 PM
  #6
WarriorOfGandhi
Was saying Boo-urns
 
WarriorOfGandhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Country: Scotland
Posts: 10,790
vCash: 500
I'd do Kennedy for ROB. No interest in Tangradi, he's barely an NHL player.

WarriorOfGandhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 06:10 PM
  #7
Avs_19
Peter the Great
 
Avs_19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 22,964
vCash: 50
I would probably do either one of those trades. It doesn't matter if Kennedy/Tangradi is terrible, just getting O'Byrne out of the line up makes the trade worth it. He can't skate, can't shoot, can't pass, can't handle the puck, and he isn't very physical even though he is 6'5" and 230+ lbs. He is decent at blocking shots though.

Avs_19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 07:55 PM
  #8
cgf
Registered User
 
cgf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,986
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avs_19 View Post
I would probably do either one of those trades. It doesn't matter if Kennedy/Tangradi is terrible, just getting O'Byrne out of the line up makes the trade worth it. He can't skate, can't shoot, can't pass, can't handle the puck, and he isn't very physical even though he is 6'5" and 230+ lbs. He is decent at blocking shots though.
Stop. ROB's been bad this year, and doesn't understand that he stick isn't just for smacking the puck away from players and corralling them, but he was a good defensive defensemen last year, and once he shakes of the rust he should be this year.

cgf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 07:57 PM
  #9
AvsFan20
77 33 19 21 (52)
 
AvsFan20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 2,482
vCash: 50
Would love Kennedy on this team.

AvsFan20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 08:07 PM
  #10
Nihiliste
Registered User
 
Nihiliste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,456
vCash: 765
Another poster who would probably do the Kennedy deal. Definitely not Tangradi though.

Nihiliste is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 08:11 PM
  #11
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 6,192
vCash: 50
Meh, Avs have no room for Kennedy when healthy. Which is almost never. But I like ROB still and think he can be a long term solution for us when used appropriately. I'd only say yes if I didn't plan on keeping him around, personally I would keep ROB.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 08:14 PM
  #12
Pierce Hawthorne
Formerly Avsare1
 
Pierce Hawthorne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Caverns of Draconis
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,201
vCash: 599
And another Avs fan who would do the Kennedy deal. Actually a decent trade for both teams.

Obyrne has been weak so far this year, but once he shaked off the new season jitters he'll be a solid Defensive guy again.

Kennedy would be nice though, could potentially be a decent 3C replacement if he who shall not be named continues his Russian ways. Although Mitchell is filling in quite well in the 3C role right now.

As for Tangradi, wouldn't do it if it was a 3rd, but a 2nd is a lot closer. I would probably pull the trigger on Tangradi + 2nd.

Pierce Hawthorne is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 08:16 PM
  #13
TorstenFrings
wieder zuhause!!!
 
TorstenFrings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Country: Germany
Posts: 2,674
vCash: 500
Meh, I am not invested in this. I don´t want any more D that isn´t a top4 upgrade, so wouldn´t want to trade for O'Byrne at all. It`s probably fair, if unneccessary, though.

TorstenFrings is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 08:27 PM
  #14
Nihiliste
Registered User
 
Nihiliste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,456
vCash: 765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avsare1 View Post
And another Avs fan who would do the Kennedy deal. Actually a decent trade for both teams.

Obyrne has been weak so far this year, but once he shaked off the new season jitters he'll be a solid Defensive guy again.

Kennedy would be nice though, could potentially be a decent 3C replacement if he who shall not be named continues his Russian ways. Although Mitchell is filling in quite well in the 3C role right now.

As for Tangradi, wouldn't do it if it was a 3rd, but a 2nd is a lot closer. I would probably pull the trigger on Tangradi + 2nd.
Tangradi is no more useful than Kevin Porter, but yeah if someone offered a 2nd for O'byrne the Avs would obviously take it.

Nihiliste is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 08:49 PM
  #15
Rowdy Roddy Peeper
Search and Destroy
 
Rowdy Roddy Peeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,756
vCash: 500
The Pens have absolutely no need for O'Byrne.

The whole defense (including Despres and Bortuzzo) is playing great, and that's even with Niskanen on the sidelines. When he comes back, our defense will be sitting a quality defenseman.

Rowdy Roddy Peeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 09:14 PM
  #16
OCPenguin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,231
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctrSteveBrule View Post
I don't know much about Ryan O'Byrne and how he is received in Colorado but I like his game and I think he could bring what the pens need on D right now if they want to move Despres for a winger at the deadline. Again, I really don't know anything about his value but with all of Colorado's injuries, they surely have some holes in the top 6.

A tweener guy like Kennedy or Tangradi could be useful in a temporary top 6 role and could be moved down once they get healthy.

so how about

Kennedy for Ryan O'Byrne

or

Tangradi + 3rd for Ryan O'Byrne



thoughts?
Totally random idea

Despres isn't going anywhere.

OCPenguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2013, 09:31 PM
  #17
Zen Arcade
eat the record cover
 
Zen Arcade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 12,417
vCash: 500
In spite of what some Pens fans think, Kennedy is a solid role player. Why are we moving him for something we don't need?

Zen Arcade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-06-2013, 12:37 AM
  #18
jmelm
HFBoards Sponsor
 
jmelm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,492
vCash: 500
If we trade Kennedy, it should be part of a package (i.e. + Matta + a pick/prospect) to acquire a legit top-6 winger.


The last thing we need in Pitts is another Dman. We do need an upgrade on the wing, however; and while I do not want to trade Kennedy for another 3rd line winger (which would be a lateral move at best), I would happily trade him as part of a larger deal for an upgrade in the top-6.

jmelm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-06-2013, 12:52 AM
  #19
CobraAcesS
Registered User
 
CobraAcesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Seattle
Country: United States
Posts: 2,323
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonewolfe2015 View Post
Meh, Avs have no room for Kennedy when healthy. Which is almost never. But I like ROB still and think he can be a long term solution for us when used appropriately. I'd only say yes if I didn't plan on keeping him around, personally I would keep ROB.
Yeah people are a little quick to sour on a player, ROB has had his ups and downs but if he was ACTUALLY used as a bottom pair shutdown guy for us instead of a top 4 defender then he would be great. O'Byrne is good enough to fill in as a top 4 but that shouldn't be his role.

And yes he really needs to shake off that rust, watching him throw the puck into the stands made it really hard for me not to question my loyalty to him as a guy I want to keep around. But hes been good for us since we got him, he should of been skating and not 'coaching' during the lockout.

CobraAcesS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-06-2013, 12:58 AM
  #20
Captain Hook
Derick Pouliot
 
Captain Hook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 10,883
vCash: 500
This proposal is so meh for both sides.

Captain Hook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-06-2013, 01:01 AM
  #21
Mouse21
Registered User
 
Mouse21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,080
vCash: 2171
why in the **** would you want OB? lol
done.

Mouse21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-06-2013, 01:09 AM
  #22
DoctrSteveBrule
BrooksOrpeck
 
DoctrSteveBrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,604
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowdy Roddy Peeper View Post
The Pens have absolutely no need for O'Byrne.

The whole defense (including Despres and Bortuzzo) is playing great, and that's even with Niskanen on the sidelines. When he comes back, our defense will be sitting a quality defenseman.
agreed. I just figured later in the year if we need to acquire a winger, having an extra D-man with experience could be helpful. This isn't one of those trade that I think the pens NEED to do now or ever but if we wanted to make a move later on. Having another established D-man could be helpful. I know we'll be sitting a quality defenseman when Nisky gets back but we'll be in a trouble if we have to move one of them later on.

EDIT: Also didn't know many avs fans had such a low opinion of O'Byrne. Maybe he's not the guy to target but I figure a trade like this might happen at some point during the year

DoctrSteveBrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-06-2013, 01:44 AM
  #23
PAZ
.
 
PAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,776
vCash: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctrSteveBrule View Post
agreed. I just figured later in the year if we need to acquire a winger, having an extra D-man with experience could be helpful. This isn't one of those trade that I think the pens NEED to do now or ever but if we wanted to make a move later on. Having another established D-man could be helpful. I know we'll be sitting a quality defenseman when Nisky gets back but we'll be in a trouble if we have to move one of them later on.

EDIT: Also didn't know many avs fans had such a low opinion of O'Byrne. Maybe he's not the guy to target but I figure a trade like this might happen at some point during the year
He was solid for us last year, probably one of our most consistent defenders after EJ.

This year... i'd trade him for a 7th if we didn't have all these injuries. However, he's helping us draft Jones so I can live with his boneheaded mistakes.

PAZ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-06-2013, 06:46 AM
  #24
Pierce Hawthorne
Formerly Avsare1
 
Pierce Hawthorne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Caverns of Draconis
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,201
vCash: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nihiliste View Post
Tangradi is no more useful than Kevin Porter, but yeah if someone offered a 2nd for O'byrne the Avs would obviously take it.
Exactly. Not so much Tangradi I would want there, just getting a 2nd back for Obyrne.

And I wouldn't say Tangradi is as bad as some make him out to be. He at least still has the potential to be a 3rd liner IMO.

Pierce Hawthorne is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-06-2013, 07:35 AM
  #25
Rowdy Roddy Peeper
Search and Destroy
 
Rowdy Roddy Peeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,756
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctrSteveBrule View Post
agreed. I just figured later in the year if we need to acquire a winger, having an extra D-man with experience could be helpful. This isn't one of those trade that I think the pens NEED to do now or ever but if we wanted to make a move later on. Having another established D-man could be helpful. I know we'll be sitting a quality defenseman when Nisky gets back but we'll be in a trouble if we have to move one of them later on.
True. Especially if we sustain a couple injuries.

Rowdy Roddy Peeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.