HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Chicago Blackhawks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Quack, Quack. Chicago V Anaheim 7:30pm @ The U.C.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-12-2013, 10:26 PM
  #551
MadhouseOnMadison
Man crush on Amonte
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,040
vCash: 500
Outside of Toews we really don't have anybody for the SO. Kane sometimes pulls something out of his ass but really Toews is the only one that's even close to being reliable.

MadhouseOnMadison is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:26 PM
  #552
DisgruntledHawkFan
Moderator
Blackhawk Down
 
DisgruntledHawkFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 34,336
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DisgruntledHawkFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralph0226 View Post
Hawks deserved to lose this one.
Lol wut

DisgruntledHawkFan is online now  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:27 PM
  #553
HawksFan74
Tread Lightly
 
HawksFan74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 20,002
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralph0226 View Post
TWO goals on two shots.
Please tell me you're forgetting the sarcasm here.

HawksFan74 is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:27 PM
  #554
zac
Registered User
 
zac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,354
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralph0226 View Post
Hawks deserved to lose this one.
Yes and no.

If, by some act of god, this results in the powers that be waking the ******* up and drastically changing our moronic PP this will be game worth losing. I wouldn't bet my Neifi Perez rookie card on it, though.

zac is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:27 PM
  #555
ralph0226
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,979
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtosis View Post
No they didn't. They may have not deserved to win, but they certainly didn't deserve to lose.
They were sluggish much of the game, and just plain lazy the last couple of minutes of regulation. And two PP in over time. They deserved to lose.

ralph0226 is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:28 PM
  #556
brtriad
Registered User
 
brtriad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Loop
Country: United States
Posts: 13,046
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to brtriad
I think we can all agree on one thing: Fire Kitchen

brtriad is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:28 PM
  #557
Gurth
Registered User
 
Gurth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Madison
Country: United States
Posts: 1,818
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawksFan74 View Post
After the game he just had you give him **** on a good shootout goal.

I don't know who any of these posters even like on the team.

We're undefeated. This was the trap game. So what?


Remembering why I steer clear of the game threads. Every little mistake is a cup full of sand in the collective you know what.

Gurth is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:28 PM
  #558
DisgruntledHawkFan
Moderator
Blackhawk Down
 
DisgruntledHawkFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 34,336
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DisgruntledHawkFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralph0226 View Post
They were sluggish much of the game, and just plain lazy the last couple of minutes of regulation. And two PP in over time. They deserved to lose.
Nope. That's all.

DisgruntledHawkFan is online now  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:28 PM
  #559
Kurtosis
Trying Not To Suck
 
Kurtosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeview
Country: United States
Posts: 23,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zac View Post
Yes and no.

If, by some act of god, this results in the powers that be waking the ******* up and drastically changing our moronic PP this will be game worth losing. I wouldn't bet my Neifi Perez rookie card on it, though.
Hahahaha.

By the way **** shootouts.

Kurtosis is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:28 PM
  #560
Cullksinikers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 'Merica
Country: United States
Posts: 15,173
vCash: 500
Who cares about the shootout. It should not have come down to that. You give up a goal in the last three minutes then blow hard on two four-on-threes.

Cullksinikers is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:30 PM
  #561
Kurtosis
Trying Not To Suck
 
Kurtosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeview
Country: United States
Posts: 23,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralph0226 View Post
They were sluggish much of the game, and just plain lazy the last couple of minutes of regulation. And two PP in over time. They deserved to lose.
What game were you watching? The 2 PP's they obviously should have converted on, but they certainly didn't get outplayed in regulation.

Kurtosis is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:30 PM
  #562
ralph0226
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,979
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cullksinikers View Post
Who cares about the shootout. It should not have come down to that. You give up a goal in the last three minutes then blow hard on two four-on-threes.
I see someone was watching the same game I was.

ralph0226 is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:30 PM
  #563
zac
Registered User
 
zac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,354
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisgruntledHawkFan View Post
Lol wut
Two 4 on 3 PPs that result in a grand total of one, maybe two legit chances is a deserved loss in my book. I thought we were slightly outplayed on the overall, with our penalty kill and regulation GT really shining through. Saad, Kruger (3rd line in general), Crawford and Hammer were fantastic. Kane, Keith, and especially Sharp were pretty bad out there tonight.

