HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Buffalo Sabres
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

End of season report card

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-26-2013, 09:22 PM
  #1
gallagt01
Registered User
 
gallagt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sloan
Posts: 8,379
vCash: 500
End of season report card

I think I fired this guy up last year so I figured I'd do it again.

Forwards:

Ennis: C
-Ennis was unable to maintain the torrid scoring pace that he exhibited at the end of the 11-12 season. He channeled his inner Afinogenov far more often and it got him into some trouble at times. He was forced into some difficult defensive situations, especially early in the year, and struggled because of it. Provided offense on a team devoid of it. Really needs to take a major step forward next season.

Flynn: B
-Came up to play out a season of suck and performed like a regular NHL player. He was very responsible and reliable in all facets of the game. Showed some offensive upside and gave the team much-needed speed.

Foligno: D
-Foligno was a major disappointment this year, and not because of his offensive numbers. He did a lot of floating – a far cry from the player we saw late last year. Additionally, he wasn’t always engaged physically.

Gerbe: D-
-Nathan Gerbe is not an NHL player. This season validated that notion.

Grigorenko: C
-This would be a flat out F but I find it difficult to give Grigorenko a poor grade for being thrust into a league he was clearly not ready for. Overall, he never really hurt this team – he certainly didn’t help, either. I’d like to see him come to camp stronger and more willing to engage in puck battles and board play.

Hecht: B
-Despite popular belief, Hecht isn’t a bad player. That’s an ignorant point of view spread around these parts with regularity. He provided a solid veteran presence and, as he always does, performed responsible defensively. Coupled with a cheap contract, Hecht played very well this year (it’s not his fault coaches insisted on using him in bigger minutes at times). Thank you for the years of service, Jochen. Enjoy your time in the DEL.

Hodgson: C
-I refuse to give Hodgson a higher grade than Ennis and vise-versa. Both guys have a ton of potential and were in situations that probably weren’t great for their development. Hodgson had a great first half offensively but cooled off tremendously. He needs to take tremendous leaps in his defensive play. I think he’ll do that with a full training camp under his belt.

Kaleta: B-
The penalty killing, energy and attitude were there as per usual. Considering that five of the games Pat missed were due to a suspension, he stayed relatively healthy this year. The offense was virtually non-existent, but because he’s not paid to score, it didn’t impact his grade much (suspension did hurt).

Leino: N/A
-Ville couldn’t stay on the ice. As such, grading his play seems silly. He needs to be an impact player for the Sabres next year.

Ott: B-
-Came to Buffalo, played as advertised. He adopted a leadership role instantly. He always came to play and had some timely offense sporadically throughout the year. He loses points for ill-timed penalties and some late-game shenanigans (trying to trip Budaj late in a loss to MTL, trying to lick Halpern) that served as poor representations of the organization.

Porter: B
-Porter was fed some major minutes alongside Flynn and manned some hefty defensive responsibilities as the season went on. He’s certainly not the most talented, but I think he’s earned himself a roster spot for next year.

Scott: B
-No issues with Scott’s game. He’s a better hockey player than Andrew Peters ever was. Had some nice fights and was a great character guy for the room. I think he’ll be back.

Stafford: C-
-He didn’t play nearly as bad as the Buffalo faithful may indicate, but the lack of offense was too much to earn a higher grade. When you’re making $4 million, you better be finding the net. He didn’t.

Vanek: B-
-He played as he always does – injured and inconsistently. Had a great start to the year and came back down to Earth as injuries set it. I think his days in Buffalo are numbered.

Defensemen:

Ehrhoff: B
-Ehrhoff quietly enjoyed a hell of a year. The last few games here tainted an otherwise beauty of a plus/minus on a terrible team and his five goals matched his output from last season. He’ll be in line for a letter next year.

Leopold: D
-Leopold was awful. I have nothing more to say.

Myers: C-
-Myers was finally starting to turn the corner before his latest injury setback. He had a rough go from the start, and Buffalo’s success in the near future hinges largely on Myers’ ability to find his game once more.

