HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

BOS @ NYR | Still Alive

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-24-2013, 12:00 AM
  #376
shinchanyo
Registered User
 
shinchanyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
I'm sorry I got pulled into that convo but I am NOT assigning all of the blame to hank for game 1. I am assigning some to him though. He was absolutely PHENOMENAL today and in the last game and in most of the games he has been in and I have defended him as the best goalie on earth and a great PO performer multiple times on the main board and here. I try to be objective game by game and not be a biased homer fan though

shinchanyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:01 AM
  #377
schabadoo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,354
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwayry View Post
Not it was not clear. You blamed Hank exclusively. Apparently we have made some progress sine this post.
I'm with you, it was all Hank's fault in his posts.

schabadoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:02 AM
  #378
shinchanyo
Registered User
 
shinchanyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by schabadoo View Post
I'm with you, it was all Hank's fault in his posts.
How? Please quote all the times I blamed the forwards and said specifically that I was not blaming Hankl alone. Or are you ****ing with me?

shinchanyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:08 AM
  #379
Kwayry
Registered User
 
Kwayry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Plano
Country: United States
Posts: 2,969
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinchanyo View Post
You are bafflingly incapable of understanding anything.
"Godlike saves in OT"
"The OT performance by the forwards was atrocious."

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL I am getting trolled or you are a very very poor reader.

Also I later clarified. "Henrik cost us a win" means in regulation. I also did not say that he ALONE cost us a win. And in the 18 or so posts SINCE this first one I clearly clarified I was blaming the forwards as well. But I do feel hank deserves more blame in regulation for his bad goals. But yea even in what you quoted I am not blaming Henrik alone. You have impressed me with your troll skills/inability to comprehend information. Or maybe you've ALREADY been drinking I dunno but there's not much else that could explain your inability to fairly discuss things and understand clarifications or opinions
Yes, I have been and I am drinking.
Listen, I learned a long time ago, not to take insults personally, they are actually a sign of a weak position, but I digress.
If you changed your mind about who is to blame in game 1 along the way, then that's all that matters to me.
Let's enjoy this win, i was not expecting it after the first period. Cheers.

Kwayry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:10 AM
  #380
shinchanyo
Registered User
 
shinchanyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwayry View Post
Yes, I have been and I am drinking.
Listen, I learned a long time ago, not to take insults personally, they are actually a sign of a weak position, but I digress.
If you changed your mind about who is to blame in game 1 along the way, then that's all that matters to me.
Let's enjoy this win, i was not expecting it after the first period. Cheers.
Why are you insulted? DId I say something incorrect or misrepresent your position in some way as you have done to me? You can['t seem toe xplain yourself or correctly understand what I'm writing even when it's spelled out as clearly as possible. What a joke. Also there is a difference between an insult and a legitimate criticism.

shinchanyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:12 AM
  #381
Kwayry
Registered User
 
Kwayry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Plano
Country: United States
Posts: 2,969
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinchanyo View Post
Why are you insulted? DId I say something incorrect or misrepresent your position in some way? You can['t seem toe xplain yourself or correctly understand what I'm writing even when it's spelled out as clearly as possible. What a joke.
I offered an olive branch and you refused it.
You seemed to have tied yourself in a knot. you were arguing against your own words, all I did was repost them. Don't blame me.

Kwayry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:12 AM
  #382
schabadoo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,354
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinchanyo View Post
Or are you ****ing with me?
Not at all.

You seem to be though.

schabadoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:13 AM
  #383
schabadoo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,354
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColonialsHockey10 View Post
Oh and that Jonny Boychuk hit was one of my favorites in recent memory. Completely clean, just catching a guy (idiot) with his head down, and nobody was hurt.
Idiot instead of goon...improvement I guess.

schabadoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:14 AM
  #384
shinchanyo
Registered User
 
shinchanyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwayry View Post
I offered an olive branch and you refused it.
You seemed to have tied yourself in a knot. you were arguing against your own words, all I did was repost them. Don't blame me.
No I wasn't you were. I asked you to explain and you did not. You asked me to explain and even though it was already obviously explained I explained again. Go ahead explain yourself why does Hank get zero blame for his goals he let in?

Also why, when I said I was blaming both hank and the F, did you continue to say I blamed only Hank? Why did you quote a post where I BLAMED the forwards and claim I was blaming Hank alone? Trying to run away from your own incorrect points is not extending the olive branch. If you wanted to extend any sort of olive branch you'd discuss this instead of ignoring points and putting words in my mouth.

shinchanyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:15 AM
  #385
shinchanyo
Registered User
 
shinchanyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by schabadoo View Post
Not at all.

