Value of: Tallinder+Tedenby+Josefson

[HossTheBoss]

I'd like for Chicago to add Josefson. In part because, as massive mentioned, he has a history of playing well with Kruger and their good friends, but also because I personally like Josefon as a player/prospect.

I don't really know what to offer though. I would think Chicago wouldn't really want to shake up the roster too much.

If you're looking for grit, maybe something around Beach+ for Josefson?

[WeridAl]

Originally Posted by JawandaPuck

Edmonton IMO.

Please keep Edmonton out of this.

[tsujimoto74]

Originally Posted by Kovalchuk Army

I would love for Devils to get Steve Ott.

Devils need an agitator, well someone better than Barch or Janssen.

Stafford + Ott for Tallinder + Josefson + Tedenby.

Why would Buffalo do that? They give up the 2 best players.
Hint: They wouldn't

[VanekTheMvp]

Enroth
Adam
For
Tallinder
Josefson
2013 2nd

Or

McCormick
2013 5th
For
Tallinder

Not sure of jerseys needs but youth always seems good. Nj has goalie depth but enroth has played a good amount of games, behind a terrible defense....

[Rhodes 81]

Trading josefson would be a mistake I doubt Lou is going to make

[MJMazzarone]

Originally Posted by VanekTheMvp

Enroth
Adam
For
Tallinder
Josefson
2013 2nd

Or

McCormick
2013 5th
For
Tallinder

Not sure of jerseys needs but youth always seems good. Nj has goalie depth but enroth has played a good amount of games, behind a terrible defense....

NJ currently isn't in the market for a goalie. Marty and Moose for another year and it seems that the Devils are high on Wedgewood.

Would you do:



Adam
Stafford

for



Tallinder
Josefson
Tedenby
2013 Second

[tsujimoto74]

Originally Posted by MJMazzarone

NJ currently isn't in the market for a goalie. Marty and Moose for another year and it seems that the Devils are high on Wedgewood.

Would you do:



Adam
Stafford

for



Tallinder
Josefson
Tedenby
2013 Second

Buffalo isn't going to deal Stafford for scraps and a 2nd. We have enough holes on our roster as it is. Dealing an established top 6 forward for spare parts, a D man that's been a healthy scratch this season, and a pick doesn't make much sense. If Buffalo ends up selling at the deadline and decides to make Stafford available, then we're going to be looking for younger pieces.

[Zippy316]

Originally Posted by tsujimoto74

Buffalo isn't going to deal Stafford for scraps and a 2nd. We have enough holes on our roster as it is. Dealing an established top 6 forward for spare parts, a D man that's been a healthy scratch this season, and a pick doesn't make much sense. If Buffalo ends up selling at the deadline and decides to make Stafford available, then we're going to be looking for younger pieces.

Absolutely clueless?

Before you label players scraps, know who they are. Devils don't even need to add a pick there.

I'd probably do the three players for Adam and Stafford, although I would be reluctant to give up on both Tedenby or Josefson, it is pretty fair value.

[VanekTheMvp]

Originally Posted by MJMazzarone

NJ currently isn't in the market for a goalie. Marty and Moose for another year and it seems that the Devils are high on Wedgewood.

Would you do:



Adam
Stafford

for



Tallinder
Josefson
Tedenby
2013 Second

Fair enough, I dont enroth has the stamina to be a nunber one behind our defense but nj seems to have more defensive minded group abd he could be a number 1 behind that. On that note I would pass on the proposed trade just becsise the lack of rw that will be available around the deadline I think we could get more ala1st and a prospect. I would really like tallinder the most ...something around him.

[manilaNJ]

Originally Posted by Rhodes 81

Trading josefson would be a mistake I doubt Lou is going to make

I'm in agreement with this, despite him being the new Devils fan whipping boy.

Originally Posted by VanekTheMvp

I would really like tallinder the most ...something around him.

Luke Adam + 2nd for Tallinder seems to be a trade that Buffalo & NJ fans have agreed on in the past.
I'd be more than willing to do that.