HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Vancouver-Toronto

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-06-2013, 03:51 PM
  #1
geebaan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 73
vCash: 500
Vancouver-Toronto

I was watching this piece on tv about how the leafs might trade Bozak, as they already have Grabovski for 5.5mill a year, and Bozak could ask for as much as 4-4.5, something they wouldn't want to pay. Canucks could really use this guy from a face-off/scoring perspective, and could be a great rental.

Schroeder
Kevin Connaughton
2nd Round Pick

for

Tyler Bozak

too little? toom much? what y'all think

geebaan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 03:53 PM
  #2
DougGilmour93
Registered User
 
DougGilmour93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,143
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by geebaan View Post
I was watching this piece on tv about how the leafs might trade Bozak, as they already have Grabovski for 5.5mill a year, and Bozak could ask for as much as 4-4.5, something they wouldn't want to pay. Canucks could really use this guy from a face-off/scoring perspective, and could be a great rental.

Schroeder
Kevin Connaughton
2nd Round Pick

for

Tyler Bozak

too little? toom much? what y'all think
No sense getting all those assets involved. Just send us a 1st and be done with it.

DougGilmour93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 03:54 PM
  #3
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,743
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by geebaan View Post
I was watching this piece on tv about how the leafs might trade Bozak, as they already have Grabovski for 5.5mill a year, and Bozak could ask for as much as 4-4.5, something they wouldn't want to pay. Canucks could really use this guy from a face-off/scoring perspective, and could be a great rental.

Schroeder
Kevin Connaughton
2nd Round Pick

for

Tyler Bozak

too little? toom much? what y'all think
Schroeder's working fine thank you. And our top D prospect and a second for Bozak, who is UFA this off season? Huge pass thank you.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 03:56 PM
  #4
LPH
[hello] :)
 
LPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Granduland
Country: United States
Posts: 40,436
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougGilmour93 View Post
No sense getting all those assets involved. Just send us a 1st and be done with it.
Bozak is not worth a first, he would need to be good defensively to even be effective on our team. A #3 Centre who cant play defense? No thanks

he's worth way more to the leafs than the canucks

LPH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 03:57 PM
  #5
GordieHoweHatTrick
Registered User
 
GordieHoweHatTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,910
vCash: 500
Too much for Bozak. Leafs won't trade him though because he's carved a niche out as Kessel's linemate

GordieHoweHatTrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:05 PM
  #6
Drew311
Play Me
 
Drew311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,915
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by live playoff hockey View Post
Bozak is not worth a first, he would need to be good defensively to even be effective on our team. A #3 Centre who cant play defense? No thanks

he's worth way more to the leafs than the canucks
How is he bad defensively?

Drew311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:07 PM
  #7
roach9
Registered User
 
roach9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,584
vCash: 500
People are getting exceptionally good at trolling around these parts. Hopefully y'all realize trolls when you see them.

roach9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:09 PM
  #8
Todds Chiropractory
Registered User
 
Todds Chiropractory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,177
vCash: 50
Wouldn't move Schroeder one for one

Todds Chiropractory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:14 PM
  #9
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,743
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by roach9 View Post
People are getting exceptionally good at trolling around these parts. Hopefully y'all realize trolls when you see them.
Yes, but many that deliberately troll convince others that they are not, and then we end up with someone saying Bozak is worth that much to the Canucks, or vice versa.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:17 PM
  #10
blueNwhite89
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,798
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by live playoff hockey View Post
Bozak is not worth a first, he would need to be good defensively to even be effective on our team. A #3 Centre who cant play defense? No thanks

he's worth way more to the leafs than the canucks
what is it that makes you say he's bad defensively?

blueNwhite89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:22 PM
  #11
blankall
Registered User
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,231
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by geebaan View Post
I was watching this piece on tv about how the leafs might trade Bozak, as they already have Grabovski for 5.5mill a year, and Bozak could ask for as much as 4-4.5, something they wouldn't want to pay. Canucks could really use this guy from a face-off/scoring perspective, and could be a great rental.

Schroeder
Kevin Connaughton
2nd Round Pick

for

Tyler Bozak

too little? toom much? what y'all think
Way too much from Vancouver.

Bozak is not having the greatest year and is an upcomming UFA. You'll get a 2nd at most. Rental players like Bozak do not go for 1sts.

blankall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:27 PM
  #12
Sonny21
Registerd User
 
Sonny21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,627
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Way too much from Vancouver.

Bozak is not having the greatest year and is an upcomming UFA. You'll get a 2nd at most. Rental players like Bozak do not go for 1sts.
Do you watch every leaf game? In what assessment was it that you came to the conclusion his not having the greatest year when he has become elite face off guy (3rd in NHL) and having as good year as well.

You're right though, only juggernauts like Gaustad are worth a 1st He will MOST definitely fetch a 1st if he were to be traded (22+ 1st)

Sonny21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:32 PM
  #13
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,483
vCash: 5555
I don't think adding Bozak is worth giving up Schroeder or a 1st. A 2nd + B prospect is the most I'd want to give up.

Vankiller Whale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:53 PM
  #14
BlueBaron
Registered User
 
BlueBaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toronto, On
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,482
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLblue75 View Post
what is it that makes you say he's bad defensively?
Basically having no idea what he is talking about.

This is an odd proposal, we need Bozak for the playoffs if we make it. Stop thinking like a rebuilding team. Also there is no way in hell Bozak will get much more than 2.5 Mil unless it's from a desperate bottom feeder.