Pardy: C-
-He’s a bad player that played poorly much of the time. He also accepted his demotion at the beginning of the year, provided a nice presence for Rochester and eventually earned a role on this team. He played well sometimes.

Pysyk: B
-The sample size is small, but Pysyk played a game he’d been advertised to play since he was drafted: smart, simple and effective. I’m looking forward to a full season next year.

Regehr: C
-Regehr wasn’t awful defensively, but his lack of puck moving ability really hampered the team’s defense. It’s really no surprise that the d improved dramatically when he was shipped out. Thanks for your services, Robyn.

Ruhwedel: B
-Like Pysyk, the sample size is way too small. But for a guy thrust into NHL action right out of college, he performed admirably. He’ll get an extended look in camp next year.

Sekera: B-
-‘Rej certainly didn’t play as he did in 11-12, but he wasn’t bad. He’s an effective puck mover and those are valuable on any team.

Weber: B
-Weber looked like a new player this year. I was tempted to give him an A simply for the very obvious improvement in his game. For a guy who has never exhibited his upside to be more than a bottom-pairing defender, he looked pretty damn good in top-four situations this year.

Goalies:

Enroth: B
-Enroth won some games. That in and of itself is an improvement.

Miller: B-
-He played pretty damn well at the start of the year. He clearly fell off as the season went on, and the fan base has turned on him, but overall, not an awful year.

Coaching:

Rolston: C-
-Not much changed when Rolston took over. He’s a minor league coach and seemed dejected when things went awry.

Ruff: D
-Regier made the right move in firing him.


Last edited by gallagt01: 04-26-2013 at 09:29 PM.
gallagt01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 09:27 PM
  #2
Mergus merganser
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,298
vCash: 500
hahaha... Vanek gets 41 points in 38 games and gets a B-..... Guess a 44 goal pace isn't good enough.

Oye

Mergus merganser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 09:38 PM
  #3
Stop Winnin
TANK ON BOYS
 
Stop Winnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 8,649
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mergus merganser View Post
hahaha... Vanek gets 41 points in 38 games and gets a B-..... Guess a 44 goal pace isn't good enough.

Oye
When you consider that half his points were scored in the first 10 games, yeah he gets a B- for the disappearing act he pulled when we needed him most.

Stop Winnin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 09:46 PM
  #4
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 56,679
vCash: 500
Awards:
Forwards:

Vanek: B+; When he was completely healthy, he was pretty damn good. When is he completely healthy?
Ott: B; Hitting and energy in spades, willing to step up to be a team spokesman when they needed a mouthpiece. Plays with his heart on his sleeve, both good and bad.
Hecht: B; Didn't expect much from the oft-broken Jochen, but he was still a defensive rock and late in the year chipped in, creating some scoring plays
Flynn: B; No expectations, played a smart game with and without the puck, provided speed and some timely scoring when it was sorely lacking
Kaleta: B; Still a pest and played well as a PKer and defensive specialist. Problems still with the Richards suspension and another shot-blocking injury to his oft-damaged hands.
Hodgson: C+; Strides made offensively, but exposed his defensive game as subpar. A lot of room for improvement here.
Porter: C+; Expected an energetic 4th liner and got it. Had some ups and downs, still a bit better than I expected.
Scott: C; tuning up Thornton set the tone for the Buffalo-Boston series which alone should give him better marks, but there were loses to guys like Ott and Parros that didn't help them. Still wouldn't mind him back in this role next year.
Foligno: D; played with inconsistency which can be expected of many second year players but not when they have a large role gifted to them.
Ennis: D; Couldn't handle the Ruff-forced d-zone minutes to start the season and ended with a lack of confidence
Stafford: D-; Not always bad, but clearly his confidence was badly battered as his season-long shooting slump continued.
Grigorenko: D-; Not his fault he was here before he was ready. He was not good almost every game here, glad he got a chance to get in some playing time in the Q and he was better upon his return
Gerbe: F; All the claims of heart don't offset that he sucked hard in just about every facet of the game this year. If you can't score, can't defend, what ****ing good are you?
McCormick: F; So much for an NHL career Cody.
Ellis: F; Enjoy hanging with Cody.
Adam: F; I question if they qualify you.
Leino: Incomplete. A bad hip, a collapsed lung punctuating a few solid games as an offensive contributor.

