HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Tampa Bay Lightning
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

4/9/13 - 7:30PM EDT - Ottawa vs Tampa Bay

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-09-2013, 09:15 PM
  #276
zeykshade
Registered User
 
zeykshade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Posts: 5,448
vCash: 500
LOL, another **** call from the refs. How is that holding the stick on Baby Jesus? Seriously he's being pitchforked around by the Sen.

zeykshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:15 PM
  #277
HoseEmUp
Registered User
 
HoseEmUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,044
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeykshade View Post
Don't listen to Potvin...Even Sens fans will tell you that if he's not talking, he's hitting his bong.
And deprive myself of that beautiful voice?

Never.

HoseEmUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:16 PM
  #278
zeykshade
Registered User
 
zeykshade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Posts: 5,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattM92 View Post
I'm pretty sure he's right. Same scenario as if a puck is kicked on net but touches someone stick before going in. It's a clean goal. Now if it's high sticked, it has to touch an opposing player before going in to cancel the high stick
Oh he's right, but he's stating some **** that doesn't need to be stated to any Ottawa Senators fan. They know this **** cold.

zeykshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:17 PM
  #279
IdealisticSniper
Registered User
 
IdealisticSniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,340
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattM92 View Post
I'm pretty sure he's right. Same scenario as if a puck is kicked on net but touches someone's stick before going in. It's a clean goal. Now if it's high sticked, it has to touch an opposing player before going in to cancel the high stick
Actually, I believe the rule is possession. Meaning a deflection off another stick without actual possession and it still doesnt count.

80.3 Disallowed Goal – When an attacking player causes the puck to enter the opponent’s goal by contacting the puck above the height of the crossbar, either directly or deflected off any player or official, the goal shall not be allowed. The determining factor is where the puck makes contact with the stick. If the puck makes contact with the stick below the level of the crossbar and enters the goal, this goal shall be allowed.

A goal scored as a result of a defending player striking the puck with his stick carried above the height of the crossbar of the goal frame into his own goal shall be allowed.

So no, hes not right.

IdealisticSniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:17 PM
  #280
The Wyzerhood
A league of his own
 
The Wyzerhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,935
vCash: 500
Stamkos looks like he's ****ing lost out there

The Wyzerhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:18 PM
  #281
MattM92
Registered User
 
MattM92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 3,880
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeykshade View Post
Oh he's right, but he's stating some **** that doesn't need to be stated to any Ottawa Senators fan. They know this **** cold.
Oh ok, thought you guys were disputing the validity, not the necessity of saying it.

MattM92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:18 PM
  #282
zeykshade
Registered User
 
zeykshade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Posts: 5,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IdealisticSniper View Post
Actually, I believe the rule is possession. Meaning a deflection off another stick without actual possession and it still doesnt count.

Let me see if I can find it
Really? I thought that if you put it off another player with a high stick(other than the goalie of course) it was ok.

Would make sense either way imo.

Rule 62 (d):

“Contacting the puck above the normal height of the shoulders with the stick is prohibited and when it occurs, play shall be stopped and the ensuing face-off shall be at the spot where the offense occurred, unless:

(1) a player of the non-offending team obtains possession and control of the puck, in which case play shall continue.

(2) a player of the offending side shall bat the puck into his own goal, in which case the goal shall be allowed.

(3) the offending team gains a territorial advantage, then the face-off shall be where the stoppage of play occurred, unless otherwise stated in the rules.” (Canadian Hockey Referee’s Case Book/Rule Combination, 2001, pg. 173).

zeykshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:18 PM
  #283
IdealisticSniper
Registered User
 
IdealisticSniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,340
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeykshade View Post
Oh he's right, but he's stating some **** that doesn't need to be stated to any Ottawa Senators fan. They know this **** cold.
Actually hes wrong

IdealisticSniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:18 PM
  #284
The YzerJesus
HoseEmAllAround
 
The YzerJesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: location location
Country: United States
Posts: 5,467
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by stryfe604 View Post
They are covered in padding. What is your point? It still hurts like a *****
If he hit where I'm thinking he hit, it doesn't hurt, especially with the amount of force Gonchar put on the slash. If he hit between the glove and the elbow pad, where there's no padding, then I can believe Panik there.

The YzerJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:19 PM
  #285
IdealisticSniper
Registered User
 
IdealisticSniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,340
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeykshade View Post
Really? I thought that if you put it off another player with a high stick(other than the goalie of course) it was ok.

Would make sense either way imo.
See my edit. I put the rule in my post.

IdealisticSniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:19 PM
  #286
Follower of Yzlam
#FreeDrouin
 
Follower of Yzlam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 12,008
vCash: 134
Sens fans are complaining about playing us...

I love Jon Cooper.

Follower of Yzlam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:20 PM
  #287
Felonious Python
Moderator
Purple Squirrel
 
Felonious Python's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Hot Seat
Posts: 13,520
vCash: 500
I'm sort of surprised that Malone got PP time on the 5-on-3 that resulted in Vinny's goal. Malone's been pretty rough this game.

