HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Rielly for Nugent-Hopkins

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-01-2013, 12:55 AM
  #1
LarKing
Registered User
 
LarKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 7,411
vCash: 500
Rielly for Nugent-Hopkins

Now, before you jump all over me actually think about this one. This gives the Oilers a great future defense with Rielly, Schultz, Klefbom, Smid, and Petry. They're still left with a really solid forward core in Hall, Eberle, Yakupov, Gagner, Hemsky, Paajarvi etc. The Leafs would get a legit center who should only continue to improve. Kessel and him would be super dangerous. This would also allow the Oilers to pick a center in the draft with their future D set. Thoughts?

LarKing is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 12:58 AM
  #2
maroon 6
Live and let live
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: British Columbia
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,071
vCash: 50
Toronto has to add a lot more. RNH >>> Reilly

maroon 6 is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 12:59 AM
  #3
TMLife
Auston Matthews
 
TMLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,229
vCash: 500
WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS TO US?! RNH>>>>> RIELLY. He is nhl proven.

TMLife is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 12:59 AM
  #4
Wiqkid*
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ann Arbor
Country: United States
Posts: 672
vCash: 500
Umm add Kadri

Wiqkid* is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:01 AM
  #5
Djp
Registered User
 
Djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle,WA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,204
vCash: 500
Hold on---i need to get some popcorn.....

Djp is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:04 AM
  #6
West Coast Bias*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 863
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to West Coast Bias* Send a message via AIM to West Coast Bias* Send a message via Yahoo to West Coast Bias*
Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimusForever View Post
WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS TO US?! RNH>>>>> RIELLY. He is nhl proven.
You seriously think that Edmonton would say no to this deal because Rielly isn't NHL proven? It's not like they need grizzled veterans, because they aren't contending.

West Coast Bias* is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:06 AM
  #7
morrielly
Registered User
 
morrielly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: toronto
Posts: 559
vCash: 380
umm how about we stop throwing rielly in every other proposal???

nd besides, leafs fan here saying that right now rnh>>>rielly

morrielly is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:11 AM
  #8
McYoungGuns
Registered User
 
McYoungGuns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,818
vCash: 50
No ty , we appreciate your interest in our number one Centre but you are not giving nearly enough for us to move him and therefore we respectfully decline your offer

Thank you for Time and effort

McYoungGuns is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:12 AM
  #9
Hertl Power
Registered User
 
Hertl Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area, California
Country: United States
Posts: 1,388
vCash: 500
RNH because of position would probably be the hardest of the big 4 forwards to get out of Edmonton. This trade would currently leave Gagner and Horcoff as their centers on their top two lines. Then when you get to value it isn't close anyway.

Hertl Power is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:14 AM
  #10
LarKing
Registered User
 
LarKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Country: United States
Posts: 7,411
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by YoungGuns View Post
No ty , we appreciate your interest in our number one Centre but you are not giving nearly enough for us to move him and therefore we respectfully decline your offer

Thank you for Time and effort
I'm not a Leafs fan.

LarKing is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:14 AM
  #11
Roof Daddy
Registered User
 
Roof Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,582
vCash: 500
Horrible. Gagner as our 1C and Horcoff as our 2C? I like Rielly, but he's not needed near as much as The Nuge, nor do I think he is as good. If we were to trade one of our young guns it would be for a top pairing Dman who can contribute now. Rielly could get there, but it won't be next year. I'd say Klefbom will make just as big an impact next year.

Roof Daddy is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:16 AM
  #12
West Coast Bias*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 863
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to West Coast Bias* Send a message via AIM to West Coast Bias* Send a message via Yahoo to West Coast Bias*
Quote:
Originally Posted by morrielly View Post
right now rnh>>>rielly
That's the entire point of the trade, because Toronto is further along the yellow brick road of contending than Edmonton. Whoosh!

West Coast Bias* is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:21 AM
  #13
Seachd
Registered User
 
Seachd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Fail
Posts: 18,033
vCash: 167
There would be no reason for the Oilers to even consider this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by West Coast Bias View Post
That's the entire point of the trade, because Toronto is further along the yellow brick road of contending than Edmonton. Whoosh!
That really has nothing to do with this trade or the value of the players involved.

Seachd is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:21 AM
  #14
Roof Daddy
Registered User
 
Roof Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,582
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by West Coast Bias View Post
That's the entire point of the trade, because Toronto is further along the yellow brick road of contending than Edmonton. Whoosh!
So we trade the better player now who in all likelihood remains the better player over the course of their careers and plays a position that is a greater need for that of a lesser need why?

