HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Speculation/Be a GM Thread

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-24-2013, 02:37 PM
  #376
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calad View Post
Maybe Gaborik can go the other way?
Rebuild =/= Gaborik. Lol. If they move him they're dumb and 2 they're rebuilding

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:38 PM
  #377
Rangers Fail
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Rangers Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 17,518
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
Sadly ur prob right..
Beaver did have excellent chemistry with Eriksson, but yeah, Crosby couldn't score goals in this system.

Rangers Fail is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:39 PM
  #378
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grind Jam Grind View Post
Beaver did have excellent chemistry with Eriksson, but yeah, Crosby couldn't score goals in this system.
I agree don't matter who we trade/get the biggest change needs to be the system.

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:45 PM
  #379
NYR Sting
Heart and Soul
 
NYR Sting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,506
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernmeister View Post
Thank you. Here's what I see are full sides of your picture.

Kesler MAYBE can be had, at all.
Kesler may EVEN be had at reduced level due to damage from injury history.

There IS a chance he could be Drury 2.0, although I don't think, IMO, that that would be immediate. As best as I can tell, the recent issues are not overriding critical, like severe concussion. The immediate thing was the broken foot.

We have fortunate timing in that Kesler may be limited/no use to 'nucks this year.

We have unfortunate situation that even if Kesler does not play, or if at all is compromised, the likely area they will focus on is C. Regardless of Kesler being moved or not moved in any other deal with any other club, their primary focus will be IMO, will be another C.

The dynamic is not yet set in stone.

Kesler would be likely improvement/replacement for Stepan --- yes, there is some gamble, but unless/until Kesler gets major concussion, I think the risk is acceptable.

Of course, the upgrade to Kesler is not worth Gaborik, as well as the utility of Biron to facilitate moving Luongo now.

However, I tagged a HUGE + Van. would have to send back.
In addition to first, we'd want prospects. Do we think they have ANY prospects, prefer. a C, who could make this worthwhile moving forward?

In other words, we take the hit this year and move for next year we not only have Kesler to replace Stepan --- THAT'S ONE FOR ONE, so short term we are ok there --- but we also have ______ which improves us, hopefully at C as well

If we say to Van. we bail you out with Stepan today, what (2 Cs) will you give us for tomorrow (one of which is Kesler)?
When the trade deadline passes and Kesler is still a Canuck, and Stepan is still a Ranger, when there is no Rangers/Blackhawks trade involving Boyle for Olsen, when the Rangers don't trade Stepan for Yandle, etc., do us all a favor and use that moment as an opportunity to learn something that you probably should have figured out sometime ago: trade proposals aren't for you.

NYR Sting is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:46 PM
  #380
Championship*
#Joel&Ellie
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,503
vCash: 500
Loui would probably cost MDZ + Kreider + A pick. Hefty.

Championship* is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:49 PM
  #381
Sticky Fingers
Registered User
 
Sticky Fingers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,516
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR Sting View Post
When the trade deadline passes and Kesler is still a Canuck, and Stepan is still a Ranger, when there is no Rangers/Blackhawks trade involving Boyle for Olsen, when the Rangers don't trade Stepan for Yandle, etc., do us all a favor and use that moment as an opportunity to learn something that you probably should have figured out sometime ago: trade proposals aren't for you.
Haha

Sticky Fingers is online now  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:50 PM
  #382
Rangers Fail
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Rangers Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 17,518
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR Sting View Post
When the trade deadline passes and Kesler is still a Canuck, and Stepan is still a Ranger, when there is no Rangers/Blackhawks trade involving Boyle for Olsen, when the Rangers don't trade Stepan for Yandle, etc., do us all a favor and use that moment as an opportunity to learn something that you probably should have figured out sometime ago: trade proposals aren't for you.


Time to put the trade proposals to bed, Bern. I'll send you a copy of NHL 13 if you want.

Rangers Fail is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:51 PM
  #383
JeffMangum
mfw Flyers D
 
JeffMangum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Listening to music
Country: United States
Posts: 56,439
vCash: 300
Rangers need depth. Acquiring Eriksson only makes sense if Gaborik is moved for two 2nd/3rd line players.

Eriksson is awesome, though. One of the best two-way players in the world right now.

__________________

#TannerGlass2014
SEEN YOUR VIDEO!
#SheWentToHarvard
JeffMangum is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:52 PM
  #384
Vidic15
Registered User
 
Vidic15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Country: Romania
Posts: 1,079
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Championship View Post
Loui would probably cost MDZ + Kreider + A pick. Hefty.
I'd trade Kreider for him. Eriksson is on a good contract.

