HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Vancouver Proposal: Sedins for ..

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-19-2005, 02:53 AM
  #1
Path Of The Beserker
Greasy Swede
 
Path Of The Beserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pillaging The West
Country: Denmark
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
Vancouver Proposal: Sedins for ..

Get Rid of the Sedins who knows they may be a hit somewhere else. maybe toss in say Kiril Koltsov or Brandon Reid and a draft pick. What could they get in return? mainly a Center and a Left Wing.???
Im not against the Sedins or anything, but would like to find out what kind of depth the nucks could bring in in return for the Sedins. I think there would be some interested teams that would be willing to give them more ice time and see how they produce.


Last edited by Path Of The Beserker: 05-19-2005 at 03:07 AM.
Path Of The Beserker is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 02:56 AM
  #2
kmad
Riot Survivor
 
kmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,035
vCash: 500
to waivers: heatley wanted

kmad is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 02:58 AM
  #3
Path Of The Beserker
Greasy Swede
 
Path Of The Beserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pillaging The West
Country: Denmark
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
put them on waivers? are they worth that much to someone?lol

Path Of The Beserker is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 03:46 AM
  #4
Safir*
 
Safir*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Country: Turkmenistan
Posts: 13,959
vCash: 500
Let me just recap.

You offer:

- Daniel Sedin
- Henrik Sedin
- Kiril Koltsov or Brandon Reid (a Hamburg Freezer nowadays)
- a draft pick


Maybe Florida is a potential trade partner.

- Weiss
- Stewart
- a pick

Safir* is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 03:52 AM
  #5
kmad
Riot Survivor
 
kmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,035
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by heatley wanted
put them on waivers? are they worth that much to someone?lol
I meant send you to waivers

the Sedins are not going anywhere

kmad is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 03:59 AM
  #6
Path Of The Beserker
Greasy Swede
 
Path Of The Beserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pillaging The West
Country: Denmark
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
some of the people here amaze me...
IF you were offering them, Not SINCE they are being offered. As far as I am concerned, this section of the board is more for fun than real heresay or will happens. Whats the percentage of the trades you or anyone elsee here have proposed that have gone through.
Have there not been other times it's been said that "they AREN'T going anywhere" and sure s**t they get traded?
Just Curious.....

Path Of The Beserker is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 05:05 AM
  #7
McDonald19
Hampus
 
McDonald19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: California
Country: United States
Posts: 17,528
vCash: 500
Is there any reason that they need to be traded together?

split them up and see what happens it's not like having them together has been that amazing.

McDonald19 is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 07:06 AM
  #8
PhillyPhantoms
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 96
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by McDonald19
Is there any reason that they need to be traded together?

split them up and see what happens it's not like having them together has been that amazing.
I don't think any team would really want to take the risk of splitting them up, mainly because they don't know how they would play without each other.

What I don't get it is why everyone is so down on the Sedins. For how weak their draft class was, I think that they were the right picks and have done well.

PhillyPhantoms is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 10:41 AM
  #9
Path Of The Beserker
Greasy Swede
 
Path Of The Beserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pillaging The West
Country: Denmark
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
as I stated. I am not down on them. I think maybe its time for the canucks to try a little tweeking. New GM and all, maybe he should try and make the team his own a little bit.
Maybe some different goaltending(besides auld, hes a keeper) and something a bit different at the forward position.?
Just my opinion. I am quite new at these type of boards, so just feeling my way around right now. thanks for the opinions everyone.

Path Of The Beserker is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 10:51 AM
  #10
NFITO
hockeyinsanity*****
 
NFITO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,903
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by heatley wanted
some of the people here amaze me...
IF you were offering them, Not SINCE they are being offered. As far as I am concerned, this section of the board is more for fun than real heresay or will happens. Whats the percentage of the trades you or anyone elsee here have proposed that have gone through.
Have there not been other times it's been said that "they AREN'T going anywhere" and sure s**t they get traded?
Just Curious.....
this part of the board still needs to have some reason behind the suggested deals... sure it's all for fun - but then don't be suprised when you get logical replies back where it doesn't make sense to deal them...

offers like this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomACE
Let me just recap.

