HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Gaborik vs. Nash

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-07-2013, 07:25 PM
  #1
chosen
Registered User
 
chosen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,691
vCash: 500
Gaborik vs. Nash

Anyone left who still believes that Gaborik is a better hockey player than Nash?

chosen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 07:27 PM
  #2
Mio41
Ron Harris #3
 
Mio41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 2,594
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Anyone left who still believes that Gaborik is a better hockey player than Nash?
Not me...confident that by the time Nash is done with us, he will be one of our alltime greats

Mio41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 07:27 PM
  #3
JohnC
#FreeSteve
 
JohnC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 4,729
vCash: 500
It depends.

Goal scorer? Gabs

All around hockey player? I'd say Nash

JohnC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 07:29 PM
  #4
JeffMangum
Registered Ab-user
 
JeffMangum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Listening to music
Country: United States
Posts: 57,536
vCash: 500
Gaborik was once a better finisher.

He seems to have lost the snap in his shot.

Nash is superior in nearly all facets, if not every single one, at this point. I've been touting Nash over Gaborik since the discussion came up. He is, simply put, a more effective player than Gaborik.

__________________
Everything about you is bringing me misery.
JeffMangum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 07:33 PM
  #5
Panfork
Pacioretty Hater
 
Panfork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 2,377
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenith View Post
Gaborik was once a better finisher.

He seems to have lost the snap in his shot.

Nash is superior in nearly all facets, if not every single one, at this point. I've been touting Nash over Gaborik since the discussion came up. He is, simply put, a more effective player than Gaborik.
This. Gaborik's shot at its best is better then Nash's. Gaborik's ability to get his shot off from anywhere, again, at its best, is better then Nash's. Everything else? I think Nash has the upper hand.

People on this board seem to really give Nash heat for completely ignoring defense, but there have been quite a few situations where Nash has come back to backcheck and made a good play. He's definitely been more useful on the forecheck/backcheck than Gaborik ever was.

Panfork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 07:34 PM
  #6
Swept In Seven
Disciple of The Zook
 
Swept In Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 9,393
vCash: 500
Nash is an gamebreaking impact player. Gaborik is a a terrific goal scorer who was slumping big time. I'd say Gabby is more naturally gifted goal scoring wise, but Nash is the overall better player.

Swept In Seven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 07:46 PM
  #7
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 500
Why not bo...

Well based on this season, it's really a no brainer. Nash seemed to be on another tier. Still think Gaborik's first season as a NYR was better than Nash currently. We'll see what happens in the future.

Kershaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 07:47 PM
  #8
Amazing Kreiderman
Night-shift fan!
 
Amazing Kreiderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Netherlands
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 5,258
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcman View Post
It depends.

Goal scorer? Gabs

All around hockey player? I'd say Nash
I feel Nash creates more than Gaborik. However, it's not relevant since the 2 are not comparable.

1 is a playmaker, the other is a sniper. Nash has years left on his contract, Gaborik will be UFA in 2014. Nash is 3 years younger.

__________________
There are two types of people in this world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data;
Amazing Kreiderman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 08:14 PM
  #10
NYRCSKA*
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Parts unknown
Posts: 621
vCash: 500
Gaborik was a great pure goal scorer and a deadly sniper. Unfortunately, after the shoulder injury, I doubt he will ever be the same. That's a rough injury for anyone to come back from, and you are never 100%. Plenty of pitchers in baseball have seen their careers come to an end because of it. You never really get full mobility back in your shoulder.

NYRCSKA* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 08:17 PM
  #11
Thirty One
portnor, pls
 
Thirty One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,570
vCash: 420
Never have.

Thirty One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 08:24 PM
  #12
Green Blob*
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,257
vCash: 500
Gabbys shot hasnt been the same since his latest should surgery in the offseason.

Green Blob* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 08:26 PM
  #13
slickjay
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 41
vCash: 500
This isn't even a discussion. Gaborik was a ghost this season. He feasts on weak teams and scores a lot of easy goals. He can't create his own offense because he's terrified to use his own speed and can't beat anyone 1 on 1. He is extremely overrated at this stage of his career. He's not a franchise player but will still score a bunch of goals with his shot and being in the right spots at the right time.

Nash on the other hand is the centre of the offense. He can create 1 on 1, hell even 1 on 3. He has confidence to try to make a play for himself and often does. Add to that his playmaking skills and its not even close. The only time he bothers me is when he gets up sluggish and doesn't look too keen on getting back and blocking shots. There's an argument that says he shouldn't be doing much of either, and Gaborik certainly isn't any better. Gaborik taking the puck from Lundqvist and turning it over against Washington leading to the overtime winner is engrained in my mind.

slickjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 08:28 PM
  #14
Riverdale
Registered User
 
Riverdale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 5,635
vCash: 500
They play completely different styles of hockey. Why is this a question?

Riverdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 08:33 PM
  #15
qwertyaas
LGR@
 
qwertyaas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 4,912
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Blob View Post
Gabbys shot hasnt been the same since his latest should surgery in the offseason.
Feel the same. He doesn't have the release he used to have.

qwertyaas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 08:36 PM
  #16
Jabroni
The People's Champ
 
Jabroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,758
vCash: 500
Gaby is the better goal scorer, Nash is the better overall player.