Vidic15 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 02:56 PM
  #385
NYR Sting
Heart and Soul
 
NYR Sting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,506
vCash: 500
Joe Nieuwendyk should be fired on the spot if he trades Loui Eriksson. What an awful move that would be. Other than Lundqvist, Callahan, and maybe McDonagh, there isn't a single player I wouldn't move from this team to get LE.

NYR Sting is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 03:05 PM
  #386
Rangers Fail
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Rangers Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 17,518
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR Sting View Post
Joe Nieuwendyk should be fired on the spot if he trades Loui Eriksson. What an awful move that would be. Other than Lundqvist, Callahan, and maybe McDonagh, there isn't a single player I wouldn't move from this team to get LE.
This is the guy that traded James Neal and Niskanen for Goligoski...

So, branching off of that, let's do MDZ for Eriksson and Brenden Dillon!

Rangers Fail is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 03:15 PM
  #387
Punxrocknyc19*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,233
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grind Jam Grind View Post
This is the guy that traded James Neal and Niskanen for Goligoski...

So, branching off of that, let's do MDZ for Eriksson and Brenden Dillon!
where do i sign add Roussel and we will give then Boyle..

Del Zotto and Boyle for Eriksson Dillon and Roussel

Punxrocknyc19* is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 03:47 PM
  #388
Vitto79
Registered User
 
Vitto79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sarnia
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,486
vCash: 500
its Eklund but if true it would be nice if this was Louii Eriksson to the Rangers in a Gaborik deal..........one can dream

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklun...2#.UU9l7Bc3uCc

Vitto79 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 03:49 PM
  #389
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR Sting View Post
Joe Nieuwendyk should be fired on the spot if he trades Loui Eriksson. What an awful move that would be. Other than Lundqvist, Callahan, and maybe McDonagh, there isn't a single player I wouldn't move from this team to get LE.
You'd put Callahan as an untouchable for Loui Eriksson, the most complete winger in the NHL and signed to a bargain contract?

Kershaw is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 03:56 PM
  #390
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenith View Post
Rangers need depth. Acquiring Eriksson only makes sense if Gaborik is moved for two 2nd/3rd line players.

Eriksson is awesome, though. One of the best two-way players in the world right now.
I would trade Gaborik for parts if we got Erikkson

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 03:58 PM
  #391
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grind Jam Grind View Post


Time to put the trade proposals to bed, Bern. I'll send you a copy of NHL 13 if you want.
I'll take a copy for ps3..

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 03:59 PM
  #392
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Del Zotto Kreider 1st for Eriksson.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 03:59 PM
  #393
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kershaw View Post
Del Zotto Kreider 1st for Eriksson.
I'd do that definitely but we don't have a 1st

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 04:00 PM
  #394
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kershaw View Post
You'd put Callahan as an untouchable for Loui Eriksson, the most complete winger in the NHL and signed to a bargain contract?
This.. I'd give up anyone other than Hank.

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 04:01 PM
  #395
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
I'd do that definitely but we don't have a 1st
2014 First or the First in a potential Gaborik trade.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 04:04 PM
  #396
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
This.. I'd give up anyone other than Hank.
Agreed.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 04:08 PM
  #397
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,404
vCash: 500
With that said... Erikkson straight up for Mcdonagh?

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 04:10 PM
  #398
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
With that said... Erikkson straight up for Mcdonagh?
Yeah, I'd do it. Eriksson has the best contract in the league and would become likely the team's best and most complete player. Maybe he can kickstart Richards again as they played on the same line when he was above PPG. Losing McD would suck, but we have the depth in LHD to still have it as a position of strength. Staal-Del Zotto-Skjei.

Kershaw is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 04:11 PM
  #399
Bob Richards
Mr. Mojo Risin'
 
Bob Richards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 46,046
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundsanity30 View Post
With that said... Erikkson straight up for Mcdonagh?
Really grit your teeth on that but Loui is an amazing hockey player. I might just pull that trigger if I was in Slats' chair.

__________________
"New day, new hope. Richards Buyout 2014". -Ail
Bob Richards is offline  
Old
03-24-2013, 04:15 PM
  #400
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kershaw View Post
Yeah, I'd do it. Eriksson has the best contract in the league and would become likely the team's best and most complete player. Maybe he can kickstart Richards again as they played on the same line when he was above PPG. Losing McD would suck, but we have the depth in LHD to still have it as a position of strength. Staal-Del Zotto-Skjei.
I agree .. erikkson-richards-gaborik. Hagelin-stepan-nash. Kreider-miller-callahan. And we still wouldn't score lol.

Lundsanity30 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.