You offer:

- Daniel Sedin
- Henrik Sedin
- Kiril Koltsov or Brandon Reid (a Hamburg Freezer nowadays)
- a draft pick


Maybe Florida is a potential trade partner.

- Weiss
- Stewart
- a pick
are really a joke, that won't work... think about it? are the canucks or the panthers the rebuilding team here?

The canucks are going to move 2 guys that are among the top scoring per minute players in the league - which is great production for 2nd line players - for a couple of prospects that have a lot more to prove?

The canucks aren't going to rebuild their team right now... they aren't going to move 2 top 6 forwards, that have only been getting better, and are coming off solid years in the SEL and WC, for a couple of guys that might not make our top 3 lines, let alone top 6 roles.

I'm not saying that this board shouldn't be used for suggestions like this - but there should be some logic behind it... not simply dropping players for the sake of moving them and what they could get back in return. The Sedins - we've seen examples on this board for it for years now - aren't going to bring back value among HF fans here that the canucks would need back in order to move them.

For the canucks to move the Sedins, you need back 2 guys that are going to replace them in the top 6 for the same immediate impact that the Sedins already give, while being at the same salary level that these two players are in (considering our already $43mill payroll)...

realistically, is there any team in the league that can offer that - basically we need 2 players that are at least as good now as the Sedins are, to move them... we need 2 Sedin-types basically to move the Sedins, so why it makes no sense to deal them.

The Sedins - because of this - simply won't be moved..... their value to the team is HIGH whether the Sedin bashers want to admit it or not... 2 players in your top 6 that are scoring at fine level (points per minute, there aren't many players better than them - and in a 2nd line role, what more can you ask for?), that are making less than the league's average salary, and are young and still improving - and have shown improvement over the past few years.

I'd like to see one logical trade that makes sense for the canucks, where the can replace the Sedins role in the lineup, and replace their salaries - and either get players that are better now, but don't have the upside, or players that are as good now, and have the same upside. But the fact remains that since the canucks are not a rebuilding team, they can't afford to move the Sedins for a present downgrade in their top 6 roles.

does this make sense?

NFITO is online now  
Old
05-19-2005, 12:27 PM
  #11
PhillyPhantoms
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 96
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuckfan in TO
this part of the board still needs to have some reason behind the suggested deals... sure it's all for fun - but then don't be suprised when you get logical replies back where it doesn't make sense to deal them...

offers like this:



are really a joke, that won't work... think about it? are the canucks or the panthers the rebuilding team here?

The canucks are going to move 2 guys that are among the top scoring per minute players in the league - which is great production for 2nd line players - for a couple of prospects that have a lot more to prove?

The canucks aren't going to rebuild their team right now... they aren't going to move 2 top 6 forwards, that have only been getting better, and are coming off solid years in the SEL and WC, for a couple of guys that might not make our top 3 lines, let alone top 6 roles.

I'm not saying that this board shouldn't be used for suggestions like this - but there should be some logic behind it... not simply dropping players for the sake of moving them and what they could get back in return. The Sedins - we've seen examples on this board for it for years now - aren't going to bring back value among HF fans here that the canucks would need back in order to move them.

For the canucks to move the Sedins, you need back 2 guys that are going to replace them in the top 6 for the same immediate impact that the Sedins already give, while being at the same salary level that these two players are in (considering our already $43mill payroll)...

realistically, is there any team in the league that can offer that - basically we need 2 players that are at least as good now as the Sedins are, to move them... we need 2 Sedin-types basically to move the Sedins, so why it makes no sense to deal them.

The Sedins - because of this - simply won't be moved..... their value to the team is HIGH whether the Sedin bashers want to admit it or not... 2 players in your top 6 that are scoring at fine level (points per minute, there aren't many players better than them - and in a 2nd line role, what more can you ask for?), that are making less than the league's average salary, and are young and still improving - and have shown improvement over the past few years.

