HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Edm/St.Louis

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-08-2013, 03:13 PM
  #1
justiceofyoda
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 18
vCash: 500
Edm/St.Louis

Good Day,

Not a frequent poster but figured i would give a proposal a shot....feel free to send me back under the rock that i crawled from.

St. Louis gets:

Yakupov
Klefbom
Gagner
2013 1st round pick
2013 2nd round pick (Ana)

Edmonton gets:

Backes
Shattenkirk
Halak

Not sure what St.Louis' needs are but this would address Edmontons for sure. Not sure about value as i know Backes holds the 'C' and Shatty is lighting it up right now.

justiceofyoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 03:17 PM
  #2
ManyIdeas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 5,197
vCash: 362
Nah. Definitely have seen worse proposals though.

ManyIdeas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 03:19 PM
  #3
alpine4life
Registered User
 
alpine4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,189
vCash: 500
non of St. Louis needs are addressed here...

no #1 lefthanded pairing defenseman in the offer
no true # centerman in the offer...

plus to combine Shattenkirk, Backes, Halak for futures.... LOL at the proposal

alpine4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 03:22 PM
  #4
WeridAl
YuckaFlux
 
WeridAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10ft of Snow
Posts: 1,748
vCash: 500
Oilers pass

WeridAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 03:28 PM
  #5
bleedblue1223
Fire Army
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 29,033
vCash: 130
Turrible

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 03:30 PM
  #6
Vladys Gumption
Global Moderator
Colt55
 
Vladys Gumption's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 16,015
vCash: 500
That's a pretty resounding no from both sides.

Vladys Gumption is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 03:48 PM
  #7
PerryTurnbullfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Penalty Box
Country:
Posts: 2,867
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by justiceofyoda View Post
Good Day,

Not a frequent poster but figured i would give a proposal a shot....feel free to send me back under the rock that i crawled from.

St. Louis gets:

Yakupov
Klefbom
Gagner
2013 1st round pick
2013 2nd round pick (Ana)

Edmonton gets:

Backes
Shattenkirk
Halak

Not sure what St.Louis' needs are but this would address Edmontons for sure. Not sure about value as i know Backes holds the 'C' and Shatty is lighting it up right now.
Gagner
Hall
Schultz
Smid
Klefbom
1st ++

really don't want to move any of these 3. Have to overpay.

PerryTurnbullfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 04:10 PM
  #8
McSuper
5-14-6-1
 
McSuper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,328
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PerryTurnbullfan View Post
Gagner
Hall
Schultz
Smid
Klefbom
1st ++

really don't want to move any of these 3. Have to overpay.
This has to be a joke , right ? You can not be serious . This has to be the worst . Over payment maybe . I sure hope the Oilers get kiss and you got lube .


Really don't want to move Hall . Have to over pay
Backs
Shattenkirk
Pietrangelo
Stewart
1st ++
See i can put a dumb ass post to


Last edited by McSuper: 03-08-2013 at 04:15 PM.
McSuper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 04:11 PM
  #9
blueNwhite89
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,050
vCash: 500
No need for STL to do this IMO. And Shatty is going nowhere.

blueNwhite89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 04:13 PM
  #10
Mystifo
No more Mr.FightGuy
 
Mystifo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: YYT
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,822
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by justiceofyoda View Post
Good Day,

Not a frequent poster but figured i would give a proposal a shot....feel free to send me back under the rock that i crawled from.

St. Louis gets:

Yakupov
Klefbom
Gagner
2013 1st round pick
2013 2nd round pick (Ana)

Edmonton gets:

Backes
Shattenkirk
Halak

Not sure what St.Louis' needs are but this would address Edmontons for sure. Not sure about value as i know Backes holds the 'C' and Shatty is lighting it up right now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PerryTurnbullfan View Post
Gagner
Hall
Schultz
Smid
Klefbom
1st ++

really don't want to move any of these 3. Have to overpay.

From one extreme to the other. Beautiful HFBoards at its finest.

Mystifo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 04:17 PM
  #11
SirPaste
#HitchGonnaHitch
 
SirPaste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 12,510
vCash: 50
Sounds good, lets start the rebuild again!

SirPaste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 04:19 PM
  #12
CarvinSigX
The Toilet
 
CarvinSigX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 11,425
vCash: 1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedblue1223 View Post
Turrible
I read it "turdible" the first time.

These teams are NOT good trade partners. Edmonton doesn't have what the Blues need.

CarvinSigX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 04:44 PM
  #13
Johnny McBravo
Hello Connor
 
Johnny McBravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,643
vCash: 500
Yikes! Oilers pass on this. We need Klefbom.

