HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

When Lupul Returns

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-10-2013, 01:58 PM
  #51
My Sweet Shadow
Registered User
 
My Sweet Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sioux Lookout, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,252
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cup67 View Post
gunnersson has to be moved, while he is on the injured list, cause if we activate him we will be over the 23 man roster, now what?
My feeling is that we should send Komi down to the Marlies when Gunnar is ready to come back. Maybe he gets claimed, but more likely he clears and we get a $900K reduction in his cap hit.

My Sweet Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 01:59 PM
  #52
dannyboy8920
Registered User
 
dannyboy8920's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,807
vCash: 50
I'd have no problem starting Lupul with Kadri and seeing where it goes.


Carlyle preaches "earning your minutes" Lupul has done enough to jump right into number 1 wing. However, JVR has earned his minutes.

Mac on 4th line with Mcc and Maclaren.....Plugging Orr in when we need to.

dannyboy8920 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 02:00 PM
  #53
Epictetus
Moderator
Create yourself.
 
Epictetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,714
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by My Sweet Shadow View Post
We don't really have any big contracts on the books that we need to unload as it stands right now. Is this offseason the only time that we can use the two anmesty buyouts or can we hold on to them for future use?
You are allowed to use one this summer, or next year's summer.

These scenario's don't really help the Leafs, though. Only Komisarek has a deal where this would be relevant, while player's like Grabovski and Liles have some trade value, so it would not make sense to amnesty them.

The other option would be to trade for a bad contract, and then use the amnesty on the contract. You could acquire assets for taking on the contract, as well. I have yet to hear confirmation on if this is legal or not yet, though. If it is, this would be the Leaf's key financial advantage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by My Sweet Shadow View Post
Do the amnesty buy-outs need to be used in the coming offseason or can we hold on to them?

If they do need to be used, then one thing I've been thinking about is does anyone know if there's a rule against buying a player out and then signing them to a new contract? If it was allowed, then that could be a really effective move for some teams who don't have any glaring albatross contracts (i.e. buy out Phaneufs final year at $5.5M, meaning he'd get $1.83M for two years that didn't count against the cap, and then re-sign him to a contract that's like $1M/yr less than normal). Of course, there'd need to be some agreement between the team and player to make this work, but just a thought.
It would be illegal to do this, as I think it would count as a 'circumvention' of the CBA, and I can't see either the PA or League accepting it. It would fall under "re-structuring of contract."

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeke View Post
Not sure, but I'd guess it's a one-time window.

We're gonna have to use one at least on Komi. Other than that, any other contract we might want to move will be tradeable IMO.

I wonder if they can amnesty Tucker or Armstrong's last year of buyout caphit, maybe.
No, there is a window this summer and next summer.

Agreed on the second paragraph, see above.

And why would you use it on Tucker and Armstrong when the amount, namely, 1 million is insignificant and expiring soon (assuming this is possible)?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Goodman View Post
i'd rather keep komi, can't beleive i just said it but he's a good fit under carlyle.

the reason i say macarthur and gunnarsson is i think they could fetch a decent pick or prospect to help restock the farm. i'm perfectly fine with getting rid of steckel and keeping macarthur as insurance though.
Komisarek is mentioned because the Leafs have an amnesty clause and it can be used or not used. Since people do not like things to go to waste, he is the most logical choice. Not only is he not playing, but his contract goes for another year as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by My Sweet Shadow View Post
My feeling is that we should send Komi down to the Marlies when Gunnar is ready to come back. Maybe he gets claimed, but more likely he clears and we get a $900K reduction in his cap hit.
Komisarek has a 'NMC', meaning he cannot be sent down. If he did not have one of these clauses, then I think he would have already been sent down.

It's a shame, really. He could have been at least playing in the AHL rather than not playing in the NHL.


Last edited by Epictetus: 02-10-2013 at 02:08 PM.
Epictetus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 02:07 PM
  #54
Didact
lost a bet. sigh!!
 
