HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Buffalo Sabres
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Buffalo Trading up in the Draft

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-21-2013, 12:30 AM
  #126
Shoey
Hello.
 
Shoey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 643
vCash: 500
you may note that I did not include the 2014 1st, that's because in sell everything mode my main goal for this upcoming season is to be absolutely god-awful and score the #1 overall pick.

Shoey is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 12:30 AM
  #127
Luceni
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austria
Country: Austria
Posts: 3,678
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
I'm not even joking when I would say that I would offer the following package without blinking.

Hodgson (50% salary)
Vanek (50% salary)
Myers (50% salary)
Armia
Larsson
Pysyk
McCabe
2013 1st (8)
2013 1st (16)
2013 2nd (38)
2013 2nd (53)

give them everything, if he's the guy that can turn your franchise around he's worth it.
that's probably the most stupid offer I've ever seen. McKinnon may become a franchise center but that package is just riddiclous.

Luceni is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 12:30 AM
  #128
Paradigm
Registered User
 
Paradigm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 1,503
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
I'm not even joking when I would say that I would offer the following package without blinking.

Hodgson (50% salary)
Vanek (50% salary)
Myers (50% salary)
Armia
Larsson
Pysyk
McCabe
2013 1st (8)
2013 1st (16)
2013 2nd (38)
2013 2nd (53)
2013 3rd (69)
2014 2nd
2014 2nd (from Minnesota)

give them everything, if he's the guy that can turn your franchise around he's worth it.
You'd completely gut our franchise for one player? I wouldn't even trade all of that for Crosby

Paradigm is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 12:43 AM
  #129
Shoey
Hello.
 
Shoey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 643
vCash: 500
yes, I would.

a franchise centerman is everything, if you're not trying to get one... you're not trying.

Shoey is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 12:46 AM
  #130
Shoey
Hello.
 
Shoey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 643
vCash: 500
furthermore I think Florida would be insane to accept that offer.

Shoey is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 12:48 AM
  #131
MARCUS FOLlGNO PHD
~
 
MARCUS FOLlGNO PHD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Country: Ras al-Khaimah
Posts: 13,019
vCash: 50
That's terrible.

MARCUS FOLlGNO PHD is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 12:50 AM
  #132
ZZamboni
Puttin' on the Foil
 
ZZamboni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 11,846
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
furthermore I think Florida would be insane to accept that offer.
Oh this should be rich... Please explain.


ZZamboni is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 12:56 AM
  #133
Paxon
Moderator
⚔Z E M G U S⚔
 
Paxon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Laurel, MD
Country: United States
Posts: 24,581
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
yes, I would.

a franchise centerman is everything, if you're not trying to get one... you're not trying.
Nothing is everything... that trade would destroy the franchise. They have a better chance of acquiring a franchise center by any other means -- even solely with those picks in the offer -- than they would at fielding a competitive team for MacKinnon to be the franchise center of.

Paxon is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 12:58 AM
  #134
start winnin
NO MORE TANK BOYS
 
start winnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 9,160
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
I'm not even joking when I would say that I would offer the following package without blinking.

Hodgson (50% salary)
Vanek (50% salary)
Myers (50% salary)
Armia
Larsson
Pysyk
McCabe
2013 1st (8)
2013 1st (16)
2013 2nd (38)
2013 2nd (53)
2013 3rd (69)
2014 2nd
2014 2nd (from Minnesota)

give them everything, if he's the guy that can turn your franchise around he's worth it.

start winnin is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 01:16 AM
  #135
EichHart
Registered User
 
EichHart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hamburg, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,180
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
I'm not even joking when I would say that I would offer the following package without blinking.

Hodgson (50% salary)
Vanek (50% salary)
Myers (50% salary)
Armia
Larsson
Pysyk
McCabe
2013 1st (8)
2013 1st (16)
2013 2nd (38)
2013 2nd (53)
2013 3rd (69)
2014 2nd
2014 2nd (from Minnesota)

give them everything, if he's the guy that can turn your franchise around he's worth it.
You can't be serious...

EichHart is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 01:40 AM
  #136
Shoey
Hello.
 
Shoey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 643
vCash: 500
It's a bad deal for Florida because my philosophy is that I wouldn't trade a potential superstar like Nathan MacKinnon for anything if I was in their position.

I'm well aware the philosophy of completely gutting a team in order to get a franchise centerpiece isn't going to sit well with a lot of people. This is the only move of this nature you make, the rest of my future moves in my cold and calculated approach would be to sell off anyone of value from the old core for young players with potential. To build around the remaining young players in the organization like Grigorenko, Girgensons, Tropp, Ruhwedel, and McNabb and allow them to grow together.

After I've made a move like this I can begin the process of stockpiling picks and acquiring young futures, but before I've got my franchise center that's not an approach I care to take because I ultimately believe it to be one that will not end with a Stanley Cup victory.