I wish I had a dollar for every 3 foot zip pass Kane attempted tonight.

zac is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:31 PM
  #564
Kurtosis
Trying Not To Suck
 
Kurtosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeview
Country: United States
Posts: 23,951
vCash: 500
This PP hasn't been good for at least 10 years. I don't care about the year they finished top 10, that PP still sucked.

Kurtosis is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:32 PM
  #565
zac
Registered User
 
zac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,354
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralph0226 View Post
They were sluggish much of the game, and just plain lazy the last couple of minutes of regulation. And two PP in over time. They deserved to lose.
Agreed.

zac is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:33 PM
  #566
Kurtosis
Trying Not To Suck
 
Kurtosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeview
Country: United States
Posts: 23,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cullksinikers View Post
Who cares about the shootout. It should not have come down to that. You give up a goal in the last three minutes then blow hard on two four-on-threes.
But it did. And shootouts are a joke. So there.

Kurtosis is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:34 PM
  #567
DisgruntledHawkFan
Moderator
Blackhawk Down
 
DisgruntledHawkFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 34,336
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DisgruntledHawkFan
The Hawks carried the play and failed to convert on the man advantage.

Saying they deserved to lose is laughable. They deserved to lose against Calgary.

DisgruntledHawkFan is online now  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:34 PM
  #568
Gurth
Registered User
 
Gurth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Madison
Country: United States
Posts: 1,818
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtosis View Post
What game were you watching? The 2 PP's they obviously should have converted on, but they certainly didn't get outplayed in regulation.
Obviously should have been converted on?

Are we at 90% on the PP?

Even good PP teams don't automatically convert just because a fan of theirs thinks they should.

Gurth is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:35 PM
  #569
Cullksinikers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: 'Merica
Country: United States
Posts: 15,173
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtosis View Post
But it did. And shootouts are a joke. So there.
They really should go to three-on-three for a few minutes, but I am not going to complain as much about it since we're still 10-0-3 and still have room to improve. The team has gotten 23 of the first 26 points and hasn't hit their ceiling.

Cullksinikers is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:38 PM
  #570
Pepe Silvia
Registered User
 
Pepe Silvia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 8,936
vCash: 1344
Sucks that they lost but at least they still got a point. Crawford played well again and Saad continues to impress and create chances. The PK has been amazing

Crawford looks confident. He's challenging shooters, cutting down angles, and controlling rebounds.

Pepe Silvia is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:39 PM
  #571
Kurtosis
Trying Not To Suck
 
Kurtosis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lakeview
Country: United States
Posts: 23,951
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurth View Post
Obviously should have been converted on?

Are we at 90% on the PP?

Even good PP teams don't automatically convert just because a fan of theirs thinks they should.
Ok, take obviously out. They still should have converted. If you want to nitpick negative nancies I'm not the guy. I still think they outplayed Anaheim, but hey **** happens.

Kurtosis is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:43 PM
  #572
Gurth
Registered User
 
Gurth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Madison
Country: United States
Posts: 1,818
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtosis View Post
Ok, take obviously out. They still should have converted. If you want to nitpick negative nancies I'm not the guy. I still think they outplayed Anaheim, but hey **** happens.

I'm spoiling...

I'll leave now while the getting's good.


What's gonna happen when we actually lose a game though?

Kane, Keith, Seabrook & Sharp trade threads. Fire Stan will get bumped. The goalie will once again be our only weakness. CAN'T WAIT!

Gurth is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:45 PM
  #573
DisgruntledHawkFan
Moderator
Blackhawk Down
 
DisgruntledHawkFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 34,336
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DisgruntledHawkFan
Seriously. The Hawks had an off night and out played the number two team in the conference.

Step back from the ledge.

DisgruntledHawkFan is online now  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:52 PM
  #574
MMonarchs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 582
vCash: 500
Adding a little salt to the wound...as bad as you think the Chicago PP is, you do realize how GOD AWFUL the Anaheim PK is, right?

MMonarchs is offline  
Old
02-12-2013, 10:57 PM
  #575
MadhouseOnMadison
Man crush on Amonte
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,040
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMonarchs View Post
Adding a little salt to the wound...as bad as you think the Chicago PP is, you do realize how GOD AWFUL the Anaheim PK is, right?
Clearly our PP is crappier than your PK.

Did Anaheim even clear the zone in either of those PKs in OT? It looked like the Hawks just tossed it out of the zone themselves every time.

MadhouseOnMadison is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2017 All Rights Reserved.