Didact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,333
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by My Sweet Shadow View Post
My feeling is that we should send Komi down to the Marlies when Gunnar is ready to come back. Maybe he gets claimed, but more likely he clears and we get a $900K reduction in his cap hit.
Komi has a NMC, we won't be able to send him to the minors.

Didact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 02:10 PM
  #55
theIceWookie
formerly FinnishKule
 
theIceWookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,526
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyDangler 91 View Post
Curious to see what Carlyle will do with his lines when Lupul returns.
I'd like to see something like this

Lupul - Bozak - Kessel
Komarov - Grabovski - Kulemin (2a/checking line)
vanRiemsdyk - Kadri - Frattin (2b scoring)
McClaren - McClement - Orr

Bye bye MacArthur?
MacArthur's gone. We've all seen it for a while. There isn't a spot for him.

I'd like to see the lines rolled a little more even. Or roll Kessel/Bozak/JVR with the most and then even times for Grabo and Kadri's lines. Give us some balanced scoring that will be hard to shut down all at once.

theIceWookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 02:27 PM
  #56
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,012
vCash: 500
Does Lupul play on his off side to play with Kessel? Meaning is he more of a natural RW?

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 02:41 PM
  #57
Cool Beans Man
Registered User
 
Cool Beans Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,544
vCash: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by marty111 View Post
Does Lupul play on his off side to play with Kessel? Meaning is he more of a natural RW?
He's much more comfortable on the left side.

He played RW in Anaheim and he wanted to play LW but Carlyle didn't think he could.

When Carlyle came here, he apologized to Lupul, and said he's a much better fit on the left side.

Cool Beans Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 02:46 PM
  #58
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans Man View Post
He's much more comfortable on the left side.

He played RW in Anaheim and he wanted to play LW but Carlyle didn't think he could.

When Carlyle came here, he apologized to Lupul, and said he's a much better fit on the left side.
Ah okay... makes sense I guess although it would have helped having Lupul on RW.

So is this how it goes?

RW: Kessel, Kulemin, Frattin
LW: Lupul, JVR, Komorov, MacArthur

C: Grabovski, Kadri, Bozak, McClement

Most of out guys play the left side?

EDIT - I guess Frattin plays RW?

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 02:54 PM
  #59
Brewsky
King Of The Ice Mugs
 
Brewsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: King County
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,243
vCash: 653
Send a message via ICQ to Brewsky Send a message via AIM to Brewsky Send a message via MSN to Brewsky Send a message via Yahoo to Brewsky Send a message via Skype™ to Brewsky
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans Man View Post
He's much more comfortable on the left side.

He played RW in Anaheim and he wanted to play LW but Carlyle didn't think he could.

When Carlyle came here, he apologized to Lupul, and said he's a much better fit on the left side.
Wasn't it the other way around? Lupul wanted to play RW, but Caryle thought he couldn't because they had Perry and Selanne on the right side, so they stuck Lupul on the LW?

Brewsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 03:30 PM
  #60
zeke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,722
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Epictetus View Post
And why would you use it on Tucker and Armstrong when the amount, namely, 1 million is insignificant and expiring soon (assuming this is possible)?
well, because we have no other contracts that are amnesty-worthy.

zeke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 03:34 PM
  #61
Brody
What bet?
 
Brody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Valencia
Posts: 5,080
vCash: 50
Lupul - Bozak - Kessel
JVR - Grabovski - Kulemin
Komarov - Kadri - Frattin
McClaren - McClement - Orr

Ship out MacArthur and one of Steckel/Brown.

Brody is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 03:35 PM
  #62
zeke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,722
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by marty111 View Post
Ah okay... makes sense I guess although it would have helped having Lupul on RW.

So is this how it goes?

RW: Kessel, Kulemin, Frattin
LW: Lupul, JVR, Komorov, MacArthur

C: Grabovski, Kadri, Bozak, McClement

Most of out guys play the left side?

