HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Winnipeg Jets
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

A little slow, a little late. Jets lose 3-2.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-13-2013, 12:34 AM
  #126
Gump Hasek
Spleen Merchant
 
Gump Hasek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 222 Tudor Terrace
Posts: 10,103
vCash: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksnWpg View Post
My Ladd hate existed long before the Jets 2.0 existed so I'm entitled to my opinion thanks.

If the Jets were a good team, he would be on the 3rd line.
Ladd wasn't the problem, he conversely was one of the few assets out there tonight, especially at forward. Can't think of many 30 goal scoring 3rd liners either, sorry.

Gump Hasek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:35 AM
  #127
Che vy Teemuchuk
Registered User
 
Che vy Teemuchuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: John Labatt Centre
Country: Canada
Posts: 960
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by garret9 View Post
No one cares about Garret's stats
I just showed that Ladd's low goal totals before 2010-11 were due to low icetime and him being not a top6 player
Dude. Numbers and rational analysis have no hope of penetrating the Ladd hate bubble. You brought a knife to a crap flinging fight.

Che vy Teemuchuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:35 AM
  #128
sipowicz
The Original
 
sipowicz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,793
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brogosian View Post
This is mind numbingly maddening to me.

How do people make such snap damned judgements all the time.

Let me state a FACT.

If players careers could hinge on ONE game, not one player would be in the NHL.

Peluso may not fit for the jets, but for the love of god it was his first game!
What exactly does he bring to the team? All he has shown is that he can't score or make a play throughout his hockey career. He's a hired goon. Mach or Mittens would bring more to the team than Peluso ever will. When Wright became available after they picked up Peluso up, Peluso became expendable.

sipowicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:36 AM
  #129
Potrzebie
Registered User
 
Potrzebie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,066
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by garret9 View Post
Well...



Looks like he could have have been a 30+ goal scorer back in 2007-2009...

I broke it all down here. Ladd is a very very very very good 2nd liner. Good enough to pass as an ok 1st liner
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/ne...ply&p=57429089

Potrzebie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:36 AM
  #130
Turbofan
Just shoot it Toby!!
 
Turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,221
vCash: 50
Oh yeah I would have loved to see Spencer Mach on the team. He really stepped up during his call-up.

Turbofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:37 AM
  #131
sipowicz
The Original
 
sipowicz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,793
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gump Hasek View Post
Hoooeeeee.

Peluso's debut wasn't exactly golden but he did not cost us the game anyway. Doubt we'll see much of him in the future.

Wellwood? I'm a fan when he plays well but he has been horrible this season. He looks like he doesn't even care; bye, Kyle. We've traded you for a pick. Poni is playing like he is either playing hurt or he is scared to get hurt.

The Jets have a bigger team but zero jam. Bring up Cormier and try him in the middle on the third line. The guy in that spot currently diddles around with the puck a lot and accomplishes little; two points 1/4 through the season. Redmond was a gong show tonight, Postma wasn't much better. Rooks on the pp blue line? Yikes.

WTH is our GM doing all day long? I'm not talking about cleaning house; that will happen at season end regardless - given all of the expiring contracts. Can't they just at least give Cormier a try though in the meantime? They need some enthusiasm in that lineup, even if it comes via an in-house shakeup. Do something.

Bah. Disregard. I'm just angry.
A comment on MIA Joke-in and it would have been a perfect post!

sipowicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:42 AM
  #132
bigplay41*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,674
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to bigplay41*
well it keeps getting tougher with Pittsburgh friday should be interesting

bigplay41* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:43 AM
  #133
Che vy Teemuchuk
Registered User
 
Che vy Teemuchuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: John Labatt Centre
Country: Canada
Posts: 960
vCash: 500
yeah, the thing I really liked was seeing Jokinen drop down the line-up. He's had 10 games to work things out. He will be a producer for us. But he's gotta earn his ice-time a bit more now.

Che vy Teemuchuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:44 AM
  #134
Gump Hasek
Spleen Merchant
 
Gump Hasek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 222 Tudor Terrace
Posts: 10,103
vCash: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by sipowicz View Post
A comment on MIA Joke-in and it would have been a perfect post!
Part of his problem is that they've been trying to play two shooters together and it aint' working. Flip Ladd & Kane FFS. Jokinen will come around if paired with someone that at least throws him the puck on occasion.

