HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Trade: Toronto - Colorado - Calgary

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-24-2013, 05:03 PM
  #1
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,019
vCash: 500
Trade: Toronto - Colorado - Calgary


F - Mikhail Grabovski


F - Ryan O'Reilly [RFA - unsigned]
Draft - Calgary's 2013 2ND


D - Carl Gunnersson [RFA - 1 YR @ 1.325M]
Draft - Toronto's 2013 1ST
F - Max Reinhart

Calgary: gets an immediate upgrade for two prospects. If they want to full out tank then possibly this is the wrong direction for them but Grabovski is 29 years old and signed for 4-5 years. Management confuses me as an outsider but appears they do not want to blow things up, rather retool. Allows them to roll with Cammarelli - Grabovski - Stajan - Cervenka down the middle at a modest price.

Toronto: gets a left handed two-way center with upside of being a #1b to fit between Lupul and Kessel. Allows them to roll with O'Reilly - Kadri - Bozak - McCLement down the middle. In order to make up for the immediate upgrade on Grabbo [that also fits better with the team] they forfeit Gunnersson and a 1st round draft choice but also recieve a 2nd round pick from Calgary. For them this trade moves youth out and youth in, helps them compete now and in the future and for all intent and purposes structures their team better suited for Randy Caryle's game.

Colorado: gets a young top 4 defender [capable of playing on a top pairing] on an excellent cheap deal who is also an RFA, a center prospect in Reinhart, and a first round draft selection in a deep draft. Basically your standard player, prospect, pick type trade. Colorado may be able to snatch a better 1-for-1 swap for O'Reilly but it is really tough to tell at this point. The benefit of a trade like this allows them to continuing rebuilding, keep their cap hit down and hand pluck their own prospect in a couple of months. Where Toronto's pick falls will ultimately determine the total value of the deal but even in the 10-15 range it still offers solid value.

Just thinking of an idea here that might help out all three franchises. Hate it, love it, indifferent...???

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:07 PM
  #2
HossTheBoss
Playoffs Baby!
 
HossTheBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12,395
vCash: 500
Colorado laughs.. hard.

HossTheBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:08 PM
  #3
IronHalen
Registered User
 
IronHalen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 45
vCash: 500
toronto most likely says no

IronHalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:10 PM
  #4
Flamesarmstrong22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 808
vCash: 500
I actually really like the deal. I think it's fair. Avalanche fans will say not enough because they all over value o'reilly and under value gunnerson but a top 4 Defencman,good prospect and a 1st is good value.

Good job OP!

Flamesarmstrong22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:11 PM
  #5
Phion Keneuf
Top Dawg Ent.
 
Phion Keneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country: Italy
Posts: 24,285
vCash: 50
Grabovski for Reinhart?

Flames take that and laugh.

Leafs say no, Avs say no (maybe if that 1st is good, but then the Leafs would say no even more)...

Phion Keneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:13 PM
  #6
HossTheBoss
Playoffs Baby!
 
HossTheBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12,395
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesarmstrong22 View Post
I actually really like the deal. I think it's fair. Avalanche fans will say not enough because they all over value o'reilly and under value gunnerson but a top 4 Defencman,good prospect and a 1st is good value.

Good job OP!
Max Reinhart's a good prospect? He's a mid-level guy.

Colorado gives up the best player in the deal and get 26-year-old Dman, mid 1st and a mid-level prospect? That's horrible value.

HossTheBoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:13 PM
  #7
The Podium
Formerly chrisx101
 
The Podium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,064
vCash: 500
Flames get Grabovski for Reinhart and a 2nd
The Leafs get a similar calibre, albeit younger, player in O'Rielly for Grabovski + Gunnarsson + 1st?
Avs deal O'Rielly for a B-level prospect, a mid 1st and a 26 year old D?

Noo...

The Podium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:13 PM
  #8
Mahleezer
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 161
vCash: 500
Calgary's 2013 2nd? really?

Montreal in this deal as well... edit your post to include a 4 way deal!

lol

Mahleezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:17 PM
  #9
kihei
Registered User
 
kihei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,074
vCash: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronHalen View Post
toronto most likely says no
You must possess a most dry sense of humour with that "most likely." Let's see Grabovski and Gunnerson and this year's 1st for ROR and a Calgary 2nd. A very definite, ultra-firm, you-must-be-joking, what-were-they thinking, well, *******, NO.

kihei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:18 PM
  #10
MillarWithASave
Registered User
 
MillarWithASave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 3,644
vCash: 500
So Grabovski, Gunnarsson, and a 1st for ROR and a 2nd?

MillarWithASave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:23 PM
  #11
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,019
vCash: 500
Aside from Montreal maybe having Calgary's 2ND Round pick I was completely serious.

Maybe I just think O'Reilly and Gunnersson are getting highly overrated from each side but I thought the deal was fair.

