HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Jessiman to...Dartmouth Next Year

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-29-2005, 11:33 PM
  #1
FLYLine24
The Mac Truck
 
FLYLine24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 29,771
vCash: 500
Jessiman to...Dartmouth Next Year

Saw this in the OTG Forums:

Quote:
Back to Dartmouth, responding to a reporter's question during a New York Rangers question and answer session Wednesday, Dartmouth hockey standout Hugh Jessiman responded that he expects "to go back to Dartmouth and really do well this year."
Quote:
"I'd like to take our team to the ECAC Championship and win that," Jessiman said. "Then go to the NCAA tournament and do well. Personally, I want to raise the bar from where I was last year contribution-wise. I just want to keep working hard so I'm prepared for my opportunity to take the next step with the Rangers and be ready to contribute."
http://www.theunionleader.com/articl...?article=54663

--
So there it is...looks likes hes made up his mind....im sure there will be a lot of angry folk with this news but im ok with it....sure i would have liked him to go to Hartford next year but with the injury I dont think its a bad idea.

FLYLine24 is offline  
Old
05-29-2005, 11:49 PM
  #2
Onion Boy
Registered User
 
Onion Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: Japan
Posts: 2,678
vCash: 500
I have no problem with it. With a project like Jessiman, it's better not to rush his development. It's not as if the NYR need him to be the missing piece to the puzzle the next few seasons. Last season was basically a lost year for Hugh so another year at Dartnouth can't hurt.

Onion Boy is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 12:27 AM
  #3
NYRangers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,853
vCash: 500
To be honest, I'm a little surprised.

I would like to see him working with the Rangers staff at Hartford since they have some good coaches down there. But I'm not sure if he's ready for the NHL. Whatever, I'd rather seem they take him slow then fast.

NYRangers is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 01:18 AM
  #4
Servo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 574
vCash: 500
I think its great to see the guy sticking with school, and perhaps even earning an Ivy League degree on his way to the pros. I'm afraid my Big Red will prevent him from ever winning that ECAC title though.

Servo is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 01:51 AM
  #5
Barnaby
Registered User
 
Barnaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Jefferson, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 4,559
vCash: 500
Good, he missed a whole year. Maybe he can dominate next year before moving to the AHL.

Barnaby is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 03:07 AM
  #6
Kovy274Hart
Registered User
 
Kovy274Hart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Shaolin
Country: United States
Posts: 1,498
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Kovy274Hart
This is a good move. He missed a whole yr basically of development. And he needs to get back to dominating.

Kovy274Hart is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 03:57 AM
  #7
Ola
Registered User
 
Ola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 17,802
vCash: 500
I don't like it at all. I mean, he wants to dominate? Well thats something he'll never do the second he leaves Darthmouth anyway... He will be 21 y/o next year and is planning on playing in a below avg. College league.

Whats gooing to make him successful in the NHL is his size, ability to play in traffic ect. Then he have the skills to go along. But the determing factor how good this kid is gooing to be will be how well he handles the physical game. The way I see Hugh will have missed two years of developing because of his decisions...

Ola is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 07:33 AM
  #8
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 31,868
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnaby
Good, he missed a whole year. Maybe he can dominate next year before moving to the AHL.
Who is he going to dominate?

RangerBoy is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 07:36 AM
  #9
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 31,868
vCash: 500
Hugh Jessiman made those comments on May 11 when it looked like the NHL would never return.A few weeks later,some signs of optimism have entered the picture.The Rangers need to get Jessiman into their Calgary camp and really lean to him to leave Dartmouth

RangerBoy is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 07:50 AM
  #10
BLACKBURN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 923
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ola
I don't like it at all. I mean, he wants to dominate? Well thats something he'll never do the second he leaves Darthmouth anyway... He will be 21 y/o next year and is planning on playing in a below avg. College league.

Whats gooing to make him successful in the NHL is his size, ability to play in traffic ect. Then he have the skills to go along. But the determing factor how good this kid is gooing to be will be how well he handles the physical game. The way I see Hugh will have missed two years of developing because of his decisions...
I think the key thing here is Hugh is a project who not only lost a year bt im sure lost some confidence (his points totals were hardly spectacular, largly due to the injury). I have no problem with him dominating a league, getting high points totals and then moving up to the next level. Also if he went to hartford this year he would likely end up with below 30 points and everyone would say, hes not as good as I thought he would be, lets trade him. This year will do no damage, however could be really beneficial.