I'd like to see one logical trade that makes sense for the canucks, where the can replace the Sedins role in the lineup, and replace their salaries - and either get players that are better now, but don't have the upside, or players that are as good now, and have the same upside. But the fact remains that since the canucks are not a rebuilding team, they can't afford to move the Sedins for a present downgrade in their top 6 roles.

does this make sense?
Very well put, my thoughts exactly

PhillyPhantoms is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 12:34 PM
  #12
ZombieMatt
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,244
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomACE
Let me just recap.

- Kiril Koltsov or Brandon Reid (a Hamburg Freezer nowadays)
Actually Reid signed to play in the Swiss league next season.

ZombieMatt is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 02:05 PM
  #13
ShippinItDaily
Registered User
 
ShippinItDaily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Saskatoon
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,116
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to ShippinItDaily
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuckfan in TO
this part of the board still needs to have some reason behind the suggested deals... sure it's all for fun - but then don't be suprised when you get logical replies back where it doesn't make sense to deal them...

offers like this:



are really a joke, that won't work... think about it? are the canucks or the panthers the rebuilding team here?

The canucks are going to move 2 guys that are among the top scoring per minute players in the league - which is great production for 2nd line players - for a couple of prospects that have a lot more to prove?

The canucks aren't going to rebuild their team right now... they aren't going to move 2 top 6 forwards, that have only been getting better, and are coming off solid years in the SEL and WC, for a couple of guys that might not make our top 3 lines, let alone top 6 roles.

I'm not saying that this board shouldn't be used for suggestions like this - but there should be some logic behind it... not simply dropping players for the sake of moving them and what they could get back in return. The Sedins - we've seen examples on this board for it for years now - aren't going to bring back value among HF fans here that the canucks would need back in order to move them.

For the canucks to move the Sedins, you need back 2 guys that are going to replace them in the top 6 for the same immediate impact that the Sedins already give, while being at the same salary level that these two players are in (considering our already $43mill payroll)...

realistically, is there any team in the league that can offer that - basically we need 2 players that are at least as good now as the Sedins are, to move them... we need 2 Sedin-types basically to move the Sedins, so why it makes no sense to deal them.

The Sedins - because of this - simply won't be moved..... their value to the team is HIGH whether the Sedin bashers want to admit it or not... 2 players in your top 6 that are scoring at fine level (points per minute, there aren't many players better than them - and in a 2nd line role, what more can you ask for?), that are making less than the league's average salary, and are young and still improving - and have shown improvement over the past few years.

I'd like to see one logical trade that makes sense for the canucks, where the can replace the Sedins role in the lineup, and replace their salaries - and either get players that are better now, but don't have the upside, or players that are as good now, and have the same upside. But the fact remains that since the canucks are not a rebuilding team, they can't afford to move the Sedins for a present downgrade in their top 6 roles.

does this make sense?
Ok how about this:

To Vancouver:
Ryder
Ribeiro

To Montreal:
H Sedin
D Sedin

Value seems prety fair as both teams give up 2 young top 6 forwards for 2 of the same in return. Ryder and Ribiero have both had better seasons than the Sedins have but the Sedins are both a bit younger I believe and have maybe a little more upside. It would depend on how each team feels on their respective players before this type of a deal would be done but seems fair to me.

ShippinItDaily is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 02:13 PM
  #14
NFITO
hockeyinsanity*****
 
NFITO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,903
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dangler19
Ok how about this:

To Vancouver:
Ryder
Ribeiro

To Montreal:
H Sedin
D Sedin

Value seems prety fair as both teams give up 2 young top 6 forwards for 2 of the same in return. Ryder and Ribiero have both had better seasons than the Sedins have but the Sedins are both a bit younger I believe and have maybe a little more upside. It would depend on how each team feels on their respective players before this type of a deal would be done but seems fair to me.
I wouldn't touch this deal... I like Ryder a lot, but I'm not at all high on Riberio.

While Riberio is scoring well, Henrik has a better 2-way game, and is getting better each season in it. And his chemistry with Daniel is undeniable.

I wouldn't touch this deal as a result. I honestly can't see a deal take place for these guys... to get them from Vancouver, because of the factors involved - age, salary, chemistry, upside, current production and role with the team - it would have to be an overpayment for them to be moved - and Ryder and Riberio IMO is not an overpayment (although a much more reasonable offer than the Florida example).

