That disallowed goal late in the first would have made a huge difference for us starting the second period . It's déja vu all over again , we let the other team take the early lead and we are trying to catch them . Kinda hard to win games when you always start late . On the bright side i think that PAP had a good period , well at least that's the guy i saw the most in the first .
The league wants scoring up....
1)goalie outside the crease then they can't be protected from that kind of contact. I'm not advocating charging, but that was just soft.
2)make that call and players "pushed" into crease reviewable
69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgment of the Referee(s), and not by means of video replay or review.
69.4 Contact Outside the Goal Crease - If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.