HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie
Notices

per Dreger: Sharks interested in Clutterbuck (Nope - traded to NYI)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-30-2013, 11:58 AM
  #1
LadyStanley
Elasmobranchology-go
 
LadyStanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sin City
Country: United States
Posts: 67,788
vCash: 500
per Dreger: Sharks interested in Clutterbuck (Nope - traded to NYI)

KKurzCSN 9:49am via Twitter for iPhone According to @DarrenDreger #SJSharks potentially interested in Cal Clutterbuck. We do know Sharks need another forward

LadyStanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:01 PM
  #2
ramstoria
Registered User
 
ramstoria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sacramento
Country: United States
Posts: 917
vCash: 500
I've wanted Clutterbuck for a couple of years. Torres lowers our need for him, but I still think he'd be a great piece for us to add. More depth, another role player. Something we've painfully lacked over the years.

ramstoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:01 PM
  #3
JoeThorntonsRooster
#FireDougWilson
 
JoeThorntonsRooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,369
vCash: 500
It's Dreger, so DW probably told him outright that he wants no part of Clutterbuck.

JoeThorntonsRooster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:03 PM
  #4
sr228
Registered User
 
sr228's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,113
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ramstoria View Post
I've wanted Clutterbuck for a couple of years. Torres lowers our need for him, but I still think he'd be a great piece for us to add. More depth, another role player. Something we've painfully lacked over the years.
Yep - can contribute 10-15 goals, take on the toughs, kills penalties. Considering the cap situation with the Sharks I would imagine they'll be trying to acquire players like Clutterbuck, Kennedy, etc.

sr228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:06 PM
  #5
JoeThorntonsRooster
#FireDougWilson
 
JoeThorntonsRooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,369
vCash: 500
Clutterbuck plays PK? I don't remember that of him, I thought he was bad defensively?

JoeThorntonsRooster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:06 PM
  #6
Hatrick Marleau
Just Win The Game
 
Hatrick Marleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: With JR
Posts: 4,474
vCash: 500
We don't need him but as long as he is cheap I don't care.

Hatrick Marleau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:16 PM
  #7
Crafton
Liver-Eating Johnson
 
Crafton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 9,753
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Great 88 View Post
Clutterbuck plays PK? I don't remember that of him, I thought he was bad defensively?
fourth on the Wild in SH TOI /G. second among forwards after Brodziak. take a peak at his usage chart to see how he was deployed.

Crafton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:18 PM
  #8
Fistfullofbeer
#FREEHEED #FREERYAN
 
Fistfullofbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Country: United States
Posts: 15,538
vCash: 1100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatrick Marleau View Post
We don't need him but as long as he is cheap I don't care.
This. He could probably fit in as a tweener in Havlat's spot while he is on LTIR.

Fistfullofbeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:20 PM
  #9
JoeThorntonsRooster
#FireDougWilson
 
JoeThorntonsRooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,369
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crafton View Post
fourth on the Wild in SH TOI /G. second among forwards after Brodziak. take a peak at his usage chart to see how he was deployed.
Oh, in that case, we could definitely use him. Burish is one of the worst PK'ers in the league.

JoeThorntonsRooster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:21 PM
  #10
FeedingFrenzy
Registered User
 
FeedingFrenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,881
vCash: 500
anything under 2million for Cal and I say F-ya!! Having Clutter not only gives us a back-up to the "torres" role, it makes this team down right nasty..

Throw him a "Burish" contract and be done

FeedingFrenzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:22 PM
  #11
do0glas
Registered User
 
do0glas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,698
vCash: 500
wed have to offersheet him correct? so wed be giving up a second rounder in compensation given his potential caphit?

do0glas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:22 PM
  #12
SharksAddict
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,534
vCash: 500
I like him but he doesn't fill their biggest need, which is scoring. With how good this draft is I'd hate to blow even a 3rd round draft pick on him.

SharksAddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:23 PM
  #13
Crafton
Liver-Eating Johnson
 
Crafton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 9,753
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by do0glas View Post
wed have to offersheet him correct? so wed be giving up a second rounder in compensation given his potential caphit?
it would be a trade for his RFA rights, no? same thing with the Kennedy speculation.

Clutterbuck's QO is 1.7M. Kennedy is 2M. i'm guessing they'd both take 2-2.2M. no loss of draft picks and all that (beyond what they paid to get the rights).

Crafton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:24 PM
  #14
Fistfullofbeer
#FREEHEED #FREERYAN
 
Fistfullofbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Country: United States
Posts: 15,538
vCash: 1100
Quote:
Originally Posted by do0glas View Post
wed have to offersheet him correct? so wed be giving up a second rounder in compensation given his potential caphit?
I did not realize he was an RFA.