__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle
Chainshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 09:48 PM
  #5
ZZamboni
Puttin' on the Foil
 
ZZamboni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 10,511
vCash: 500
Goaltending - A-

Forwards - B-

Defense - C-

ZZamboni is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 09:53 PM
  #6
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 56,679
vCash: 500
Awards:
The Defense:

Ehrhoff: B; mostly good, managed to log a lot of minutes and limited the "Errorhoff" moments most nights
Weber: B; resurrected himself.
Pysyk: B; kid looked good, smooth most nights. Still learning and will have rookie/youngster moments
Ruhwedel: B; kid also looked good in relatively sheltered minutes. Him knocking established NHLers like Mark Stuart and Jaromir Jagr around was a highlight of the last weeks of the season.
Sekera: C+; not to last year's level but close
Pardy: D; too many turnovers and bad positional play for my taste
Regehr: D; so much for leadership and tough play.
Myers: F; out of shape and bad decision making made him particularly ineffective most of his time healthy. Glad he started to come around late in the season prior to getting hurt, but they needed more out of him for the minutes he was being given.
Sulzer: F; Soft-zer can go away.
Leopold: F-; thank God this guy got them anything at the deadline.


Last edited by Chainshot: 04-26-2013 at 09:59 PM.
Chainshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 09:55 PM
  #7
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 56,679
vCash: 500
Awards:
The Goaltending:

Miller: B-; Saw more rubber than roadkill on the Trans-Canada highway and came up with a lot of stops. However, the porous defense left him out to dry plenty and he had some moments I'm sure he wants back.
Enroth: C; A tale of two seasons for Jhonas -- pre-Ruff and post-Ruff. Glad he started to stop the puck again since he was a trainwreck under Ruff.

Chainshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 09:56 PM
  #8
Moskau
Registered User
 
Moskau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Western New York
Posts: 10,135
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZZamboni View Post
Goaltending - A-

Forwards - B-

Defense - C-
Seriously?

Goaltending was a solid B- but to have this group of forwards at a B-? Maybe offensively they were a B- (18th in scoring) but defensively they were C- or worse.

I've said it a few times but outside of Leopold, Pardy and Myers and to a smaller extent Sulzer Regehr most of this teams defensive woes were because of how the forwards played and not the defensemen.

Moskau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 09:58 PM
  #9
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 56,679
vCash: 500
Awards:
Coaching:

Ruff - F Clearly couldn't get through to these guys early and lingered (again). His system wasn't working and the specialty teams were terrible.
Rolston - C Got through more and some of the issues sorted out but the specialty teams are still a mess.

Front Office:

Regier - F. Leaving Ruff at the helm after the first early slump set the stage for continued slumping. He built this team. And this team is not good.

Chainshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 10:11 PM
  #10
Royisgone
Registered User
 
Royisgone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 803
vCash: 500
It was noted in the game tonight that COHO leads all NHL sophomores in scoring, at least as of tonight. That's not that bad, is it?

I vote Mike Weber most improved player. I thought he improved his overall game immensely this year, even if some chinks remain in his armor.

Royisgone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 10:14 PM
  #11
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 56,679
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royisgone View Post
It was noted in the game tonight that COHO leads all NHL sophomores in scoring, at least as of tonight. That's not that bad, is it?

I vote Mike Weber most improved player. I thought he improved his overall game immensely this year, even if some chinks remain in his armor.
Hodgson is also one of the worst players in Goals Against/60 minutes played in the NHL. He gets his points... and gives them right back.

Chainshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 10:16 PM
  #12
ZZamboni
Puttin' on the Foil
 
ZZamboni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 10,511
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royisgone View Post
It was noted in the game tonight that COHO leads all NHL sophomores in scoring, at least as of tonight. That's not that bad, is it?