Felonious Python is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:20 PM
  #288
MattM92
Registered User
 
MattM92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 3,880
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IdealisticSniper View Post
Actually, I believe the rule is possession. Meaning a deflection off another stick without actual possession and it still doesnt count.

80.3 Disallowed Goal – When an attacking player causes the puck to enter the opponent’s goal by contacting the puck above the height of the crossbar, either directly or deflected off any player or official, the goal shall not be allowed. The determining factor is where the puck makes contact with the stick. If the puck makes contact with the stick below the level of the crossbar and enters the goal, this goal shall be allowed.

A goal scored as a result of a defending player striking the puck with his stick carried above the height of the crossbar of the goal frame into his own goal shall be allowed.

So no, hes not right.

Well there you go. Good call IS

MattM92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:20 PM
  #289
IdealisticSniper
Registered User
 
IdealisticSniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,340
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeykshade View Post
Really? I thought that if you put it off another player with a high stick(other than the goalie of course) it was ok.

Would make sense either way imo.

Rule 62 (d):

“Contacting the puck above the normal height of the shoulders with the stick is prohibited and when it occurs, play shall be stopped and the ensuing face-off shall be at the spot where the offense occurred, unless:

(1) a player of the non-offending team obtains possession and control of the puck, in which case play shall continue.

(2) a player of the offending side shall bat the puck into his own goal, in which case the goal shall be allowed.

(3) the offending team gains a territorial advantage, then the face-off shall be where the stoppage of play occurred, unless otherwise stated in the rules.” (Canadian Hockey Referee’s Case Book/Rule Combination, 2001, pg. 173).
Youre looking at the wrong rule.

You have to look at the rules in 80. That are high sticking directly leading to a goal. Like this one:

80.3 Disallowed Goal – When an attacking player causes the puck to enter the opponent’s goal by contacting the puck above the height of the crossbar, either directly or deflected off any player or official, the goal shall not be allowed. The determining factor is where the puck makes contact with the stick. If the puck makes contact with the stick below the level of the crossbar and enters the goal, this goal shall be allowed.

A goal scored as a result of a defending player striking the puck with his stick carried above the height of the crossbar of the goal frame into his own goal shall be allowed.

IdealisticSniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:20 PM
  #290
Steve Yzerman
A New Season Begins
 
Steve Yzerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mississauga
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,524
vCash: 500
On one hand, I'm glad Aulie didn't fight Neil so Aulie can stay out and play, but on the other hand I wanted Aulie to stop Neil from talking smack.

Steve Yzerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:20 PM
  #291
HoseEmUp
Registered User
 
HoseEmUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,044
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattM92 View Post
I'm pretty sure he's right. Same scenario as if a puck is kicked on net but touches someone's stick before going in. It's a clean goal. Now if it's high sticked, it has to touch an opposing player before going in to cancel the high stick
Are you sure?

If you're right, my sincere apologies to next year's winner of The Voice.

EDIT: Seems I was right. Apology retracted.

HoseEmUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:21 PM
  #292
zeykshade
Registered User
 
zeykshade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Posts: 5,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by IdealisticSniper View Post
See my edit. I put the rule in my post.
Cool deal. That makes more sense as the puck wouldn't have been going toward the opponent player if it weren't high sticked in the first place. So Potvin is even deeper into his bong.

zeykshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:21 PM
  #293
IdealisticSniper
Registered User
 
IdealisticSniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,340
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattM92 View Post
Well there you go. Good call IS


IdealisticSniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:21 PM
  #294
The Wyzerhood
A league of his own
 
The Wyzerhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,935
vCash: 500
Labrie's happier about his hit on Cory than his 1st NHL goal

The Wyzerhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:21 PM
  #295
Felonious Python
Moderator
Purple Squirrel
 
Felonious Python's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Hot Seat
Posts: 13,520
vCash: 500
The only rule I know is #48.

Onus. Principle point of contact.

Felonious Python is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:22 PM
  #296
str8shooter
Rookie User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 189
vCash: 500
Really happy with Bishop tonight. If Lindback comes back soon, we'll officially put Garon out to pasture eh?

str8shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:22 PM
  #297
FDfranklin
Check Mate
 
FDfranklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,818
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tampa Bay Trio View Post
Labrie's happier about his hit on Cory than his 1st NHL goal
That was a very funny interview.

FDfranklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:22 PM
  #298
The Wyzerhood
A league of his own
 
The Wyzerhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,935
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crabby Williams View Post
Are you sure?

If you're right, my sincere apologies to next year's winner of The Voice.
Nah you're ok. It was a high stick, no goal was the right call.

The Wyzerhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:22 PM
  #299
zeykshade
Registered User
 
zeykshade's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Posts: 5,448
vCash: 500
So, had Turris high sticked the puck into Carle's high stick and it went in, it's a good goal? =p

zeykshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-09-2013, 09:22 PM
  #300
stryfe604
Believes in Yzergod
 
stryfe604's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,755
vCash: 500
Only in Murika would I see that horrible food commercial. Funny that its about how to re heat food, not make a healthy alternative because of the rising obesity.

Also Nacho is ****ing awesome. Best interview I have seen all season.

stryfe604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.