HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Vancouver Canucks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Andrew Ebbett recal--wait, no, he's been re-assigned to Chicago. (Post 112)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-02-2013, 02:19 AM
  #151
Golden Boy
The Spy in Beantown
 
Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Currently Undercover
Posts: 571
vCash: 500
http://twitter.com/aebbett/status/30...820736/photo/1

well at least he has a sense of humor.

Golden Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2013, 02:30 AM
  #152
canuck4life16
It what it is-mccann
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancity
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,380
vCash: 576
we don't hate him as a person just as a hockey player, two different things

canuck4life16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2013, 02:41 AM
  #153
Iceberg Slim
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Denmark
Posts: 244
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer79 View Post
The way I understood it, Pinizzotto was on IR so didn't count towards the 23 man limit. To be put on the conditioning assignment, he does count towards the 23 man roster. That would explain why Volpatti was exposed. Ebbett was going to take Kesler's spot on the 23 man roster, but they picked up Sestito so Ebbett got sent back down. If Pinizzotto wasn't taking a spot on the 23 man roster during the conditioning stint, I would assume that Ebbett would have stayed up until Pinizzotto got recalled from the conditioning assignment.
Thanks makes more sense.

I initially looked at Capgeek's roster numbers (see: http://www.capgeek.com/canucks/) which had the Canucks at 24 players, including 2 on IR, which suggested they currently were running with only 22 active players (including Sestito).

This made me think that Pinizzotto didn't count against the limit and I haven't read the new CBA so I just trusted the numbers on Capgeek (and the fact that they didn't list him against the current NHL roster).

Still problematic, in terms of waiving Volpatti, that MG wasn't aware of the possibility that Kesler would be going on IR the following day (and thereby making a spot available).

Also seems questionable that the Canucks really believed they would sneak Volpatti through, given all the rumours suggesting a number of teams would be interested. If we're to believe Lorne Henning (see: http://www.theprovince.com/sports/Ca...909/story.html), the Canucks are just gutted that they lost Volpatti. Not sure if I fully buy into that spin.

Anyway, Sestito replaces Volpatti (and is younger, bigger, and has an arguably better pedigree, given his draft position) and since Pinner is taking up a roster spot, the Canucks appear intent on using him (which I certainly endorse). I've been interested in seeing what Pinizzotto can do at the NHL level since he was first acquired and, given that he plays both centre and wing, the current situation down the middle should provide an opportunity.

EDIT: Just realizing that the Canucks might have had another option.

Given that Bieksa didn't play on Tuesday, when Volpatti was waived on Wednesday, the Canucks knew that Bieksa would be out at least until Saturday's game, which should have given him enough missed days from his injury the previous Friday to be placed on IR this week (need seven days from injury, which was Friday).

So, if we say the Canucks are currently carrying 25 players, including Pinner (in the AHL on 2 week conditioning), but could have placed 3 players on IR (Manny, Kes, Juice), the Canucks should have been able to manipulate the injured reserve to allow them to activate Pinizzotto (from IR) by placing Bieksa on IR (even without knowing about Kesler's injury). Then, following Kesler's move to IR, Sestito could have also been added (if they still wanted to grab him, given they'd have kept Volpatti in this scenerio). This without needing to waive anyone.

I suppose it's not really a big deal (losing a 4th line, AHL/NHL tweener like Volpatti), but I kind of trust MG, or at least Gilman, to be able to take advantage of these things and to manipulate the rules whenever needed. When Volpatti was waived, the Canucks couldn't have known they'd be nabbing Sestito later as a replacement, so it's a little surprising that they didn't use the injured reserve to protect their assets, however minor they might be.


Last edited by Iceberg Slim: 03-02-2013 at 03:16 AM. Reason: additional point added
Iceberg Slim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2013, 04:10 AM
  #154
vanuck
#Gaunce4GM
 
vanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 14,071
vCash: 500
Yeah, it's strange. I don't see why they couldn't have put Kesler on IR to facilitate what needed to be done. It's a minor enough impact to the team that it's not really a big deal, but obviously you don't want them to just lose forward depth for nothing like that so hopefully in future we don't see this happening again.

vanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2013, 10:40 AM
  #155
Tiranis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 23,048
vCash: 500
Volpatti was waived before they found out about Kesler's injury.

Tiranis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2013, 01:54 PM
  #156
rebel diamond
Registered User
 
rebel diamond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
Country: Trinidad and Tobago
Posts: 5,045
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Promethesis View Post
http://twitter.com/aebbett/status/30...820736/photo/1

well at least he has a sense of humor.
Also being on the big league roster for a day was worth about $1500 to him, so I don't think hes complaining too much.

rebel diamond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-02-2013, 04:45 PM
  #157
vanuck
#Gaunce4GM
 
vanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 14,071
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiranis View Post
Volpatti was waived before they found out about Kesler's injury.
Yeah, I just read about it in a Province article, thanks.

vanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.