HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Arizona Coyotes
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Contracts for Boedker and Smith

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-20-2013, 10:27 AM
  #26
Sindiggy
Go Desert Dogs
 
Sindiggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Country: United States
Posts: 2,563
vCash: 500
GMDM can't commit $4m/yr to a goalie that has had 1 good year and 1 incredible playoff performance.

Face it, he's been crap this year... .900 save pct is just not good enough at the NHL level to win games, especially if we're not the Blackhawks or Lightening or Penguins. We can't allow 2.85 goals a game and think we're going to win, not going to happen.

Sindiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-20-2013, 09:05 PM
  #27
hbk
Registered User
 
hbk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,604
vCash: 500
We're getting the Smith that everyone feared we were acquiring when we originally signed him. There's lots of .900 save percentage goalies available at less than $6 million. I understand if Maloney offers him $4 M + but he'd be losing years on my contact offer and I'd likely start with a salary number that starts with a 3.

hbk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-20-2013, 11:21 PM
  #28
Guest
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,252
vCash: 500
I actually think this year can be a toss out. Smith had a great year last year, and it's not uncommon for players to burnout after an extended playoff run that is emotional and overachieving. I don't want to commit big dollars to Smith at the same time. He's proven to be worth his current contract, and I think if he wants a major raise (like doubling his contract) then he needs to prove it more than once. Sign another one or two way deal.

The funny thing to me about all of this is how often Tippett teams are credited with making a goalie. For the most part that has not been the case this year, and it's not done much for Barbs either. I think Tippett teams can make a good goalie look great (Smith, Bryz, Turco) but it's all relative to the talent you are starting with. I think that Smith has enough talent to put together more successful than not seasons under a Tippett coached team.

On a side note, I can't help but feel the team ownership factors into things. I've probably been saying that for four years, but I think in some limited circumstances it could be more considerable than others. I think it impacts a guy like Doan more than a guy like Sullivan for sure. I think someone like Smith, a pending free agent, can look at it in the back of their mind and make them uneasy. I know no one wants to hear excuses, but it would be foolish to say that it has no impact on players.

Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-20-2013, 11:26 PM
  #29
Naurutger
#FreeMax
 
Naurutger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maricopa County
Country: United States
Posts: 5,144
vCash: 1329
When Smith gets time off he comes back on fire but during this stretch they are working him. $4 m a year sure, but too many goalies in the system to not use them and over pay.

Naurutger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.