HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

SJS-Vancouver

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-28-2013, 02:31 PM
  #1
Canadian Gold X3
It is what it is.
 
Canadian Gold X3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,399
vCash: 500
SJS-Vancouver

To

Martin Havlat

To
David Booth

Kevin Connauton

2013 2nd round pick

Fair or not?

Canadian Gold X3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:32 PM
  #2
Arkansas Shark
Rebuild lol
 
Arkansas Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Underground Bunker
Country: United States
Posts: 3,372
vCash: 500
Don't want any part of David Booth. No from SJ

Arkansas Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:33 PM
  #3
miscbrahh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 27
vCash: 500
david booth sucks

miscbrahh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:33 PM
  #4
Canadian Gold X3
It is what it is.
 
Canadian Gold X3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,399
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkansas Shark View Post
Don't want any part of David Booth. No from SJ
Would Raymond be of interest?

Canadian Gold X3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:34 PM
  #5
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,565
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Classless One View Post
Would Raymond be of interest?
I came into this thread thinking:

"Don't let it be for Raymond, please don't let it be for Raymond"

and then to my great surprise, Raymond was not involved in the deal at all! joy!

Then I saw your post.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:35 PM
  #6
Co Ho*
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,367
vCash: 500
Yeah we won't get much for Booth, his value is at an all time low. Multiple injuries lately and low point production, although he's looked decent when he has been on the ice. Maybe deal him next trade deadline if he puts up another 20+ goal season and we need cap space or a playmaker instead.

San Jose fans, any chance Demers is available?

Co Ho* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:38 PM
  #7
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,565
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Nucks View Post
Yeah we won't get much for Booth, his value is at an all time low. Multiple injuries lately and low point production, although he's looked decent when he has been on the ice. Maybe deal him next trade deadline if he puts up another 20+ goal season and we need cap space or a playmaker instead.

San Jose fans, any chance Demers is available?
It's not out of the question, but pretty unlikely once Murray was traded. Especially not at the deadline. Sharks have Irwin up already and their most NHL guy after that is Petrecki, who isn't exactly a replacement for Demers. Acolotse is injured (broken jaw) and Tennysson is a maybe next season, Albetshauser is atleast a full season away, along with Demelo.

Point is, we are swimming in talented defensive prospects, but that still doesn't make Demers expendable. I'd sooner trade Braun.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:39 PM
  #8
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,803
vCash: 50
What would it cost for Havlat? I thought you guys wanted to add speed to the lineup? Why no interest in Raymond he's tied for the Canucks lead in goals.

Horvat2Virtanen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:39 PM
  #9
caley
Moderator
 
caley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,182
vCash: 500
I'd probably do it from a San Jose viewpoint, you get a player who - let's be honest here - is likely going to be in and out of the lineup about as often as Havlat with maybe a slight dip in production, whom you can always buy out in 2014 if he doesn't rebound, throw in a 2nd rounder and a pretty solid prospect, and all you lose is a guy who has seasons of 27 points and (prorated) 22 points respectively.

For the Canucks, I would absolutely not do it.

__________________
Dan O'Toole: "So if I have this right, only acceptable goal celebration in NHL is to put hands at your sides and then feel shame."
caley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:39 PM
  #10
Canadian Jesus
Registered User
 
Canadian Jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 220
vCash: 1850
Sharks should do it

Canadian Jesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:40 PM
  #11
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,803
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by caley View Post
I'd probably do it from a San Jose viewpoint, you get a player who - let's be honest here - is likely going to be in and out of the lineup about as often as Havlat with maybe a slight dip in production, whom you can always buy out in 2014 if he doesn't rebound, throw in a 2nd rounder and a pretty solid prospect, and all you lose is a guy who has seasons of 27 points and (prorated) 22 points respectively.

For the Canucks, I would absolutely not do it.
Canucks do this deal 10/10 IMO.

Horvat2Virtanen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:41 PM
  #12
Arkansas Shark
Rebuild lol
 
Arkansas Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Underground Bunker
Country: United States
Posts: 3,372
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Classless One View Post
Would Raymond be of interest?
No Raymond either

Do the Canucks have any speedy winger prospects? I'm not very familiar with their prospect pool outside Jensen.