I vote Mike Weber most improved player. I thought he improved his overall game immensely this year, even if some chinks remain in his armor.
Weber did get the Unsung Hero award as voted on by the players. He had a nice year. I hope he really truly turned a corner and continues to improve.

ZZamboni is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 10:40 PM
  #13
Hal2000
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 372
vCash: 500
Ennis: C+
-Had a decent start, seemed to disappear as the season went on. This team will be relying on him a lot in the future.

Flynn: A-
-Gave it his all, impressive first season to be honest. 11 pts. and a +6 in 26 games isn't bad for a rookie on this disappointing team. What more do you expect? Should be in the future plans.

Foligno: D
-After the first game of the year he completely vanished it seemed. I'm surprised he still had 18 pts. Wasn't as physical as I expected him to be. He can only improve from here I hope.

Gerbe: D
-Nathan Gerbe should not be on the team next year. He's had his time to earn a permanent roster spot.

Grigorenko: C
-People had high expectations for him, especially for an 18-year-old. Improved a little as the season went on. Started showing some flashes in the last few games. He will only get better.

Hecht: B
-Sadly it seemed as if most Sabre fans dirt-bagged him but he gave it is all and especially improved after Rolston benched him. Solid and smart defensive-forward. As advertised. I'll miss you Jochen

Hodgson: C+
-Started out nice but really cooled off. Was a mess in his own end quite often. Still, he was second on the team in points and seemed to develop some chemistry with Vanek. I have a feeling that next year will be great for him, offensively at least.

Kaleta: B
-Came as advertised, I dont need to elaborate much on what he brought to the table. Was injured a couple times/suspended...wish he could stay healthy. A few more points would be nice, too.

Leino: N/A
-Can't really give him a grade but looked a hell of a lot better this year in the few games he played compared to last. Gets a bad wrap on these boards because of the contract/mediocre season last year but I think if he stays healthy we'll be in for a pleasant surprise.

Ott: A
-Was better than advertised IMO. Don't really need to elaborate here, either.

Porter: B
-You cant expect much more than the effort you got this year from Porter. A nice 4th-line player who IMO is an upgrade from Matt Ellis. Reliable player, should be here next season.

Scott: C
-Was a nice character guy for the room. Added some toughness. No points.

Stafford: D-
-Was invisible many nights. Didn't provide much offense. Christian Ehrhoff had more points than him (22 to 18). Team-worst minus-16. How can you defend any of that?

Vanek: B
-Played pretty much as he does each year. Had a career year going but then started playing inconsistent. I hope we retain him, he is a unique player/talent. Injured too often though and I get the impression he played through a lot of said injuries. Led the team in points while playing 10 less games than the next highest point-getter (Hogdson).

Defensemen:

Ehrhoff: A-
-Had a solid year. Fifth on the team in points (22) and a +6 on a team where almost everyone is a minus. Plays in every situation. So glad he is on this team.

Myers: D+
-Slowly improved after Ruff was gone but obviously needs to bring a lot more to the table next year. He's a big reason why this team had such a disappointing season. Failed to provide much offense.

Pardy: C-
-Played okay sometimes, mediocre/bad the rest. Gave him some leverage with the grade because he's a rookie. I really don't know what else to say.

Pysyk: B
-Played very good for a rookie. Should be on the team next year.

Ruhwedel: B
-Looked promising in his short tenure here, especially for a young guy.

Sekera: B-
-Had a decent year, and is a good puck-mover. Kinda unnoticeable, but I guess thats a sign of a good defenceman.

Weber: B+
-Didn't get enough credit for the year he had. Solid defenceman...physical....basically a younger Robyn Regher.

Goalies:

Enroth: B-
-Had some highlight-reel saves/great games with the occasional bad game it seemed. On par with his career, I guess.