Jabroni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 08:37 PM
  #17
Mio41
Ron Harris #3
 
Mio41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 2,594
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by slickjay View Post
This isn't even a discussion. Gaborik was a ghost this season. He feasts on weak teams and scores a lot of easy goals. He can't create his own offense because he's terrified to use his own speed and can't beat anyone 1 on 1. He is extremely overrated at this stage of his career. He's not a franchise player but will still score a bunch of goals with his shot and being in the right spots at the right time.

Nash on the other hand is the centre of the offense. He can create 1 on 1, hell even 1 on 3. He has confidence to try to make a play for himself and often does. Add to that his playmaking skills and its not even close. The only time he bothers me is when he gets up sluggish and doesn't look too keen on getting back and blocking shots. There's an argument that says he shouldn't be doing much of either, and Gaborik certainly isn't any better. Gaborik taking the puck from Lundqvist and turning it over against Washington leading to the overtime winner is engrained in my mind.
My favorite was the Craps game where he played with Cally and Steps, cally and Steps won about 5 scrums and literally kept the puck down low for about 40 seconds, Steps passes it to Gabby who sends a pass to Carllsson who passes ahead for a 2 on 1 and Hank saves Gabby

Mio41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 09:10 PM
  #18
Cresto
In the pantry
 
Cresto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,208
vCash: 500
Goal Scorer* is Gaborik
All around is Nash

*has to be set up with opportunities from line mates, experiences slumps, cannot dictate the game on his own.

To continue with my food analogies that so many people are objecting to, Gaborik is like bacon and Nash is pork chops. As good as bacon is, it's not enough to be center of an entire meal and you certainly can't expect to have it meal after meal after meal. Nash on the other hand gives less of a hit of taste up front, he can show up every night and be the center ingredient in the dish and can show up and be more versatile and do different things on different nights and accommodate the other ingredients on the plate to form the most balanced dish.

Cresto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 09:13 PM
  #19
Killem Dafoe
Moderator
k.
 
Killem Dafoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Land of Bad Drivers
Country: United States
Posts: 15,940
vCash: 50
Nash is just a more dynamic player. In years past, Gaborik had great speed and a killer wrist shot, although we didn't see much of that this

season. In general, Nash has the upper hand because of his all around play, and let's face it, he's got a tote bag full of moves that Gaborik just

doesn't.

Killem Dafoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 09:13 PM
  #20
BlueshirtBlitz
Rich Nash
 
BlueshirtBlitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 19,033
vCash: 500
Lets see if Nash can do what Gabby did in two full seasons here.

If Nash can put up 82+ points, he wins me over.

Until then, Gabby's first season with us has him as the better NYR. If that 09-10 Gaborik was playing with this team, even sans Nash, we'd be juggernauts.

BlueshirtBlitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 09:14 PM
  #21
Rangers Fail
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Rangers Fail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 17,959
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCresty View Post
Goal Scorer* is Gaborik
All around is Nash

*has to be set up with opportunities from line mates, experiences slumps, cannot dictate the game on his own.

To continue with my food analogies that so many people are objecting to, Gaborik is like bacon and Nash is pork chops. As good as bacon is, it's not enough to be center of an entire meal and you certainly can't expect to have it meal after meal after meal. Nash on the other hand gives less of a hit of taste up front, he can show up every night and be the center ingredient in the dish and can show up and be more versatile and do different things on different nights and accommodate the other ingredients on the plate to form the most balanced dish.
Yes! I love your metaphors, I really do. I'd say it's a pretty good comparison. Gabby was very streaky, and was a frustrating player at times.

Rangers Fail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 09:28 PM
  #22
GWOW
Two Pucks, One Cup
 
GWOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 15,193
vCash: 500
Gaborik has had the better career.

GWOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 09:29 PM
  #23
Green Blob*
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,257
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueshirtBlitz View Post
Lets see if Nash can do what Gabby did in two full seasons here.

If Nash can put up 82+ points, he wins me over.

Until then, Gabby's first season with us has him as the better NYR. If that 09-10 Gaborik was playing with this team, even sans Nash, we'd be juggernauts.
We are comparing them both now though right?

Right now Nash > Gaborik.

Comparing Gaborik in his prime season to Nash at the moment doesn't make sense since Gaborik isn't 28 anymore.

Green Blob* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 09:30 PM
  #24
Green Blob*
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,257
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GWOW View Post
Gaborik has had the better career.
Well I'd hope so when you compare the teams both of them have played on.

Green Blob* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-07-2013, 09:59 PM
  #25
BlueshirtBlitz
Rich Nash
 
BlueshirtBlitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 19,033
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Blob View Post
We are comparing them both now though right?

Right now Nash > Gaborik.

Comparing Gaborik in his prime season to Nash at the moment doesn't make sense since Gaborik isn't 28 anymore.
Are we? A lot of people often try and paint the argument in a way that insinuates Nash has been better than Gabby from the beginning of their careers, which I disagree with.

This season it's a no brainer. But if you look back on last season Gabby was the better player even that recently.

BlueshirtBlitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.