You seem to be though.
K then explain yourself. back up your opinion with logic and reasoning. I asked you to do something if you are going to put words in my mouth and misrepresent me then prove it Quote the times I said that hank was not solely at fault and quote all the times I blamed the forwards. I did it a lot. This should neatly disprove your false assertion


Last edited by shinchanyo: 05-24-2013 at 12:25 AM.
shinchanyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:16 AM
  #386
TCRF
RICK. GNASH
 
TCRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lancaster, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 19,410
vCash: 476
Gotta take games one by one.

TCRF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:25 AM
  #387
Glen Sathers Cigar
Sather = Evil Genius
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,597
vCash: 500
In 2010 Philly won game 4 in OT and then went on to comeback to win the series. Can we do it? One game at a time! (They also lost game 1 of that series in OT, like we did)

I'll be praying that Hank is in god mode for game 5, if he is...ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN!

Glen Sathers Cigar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:26 AM
  #388
DudMan28
Registered User
 
DudMan28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,012
vCash: 500
I think our 4th line really helped set the tone. They were flying around laying hits. When you think a hit is coming you tend to rush and make mistakes. Our 4th line gave us exactly what Boston's 4th line has been giving them all series.

DudMan28 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:27 AM
  #389
Kwayry
Registered User
 
Kwayry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Plano
Country: United States
Posts: 2,969
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinchanyo View Post
No I wasn't you were. I asked you to explain and you did not. You asked me to explain and even though it was already obviously explained I explained again. Go ahead explain yourself why does Hank get zero blame for his goals he let in?

Also why, when I said I was blaming both hank and the F, did you continue to say I blamed only Hank? Why did you quote a post where I BLAMED the forwards and claim I was blaming Hank alone? Trying to run away from your own incorrect points is not extending the olive branch. If you wanted to extend any sort of olive branch you'd discuss this instead of ignoring points and putting words in my mouth.
Now you are moving the goal posts. the debate was about who gets the blame for costing us the game.
Sure One of those goals was a soft one, I said it then and i am saying it now. But the soft goal, the tying goal very early in the 3rd period, didn't cost us the game, the failure of the PP is what cost us the game.

I think it was in discussion with Crease where I said, I can't blame Hank for any of the losses. the one where there is a debate in my mind is the second game, 5-2 game. But given how bad the defense in front of him was I can hardly blame him.
I will defend Girardi to the grave, except for that 2nd game. He was dreadful.

Kwayry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:33 AM
  #390
shinchanyo
Registered User
 
shinchanyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwayry View Post
Now you are moving the goal posts. the debate was about who gets the blame for costing us the game.
Sure One of those goals was a soft one, I said it then and i am saying it now. But the soft goal, the tying goal very early in the 3rd period, didn't cost us the game, the failure of the PP is what cost us the game.

I think it was in discussion with Crease where I said, I can't blame Hank for any of the losses. the one where there is a debate in my mind is the second game, 5-2 game. But given how bad the defense in front of him was I can hardly blame him.
I will defend Girardi to the grave, except for that 2nd game. He was dreadful.
Incorrect I did not move the goal posts.
Incorrect that's not the debate. My POINT is both get a share of the blame.
Your point is Hank gets zero blame. "Who" implies one group or person gets blamed. Not my stance

Quote:
Originally Posted by shinchanyo View Post
. Why does Hank get zero blame for his goals he let in?

Also why, when I said I was blaming both hank and the F, did you continue to say I blamed only Hank? Why did you quote a post where I BLAMED the forwards and claim I was blaming Hank alone? .
You answered nothing that I asked here. 3 Questions in that quote. Answer them please.

shinchanyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:41 AM
  #391
ajdj10
Registered User
 
ajdj10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Country: Australia
Posts: 911
vCash: 500
We are...................ALIVE!

ajdj10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:41 AM
  #392
shinchanyo
Registered User
 
shinchanyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 2,550
vCash: 500
Thank you schabadoo and Kwayry you have both failed miserably to explain yourselves, clarify or answer me. Yikes. At least Kwayry you admitted you are drunk but I've got to go to bed. Hopefully you can admit you were wrong. But you're admittedly drinking so I guess it doesn't matter.

shinchanyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:44 AM
  #393
Kwayry
Registered User
 
Kwayry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Plano
Country: United States
Posts: 2,969
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinchanyo View Post
Incorrect I did not move the goal posts.
Incorrect that's not the debate. My POINT is both get a share of the blame.
Your point is Hank gets zero blame. "Who" implies one group or person gets blamed. Not my stance



You answered nothing that I asked here. 3 Questions in that quote. Answer them please.
I will summarize my answers this way. Hank gets blamed for the tying goal, it was a soft goal that he should have made. I will stress this point, it was a tying goal early in the 3rd period. It was not a go ahead goal!
The team had a late PP to win the game, again, not to tie it, but to win it.
Therefore, I cannot blame him for costing us the game.