Miller: B+
-Had good numbers for a team that was a mess in their own end most of the year. What do people expect when he's facing 40 shots a game compared to 25 for us? I would have given him an A- but he ruined our draft position


Last edited by Hal2000: 04-26-2013 at 10:51 PM.
Hal2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 10:44 PM
  #14
tsujimoto74
Registered User
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 9,211
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moskau View Post
Seriously?

Goaltending was a solid B- but to have this group of forwards at a B-? Maybe offensively they were a B- (18th in scoring) but defensively they were C- or worse.

I've said it a few times but outside of Leopold, Pardy and Myers and to a smaller extent Sulzer Regehr most of this teams defensive woes were because of how the forwards played and not the defensemen.
Those guys all logged big minutes. Forwards not understanding their defensive role was definitely an issue, but a lot of our blue-liners sucked too.

tsujimoto74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-26-2013, 10:47 PM
  #15
Hasek
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 175
vCash: 500
I will just do a couple since I agree with most of the above.
Stafford: F - obvious reasons.
Grigorenko: Not lower than a C. I understand this is HF Boards and every 18 yo is expected to put up Crosby numbers or they are busts, but realistically he was not bad at all.
Miller: A - Judge his on ice performance. He was solid.

Hasek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 01:59 AM
  #16
sabres19892
Registered User
 
sabres19892's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 214
vCash: 500
Miller A- - The guy stood on his head most nights. Fans booed him for no reason, have to feel bad for him

Enroth B- - a few shaky starts early but really finished well.

Ehrhoff B+ - the guy was solid in all areas. severely underrated

Myers C- - Oh boy.

Sekera B- - Sekera is Sekera. reliable

Weber B - Impressive year

Pysyk B+ - small sample size but looked great.

Ruhwedel A- - again small sample size but boy what a surprise so solid

Pardy C - He was ok, some dumb penalties

Ennis C+ He was alright, underachieved a bit

Stafford D-

Vanek B - disappeared after strong start

Ott C -wasn't as much of a pest as I thought he was. Added some scoring

Hodgson B- -played well when Vanek did

Flynn A- - brought great energy most nights and was a nice surprise

Porter B- - proved to me that he belongs in NHL

Foligno D - I don't remember him doing anything this year except over puck handling and losing it.

Gerbe D-

Grigorenko C - Not much of an opportunity to do much because of situation

Hecht C - didn't provide much of anything but played smart when out there

Kaleta B- -blocked shots, good PKing, pest, but stupid PIMs

Scott C- -Actually played ok



Kaleta

sabres19892 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 09:23 AM
  #17
camcool21
Registered User
 
camcool21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,181
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loods View Post
Rolston: C-
-Not much changed when Rolston took over. He’s a minor league coach and seemed dejected when things went awry.
I don't think you can really say not much changed when Rolston took over.

Sabres under Rolston 15-11-5 for 35 points in 31 games. Approx. 1.13 points earned/game
Sabres under Lindy 6-10-1 for 13 points in 17 games. Approx. 0.76 points earned/game

Over the 48 game season with Lindy, the Sabres earn about 37 points. Good enough for the 2nd overall draft pick (which some Sabres fans probably would have preferred)!

Over the 48 game season with Rolston, the Sabres earn about 54 points. Good enough for about 6th place in the Eastern Conference. Definitely a playoff spot.

So, I'd say that your opinion is bad, and you should feel bad.

camcool21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 09:40 AM
  #18
WNY to NoVA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 466
vCash: 500
I dont see how anyone can judge Rolston.

How many practices did the team have under him?

WNY to NoVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 09:41 AM
  #19
1972
Registered User
 
1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,093
vCash: 500
when you give grades for young players like Pysyk/Hodgson/Ennis/Grigorenko ect.. you look at where they were to start the year and how much they improved throughout the year. I would say that almost all of our young guys made very good strides to become better players.

I am not going to rip on young guys like Ennis because he didn't play at his unsustainable pace of the end of last year, he was on pace for 54 points over 82 games which is a pretty solid season for a 23 year old if you ask me, Hodgson was on pace for a 58 point season over 82 games, heck even Foligno was on a 32 point pace of 82 games. We have some very nice pieces who are only going to get younger and still have growing pains ahead of them.