Also it's generally a bad idea to make trade proposals with Vancouver because all they generall have for us is snide insults.

BlueBaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 04:55 PM
  #15
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,743
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny21 View Post
Do you watch every leaf game? In what assessment was it that you came to the conclusion his not having the greatest year when he has become elite face off guy (3rd in NHL) and having as good year as well.

You're right though, only juggernauts like Gaustad are worth a 1st He will MOST definitely fetch a 1st if he were to be traded (22+ 1st)
Welcome to 2013, where Poni and Gagne got 4th. Bozak isn't that much more valuable to us then either player. Value is what the market will pay, we won't pay a 1st for Bozak, so the value of Bozak to Vancouver is less then a first. If there are other teams willing to pay that, swell, but we're not one of them.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:01 PM
  #16
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,743
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBaron View Post
Basically having no idea what he is talking about.

This is an odd proposal, we need Bozak for the playoffs if we make it. Stop thinking like a rebuilding team. Also there is no way in hell Bozak will get much more than 2.5 Mil unless it's from a desperate bottom feeder.

Also it's generally a bad idea to make trade proposals with Vancouver because all they generall have for us is snide insults.
And a prospect we drafted in the first round that we've taken 3 years developping and is now finally impacting our roster for a player that was a throw in for a Luongo deal, whom we didn't really care for as a fan base anyway, is...damn fine programming?

It's a bad idea to make crap proposals with Vancouver. Where is the reasoning for Vancouver to make this deal? We're getting called out for not watching a player one of your fans is trying to sell us, but the same guy couldn't even be bother to properly spell the name of the guys he's asking for.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:04 PM
  #17
Hennig
It was 4-1.
 
Hennig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,449
vCash: 1684
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLblue75 View Post
what is it that makes you say he's bad defensively?
What you don't know? Everyone on the leafs is bad defensively. Even our goalies suck at defense.

Hennig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:06 PM
  #18
showtime8
Registered User
 
showtime8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,462
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuckaholic19 View Post
Wouldn't move Schroeder one for one
Why not?

Bozak is better in a lot of aspects of the game and the reason that the Canucks are looking for depth at centre is because they don't trust Schroeder going forward this season.

showtime8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:11 PM
  #19
Ricky Bobby
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,560
vCash: 500
If Bozak hasn't signed with the Leafs by the trade deadline and a 1st was offered I'd trade Bozak in a heartbeat.

Acquiring a 1st would give the Leafs a great asset to put towards acquiring a top end D or top end center in the off-season.

Toronto even if they make the playoffs isn't a legitimate cup contender with or without Bozak.

Ricky Bobby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:11 PM
  #20
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,743
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by showtime8 View Post
Why not?

Bozak is better in a lot of aspects of the game and the reason that the Canucks are looking for depth at centre is because they don't trust Schroeder going forward this season.


Umm...say what? Why wouldn't we trust him at center? It sucks he's on the 4th line at present, but AV didn't trust him, how is he getting PP time with the Sedins? AV isn't afraid to scratch a player, age or rookie status be darned, if his play isn't what he's looking for, and it usually starts with PP time being taken away.

He's not up rooting Hank, Kesler played 7 games as 2C, Ebbett we dumped for Schroeder, Raymond (for now) is playing very well at C, and Lapierre finally seems to want to be out of the doghouse as our shutdown center. Bozak might be better at present, but not enough to make up for the bright shiny future Schroeder seems to have with the Canucks.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:25 PM
  #21
Cloudedthought
Registered User
 
Cloudedthought's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 188
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBaron View Post
Basically having no idea what he is talking about.

This is an odd proposal, we need Bozak for the playoffs if we make it. Stop thinking like a rebuilding team. Also there is no way in hell Bozak will get much more than 2.5 Mil unless it's from a desperate bottom feeder.

Also it's generally a bad idea to make trade proposals with Vancouver because all they generall have for us is snide insults.
I guess we are not pumping your tires enough?

Cloudedthought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:28 PM
  #22
Sonny21
Registerd User
 
Sonny21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,627
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cogburn View Post
Welcome to 2013, where Poni and Gagne got 4th. Bozak isn't that much more valuable to us then either player. Value is what the market will pay, we won't pay a 1st for Bozak, so the value of Bozak to Vancouver is less then a first. If there are other teams willing to pay that, swell, but we're not one of them.
Those players aren't even close to the production or as valuable as Bozak is. There's a reason Brown fetched the same return as those players.

I don't really care if Vancouver would pay a 1st as I highly doubt we'd trade Bozak but he will fetch us a 1st if he were to be traded. It's one thing to say WE WON"T trade a 1st but another to assume Bozak value isn't that of 1st or that he won't fetch one from another team.

Sonny21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:31 PM
  #23
snizzbone
Give me the puck ;-)
 
snizzbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,348
vCash: 500
Vancouver wishes they had Bozak right about now.

snizzbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:36 PM
  #24
Flair Hay
Registered User
 
Flair Hay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,133
vCash: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLblue75 View Post
what is it that makes you say he's bad defensively?
He doesn't know what he's talking about.

Flair Hay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-06-2013, 05:54 PM
  #25
Cloudedthought
Registered User
 
Cloudedthought's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 188
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flowzie View Post
Vancouver wishes they had Bozak right about now.
I cant disagree...

But I also think both teams can find better fits. For Vancouver we would have to overpay for a piece we could get some where cheaper and more seasoned,with playoff experience.
Maple leafs could get some picks or prospects which Vancouver lacks both of.

Cloudedthought is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.