HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

1st COL for 1st TB (and ++)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-29-2013, 09:20 AM
  #1
kingdok
Registered User
 
kingdok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,003
vCash: 500
1st COL for 1st TB (and ++)

Since Patrick Roy seems to be considering Drouin as much as Mac and Jones, does anyone could see this:

To COL: TB 1st (3rd overall) + a solid D prospect (Koekkoek) + a young D (Gudas or Aulie)
To TB: COL 1st (1st overall)

?

kingdok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 09:35 AM
  #2
Leafssss
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 4,170
vCash: 500
I'm still thinking Avs are set on taking Jones.

Leafssss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 09:43 AM
  #3
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 15,043
vCash: 413
I'd do it just with Koekkoek probably, can't see TBL fans being too receptive.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 09:44 AM
  #4
HoseEmAllAround
Extend Matt Carle
 
HoseEmAllAround's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: water spicket
Country: United States
Posts: 7,942
vCash: 500
Not happening. We are too thin on D as it is, let alone D prospects.

HoseEmAllAround is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 09:45 AM
  #5
Marc the Habs Fan
Moderator
 
Marc the Habs Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Longueuil
Country: Canada
Posts: 72,235
vCash: 723
This is a trade proposal, not speculation...

Marc the Habs Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 09:46 AM
  #6
Juxtaposer
Outro:Divina Comedia
 
Juxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bay Area
Country: United States
Posts: 38,225
vCash: 50
The difference between pick 1 and 3 is not ++ this year. Tampa says no.

Juxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 09:51 AM
  #7
2 Weekes Notice
Registered User
 
2 Weekes Notice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Non-traditional Land
Posts: 980
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonewolfe2015 View Post
I'd do it just with Koekkoek probably, can't see TBL fans being too receptive.
I could see TB doing it for just Koekkoek without adding more. Gudas and Aulie are both probably going to be with the big club next year and TB doesn't need to lose any more NHL defenders.

2 Weekes Notice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 10:25 AM
  #8
Rschmitz
Yzermaned
 
Rschmitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tampa Bay
Country: United States
Posts: 7,654
vCash: 500
No way.

Rschmitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 10:28 AM
  #9
kingdok
Registered User
 
kingdok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,003
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Weekes Notice View Post
I could see TB doing it for just Koekkoek without adding more. Gudas and Aulie are both probably going to be with the big club next year and TB doesn't need to lose any more NHL defenders.
If TB value Jones and MacKinnon much more then Drouin, which is highly possible, they could think the difference in cost could be worth more then Koekkoek, of course it's all speculation

What if instead of Aulie or Gudas, TB was giving up a young F like Dana Tyrell or a goalie prospect like Helenius or Janus?

kingdok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 10:33 AM
  #10
stokes84
Registered User
 
stokes84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Country: United States
Posts: 15,032
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to stokes84
Since TB like Nichushkin best, why do they feel any need to trade up?

stokes84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 10:44 AM
  #11
kingdok
Registered User
 
kingdok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,003
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by stokes84 View Post
Since TB like Nichushkin best, why do they feel any need to trade up?
You really think TB would pass Jones or Mac to pick Nichushkin?

kingdok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 10:53 AM
  #12
stokes84
Registered User
 
stokes84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Country: United States
Posts: 15,032
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to stokes84
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGV View Post
You really think TB would pass Jones or Mac to pick Nichushkin?
If he's their no. 1 guy, why wouldn't they?

stokes84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 10:56 AM
  #13
tucker3434
Registered User
 
tucker3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,709
vCash: 500
As COL, I'd do it.

tucker3434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:04 AM
  #14
kingdok
Registered User
 
kingdok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,003
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by stokes84 View Post
If he's their no. 1 guy, why wouldn't they?
I doubt this, but if it's really the case, they should trade down a couple spots.

kingdok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:16 AM
  #15
The Macho Man
Fire Cooper
 
The Macho Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 31,142
vCash: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJuxtaposer View Post
The difference between pick 1 and 3 is not ++ this year. Tampa says no.
This. If Koekkoek is going the other way, we want Colorado's 2nd coming back.

Col 1st + 2nd

For

TBL 1st + Koekkoek

I just don't see enough difference in the top 3 to send too much value to move up a few spots.

The Macho Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:24 AM
  #16
tucker3434
Registered User
 
tucker3434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,709
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pronounced Anders View Post
This. If Koekkoek is going the other way, we want Colorado's 2nd coming back.