Gump Hasek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:47 AM
  #135
Romang67
Moderator
BitterSwede
 
Romang67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Bay Area
Country: Sweden
Posts: 20,651
vCash: 500
Okay, most that could be said about this game has already been said. Kane was robbed several times, should still have put the puck in the net since that's what he gets paid for, offense was a bit off, Bryz was good. Good on Ladd getting those garbage goals, want to see Burmi get more chances offensively.

But I haven't seen anyone talk about this. Was it just me, or did Buff look incredibly slow? Rusty, yeah, I get that, but it almost seemed like he was afraid of getting hurt the way he skated.

Oh well, let's talk about how Chevy will pass on Barkov because he hates europeans until our game against the Pens!

Romang67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:47 AM
  #136
LadyJet26
WHITEOUT
 
LadyJet26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,937
vCash: 50
I don't like Ladd. Sorry I chose tonight when he scored two goals to say so. I've said it before. Not ever going to change.

Redmond took a stupid penalty and the rest of the team besides him and Burmi did anything remotely good. That better? Do I fit into your idea of a good opinion?

I'm allowed an opinion. I don't need to be constantly chastised because of it. I don't need to be attacked because I have an opinion. This is exactly why I rarely post. I always get attacked for my opinions. I thought forums were for opinions and good hockey discussion? I love the Jets, but I'm allowed to dislike and criticize a player on one of my favourite teams. I love Malkin and I criticize him all the time. Ladd will play good and then pull a disappearing act for 10 games. I just don't think that shows the typical character of a top 6 player.

I don't have many people to talk hockey with and I'm not trying to stir up anything or troll Andrew Ladd as some people have said I was. I just have an opinion and was sharing it. So sorry for that.

LadyJet26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:47 AM
  #137
Flair Hay
Registered User
 
Flair Hay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,980
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksnWpg View Post
My Ladd hate existed long before the Jets 2.0 existed so I'm entitled to my opinion thanks.

If the Jets were a good team, he would be on the 3rd line.

And sorry I don't wear Jets coloured glasses all the time. I'm sure there are players you don't like who are on the Jets. Don't like Buff either. He is not a very good dman at all.
No sorry dude you just don't know what your talking about. That Chicago team had arguably the most depth of any team post '04 lockout. Geez man I was a Canucks fan too but I don't still hate Ladd and Buff because of it anymore. If anything it enlightened me on why they are viewed the way they are throughout the rest of the league...

Flair Hay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:51 AM
  #138
LadyJet26
WHITEOUT
 
LadyJet26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,937
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhay1987 View Post
No sorry dude you just don't know what your talking about. That Chicago team had arguably the most depth of any team post '04 lockout. Geez man I was a Canucks fan too but I don't still hate Ladd and Buff because of it anymore. If anything it enlightened me on why they are viewed the way they are throughout the rest of the league...
Pittsburgh had more depth. At least at centre they did.

And I'm not a dude thanks. I'm a woman.

And I'm done talking about it. I'm allowed an opinion and people don't seem to get that.

LadyJet26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:52 AM
  #139
JetsFan815
Maybe we can do it?
 
JetsFan815's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,120
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksnWpg View Post
I don't like Ladd. Sorry I chose tonight when he scored two goals to say so. I've said it before. Not ever going to change.

Redmond took a stupid penalty and the rest of the team besides him and Burmi did anything remotely good. That better? Do I fit into your idea of a good opinion?

I'm allowed an opinion. I don't need to be constantly chastised because of it. I don't need to be attacked because I have an opinion. This is exactly why I rarely post. I always get attacked for my opinions. I thought forums were for opinions and good hockey discussion? I love the Jets, but I'm allowed to dislike and criticize a player on one of my favourite teams. I love Malkin and I criticize him all the time. Ladd will play good and then pull a disappearing act for 10 games. I just don't think that shows the typical character of a top 6 player.