EDIT - I guess Frattin plays RW?
Randy really likes keeping players on their strong side, and with a healthy lineup he's almost there. Only Lupul and Kuly will be on their offwings, and they both thrive there so there's no reason to move them.


Lupul (R) - Kessel (R)
JVR (L) - Frattin (R)
Mac (L) - Kuly (L)
Koma (L) - Orr (R)

Phaneuf (L) - Kostka (R)
Liles (L) - Holzer (R)
Gunnar (L) - Franson (R)
Fraser (L) - Komi (R)


makes me think that unless Gardiner makes it impossible to keep him down, he's going to have a hard time cracking the squad any time soon.

This also makes me think that with lefties Gards and Rielly in the system, Liles and Gunnar are getting closer and closer to trade bait.....something I never would have wanted before, but with the quality play of Kostka, Holzer, Franson, and Fraser, and with Gardiner and Rielly coming up soon, is starting to make more sense.

zeke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 03:45 PM
  #63
SprDaVE
Registered User
 
SprDaVE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,833
vCash: 500
There's one top 9 forward and one defenseman too many.

Nonis has to get value here.

SprDaVE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 04:04 PM
  #64
rdawg1234
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,835
vCash: 500
Defense and MacA for 1st pick or prospect.


Which D-man do we trade though?

Phaneuf(top 4), Gardiner(top 4), Gunnar(top 4), Holzer(shutdown top 4), Liles(PP/5-6), Komi(6-7), Kostka(top 4 even strength), Fraser(6-7), Franson(PP, 5-6) are all capable of being NHL d-men

9 d-men, not counting Rielly who will make noise at camp next season. Komi won't be traded due to cap hit i'd say, so who goes? Franson? Kostka? Liles?

rdawg1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 04:07 PM
  #65
Small Brain Presence
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 379
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdosrun View Post
This.

Ron Wilson was terrible at juggling lines and when you see how well it can present opportunities under a decent coach, it is impressive.
Someone with your keen knowledge of hockey should get in touch with USA Hockey. Little did they know that all they needed was a "decent" coach and they would have walked away with gold at Vancouver.

Small Brain Presence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 04:07 PM
  #66
SeenSchenn2
Have Faith GLG
 
SeenSchenn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Thornhill, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,446
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdawg1234 View Post
Defense and MacA for 1st pick or prospect.


Which D-man do we trade though?

Phaneuf(top 4), Gardiner(top 4), Gunnar(top 4), Holzer(shutdown top 4), Liles(PP/5-6), Komi(6-7), Kostka(top 4 even strength), Fraser(6-7), Franson(PP, 5-6) are all capable of being NHL d-men

9 d-men, not counting Rielly who will make noise at camp next season. Komi won't be traded due to cap hit i'd say, so who goes? Franson? Kostka? Liles?
Liles/Franson are 5-6 dmen but Holzer/Kostka are top-4? Don't be ridiculous

SeenSchenn2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 04:10 PM
  #67
blasted_Sabre
Moderator
Warden of the North
 
blasted_Sabre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Muskoka
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,016
vCash: 500
Ya, gotta think its Mac, given Carlyle's direction.

blasted_Sabre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 04:10 PM
  #68
Small Brain Presence
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 379
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool Beans Man View Post
He's much more comfortable on the left side.

He played RW in Anaheim and he wanted to play LW but Carlyle didn't think he could.

When Carlyle came here, he apologized to Lupul, and said he's a much better fit on the left side.
This is impossible. You realize you're implying that Ron Wilson knows something about hockey?

Small Brain Presence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 04:12 PM
  #69
rdawg1234
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,835
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeenSchenn2 View Post
Liles/Franson are 5-6 dmen but Holzer/Kostka are top-4? Don't be ridiculous
I should say potential top 4. Liles is an OK top 4 guy, more suited to the PP time and less minutes. Franson is really only great at offense, average at d.

Holzer has been getting better every game, Kostka also has been calm throughout all of his games, great for the PK and even strength, not good for the PP though.