Next season we will have Myers/McNabb/Pysyk/Hodgson/Ennis/Foligno/Tropp/Grigorenko/Flynn/Enroth all 25 and under, nearly 50% of our projected roster. Expect more growing pains


Last edited by 1972: 04-27-2013 at 09:48 AM.
1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-27-2013, 09:43 AM
  #20
NCAA Hockey Fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maine
Country: United States
Posts: 618
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZZamboni View Post
Goaltending - A-

Forwards - B-

Defense - C-
If that was true they wouldn't be golfing today.

NCAA Hockey Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-28-2013, 01:57 PM
  #21
gallagt01
Registered User
 
gallagt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sloan
Posts: 8,379
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by camcool21 View Post
I don't think you can really say not much changed when Rolston took over.

Sabres under Rolston 15-11-5 for 35 points in 31 games. Approx. 1.13 points earned/game
Sabres under Lindy 6-10-1 for 13 points in 17 games. Approx. 0.76 points earned/game

Over the 48 game season with Lindy, the Sabres earn about 37 points. Good enough for the 2nd overall draft pick (which some Sabres fans probably would have preferred)!

Over the 48 game season with Rolston, the Sabres earn about 54 points. Good enough for about 6th place in the Eastern Conference. Definitely a playoff spot.

So, I'd say that your opinion is bad, and you should feel bad.
Lindy Ruff' has guided Buffalo teams to hot second-half finishes, too. His teams did it religiously.

And Rolston's superior record was indicated in the grades given to both coaches.

gallagt01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-28-2013, 02:25 PM
  #22
MayDay
Registered User
 
MayDay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mount Kisco, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,609
vCash: 500
Don't understand why Leino (8 GP) gets an incomplete based on insufficient sample size, but Ruhwedel (7 GP) gets a B.

Also, Sulzer played in 17 games, and I don't see a grade listed for him at all. Oversight?

MayDay is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-28-2013, 02:29 PM
  #23
Jeremy2020
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 1,597
vCash: 500
If the Sabres were the Planateers, Gerbe would be Ma-Ti. He may have heart, but he's f'in useless.

Jeremy2020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-28-2013, 02:29 PM
  #24
New Sabres Captain
ForFriendshipDikembe
 
New Sabres Captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 38,662
vCash: 500
Grades are based on their (expected) role. Think of it as the stars are taking harder classes.


Forwards:

Ennis: B-
-Consistency, consistency, consistency. That's what he needs to work on. There was improvement in his game (particularily on defense), but still a lot of blown assignments. Offensively, some Afinogenov moments, but he did have his moments.

Flynn: A
-For his role, an excellent job. Stepped up, provided offense, defense, solid PK talents. Did get hemmed in the defensive zone quite a bit.

Foligno: D
-Every so often Foligno would play like the guy from last year, but most of the time he was invisible.

Gerbe: D
-Gerbe is just frustrating. I've always felt his place would be as a winger on a team with 3 scoring lines. Then last year he shows good defensive chops. This year, even his usual hustle seemed not to stand out in any way. And right when he's about to get yanked from the lineup, he'll score a couple goals and suck you in to thinking he's turned the corner. He's a #13 forward in this league.

Grigorenko: C
-He never (until the end of the season) showed the offensive ability, but he also was not a liability. He was, in essence, a null factor. Should have been sent back to Quebec earlier for the good of his development.

Hecht: A-
-Offense was what you expect from a guy making 1M...maybe a little better. Defense was for the most part solid. Didn't stand out, but he knew his role, and he played it well. Godspeed Jochen.

Hodgson: B-
-Biggest complaint: defense. He really needs to work on that. Offensively the talent, willingness to go to the net...there's not much bad to say about him. But for every goal he helped create, there was a glorious chance the other way, and that keeps his rating down considerably.

