HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

ESPN declines option on NHL TV rights

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
05-28-2005, 08:28 AM
  #1
bingo_vodun
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 258
vCash: 500
ESPN declines option on NHL TV rights

http://www.cbc.ca/story/sports/natio...nhl050527.html

no there not, one is written by me and the other by you, they are not the same tard small markets, just your narrow mind cant grasp what is real, small markets that almost go bankrupt DON'T DESERVE TO EXIST. Now there will be less and less for everone.

lol it is so pathetic that the Leafs have to lower my own standers to communicate with small market teams, as they do leafs, don’t they (nashville, pittsburg, ottawa) feel ashamed, lol you should I mean I have to make an effort to be this bad at making money, leafs can make so much with hard work, but it is natural for the small ones to just ask for handouts. I truly wish I had such skills. Yes atlanta you are much smarter then me, and yes florida, what ever you change my words to must be right, I mean who am I to say what I say is what I said, I mean that is up to you right.

Get a life pro-owners and stop destroying the leauge.

bingo_vodun is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 09:23 AM
  #2
TrueBlue
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hamilton, home of Pa
Posts: 1,588
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo_vodun
http://www.cbc.ca/story/sports/natio...nhl050527.html

no there not, one is written by me and the other by you, they are not the same tard small markets, just your narrow mind cant grasp what is real, small markets that almost go bankrupt DON'T DESERVE TO EXIST. Now there will be less and less for everone.

lol it is so pathetic that the Leafs have to lower my own standers to communicate with small market teams, as they do leafs, don’t they (nashville, pittsburg, ottawa) feel ashamed, lol you should I mean I have to make an effort to be this bad at making money, leafs can make so much with hard work, but it is natural for the small ones to just ask for handouts. I truly wish I had such skills. Yes atlanta you are much smarter then me, and yes florida, what ever you change my words to must be right, I mean who am I to say what I say is what I said, I mean that is up to you right.

Get a life pro-owners and stop destroying the leauge.

Uhhh, who you talking to?

TrueBlue is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 11:14 AM
  #3
Augustus
Non basta una vita.
 
Augustus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Roma in my soul.
Country: Italy
Posts: 12,933
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueBlue
Uhhh, who you talking to?

This poster has lost faith in talking to other posters and seems to want to speak directly with cities and states, even if they are in lower case.

__________________
Noah Cross: 'Course I'm respectable. I'm old. Politicians, ugly buildings, and whores all get respectable if they last long enough.
Timothy Fenwick Jr: Do you ever get the feeling that there's something going on that we don't know about?
Boogie: If you don't have good dreams, Bagel, you got nightmares.
Augustus is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 12:55 PM
  #4
TrueBlue
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hamilton, home of Pa
Posts: 1,588
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Recidivist
This poster has lost faith in talking to other posters and seems to want to speak directly with cities and states, even if they are in lower case.

Must be some high level talk cause it went right over my head.
Although now I'm curious as to how the cities and states will respond to the post and thread.

If they don't, then it's cause he didn't use Uppercase in all the right places.

TrueBlue is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 01:40 PM
  #5
timlap
Registered User
 
timlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 7,145
vCash: 500
I don't think this is as serious an issue as some might make it out to be. Even if there had been no lockout, ESPN may well have opted not to renew. It makes sense, considering the current climate (lockout or no lockout) for ESPN to look for a better deal.

I'm betting that a new deal will be negotiated, with less money coming the way of the NHL. Not great, but not a disaster either.

I would like to think that this would be a useful bargaining chip in the negotiations, but I'm skeptical.

timlap is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 01:43 PM
  #6
Stephen
Registered User
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 26,816
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo_vodun
http://www.cbc.ca/story/sports/natio...nhl050527.html

no there not, one is written by me and the other by you, they are not the same tard small markets, just your narrow mind cant grasp what is real, small markets that almost go bankrupt DON'T DESERVE TO EXIST. Now there will be less and less for everone.

lol it is so pathetic that the Leafs have to lower my own standers to communicate with small market teams, as they do leafs, don’t they (nashville, pittsburg, ottawa) feel ashamed, lol you should I mean I have to make an effort to be this bad at making money, leafs can make so much with hard work, but it is natural for the small ones to just ask for handouts. I truly wish I had such skills. Yes atlanta you are much smarter then me, and yes florida, what ever you change my words to must be right, I mean who am I to say what I say is what I said, I mean that is up to you right.