Col 1st + 2nd

For

TBL 1st + Koekkoek

I just don't see enough difference in the top 3 to send too much value to move up a few spots.
No longer worth it for COL, in my opinion. The way I see it,:

1a. Jones
1b. MacKinnon

3. Drouin

4. Barkov
5. Nichushkin



Everybody else.

If that trade was to move down one spot and take the leftover of Mackinnon/Jones, it would closer.

tucker3434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:26 AM
  #17
CapitalsCupFantasy
Wasted opportunities
 
CapitalsCupFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 37,330
vCash: 500
Moving up to the top pick is going to cost more....think another 1st, 2 2nds, something. Just the way it is. It's never as cheap as a prospect and certainly WON'T involve the Avs giving BACK draft picks to the acquiring team.

CapitalsCupFantasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:29 AM
  #18
Rschmitz
Yzermaned
 
Rschmitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tampa Bay
Country: United States
Posts: 7,654
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalsCupFantasy View Post
Moving up to the top pick is going to cost more....think another 1st, 2 2nds, something. Just the way it is. It's never as cheap as a prospect and certainly WON'T involve the Avs giving BACK draft picks to the acquiring team.
Historically your wrong

Rschmitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:30 AM
  #19
Android 16
Registered User
 
Android 16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 9,161
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGV View Post
Since Patrick Roy seems to be considering Drouin as much as Mac and Jones, does anyone could see this:

To COL: TB 1st (3rd overall) + a solid D prospect (Koekkoek) + a young D (Gudas or Aulie)
To TB: COL 1st (1st overall)

?
I think it's a heck of a lot more beneficial for the Avs to have Seth Jones, a potential franchise d-man, than 2 young d-men who aren't worth much of a damn to the present and to the future.

Android 16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:30 AM
  #20
kingdok
Registered User
 
kingdok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,003
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalsCupFantasy View Post
Moving up to the top pick is going to cost more....think another 1st, 2 2nds, something. Just the way it is. It's never as cheap as a prospect and certainly WON'T involve the Avs giving BACK draft picks to the acquiring team.
Keep in mind that this is specific to COL wanting to draft Drouin.

kingdok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:32 AM
  #21
CapitalsCupFantasy
Wasted opportunities
 
CapitalsCupFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 37,330
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rschmitz View Post
Historically your wrong
History also supports what I'm saying. I can pick and choose years if you can.

CapitalsCupFantasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:34 AM
  #22
CapitalsCupFantasy
Wasted opportunities
 
CapitalsCupFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 37,330
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGV View Post
Keep in mind that this is specific to COL wanting to draft Drouin.


Not saying it couldn't happen, I just don't see Colorado bending over and giving away the top pick at a bargain bin price when they're in the driver's seat.

CapitalsCupFantasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 11:51 AM
  #23
Djp
Registered User
 
Djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle,WA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,820
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalsCupFantasy View Post
Moving up to the top pick is going to cost more....think another 1st, 2 2nds, something. Just the way it is. It's never as cheap as a prospect and certainly WON'T involve the Avs giving BACK draft picks to the acquiring team.
2003 draft---the last really strong draft class.....

going in FLA #1, PIT #3

The deal

TO FLA: #3 + 2nd round pick+ Mikael Samuelsson
TO PIT: #1 + 3rd round pick

Djp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 12:01 PM
  #24
kingdok
Registered User
 
kingdok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,003
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapitalsCupFantasy View Post
Moving up to the top pick is going to cost more....think another 1st, 2 2nds, something. Just the way it is. It's never as cheap as a prospect and certainly WON'T involve the Avs giving BACK draft picks to the acquiring team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djp View Post
2003 draft---the last really strong draft class.....

going in FLA #1, PIT #3

The deal

TO FLA: #3 + 2nd round pick+ Mikael Samuelsson
TO PIT: #1 + 3rd round pick
Every situation is different. There are no fixed value to a top draft pick. You have to consider which team approach the other team, and the teams involved too.

kingdok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2013, 12:13 PM
  #25
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 15,043
vCash: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pronounced Anders View Post
This. If Koekkoek is going the other way, we want Colorado's 2nd coming back.

Col 1st + 2nd

For

TBL 1st + Koekkoek

I just don't see enough difference in the top 3 to send too much value to move up a few spots.
Too rich for me, I'd be inclined to send a 3rd or 4th back at max... even then I'm not sure if Koekkoek is worth moving down for unless the Avs are dead-set on moving down for Drouin... I think Jones + Petan > Drouin + Koekkoek for instance...

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. @2017 All Rights Reserved.