Like it's definitely arguable, but both have shown top 4 potential IMO at least.

rdawg1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 04:18 PM
  #70
SeenSchenn2
Have Faith GLG
 
SeenSchenn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Thornhill, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,446
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdawg1234 View Post
I should say potential top 4. Liles is an OK top 4 guy, more suited to the PP time and less minutes. Franson is really only great at offense, average at d.

Holzer has been getting better every game, Kostka also has been calm throughout all of his games, great for the PK and even strength, not good for the PP though.

Like it's definitely arguable, but both have shown top 4 potential IMO at least.
Yeah that's better wording. I think Liles/Franson have been great and shown why they are top-4 dmen, but again to each their own. I think Kostka is very average with the puck (somehow was PPG in the AHL though), but I find he sometimes makes poor decisions and fans a lot (ala Luke Schenn). He's been steady defensively though.

SeenSchenn2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 05:44 PM
  #71
LMFAO
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 935
vCash: 500
If we ever get healthy

Lupul - Bozak - Kessel
Van Riemsdyk - Kadri - Frattin
Kulemin - Grabovski - Komarov
Brown - Mclemment - Orr
Mac - Mclaren


I kinda like this group actually

LMFAO is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 05:51 PM
  #72
Bozak
Kule+Mcclement=heart
 
Bozak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,087
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyDangler 91 View Post
Curious to see what Carlyle will do with his lines when Lupul returns.
I'd like to see something like this

Lupul - Bozak - Kessel
Komarov - Grabovski - Kulemin (2a/checking line)
vanRiemsdyk - Kadri - Frattin (2b scoring)
McClaren - McClement - Orr

Bye bye MacArthur?
You can't break up the JVR-KESSEL combo. Despite Lupul-Kessel being amazing together the JVR-KESSEL combo is close to as good but there playing very well difference which is huge. Lupul could bring so much to the Grabo or Kadri line.


JVR - BOZAK - KESSEL
LUPUL - KADRI - FRATTIN
KULE - GRABO - KOMORAV
MAC - MCCLEMENT - ORR

Line 1: 19 minutes (scoring line 1)
Line 2: 17 minutes (scoring line 2)
Line 3: 18 minutes (shut down line)
Line 4: 6 minutes (Mcclement - Mac for special teams - PK) (Orr for intimidation)

Bozak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 05:52 PM
  #73
Bozak
Kule+Mcclement=heart
 
Bozak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,087
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozak View Post
You can't break up the JVR-KESSEL combo. Despite Lupul-Kessel being amazing together the JVR-KESSEL combo is close to as good but there playing very well difference which is huge. Lupul could bring so much to the Grabo or Kadri line.


JVR - BOZAK - KESSEL
LUPUL - KADRI - FRATTIN
KULE - GRABO - KOMORAV
MAC - MCCLEMENT - ORR

Line 1: 19 minutes (scoring line 1)
Line 2: 17 minutes (scoring line 2)
Line 3: 18 minutes (shut down line)
Line 4: 6 minutes (Mcclement - Mac for special teams - PK) (Orr for intimidation)
defense**

Bozak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 05:58 PM
  #74
DionPhaneuf3
Registered User
 
DionPhaneuf3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Brampton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,178
vCash: 500
Gonna be interesting to see how the first line is gonna look. Lupul + Kessel = dynamic duo of last year

But JVR and Kessel have proven to have similar chemistry to that of Lupul + Kessel. I doubt Carlyle will break up the first line, it's producing points really well for us. Unless that line slows down i don't think Lupul will be back on the first line. Maybe JVR as centre ? not sure, but one things for sure we got WAY too many wingers. Would be ideal to move one (macarthur maybe ? ) for a center

DionPhaneuf3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-10-2013, 05:58 PM
  #75
tobra
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 29
vCash: 500
It depends if scoring is coming from top line or not.

I say put in him with kadri and frattin for first game back

tobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.