Get a life pro-owners and stop destroying the leauge.
Are you using the Martian to English feature on freetranslation?

Stephen is online now  
Old
05-28-2005, 02:02 PM
  #7
Lobstertainment
Registered User
 
Lobstertainment's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,706
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Lobstertainment
here's what I think he's trying to say

1) ESPN drops NHL rights

2) He blames this on Ownership in the lockout not both sides

3) He believes that all Leaf fans are Pro-Owners

4) He therefor blames us for the lockout, ruining hockey, and for ESPN's Board of Directors for droping the NHL Rights.

5) Rand locks this topic.

Lobstertainment is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 02:23 PM
  #8
Rand
Registered User
 
Rand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,429
vCash: 500
I'm on the side of this being disasterous news, albeit not at all surprising.

Even if ESPN renegotiates a new contract it will be even less favourable to the NHL then the previous dismal agreement was.

Rand is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 02:35 PM
  #9
FlyersFan10*
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,349
vCash: 500
The problem folks is that the NHL TV rights are national. Nationally in the U.S., the NHL is a bush league at best. What the NHL needs to do is negotiate a contract that is regional with ESPN. It's clear that hockey is only popular in certain areas of the U.S. and that if the NHL addresses that, they and ESPN can make money from regional broadcasts.

FlyersFan10* is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 03:00 PM
  #10
TrueBlue
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hamilton, home of Pa
Posts: 1,588
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyersFan10
The problem folks is that the NHL TV rights are national. Nationally in the U.S., the NHL is a bush league at best. What the NHL needs to do is negotiate a contract that is regional with ESPN. It's clear that hockey is only popular in certain areas of the U.S. and that if the NHL addresses that, they and ESPN can make money from regional broadcasts.

I agree with this.

TrueBlue is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 03:28 PM
  #11
Volcanologist
Habitual User
 
Volcanologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kessel Apocalypse
Country: Germany
Posts: 19,322
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueBlue
Uhhh, who you talking to?
Whoever will listen.

Volcanologist is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 04:04 PM
  #12
TrueBlue
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hamilton, home of Pa
Posts: 1,588
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepNCheese
Whoever will listen.

Kinda like "To whom it may concern?"

TrueBlue is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 04:40 PM
  #13
Volcanologist
Habitual User
 
Volcanologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kessel Apocalypse
Country: Germany
Posts: 19,322
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueBlue
Kinda like "To whom it may concern?"
No, kinda like the guy on the corner who drinks Scope and wears a winter coat in mid-July.

Volcanologist is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 06:51 PM
  #14
Leaf Lander
Registered User
 
Leaf Lander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: BWO Headquarters
Country: Canada
Posts: 28,292
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Leaf Lander Send a message via MSN to Leaf Lander
Leafs TV should try an acquire the rights


whats a 150 mil a season for the rights. The profits would be tenfold if properly produced and run

Leaf Lander is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 08:32 PM
  #15
no13matssundin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,257
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaf Lander
Leafs TV should try an acquire the rights


whats a 150 mil a season for the rights. The profits would be tenfold if properly produced and run

I was about to post something quip about how silly an idea that is... but then I realized it ISNT a silly idea.. and that MLSE COULD do it, especially with the massive HD studios theyre prepping at the new Maple Leaf Square complex. To tell the truth, Leafs TV might literally be the best positioned broadcaster in North America be able to pull off producing and syndicating NHL broadcasts in HD.

no13matssundin is offline  
Old
05-28-2005, 08:55 PM
  #16
FlyersFan10*
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,349
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by no13matssundin
I was about to post something quip about how silly an idea that is... but then I realized it ISNT a silly idea.. and that MLSE COULD do it, especially with the massive HD studios theyre prepping at the new Maple Leaf Square complex. To tell the truth, Leafs TV might literally be the best positioned broadcaster in North America be able to pull off producing and syndicating NHL broadcasts in HD.
The only problem is that Leafs TV is PPV or it's a specialty channel on cable/satellite. The hockey needs to be on a channel that comes with regular cable/satellite packages. That's where the draw starts making money.

FlyersFan10* is offline  
Old
05-29-2005, 08:48 AM
  #17
Jorge Garcia
Registered User
 
Jorge Garcia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,091
vCash: 500
That's where syndication comes in. LTV produces game coverage and sells it to cable systems/broadcasters across the continent, and even overseas.

