HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

dennis wideman trade?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-19-2013, 03:21 PM
  #1
Alberta_OReilly_Fan
Bruin fan since 1975
 
Alberta_OReilly_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Edmonton Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,331
vCash: 500
dennis wideman trade?

just looking forward for my bruins... I think a second puck moving dman would have more value to us than another grinder type like johnny boychuck.

the problem is boston is lacking cap room and wideman is signed for over 5 mill per season.

Calgary signed wideman when they were still trying to wiggle into the playoffs... now with iginla/kiprusoff gone the flames are going to want a couple high picks to rebuild with. wideman seems like kind of a stupid signing now.

so... here is my proposal... Calgary eats around 2 mill cap hit per year making wideman into a 3.25 mill cap hit for the rest of his contract... and boston gives Calgary boychuck and a first. or boychuck, caron, and a second...

the idea here is Calgary does have some kids that need a good vetern to help them with respectability over the next couple years. caron probably wont amount to much, but he might... and Calgary is gambling on college kids with way less potential than caron.

Calgary doesn't need wideman and I doubt they can trade him for any value at all unless they eat some cap hit... they wont need the cap room anyhow during the rebuild...

wideman was in boston before... he actually looked like a Norris trophy candiate while playing with chara... Hamilton will soon be ready to be the rh shot pp qb but having wideman around until he is would be a good thing.

a top 4 of chara/wideman/Seidenberg/Hamilton has tons of puck moving ability

id be in favor of bringing wideman back if Calgary was willing to eat some salary/cap... thoughts?

Alberta_OReilly_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-19-2013, 03:29 PM
  #2
Perro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,493
vCash: 500
with the emergance of brodie since the Boumeester trade this could be plausable. However eating that much salary for that many years could be problematic. Not sure how the cap eating retention stuff works, but is there a way that calgary only retains th 2mil the first year, or maybe 2 mil yr 1, and 1 mil in yr 2.

Perro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-19-2013, 03:39 PM
  #3
InfinityIggy
No Longer Flammable
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,625
vCash: 150
Would rather keep him, he has been much better than was advertised. Your entire premise is completely wrong. If we can't get any value for him why would we trade him to you?

InfinityIggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-19-2013, 11:42 PM
  #4
Sam Pollock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 50
vCash: 500
Wideman has a nmc and I don't see Feaster giving up on him after one season. Sorry.

Sam Pollock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2013, 12:13 AM
  #5
WhiteMandingo
Dr. Mantis Toboggan
 
WhiteMandingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,625
vCash: 500
Why would you want Wideman back? He was brutal by the end of his time in Boston. I wouldn't trade a 1st or Boychuck for him, let alone both.

WhiteMandingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2013, 01:13 AM
  #6
blankall
Registered User
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,439
vCash: 500
Too much cap being retained.

blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2013, 02:20 AM
  #7
tmurfin
500g1000pts
 
tmurfin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,643
vCash: 50
Don't see him going anywhere. He brings a lot to our club and we're not burning the whole team to the ground.

tmurfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2013, 04:45 AM
  #8
madmike77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,106
vCash: 500
No way Calgary eats that much cap. Plus they're already going to be near the cap floor. If they don't spend the money on Wideman they'll need to spend it on someone else.

madmike77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2013, 05:30 AM
  #9
LSnow
Registered User
 
LSnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Finland
Country: Finland
Posts: 3,274
vCash: 500
If i was Boston i would not take Wideman even if Calgary would eat 100% of his salary.

LSnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2013, 06:05 AM
  #10
Bourne Endeavor
Moderator
HFBoards: Night's Watch
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,351
vCash: 50
Calgary has no reason to trade him right now. His contract is awful and he's played well enough it seems for them. Why sell him for little value?

Bourne Endeavor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-20-2013, 06:18 AM
  #11
CreeksideStrangler
Registered User
 
CreeksideStrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,262
vCash: 500
Was pretty much run out of boston. I went to school with him... great guy... but worth more to Calgary

CreeksideStrangler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.