It's a colossal overpayment in every true sense of the word, but it's a trade I make specifically because the team will likely be bad for 3 years after and great for the next 10. It's a belief that you can replace every roster player and prospect on that list in time but you cannot acquire a franchise center anywhere but at the top of a draft.

I expected to be called a lunatic, and I'm fine with it.


Shoey is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 06:57 AM
  #137
Gabrielor
Registered User
 
Gabrielor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,777
vCash: 500
Again, as its been brought up, I just don't think that Florida's the team to attempt a trade with. We'd pay less (albeit, still a massive amount) to Colorado, and ensure MK with the 1st overall.

People(Buffalo management) just has to be cool with losing Myers, a couple firsts and seconds, and 2-3 of our young players(or 2 and vanek) for 1 guy.

I've watched the one guy play enough this year (including both tourny games thus far). Sold. That speed,skill,shot,presence, and two-way-game aren't found in a single player often. I hope/think Darcy sees this too.

Gabrielor is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 07:10 AM
  #138
Jame
Dream '16
 
Jame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Country: Pitcairn Islands
Posts: 41,095
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
It's a bad deal for Florida because my philosophy is that I wouldn't trade a potential superstar like Nathan MacKinnon for anything if I was in their position.

I'm well aware the philosophy of completely gutting a team in order to get a franchise centerpiece isn't going to sit well with a lot of people. This is the only move of this nature you make, the rest of my future moves in my cold and calculated approach would be to sell off anyone of value from the old core for young players with potential. To build around the remaining young players in the organization like Grigorenko, Girgensons, Tropp, Ruhwedel, and McNabb and allow them to grow together.

After I've made a move like this I can begin the process of stockpiling picks and acquiring young futures, but before I've got my franchise center that's not an approach I care to take because I ultimately believe it to be one that will not end with a Stanley Cup victory.

It's a colossal overpayment in every true sense of the word, but it's a trade I make specifically because the team will likely be bad for 3 years after and great for the next 10. It's a belief that you can replace every roster player and prospect on that list in time but you cannot acquire a franchise center anywhere but at the top of a draft.

I expected to be called a lunatic, and I'm fine with it.



Truth

Jame is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 07:13 AM
  #139
Thorton02
Registered User
 
Thorton02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 840
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
yes, I would.

a franchise centerman is everything, if you're not trying to get one... you're not trying.
..and while you're waiting 7 years to replenish your stock and get quality players along side Mackinnon, he's left via free agency because he's sick of being on a loosing team.

Thorton02 is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 07:23 AM
  #140
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 64,663
vCash: 500
Awards:
Staying the course and being bad the next two years could very well land them in the neighborhood to draft their own franchise type center. Just a thought.

__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle
Chainshot is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 07:29 AM
  #141
Gabrielor
Registered User
 
Gabrielor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chainshot View Post
Staying the course and being bad the next two years could very well land them in the neighborhood to draft their own franchise type center. Just a thought.
A thought I've thought as well. The one problem I have with this is the Buffalo Team Propensity™. Never good enough to win #1 and never bad enough to pick #1.

Gabrielor is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 07:35 AM
  #142
Jacob582
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,669
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
I'm not even joking when I would say that I would offer the following package without blinking.

Hodgson (50% salary)
Vanek (50% salary)
Myers (50% salary)
Armia
Larsson
Pysyk
McCabe
2013 1st (8)
2013 1st (16)
2013 2nd (38)
2013 2nd (53)
2013 3rd (69)
2014 2nd
2014 2nd (from Minnesota)

give them everything, if he's the guy that can turn your franchise around he's worth it.
That's more than Lindros got in trade:
Chris Simon, Mike Ricci, Kerry Huffman, Ron Hextall, Peter Forsberg, Steve Duchesne, future considerations, round 1 pick in the 1993 draft, round 1 pick in the 1994 draft and cash.

Philly contended, but never won the Cup like Colorado did.


Last edited by Jacob582: 05-21-2013 at 08:41 AM.
Jacob582 is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 07:36 AM
  #143
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 64,663
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DYaeger89 View Post
A thought I've thought as well. The one problem I have with this is the Buffalo Team Propensity™. Never good enough to win #1 and never bad enough to pick #1.
Deal Vanek, Stafford, and Miller; forcefeed minutes to kids as on-the-job training; make moves purely for the future -- all would put this team right to the bottom of the standings for at least this year, if not next.

Chainshot is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 08:14 AM
  #144
OkimLom
Registered User
 
OkimLom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,726
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DYaeger89 View Post
After listening to Chainshot, and whiteboarding a few things.

I think an attempt to trade to Colorado is the best idea.

our 1st and 2 of myers/mcnabb/pysyk is probably the base.

miller reduced salary could play, but it wouldnt be good for us, as he'll be on addon in the deal so we could keep someone else, and he'd probably fetch more solo to a goalie-needing team.

our 1-16 and a 2nd in 2013 or 2014 will continue the progression.

the over-the-top-piece would likely be one of miller-reduced sal or vanek reduced-sal (if they wanted them only), ennis, hodgson, or grigorenko.