We already get what we need from these guys... they fit a need, and they deliver. I don't see the reason to start entertaining offers for them at all - and any player in this situation - you can add Ryder, Koivu, Theodore and others - if they fit the team and address team needs, why would you deal them without an offer that is simply too good to refuse?

Ryder and Riberio for the Sedins is just not that kind of offer.

value wise, we could probably come up with a lot of fair deals, that teams simply wouldn't touch, because it makes no sense for them to make the swap - like this case for the canucks.

NFITO is online now  
Old
05-19-2005, 02:32 PM
  #15
ShippinItDaily
Registered User
 
ShippinItDaily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Saskatoon
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,116
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to ShippinItDaily
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuckfan in TO
I wouldn't touch this deal... I like Ryder a lot, but I'm not at all high on Riberio.

While Riberio is scoring well, Henrik has a better 2-way game, and is getting better each season in it. And his chemistry with Daniel is undeniable.

I wouldn't touch this deal as a result. I honestly can't see a deal take place for these guys... to get them from Vancouver, because of the factors involved - age, salary, chemistry, upside, current production and role with the team - it would have to be an overpayment for them to be moved - and Ryder and Riberio IMO is not an overpayment (although a much more reasonable offer than the Florida example).

We already get what we need from these guys... they fit a need, and they deliver. I don't see the reason to start entertaining offers for them at all - and any player in this situation - you can add Ryder, Koivu, Theodore and others - if they fit the team and address team needs, why would you deal them without an offer that is simply too good to refuse?

Ryder and Riberio for the Sedins is just not that kind of offer.

value wise, we could probably come up with a lot of fair deals, that teams simply wouldn't touch, because it makes no sense for them to make the swap - like this case for the canucks.

I kind of figured this would be your response and it is very reasonable. This deal would probably make a lot more sense for Vancouver if Ryder and Ribeiro had another season each of 65+ points and the Sedins didnt show any more improvement over their next season.

Their are probably a lot of Montreal fans who wouldnt touch this either because of the fact that Ribeiro and Ryder both have shown that they can score at a higher level than the Sedins. But like I said before, this type of deal is all about how each team feels about thier respective players. Which is I guess, what you are saying anyways.

ShippinItDaily is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 02:46 PM
  #16
NFITO
hockeyinsanity*****
 
NFITO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,903
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dangler19
I kind of figured this would be your response and it is very reasonable. This deal would probably make a lot more sense for Vancouver if Ryder and Ribeiro had another season each of 65+ points and the Sedins didnt show any more improvement over their next season.

Their are probably a lot of Montreal fans who wouldnt touch this either because of the fact that Ribeiro and Ryder both have shown that they can score at a higher level than the Sedins. But like I said before, this type of deal is all about how each team feels about thier respective players. Which is I guess, what you are saying anyways.
yes.. it would make a lot more sense if Ryder and Riberio had 65+ points again, and the Sedins didn't show any improvement... but then again, it'd make more sense for the canucks, but not much sense at all for the habs.

The Sedins have proven enough though that you just can't deal them yet. They are still only 24 - and were huge for their teams at the WC.. they had solid years in the SEL, and before that, were having solid years in Vancouver - Henrik showing he can play strong 2-way hockey, and Daniel breaking out offensively in many ways, being one of the highest scoring LWs in the game, and among the top points per minute guys in the league... both have gotten stronger, and can take punishment out there as good as anyone and still keep their level of play up, and not have injury problems because of it... both have proven that they raise their level of play in the playoffs, and anyone that thinks these guys are soft doesn't know these players at all.

If they get 16-17 mins of icetime, I think you'll see numbers a lot closer to what Ryder and Riberio had getting the 16-17 mins last year... Daniel played in 13 1/2 mins a game.

They've also proven to improve the play of the players they've played with - usually 3rd liners for the most part. And if you watch them play, their biggest strength - and I've been saying this for the last 3 years now! - is that they hardly give up any scoring chances against when they're on the ice. The majority of every shift they play, the puck is in the offensive zone, and both guys are good at getting it out of their zone quickly and changing the attack. They've been consistent in this since they came into the NHL - and something that usually gets ignored as part of their strengths.