Johnny McBravo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 04:50 PM
  #14
misfit
5-14-6-1
 
misfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of...ever
Posts: 16,128
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo View Post
Yikes! Oilers pass on this. We need Klefbom.
We'd need him a lot less with Shattenkirk in the mix.

__________________
If you are offended by this post, it's probably because you're ugly.
misfit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 05:02 PM
  #15
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,226
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeridAl View Post
Oilers pass
I don't know if they do. We'd get a number one goalie, a top pair d-man and a physical top 6 forward. Our three biggest holes, filled in one deal. I do think that value wise its an overpay, but if we were to change the 2013 first to a 2014, I'd be happy with the deal.

St. Louis is trading 2 (maybe 3, not sure of Halak's status) pieces of their core, and it would certainly hurt the present team at the expense of the future, so I doubt they take it though.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 05:47 PM
  #16
underslept
"well-informed"
 
underslept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: Poland
Posts: 2,504
vCash: 500
Neither team would do this.

underslept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 06:11 PM
  #17
danglzzz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 359
vCash: 500
Was gonna try to be nice buuuuuuut...go ahead and GTF back under your rock.

danglzzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 06:38 PM
  #18
MattyMo35
Schwartz Be With You
 
MattyMo35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 12,312
vCash: 500
I shudder to think of the Blues lines after this. Especially with the goaltending duo of Allen/Elliott.

MattyMo35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 06:54 PM
  #19
WeridAl
YuckaFlux
 
WeridAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10ft of Snow
Posts: 1,748
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by misfit View Post
We'd need him a lot less with Shattenkirk in the mix.
Klefbom brings size and toughness, and Shattenkirk doesn't have that. Like Shattenkirk, but after seeing what LA did to him in the playoffs last year, not worth giving up Klefbom for.

WeridAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 07:00 PM
  #20
WeridAl
YuckaFlux
 
WeridAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10ft of Snow
Posts: 1,748
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
I don't know if they do. We'd get a number one goalie, a top pair d-man and a physical top 6 forward. Our three biggest holes, filled in one deal. I do think that value wise its an overpay, but if we were to change the 2013 first to a 2014, I'd be happy with the deal.

St. Louis is trading 2 (maybe 3, not sure of Halak's status) pieces of their core, and it would certainly hurt the present team at the expense of the future, so I doubt they take it though.
Shattenkirk is not a top pair D, very good 2nd pair, but not top pair. I'm not sold on Halak, Dubie has been playing well and not sure if Halak could do better with the Oiler team. The only thing I love would be Backes, exactly what the Oilers need.

WeridAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 07:03 PM
  #21
bleedblue1223
Fire Army
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 29,033
vCash: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeridAl View Post
Shattenkirk is not a top pair D, very good 2nd pair, but not top pair. I'm not sold on Halak, Dubie has been playing well and not sure if Halak could do better with the Oiler team. The only thing I love would be Backes, exactly what the Oilers need.
So you're saying Shattenkirk is a top 60 defenseman? He is easily in the 20-30 range, especially with his play this season.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 07:13 PM
  #22
WeridAl
YuckaFlux
 
WeridAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10ft of Snow
Posts: 1,748
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedblue1223 View Post
So you're saying Shattenkirk is a top 60 defenseman? He is easily in the 20-30 range, especially with his play this season.
I like his play, and he has played well, but he's still not a top pairing D.

WeridAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 07:15 PM
  #23
bleedblue1223
Fire Army
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 29,033
vCash: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedblue1223 View Post
So you're saying Shattenkirk is a top 60 defenseman? He is easily in the 20-30 range, especially with his play this season.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeridAl View Post
I like his play, and he has played well, but he's still not a top pairing D.
Like I said, to not be top pairing, he needs to be outside of the top 60 in the league.

bleedblue1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 07:17 PM
  #24
HooliganX2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,859
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeridAl View Post
Shattenkirk is not a top pair D, very good 2nd pair, but not top pair. I'm not sold on Halak, Dubie has been playing well and not sure if Halak could do better with the Oiler team. The only thing I love would be Backes, exactly what the Oilers need.
Shattenkirk is easily a top pairing defense man. To argue he's not means you haven't seen him play much.

HooliganX2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2013, 07:44 PM
  #25
BarDownBobo
Registered User
 
BarDownBobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Yak City
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,529
vCash: 512
Honestly I find value comparable, but there's no reason either team would do this IMO. Doesn't match up with their timelines for success.

BarDownBobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.