Kaleta: B
-Drew penalties, killed penalties, blocked a ******** of shots. Didn't throw the big hit as often (suspension probably mellowed him out), but offense was under what you expect. Usually he gets some dirty goals right around the net, but even those were hard to come by. Solid B.

Leino: Incomplete
-When he played, he actually looked like an asset to this team. Puck possession, creativity...he was playing really well. Unfortunately, the "when he played" part was a major problem...

Ott: A-
-Did his job better than expected. Was not expecting the offense he brought, but physicality, leadership, and PK ability were as advertised. Gets dinged for some boneheaded plays, but if that's the cost of everything else he brings, it's tolerable.

Porter: B-
-A decent bottom 6 option. Too many great chances offensively that he couldn't convert on, but no other complaints with his game.

Scott: B
-Fighting? Check. Hockey? Well, we weren't expecting much from him in that department anyways...but he actually wasn't the worst player of all time. Sure, he has no offensive talent whatsoever, but he could take more than 1 shift a game.

Stafford: D
-It will always be about production with Stafford, and he didn't have it. Not sure the A on his shoulder was really a good idea either...certainly didn't show leadership on the ice.

Vanek: A
-Streaky player as always, but without question the best skater for the Sabres. His forechecking really went underappreciated this season. This guy deserves the A grade.

Defensemen:

Ehrhoff: B
-Was consistent from start to finish. Needed to get more chances to blast the puck on the PP. Some brain farts here and there, but no complaints either.

Leopold: F
-Leopold was not just bad. He was a black hole of suck. Whoever was paired with him immediately became horrible it seemed. Why he wasn't scratched sooner befuddles me.

Myers: C-
-Myers needs to stop trying to be Chara and start trying to be Niedermayer. That's his game. How much of that is on coaching I don't know, but if he's not using his feet to make plays, he's never going to be the D-man he should be.

Pardy: B-
-Spare body. Was he great? No. But all you're expecting out of a #8 D-man is to come in, play a few minutes, and get beat too bad. He passed that test.

Pysyk: B
-Pysyk got better as the year went on, which is exactly what you want to see from a young player. Should be a mainstay on the Sabres blueline for years to come.

Regehr: C
-Regehr was just caught in a bad situation. I don't think he was bad, but with everyone else around him playing bad, and his horrendous Brad Brown rating...this was just not a good fit for him anymore.

Ruhwedel: B
-Showed poise. Should compete for a spot in camp next year, would not be surprised if he goes to Rochester for some seasoning.

Sekera: B
-Rough start (Leopold factor played into that), but by end of the season he looked like the Sekera we expected for the most part.

Weber: A-
-The guy took the bull by the horns and ran with it. Consistent play. Very few of his usual hand grenades. Played the body, cleared the crease...this Mike Weber is the guy we were hoping we'd see years ago. He went from being a #6/#7 to being a #4/#5 type guy this year.

Goalies:

Enroth: B+
-Got the monkey off his back, and delivered some really nice performances. If Miller is moved, he'll get a chance to show he is capable of more.

Miller: B+
-Lots of problems in front of him, but Miller flat out stole games. Outshot by a large margin, so many breakaway and glorious chances against...sure, he had several games he would like to have back, and that keeps him from A rating. But by and large, stats do not do him justice.

Coaching:

Rolston: B
-Team's record improved. Had the guts to bench guys who needed benching. Lack of offseason/training camp hampered his ability to make real changes though.

Ruff: F
-Adjustments were not made. Results were not obtained. Pretty much lost the room it seemed like. It was time to move on.

New Sabres Captain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-28-2013, 02:31 PM
  #25
gallagt01
Registered User
 
gallagt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sloan
Posts: 8,379
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MayDay View Post
Don't understand why Leino (8 GP) gets an incomplete based on insufficient sample size, but Ruhwedel (7 GP) gets a B.
I personally saw just two games that Leino played in this year.

Either way, is it really that big of a deal? Nitpicking a bit, no?

Quote:
Also, Sulzer played in 17 games, and I don't see a grade listed for him at all. Oversight?
An oversight, yes. Likely because he was awful.

gallagt01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.