Riberio and Ryder could very easily have better careers in the NHL... they could be top line players in their prime, while the Sedins could have their development stopped and remain 2nd liners through their career... but at the age they're at, and the development they have consistently shown, I'll take my chances with the Sedins long term.

NFITO is online now  
Old
05-19-2005, 03:57 PM
  #17
salzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Windsor
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,048
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by McDonald19
Is there any reason that they need to be traded together?

split them up and see what happens it's not like having them together has been that amazing.
I remember in the days leading up to that draft hearing how some team might try to trade up and get both of them, not just because they were going to be great players, but because of the marketing magic you could create with 2 young guys who are twins like that. lol - have I missed all the mammoth endorsement deals they've signed?

salzy is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 03:59 PM
  #18
salzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Windsor
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,048
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuckfan in TO
I wouldn't touch this deal... I like Ryder a lot, but I'm not at all high on Riberio.
From what I can tell, nobody outside la belle province is all that high on Ribeiro.

salzy is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 04:13 PM
  #19
Legionnaire
Kill! Jeff, Kill!!!
 
Legionnaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: LA-LA Land
Country: United States
Posts: 35,752
vCash: 500
IMO, it would be stupid to get rid of the Sedins now. They have improved almost every season they've played in the league, and could break out given ice time. I mean look what they were able to do with around 13/14 minutes a game last season

__________________
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Mark Twain
Legionnaire is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 04:55 PM
  #20
PhillyPhantoms
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 96
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by salzy
I remember in the days leading up to that draft hearing how some team might try to trade up and get both of them, not just because they were going to be great players, but because of the marketing magic you could create with 2 young guys who are twins like that. lol - have I missed all the mammoth endorsement deals they've signed?
There was a poster with many players endorsing some brand of hockey equipment (forget what brand it was) in a local hockey shop here, and Daniel Sedin was on it. Henrik wasn't tho

PhillyPhantoms is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 05:10 PM
  #21
Path Of The Beserker
Greasy Swede
 
Path Of The Beserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pillaging The West
Country: Denmark
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
OK Well if the nucks arent going to move these two. what would be sensible for them to do to shape the team a bit, goaltending isnt the greatest and they havent done super in the playoffs. I dont think just having bertuzzi back will get a magical trip to finals for them. Wait and see? Sign a free agent or two? or make some smaller type of trades? I would like to see a change in goaltending and maybe a decent right winger to go with the sedins since they are staying? any opinions.

Path Of The Beserker is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 05:12 PM
  #22
monster_bertuzzi
registered user
 
monster_bertuzzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 30,670
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legionnaire
IMO, it would be stupid to get rid of the Sedins now. They have improved almost every season they've played in the league, and could break out given ice time. I mean look what they were able to do with around 13/14 minutes a game last season
Daniel could easily break out and be a 65+ point scorer. Hell he had 55 last year in about 75 games. This was playing with his twin and Jason King/Wade Brookbank. Sadly I think Hank Sedin will always be a 40/50 point scorer.

monster_bertuzzi is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 05:13 PM
  #23
Path Of The Beserker
Greasy Swede
 
Path Of The Beserker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pillaging The West
Country: Denmark
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
nucks fan in TO. thanks and yes it does make sense.

Path Of The Beserker is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 05:15 PM
  #24
Matty
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Strawberry Fields
Posts: 2,396
vCash: 500
Well if I were Nonis, the only way I would trade the Sedins is if I could get a bonafied #1 star center who is young in return. Guys like Lecavalier, Thornton, Spezza, Staal...

Would any of those teams part with those guys? Highly unlikely. Thus, the Sedins wouldn't be going anywhere if I were Nonis...

Matty is offline  
Old
05-19-2005, 05:47 PM
  #25
hockeyfan125
HFB Partner
 
hockeyfan125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,019
vCash: 500
Would not touch that deal at all.

hockeyfan125 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.