I don't have many people to talk hockey with and I'm not trying to stir up anything or troll Andrew Ladd as some people have said I was. I just have an opinion and was sharing it. So sorry for that.
People are arguing your points with facts and raw data, I'm not sure why you're getting so defensive.

JetsFan815 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:54 AM
  #140
Duke749
Formerly "BigTuna49"
 
Duke749's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Woodstock, Georgia
Country: Scotland
Posts: 30,095
vCash: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksnWpg View Post
I don't like Ladd. Sorry I chose tonight when he scored two goals to say so. I've said it before. Not ever going to change.

Redmond took a stupid penalty and the rest of the team besides him and Burmi did anything remotely good. That better? Do I fit into your idea of a good opinion?

I'm allowed an opinion. I don't need to be constantly chastised because of it. I don't need to be attacked because I have an opinion. This is exactly why I rarely post. I always get attacked for my opinions. I thought forums were for opinions and good hockey discussion? I love the Jets, but I'm allowed to dislike and criticize a player on one of my favourite teams. I love Malkin and I criticize him all the time. Ladd will play good and then pull a disappearing act for 10 games. I just don't think that shows the typical character of a top 6 player.

I don't have many people to talk hockey with and I'm not trying to stir up anything or troll Andrew Ladd as some people have said I was. I just have an opinion and was sharing it. So sorry for that.
You called him a 3rd liner claiming it's "your opinion" when no 3rd liner puts up points like he has for the last several years regardless what role he's been in. I think you should learn the difference between opinion and fact. You not liking Ladd is an opinion. Saying he's a top 6 winger is fact base off of facts.

Duke749 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 12:55 AM
  #141
Hank Chinaski
Global Moderator
No mistakes...
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: YTH
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,924
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by sipowicz View Post
A comment on MIA Joke-in and it would have been a perfect post!
Joke-in? No more Jonki? Or Ponki?

Jonki and Ponki, sounds like an Eastern European comedy duo.

Alright, I'm clearly tired. Night everyone.

Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:00 AM
  #142
Turbofan
Just shoot it Toby!!
 
Turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,221
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romang67 View Post
Okay, most that could be said about this game has already been said. Kane was robbed several times, should still have put the puck in the net since that's what he gets paid for, offense was a bit off, Bryz was good. Good on Ladd getting those garbage goals, want to see Burmi get more chances offensively.

But I haven't seen anyone talk about this. Was it just me, or did Buff look incredibly slow? Rusty, yeah, I get that, but it almost seemed like he was afraid of getting hurt the way he skated.

Oh well, let's talk about how Chevy will pass on Barkov because he hates europeans until our game against the Pens!
Buff looked tentative offensively. He was fine defensively, but he didn't try a single rush that I could see.

Turbofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:04 AM
  #143
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
 
garret9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,587
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksnWpg View Post
My Ladd hate existed long before the Jets 2.0 existed so I'm entitled to my opinion thanks.
Truth as this is an opinion and you are entitled to.

Quote:
If the Jets were a good team, he would be on the 3rd line.
False. This is not an opinion. You are stating a fact. A fact that is analytically PROVEN false.

Quote:
And sorry I don't wear Jets coloured glasses all the time. I'm sure there are players you don't like who are on the Jets.
And your Canuck-fan-stuborn-hatred-for-someone-who-played-well-against-them glasses are any less biased?? You realize you are contradicting your very first sentence here...


Quote:
Don't like Buff either. He is not a very good dman at all.
Again... first statement: opinion and entitled two. Second statement: false fact.




<EDIT>
I forgot to add:
since 2007 only one between Ladd + Kesler has dipped under top6 production: Kesler twice (2007-08 + 2011-12)
since 2007 Ladd has out produced Kesler except for two years, and only one year has Kesler scored more goals per ice-time


Last edited by KillEmAll83: 02-13-2013 at 01:18 AM. Reason: fixin quotes n such
garret9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:07 AM
  #144
LadyJet26
WHITEOUT
 
LadyJet26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,937
vCash: 50
[mod]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke49 View Post
You called him a 3rd liner claiming it's "your opinion" when no 3rd liner puts up points like he has for the last several years regardless what role he's been in. I think you should learn the difference between opinion and fact. You not liking Ladd is an opinion. Saying he's a top 6 winger is fact base off of facts.
I honestly believe if he were on a great team, he would be a third liner. I don't think he's that great and a bit overrated. I was going to use Jordan Staal in Pittsburgh as an example, but that was a bit of an anomaly. No team in recent years was ever that deep at centre. But I'll say it, Jordan Staal was a third liner and he scored 20+ goals 3 times in Pittsburgh. Oh and that was as oh, a third liner.