So,

1-8,Myers,McNabb,1-16,2-2014,Ennis,Vanek-half sal

I'd say yes to that as Colorado probably even without Vanek.

Its over-the-top, but it nets us MacKinnon. Knowing Darcy, maybe he'll even same a piece out of that.

We still keep hodgson,grigs,girgs,larsson,mccabe,foligno and pysyk in this case. add mackinnon, we'd still draft in the 2nd twice.


Disclaimer: Speculation is in good fun. But I actually hope we go hard after MacKinnon for real.
I think Colorado is the team to Trade with:

Myers + Miller(retain 50% salary) + 8th overall

2nd OVerall

I wouldn't even blink.

Next year, make moves for the future, and "Be Bad of Ekblad"

OkimLom is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 08:16 AM
  #145
Jame
Dream '16
 
Jame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida
Country: Pitcairn Islands
Posts: 41,095
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorton02 View Post
..and while you're waiting 7 years to replenish your stock and get quality players along side Mackinnon, he's left via free agency because he's sick of being on a loosing team.
or...

while he's developing Pegula Bucks starts building a team around a young franchise centermen.

Not to mention the picks that can/will be replenished over the years via trade deadline maneuvers

I would definitely go all in on Mackinnon... there's a misconception that the sheer quantity of young talent the Sabres will have/will acquired over 2012-2014 drafts will be a better path to franchise success than a true franchise center.

Jame is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 08:19 AM
  #146
boots electric
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 1,514
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
I'm not even joking when I would say that I would offer the following package without blinking.

Hodgson (50% salary)
Vanek (50% salary)
Myers (50% salary)
Armia
Larsson
Pysyk
McCabe
2013 1st (8)
2013 1st (16)
2013 2nd (38)
2013 2nd (53)
2013 3rd (69)
2014 2nd
2014 2nd (from Minnesota)

give them everything, if he's the guy that can turn your franchise around he's worth it.
On the plus side, this trade would give us about a ~25% chance to get Ekblad next year

boots electric is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 08:28 AM
  #147
Gabrielor
Registered User
 
Gabrielor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorton02 View Post
..and while you're waiting 7 years to replenish your stock and get quality players along side Mackinnon, he's left via free agency because he's sick of being on a loosing team.
Pascal Dupius and Chris Kunitz are noted as being the two most-often linemates of one, Sidney Crosby. Both are actually undrafted guys, and look at how well Kunitz did this year.

It's a dice roll, no doubt, just like every hockey decision. But MacKinnon is worth it IMO. Unless McDavid continues his path, this may be the best guy we'll get a crack at for a while.

Gabrielor is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 08:54 AM
  #148
Zip15
Registered User
 
Zip15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,163
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoey View Post
I'm not even joking when I would say that I would offer the following package without blinking.

Hodgson (50% salary)
Vanek (50% salary)
Myers (50% salary)

Armia
Larsson
Pysyk
McCabe
2013 1st (8)
2013 1st (16)
2013 2nd (38)
2013 2nd (53)
2013 3rd (69)
2014 2nd
2014 2nd (from Minnesota)

give them everything, if he's the guy that can turn your franchise around he's worth it.
Can't do that. The CBA permits retaining salary on a maximum of three players in a given season. These three plus the freight we're paying on Pominville would make four.

In any event, why not just keep all or most of those assets, trade off Miller and Vanek for more futures that won't help in the next 1-2 years, and get your 1C or Ekblad in the top-5 next year, and then compete for McDavid, who will be better than MacKinnon, in the 2015 Draft.

Don't rush the suffering. Let it breathe.

Zip15 is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 09:13 AM
  #149
tmack224
Registered User
 
tmack224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,485
vCash: 500
Call me crazy, I think Florida takes Drouin.

Huberdeau, Grimaldi, Bjugstad, Shore, Rau, Trochek.

They are solid at center. They need a top flight goal scorer like Drouin on Hubers wing. Howden is their only Wing prospect with any promis and he is most likely a 2nd line guy.

tmack224 is offline  
Old
05-21-2013, 09:18 AM
  #150
Gabrielor
Registered User
 
Gabrielor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,777
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmack224 View Post
Call me crazy, I think Florida takes Drouin.

Huberdeau, Grimaldi, Bjugstad, Shore, Rau, Trochek.

They are solid at center. They need a top flight goal scorer like Drouin on Hubers wing. Howden is their only Wing prospect with any promis and he is most likely a 2nd line guy.
Florida definitely goes MacKinnon. At this point, I'm not entirely sure Colorado doesn't also consider it despite their d-need...

Gabrielor is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2016 All Rights Reserved.