Roof Daddy is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:28 AM
  #15
Poochie the Dog
Always recycle!
 
Poochie the Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Another Planet
Posts: 3,280
vCash: 500
Can we please stop putting Reilly in trade proposals before he even plays a game in the NHL. Besides it would take a lot more than Reilly to get RNH.

Poochie the Dog is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:33 AM
  #16
Geese_Howard*
 
Geese_Howard*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,964
vCash: 500
I like the nuge but I don't like the fact he's having constant injury problems at a young age. Also it will require a overpayment to obtain him.

Geese_Howard* is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:36 AM
  #17
MarryMarner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Country: England
Posts: 2,128
vCash: 500
Rielly
Rights to Bozak

For

RNH

MarryMarner is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:39 AM
  #18
McFlyingV
#Free :]
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,579
vCash: 1567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geese_Howard View Post
I like the nuge but I don't like the fact he's having constant injury problems at a young age. Also it will require a overpayment to obtain him.
Not even worried about an injury that dates back to junior, especially when Hall came back 110% from that surgery this year playing a more physical and reckless game than RNH does.

As for the proposal Nuge can't be traded because of his position so no point even asking.
Oh and Rielly isn't even close in value.


Quote:
Originally Posted by KesseltoLupul View Post
Rielly
Rights to Bozak

For

RNH
Sorry you'll have to look for a #1 centre elsewhere

McFlyingV is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:39 AM
  #19
maroon 6
Live and let live
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: British Columbia
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,071
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by KesseltoLupul View Post
Rielly
Rights to Bozak

For

RNH
The difference between Reilly and RNH is a lot more than rights to Bozak...

maroon 6 is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:41 AM
  #20
West Coast Bias*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 863
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to West Coast Bias* Send a message via AIM to West Coast Bias* Send a message via Yahoo to West Coast Bias*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof Daddy View Post
So we trade the better player now who in all likelihood remains the better player over the course of their careers and plays a position that is a greater need for that of a lesser need why?
The OP handily explained this for your convenience in the first post......... by the way, you're undervaluing Rielly.

West Coast Bias* is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:46 AM
  #21
Freudian
Clearly deranged
 
Freudian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Sweden
Posts: 39,466
vCash: 50
If Oilers get to keep the Nugent- part, I guess it's fair value.

Freudian is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:47 AM
  #22
maroon 6
Live and let live
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: British Columbia
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,071
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by West Coast Bias View Post
The OP handily explained this for your convenience in the first post......... by the way, you're undervaluing Rielly.
Lol the OP never said anything about Edmonton's centers situation if RNH was to leave. Sure Edmonton will still have many good forwards but what about centers?

maroon 6 is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:49 AM
  #23
McFlyingV
#Free :]
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,579
vCash: 1567
Quote:
Originally Posted by West Coast Bias View Post
The OP handily explained this for your convenience in the first post......... by the way, you're undervaluing Rielly.
He explained what? How we'd be without a #1 centre for probably the next 5 years and be praying that a #7 pick can turn into a #1 centre (kind like how gagner at #6 was supposed to do). This honestly makes zero sense and is just a step backwards in terms of the rebuild, while losing the more valuable player.

McFlyingV is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:50 AM
  #24
dahrougem2
Registered User
 
dahrougem2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 10,583
vCash: 500
RNH is already a 1st line center in many people's eyes, and is likely going to be one of the best centers in the league for the next 10-12 years. Unless the same thing is being said about Rielly on the defensive end, then you don't make this trade. Rielly looks like a real blue chip prospect, but alone he doesn't even come close to getting RNH. A 1st line center is of much greater importance

dahrougem2 is offline  
Old
06-01-2013, 01:55 AM
  #25
firstemperor
Registered User
 
firstemperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,000
vCash: 500
Leafs do this, Oiler's wouldn't

We value Rielly immensely but RNH, despite not taking the league by storm, is very solid as a prospect and put up an impressive rookie campaign at his age. Rielly is more of an unknown right now.

HF likes to overvalue upside but we'll take the somewhat proven talent that has upside over the guy who's proven nothing with upside. To be fair to Rielly though, he hasn't gotten the same chance to prove his worth in the big leagues yet.

I suppose our necessity for a #1C tips the trade towards our favour as well (even though it's already in our favour value-wise).

To make it more fair, Leafs would likely have to add. The most the leafs would add would be a B prospect (like a Biggs, Percy, Finn). We wouldn't do this if we'd have to give up Gardiner or Kadri along with Rielly.

firstemperor is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2017 All Rights Reserved.