Jorge Garcia is offline  
Old
05-29-2005, 07:30 PM
  #18
Mike1
Registered User
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mississauga,Ontario
Posts: 3,517
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by timlap
I don't think this is as serious an issue as some might make it out to be. Even if there had been no lockout, ESPN may well have opted not to renew. It makes sense, considering the current climate (lockout or no lockout) for ESPN to look for a better deal.

I'm betting that a new deal will be negotiated, with less money coming the way of the NHL. Not great, but not a disaster either.
I think that the lockout helped seal the deal though. The NHL gave ESPN the opportunity to see if they could draw more with alternative programming & ESPN did. When you give sponsors,TV stations etc the opportunity to do something else to help get ratings or sell their product & they do well, your just p*ssing away money that could have been in your hands.

Mike1 is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 12:16 AM
  #19
timlap
Registered User
 
timlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 7,145
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1
I think that the lockout helped seal the deal though. The NHL gave ESPN the opportunity to see if they could draw more with alternative programming & ESPN did. When you give sponsors,TV stations etc the opportunity to do something else to help get ratings or sell their product & they do well, your just p*ssing away money that could have been in your hands.
I'm not convinced ESPN drew more viewers. Where did you ge that info?

timlap is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 09:08 AM
  #20
Augustus
Non basta una vita.
 
Augustus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Roma in my soul.
Country: Italy
Posts: 12,933
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by timlap
I'm not convinced ESPN drew more viewers. Where did you ge that info?

ESPN produced ratings results that showed an increased audience over their NHL coverage no matter what they televised, including the "sport" of poker. NHL in USA doesn't draw fleas and given how dulled down Badtman has allowed the game to become it isn't surprising.

Augustus is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 11:07 AM
  #21
timlap
Registered User
 
timlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 7,145
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Recidivist
ESPN produced ratings results that showed an increased audience over their NHL coverage no matter what they televised, including the "sport" of poker. NHL in USA doesn't draw fleas and given how dulled down Badtman has allowed the game to become it isn't surprising.
Source?

timlap is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 06:50 PM
  #22
Mike1
Registered User
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mississauga,Ontario
Posts: 3,517
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by timlap
I'm not convinced ESPN drew more viewers. Where did you ge that info?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/nhl...stvopportunity

Mike1 is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 08:01 PM
  #23
Augustus
Non basta una vita.
 
Augustus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Roma in my soul.
Country: Italy
Posts: 12,933
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by timlap
Source?
http://www.hockeypundits.com/2005_01_01_archives.htm

"Apathy is one telling indictment of the NHL. TV ratings are another. In a Dec. 10 column, USA TODAY's Michael Hiestand reported that during the NHL lockout, ESPN2 is averaging 0.4% of cable TV households with replacement programming that otherwise wouldn't be on TV. That's a small number. But double what NHL games drew. Arena Football, at times, earned better ratings than the NHL last season."
---------------------------------------------------------------

http://proicehockey.about.com/b/a/173199.htm

"In 2000, ABC and ESPN paid $600 million to carry NHL hockey for five years.
In 2004, ESPN paid $60 million for one year and NBC paid nothing for the rights to a handful of games over two years.
Replacement programming for cancelled NHL games - poker tournaments and whatnot - has earned higher ratings than many of last season's NHL broadcasts. "
---------------------------------------------------------------

There are more references, but I would need to charge a research fee, like the government does on FOI requests.

Augustus is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 08:54 PM
  #24
timlap
Registered User
 
timlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Posts: 7,145
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1
Thanks for the links (mike and recidivist). I accept your point.

Still I suspect ESPN would rather have the NHL than celebrity bowling. There is something of a prestige issue, and they don't want to be known as the network that shows novelty events.

I can't predict the future of this issue, but I wont be surprised if ESPN and the NHL strike a new deal, with slightly less money going toward the sport we love.

Otoh, maybe not. Then they may find new strategies for getting the NHL game visible to fans and potential fans.

Either way, I'm not worried.

timlap is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 08:59 PM
  #25
Mike1
Registered User
 
Mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mississauga,Ontario
Posts: 3,517
vCash: 500
Arena football? Bowling Night? Teammates? Poker?

It really puts into perspective how low an option the NHL is sports wise in the United States & how brutal it is going to be for them when they come back. Kind of makes you wonder what in the world they were thinking when they all decided to cancel an entire season.

Mike1 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.