HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Chi - Col - Tor

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-13-2013, 05:10 PM
  #26
TurdFerguson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 709
vCash: 500
As 3-way trades go, this one is quite reasonable. The main problem I see is that Chicago doesn't have a 2013 2nd rounder (only applicable if they don't make the WCF). It is also impossible for Chicago to take 4M in cap without moving at least Olesz or Montador (I don't think they can buy them out as long as they're injured).

TurdFerguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 05:24 PM
  #27
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 95,180
vCash: 200
Too costly

Rather call up the Avs and try to get Stastny for some futures with Avs eating some of his costs for next year (Which would make it easier for Hawks to fit)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurdFerguson View Post
As 3-way trades go, this one is quite reasonable. The main problem I see is that Chicago doesn't have a 2013 2nd rounder (only applicable if they don't make the WCF). It is also impossible for Chicago to take 4M in cap without moving at least Olesz or Montador (I don't think they can buy them out as long as they're injured).
Rusty and Monty have both begun skating again ,, Both should be healthy in offseason when they will be buyout eligible

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 07:27 PM
  #28
Sergei Shirokov
Registered User
 
Sergei Shirokov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: British Columbia
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,291
vCash: 500
This deal seems pretty good for all sides. Very Solid Proposal OP!

Sergei Shirokov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 07:34 PM
  #29
Mystifo
Malkin To Kulemin.
 
Mystifo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: YYT
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 2,383
vCash: 500
I am not a huge fan of it. But seems like COL and CHI fans hate it too so the hockey fan in me says it must be pretty damn fair.

Mystifo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-13-2013, 09:09 PM
  #30
MurrayBannerman
BBall ATD Champion
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 20,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystifo View Post
I am not a huge fan of it. But seems like COL and CHI fans hate it too so the hockey fan in me says it must be pretty damn fair.
Usually a good way of evaluating a trade.

MurrayBannerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-14-2013, 05:41 AM
  #31
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 22,608
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystifo View Post
I am not a huge fan of it. But seems like COL and CHI fans hate it too so the hockey fan in me says it must be pretty damn fair.
no, it's not.

Chicago fans hate it cause they know about the Cap after all what happened after the Cup Win and with the Campbell situation. Adding Grabo = lose depth or lose depth and Bolland.

Danault will be a usefull Bottom6 player with a little Cap hit maybe as soon as next season. On the Hawks Roster, I'd prefer to have Bolland + Danault longterm over Bolland & Grabo for this year only. That's without the 1st that goes too - Hawks would punt this draft without a 1st, 2nd and 3rd. Bad idea

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-14-2013, 10:31 AM
  #32
pvr
Kruger Line=2.5 Men
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,036
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba88 View Post
no, it's not.

Chicago fans hate it cause they know about the Cap after all what happened after the Cup Win and with the Campbell situation. Adding Grabo = lose depth or lose depth and Bolland.

Danault will be a usefull Bottom6 player with a little Cap hit maybe as soon as next season. On the Hawks Roster, I'd prefer to have Bolland + Danault longterm over Bolland & Grabo for this year only. That's without the 1st that goes too - Hawks would punt this draft without a 1st, 2nd and 3rd. Bad idea
Well said. If we're in it for a center, I'd rather just go after O'Reilly.

pvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2013, 01:21 AM
  #33
LandofLincoln
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,581
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOGuy14 View Post
Grabo at a $4M cap hit would have much higher value than has been indicated in this thread.

He is a very good #2C, and at $4M that would be a steal of a contract.
done I would overpay in prospects for that cap hit

LandofLincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.