Arkansas Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:43 PM
  #13
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,565
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Canuck View Post
What would it cost for Havlat? I thought you guys wanted to add speed to the lineup? Why no interest in Raymond he's tied for the Canucks lead in goals.
So... get faster by trading one of the faster skaters on the team? That makes loads of sense.

We don't want Raymond because he's an injury risk and prone to inconsistency. Havlat is an injury risk, but when he's playing he's consistent as hell. Our record with Havlat in the line up is dramatic compared to when he isn't.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:44 PM
  #14
Canadian Gold X3
It is what it is.
 
Canadian Gold X3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,399
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkansas Shark View Post
No Raymond either

Do the Canucks have any speedy winger prospects? I'm not very familiar with their prospect pool outside Jensen.
We have Schroeder who can play both C and Wing effectively. Most nucks fans would be against it, I however, am not opposed to it.

Canadian Gold X3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:45 PM
  #15
ItsAllPartOfThePlan
Registered User
 
ItsAllPartOfThePlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Canuck View Post
Canucks do this deal 10/10 IMO.
What? No we don't.

ItsAllPartOfThePlan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:46 PM
  #16
druncan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the city
Country: Scotland
Posts: 1,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Nucks View Post
Yeah we won't get much for Booth, his value is at an all time low. Multiple injuries lately and low point production, although he's looked decent when he has been on the ice. Maybe deal him next trade deadline if he puts up another 20+ goal season and we need cap space or a playmaker instead.

San Jose fans, any chance Demers is available?
I can't imagine he would be unless it were part of a bigger package. Sharks traded Murray to help clear up the logjam at the blueline, so dealing Demers as well would then create a bit of a depth issue for this season. They're not in full-on rebuild mode as they still fancy themselves a contender, but even if they were, he probably wouldn't be one of the assets the Sharks would use to get picks or prospects, unless he were part of a package. Maybe in the offseason.

druncan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:47 PM
  #17
Co Ho*
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,367
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Canuck View Post
What would it cost for Havlat? I thought you guys wanted to add speed to the lineup? Why no interest in Raymond he's tied for the Canucks lead in goals.
Trading Raymond for Havlat makes us a worse team. Terrible idea.

Co Ho* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:54 PM
  #18
Love
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,058
vCash: 500
Really bad for Vancouver

Love is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:57 PM
  #19
Arkansas Shark
Rebuild lol
 
Arkansas Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Underground Bunker
Country: United States
Posts: 3,372
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Nucks View Post
Yeah we won't get much for Booth, his value is at an all time low. Multiple injuries lately and low point production, although he's looked decent when he has been on the ice. Maybe deal him next trade deadline if he puts up another 20+ goal season and we need cap space or a playmaker instead.

San Jose fans, any chance Demers is available?
If Demers is on the table, Jensen would have to be included from VAN. That's how Demers is valued.

Arkansas Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 02:57 PM
  #20
Stonz
Registered User
 
Stonz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Burnaby, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,161
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Classless One View Post
We have Schroeder who can play both C and Wing effectively. Most nucks fans would be against it, I however, am not opposed to it.
When has Schroeder ever shown to be effective as a winger?

Not interested enough in Havlat to even comment on the value of the proposal.

Stonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 03:00 PM
  #21
Co Ho*
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,367
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkansas Shark View Post
If Demers is on the table, Jensen would have to be included from VAN. That's how Demers is valued.
Damn, so Rodin + Sweatt doesn't look appealing?
It worked with Ehrhoff!

Co Ho* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 03:04 PM
  #22
Arkansas Shark
Rebuild lol
 
Arkansas Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Underground Bunker
Country: United States
Posts: 3,372
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Nucks View Post
Damn, so Rodin + Sweatt doesn't look appealing?
It worked with Ehrhoff!
lol hopefully not, but this is Doug Wilson we're talking about. He could gift another quality dman to you guys again.

Arkansas Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 03:05 PM
  #23
Panj
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Country: Canada
Posts: 19
vCash: 500
I wouldn't do it if I was MG.

Panj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 03:08 PM
  #24
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,915
vCash: 5555
I am all over this as a Canucks fan.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2013, 03:19 PM
  #25
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,803
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsAllPartOfThePlan View Post
What? No we don't.
Why wouldn't we? What's one valid reason why we don't do this deal?

Horvat2Virtanen is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.