2nd and prospect for Grabovski.

Grabovski, Gunner and a 1st for O'Reilly + high 2ND.

O'Reilly for a 1st, top 4 D, and a prospect.

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:28 PM
  #12
IronHalen
Registered User
 
IronHalen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 45
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kihei View Post
You must possess a most dry sense of humour with that "most likely." Let's see Grabovski and Gunnerson and this year's 1st for ROR and a Calgary 2nd. A very definite, ultra-firm, you-must-be-joking, what-were-they thinking, well, *******, NO.
haha yea I can be pretty dry at times
If i was the T.O. GM it would be a definite no for sure

IronHalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:30 PM
  #13
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,019
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronHalen View Post
haha yea I can be pretty dry at times
If i was the T.O. GM it would be a definite no for sure
I suppose you are think Grabovski is worth a 1st+ and same with Gunnersson?

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:33 PM
  #14
IronHalen
Registered User
 
IronHalen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 45
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by marty111 View Post
I suppose you are think Grabovski is worth a 1st+ and same with Gunnersson?
well I definitely don't think upgrading from Grabo to O'Reilly would also require a first rounder, and a top 4 d-man.. even if a second is coming back as well

IronHalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:34 PM
  #15
htpwn
Registered User
 
htpwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Country: Poland
Posts: 9,880
vCash: 500
The difference between Grabovski and RoR is not Gunnarsson and a 1st.

htpwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:35 PM
  #16
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,019
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by htpwn View Post
The difference between Grabovski and RoR is not Gunnarsson and a 1st.
Well that's not the proposal soo...

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:35 PM
  #17
BBurke
Registered User
 
BBurke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,181
vCash: 500
No thanks. We don't need ROR. Not at all.

BBurke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:37 PM
  #18
Avs44
Registered User
 
Avs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 4,399
vCash: 450
So Leafs give up Grabovski, 1st, Gunnerson, for O'Reilly? Don't think Leafs will like that.


Avs say no as well. I don't think that first will be near the top 10, could easily be in the 15-20 range.

Avs44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:38 PM
  #19
Baarle
Playoffs!
 
Baarle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 3,733
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by marty111 View Post
I suppose you are think Grabovski is worth a 1st+ and same with Gunnersson?
Of course Grabovski is worth a first. Second line centre seems pretty fair. Calgary fleeces everyone while Colorado probably loses out (tough to say given the circumstance) but the leafs get fleeced hard. Change Grabovski to Bozak and the first to a second and maybe Leaf fans don't laugh at you. Of course the deal wouldn't be fair for Colorado now but that's why this premise won't work.

Baarle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:39 PM
  #20
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,019
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IronHalen View Post
well I definitely don't think upgrading from Grabo to O'Reilly would also require a first rounder, and a top 4 d-man.. even if a second is coming back as well
Well the way I'm looking at it...

Grabovski + Gunner + say 15th spot pick.

O'Reilly + 35th spot pick.

I truly think O'Reilly is better then Grabbo and any center we would be drafting at #15.

You may think we can just keep Grabovski, but I think we need an upgrade at center and this is the best way to get it.

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:40 PM
  #21
Baarle
Playoffs!
 
Baarle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 3,733
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by marty111 View Post
Well the way I'm looking at it...

Grabovski + Gunner + say 15th spot pick.

O'Reilly + 35th spot pick.

I truly think O'Reilly is better then Grabbo and any center we would be drafting at #15.

You may think we can just keep Grabovski, but I think we need an upgrade at center and this is the best way to get it.
Our centre depth is only marginally better because our 1+2 is still a a low end #1 high end #2 centre, and a 2b or 3a type centre. Plus we lose good trading pieces. Pathetic asset management.

Baarle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:41 PM
  #22
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,650
vCash: 500
Calgary has already traded this years 2nd, also this seems like the kind of patch move Calgary would do in the past I hope we don't do it now. Not that Grabo is bad, but it is time for Calgary to build with younger players and Grabo would only help us keep up the fight for 8th.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:41 PM
  #23
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,019
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baarle View Post
Of course Grabovski is worth a first. Second line centre seems pretty fair.
The only problem with that idea is what team is lacking a 2nd line center that is still good enough to make the playoffs and trade a first round pick?

I don't think any non-playoff teams would move their first for Grabbo.

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:41 PM
  #24
TheBigE
Registered User
 
TheBigE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 356
vCash: 500
Man I would have a really tough time giving up a 1st for this draft.

TheBigE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-24-2013, 05:42 PM
  #25
marty111
serenity count ↑ 46
 
marty111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,019
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baarle View Post
Our centre depth is only marginally better because our 1+2 is still a a low end #1 high end #2 centre, and a 2b or 3a type centre. Plus we lose good trading pieces. Pathetic asset management.
Only marginally better today, but ROR is what 22?

marty111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.