I wouldn't mind giving up a late 2nd rounder for him but that definitely makes it a little less attractive.

Fistfullofbeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:25 PM
  #15
do0glas
Registered User
 
do0glas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,698
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crafton View Post
it would be a trade for his RFA rights, no? same thing with the Kennedy speculation.
so as long as minny doesnt tender a QO we can trade for his rights? either way i cant see it being incredibly cheap. but a second rounder just for the rights is probably out of the questions.

he will probably get 2-2.5 mil

do0glas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:26 PM
  #16
SharksAddict
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,534
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistfullofbeer View Post
I did not realize he was an RFA.

I wouldn't mind giving up a late 2nd rounder for him but that definitely makes it a little less attractive.
In next year's draft sure, this year's draft no thank you. Too good of a draft to waste a 2nd rounder on a guy who doesn't add much scoring depth.

SharksAddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:28 PM
  #17
Crafton
Liver-Eating Johnson
 
Crafton's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 9,753
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by do0glas View Post
so as long as minny doesnt tender a QO we can trade for his rights? either way i cant see it being incredibly cheap. but a second rounder just for the rights is probably out of the questions.

he will probably get 2-2.5 mil
if they trade for the rights they can sign a deal regardless of what the Wild did and don't have to surrender any kind of compensation and i'll dig up a tweet but i think the reported asking price for the rights was a 2nd and b prospect.

Crafton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:30 PM
  #18
hohosaregood
Drunken Snacking
 
hohosaregood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas!
Posts: 19,173
vCash: 1250
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharksAddict View Post
In next year's draft sure, this year's draft no thank you. Too good of a draft to waste a 2nd rounder on a guy who doesn't add much scoring depth.
About 30 points as a 3rd line is pretty good imo

hohosaregood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:32 PM
  #19
do0glas
Registered User
 
do0glas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,698
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crafton View Post
if they trade for the rights they can sign a deal regardless of what the Wild did and don't have to surrender any kind of compensation and i'll dig up a tweet but i think the reported asking price for the rights was a 2nd and b prospect.
if its our last second rounder and one of our d prospects id do it.

do0glas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:38 PM
  #20
SharksAddict
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,534
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hohosaregood View Post
About 30 points as a 3rd line is pretty good imo
I think this team needs more than that with Havlat out. They need a guy who can fill in on the top 6 in a pinch and not drag the line down. I'd prefer Kennedy myself, more upside offensively. Granted, not nearly as physical.

I wouldn't be surprised if they are thinking using Torres on the 2nd line as they did in the playoffs.

Gali - JT - Burns
Marleau - Couture - Torres
?? - Pavs - Clutterbuck/Kennedy

SharksAddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:40 PM
  #21
sr228
Registered User
 
sr228's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,113
vCash: 500
Per LeBrun Tyler Kennedy might (repeat, might) be available - would prefer him to Clutterbuck if I was given a choice.

For people thinking the team can add a 2nd line scoring winger, don't count on it unless the Sharks trade out $$ or are 100% convinced Havlat is done for the year.

sr228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:46 PM
  #22
SJSharks42
Registered User
 
SJSharks42's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,060
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharksAddict View Post
I think this team needs more than that with Havlat out. They need a guy who can fill in on the top 6 in a pinch and not drag the line down. I'd prefer Kennedy myself, more upside offensively. Granted, not nearly as physical.

I wouldn't be surprised if they are thinking using Torres on the 2nd line as they did in the playoffs.

Gali - JT - Burns
Marleau - Couture - Torres
?? - Pavs - Clutterbuck/Kennedy
No Torres on the second line please. He was bad there during the playoffs.

SJSharks42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 12:47 PM
  #23
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,696
vCash: 1040
I would be fine with either Clutterbuck or TK to be honest, both fit our needs in different ways. In fact, I would offer up Burish and a 4th or something for Clutterbuck (since Clutterbuck is an RFA without a contract) and try to get TK as well, he's been pretty terrible lately so our worst 2nd is the most I'd give up.

Marleau - Couture - Havlat
Galiardi - Thornton - Pavelski
Torres - Hertl - Kennedy
Desjardins - Sheppard - Clutterbuck

Stuart - Burns
Vlasic - Braun
Irwin - Demers

Trade Boyle for some more picks.

hockeyball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 01:07 PM
  #24
glasgow26
Registered User
 
glasgow26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 4,459
vCash: 500
I'd love Clutterbuck, assuming we can sign him to a reasonable contract. I'd gladly give Minnesota the 58th overall pick for him. Still leaves us with a first and two seconds. I'd say that's fair.

glasgow26 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2013, 01:23 PM
  #25
WantonAbandon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,462
vCash: 500
If the price is right maybe

WantonAbandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. @2017 All Rights Reserved.