Kwayry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 12:55 AM
  #394
t3hg00se
Registered User
 
t3hg00se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,396
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to t3hg00se
Kreider-Stepan-Nash
Hagelin-Brassard-Callahan
Clowe-Richards-Zuccarello
Pyatt-Boyle-Dorsett

if clowe isnt healthy

Kreider-Stepan-Nash
Hagelin-Brassard-Callahan
Richards-Boyle-Zuccarello
Pyatt-Powe/Newbury-Dorsett

Richards might look better on the wing riding shotgun to boyle-zuccarello with how they are playing. liked haley's game tonight, but pyatt's been good and i think richards should get another shot this series and be benched if he sucks. Shouldn't be allowed near the power play.

healthy staal and stralman

McDonagh-Del Zotto
Moore-Girardi
Staal-Stralman

t3hg00se is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 01:00 AM
  #395
ColonialsHockey10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,902
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by schabadoo View Post
Idiot instead of goon...improvement I guess.
I don't think the Hollweg could have been more spot on. He's capable of making an impact, but also capable of singlehandedly screwing the team over

ColonialsHockey10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 01:05 AM
  #396
Zappy
Registered User
 
Zappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: island in the sun
Country: Djibouti
Posts: 9,631
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by shinchanyo View Post
Thank you schabadoo and Kwayry you have both failed miserably to explain yourselves, clarify or answer me. Yikes. At least Kwayry you admitted you are drunk but I've got to go to bed. Hopefully you can admit you were wrong. But you're admittedly drinking so I guess it doesn't matter.
Dude, I know this is a messageboard and you are entitled to have your arguments with people, but you are SUPER hung up on getting approval from people in like every thread. Not everyone is going to agree with you or like you - let it go.

I'm trying to read people's opinions on THIS game and your comments one Game 1 took up like half the fricken thread. There is a Lundqvist only thread, ya know...

ANYWAYS

Glad they didn't get swept. Regardless of goals, the PP looked better in general. We quieted down their fourth line a tad. Played a more physical game. Hank played great but did seem a little gassed at times.

Not trying to be a jerk, but really don't see them winning four in a row. If they prove me wrong, great. But I feel like these changes were too little too late and the adrenaline will fade.

Zappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 01:12 AM
  #397
7even
Moderator
Deus Ex Machina
 
7even's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Georgia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,967
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guess What View Post
Gotta take games one by one.
The ****ing Leafs pushed the Bruins to a 7th game after being down 3-1. Let's go Rangers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajdj10 View Post
We are...................ALIVE!


Last edited by 7even: 05-24-2013 at 01:15 AM. Reason: Rags isn't kosher here no big deal, considering most don't realize that.
7even is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 01:12 AM
  #398
DudMan28
Registered User
 
DudMan28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapp Brannigan View Post
Dude, I know this is a messageboard and you are entitled to have your arguments with people, but you are SUPER hung up on getting approval from people in like every thread. Not everyone is going to agree with you or like you - let it go.

I'm trying to read people's opinions on THIS game and your comments one Game 1 took up like half the fricken thread. There is a Lundqvist only thread, ya know...

ANYWAYS

Glad they didn't get swept. Regardless of goals, the PP looked better in general. We quieted down their fourth line a tad. Played a more physical game. Hank played great but did seem a little gassed at times.

Not trying to be a jerk, but really don't see them winning four in a row. If they prove me wrong, great. But I feel like these changes were too little too late and the adrenaline will fade.
Couldnt agree more.

I think they played an overall solid game. They were back to the early season Rangers where they would get flattened in the first ten minutes of the game. They pulled it together. Gotta get it back to the garden for game 6. One game at a time. I liked our 4th line. Brought some energy like a 4th line is supposed to. Woulndt mind seeing the same 4th line with clowe on the third and Pyatt sitting.

DudMan28 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 01:13 AM
  #399
JeffMangum
Man Girardi
 
JeffMangum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Listening to music
Country: United States
Posts: 59,288
vCash: 50
One game at a time.

This team is at their best when desperate. If they can pull out a win in game 5 (hopefully Lundqvist goes into Christ-mode), then we've got a series.

__________________
Soon.
JeffMangum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-24-2013, 01:18 AM
  #400
Loffen
Cup mode: ON
 
Loffen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Soft euro
Posts: 18,581
vCash: 500
Sweep averted. Very nice. GG, boys!

Loffen is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.