Last edited by KillEmAll83: 02-13-2013 at 01:12 AM.
LadyJet26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:09 AM
  #145
sipowicz
The Original
 
sipowicz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,793
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
Joke-in? No more Jonki? Or Ponki?

Jonki and Ponki, sounds like an Eastern European comedy duo.

Alright, I'm clearly tired. Night everyone.
The Jets wore me out tonight as well couldn't even remember what I'm even calling them anymore. These highs and lows following the Jets are tough, forgot what I missed after 1996.

sipowicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:13 AM
  #146
Che vy Teemuchuk
Registered User
 
Che vy Teemuchuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: John Labatt Centre
Country: Canada
Posts: 960
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksnWpg View Post
I don't like Ladd. Sorry I chose tonight when he scored two goals to say so. I've said it before. Not ever going to change.

Redmond took a stupid penalty and the rest of the team besides him and Burmi did anything remotely good. That better? Do I fit into your idea of a good opinion?

I'm allowed an opinion. I don't need to be constantly chastised because of it. I don't need to be attacked because I have an opinion. This is exactly why I rarely post. I always get attacked for my opinions. I thought forums were for opinions and good hockey discussion? I love the Jets, but I'm allowed to dislike and criticize a player on one of my favourite teams. I love Malkin and I criticize him all the time. Ladd will play good and then pull a disappearing act for 10 games. I just don't think that shows the typical character of a top 6 player.

I don't have many people to talk hockey with and I'm not trying to stir up anything or troll Andrew Ladd as some people have said I was. I just have an opinion and was sharing it. So sorry for that.
Well yeah, the whole third line Ladd debate is something we've hashed out before. And likely will continue to in some form or other. I'm with Garret and most others thinking it's a no-brainer, but I do see the importance of constantly appraising the team.

But I just don't get the thought process behind bringing it up in this particular thread. There is no point other than to troll when he pots our only 2 goals and played a solid game showing some of the LLW magic chemistry is coming back. If you want to constantly beat the drum, even when Ladd has a pretty awesome game, then it's only fair to expect push back on opinion that is clearly a stranger to hard facts. Even by forum users who don't post often but read often like me.

You've left Karl Rove denial and are entering Dick Morris delusion.

Che vy Teemuchuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:16 AM
  #147
KillEmAll83
Rakastan Lainetta
 
KillEmAll83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,662
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksnWpg View Post
I'm allowed an opinion. I don't need to be constantly chastised because of it. I don't need to be attacked because I have an opinion. This is exactly why I rarely post. I always get attacked for my opinions. I thought forums were for opinions and good hockey discussion? I love the Jets, but I'm allowed to dislike and criticize a player on one of my favourite teams. I love Malkin and I criticize him all the time. Ladd will play good and then pull a disappearing act for 10 games. I just don't think that shows the typical character of a top 6 player.
You certainly are allowed an opinion. And people are allowed to give their opinion of your opinion. You can dislike any of the Jets all you want, but in the end you're in the Jets forum and you have to expect people will debate that. Doubly so with the reasons you've given.

I would think being a Canucks fan you'd have more of a hate-on for Byfuglien.

__________________

These violent delights... have violent ends
KillEmAll83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:17 AM
  #148
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
 
garret9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,587
vCash: 500
Just copy and paste my facts if she won't read my quotes...

Opinion is one thing to have... but opinions on definitive statements can be wrong.
I can believe the sky is green and have that opinion all I want but that doesn't deny facts.

garret9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:17 AM
  #149
Lynk
Registered Bro
 
Lynk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15,610
vCash: 500
Quite the PGT tonight.

Lynk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 01:20 AM
  #150
garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
 
garret9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 17,587
vCash: 500
sigh i give up

garret9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.