BLACKBURN is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 08:37 AM
  #11
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,988
vCash: 500
'bout what i expected

not sure i'm happy about it but i'm not freaking out about it either. as long as he does well and doesn't crap out another year then it's probably alright

Levitate is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 10:49 AM
  #12
Servo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 574
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ola
I don't like it at all. I mean, he wants to dominate? Well thats something he'll never do the second he leaves Darthmouth anyway... He will be 21 y/o next year and is planning on playing in a below avg. College league.

Whats gooing to make him successful in the NHL is his size, ability to play in traffic ect. Then he have the skills to go along. But the determing factor how good this kid is gooing to be will be how well he handles the physical game. The way I see Hugh will have missed two years of developing because of his decisions...
This nonsense gets very tiresome, especially from those who have never even watched an ECAC game. I'm not going to get into the developmental quality of the Conference - the players in the NHL speak for themselves.

What I will get into is the misconception that Jessiman has nothing to gain from still playing in college, and that he's even ready to move to the AHL. You want to talk about "playing in traffic" and handling the physical game? Well, lets see him score a goal against Cornell. If he can't get through the best defense in the NCAAs, how is he going to be productive in the AHL or against the likes of the Devils and Flyers. Everyone talks about him dominating the ECAC. He hasn't done that yet. He hasn't even led his team to the conference final.

Jessiman needs to get back to where he was his freshman year before he's thrown into the pros. He's a power forward and therefore a long-term project. He can also stand to gain maturity and leadership skills by coming back next year.

And its also rich how "his decisions" are bad ones. God forbid someone actually gets a degree. (From Dartmouth no less.) Do you think that might look like a good decision if, for whatever reason, the kid never has a great NHL career?

Servo is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 11:46 AM
  #13
Ola
Registered User
 
Ola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 17,802
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Servo
This nonsense gets very tiresome, especially from those who have never even watched an ECAC game. I'm not going to get into the developmental quality of the Conference - the players in the NHL speak for themselves.

What I will get into is the misconception that Jessiman has nothing to gain from still playing in college, and that he's even ready to move to the AHL. You want to talk about "playing in traffic" and handling the physical game? Well, lets see him score a goal against Cornell. If he can't get through the best defense in the NCAAs, how is he going to be productive in the AHL or against the likes of the Devils and Flyers. Everyone talks about him dominating the ECAC. He hasn't done that yet. He hasn't even led his team to the conference final.
First of all I've seen one game with Jessiman, Darmouth-Cornell 20040124, so I even know how the Cornell defense looks like.

I honestly don't care if he is dominating in ECAC or not. Jessiman have great hands but not good enough to dominate in the NHL though, he will never be a player that can beat a defense by himself in the NHL. He should concentrate on learning how to play well in traffic. Take advantage of his size and handle the physical aspects of pro hockey. If he is able to do that, he will be able to take advantage of his hands. Not the other way around. And don't tell me he isn't asked to do allot in the ECAC. He have allot of responsibilitys in the transition game from deep in his own end. He often handles the puck. In the NHL Jessiman is never gooing to be that kind of player. His puck skills will come to use downlow, never deep in his own zone.

So the question should IMO be, where do he best learn how to handle the physical aspects of pro hockey, the AHL or ECAC?

I would compare him to Chris Pronger.(I know it sounds strange but its a extreme example and shows how I am thinking) Pronger were never a dominating player offensivly in juniors, decent numbers but far from dominating. Would he have been a better offensive defensemen in the NHL if he had played in juniors untill he could take the puck end to end whenever he wanted? Not a chance IMO. He would never have been able to do it in the NHL anyway. The same goes for Jessiman but not to the same extent. It won't hurt him, like if he sat out the year completly. But he will be a player in the NHL that lives on his size and are able to capitilize with his hands if his linesmates gives him the oppertunity. He will never be the kind of player like he is in Dartmouth where he is asked to orchestrate the attack from his own end. So I don't really care how well he does it in the ECAC against The Big Red.

Ola is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 12:35 PM
  #14
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,469
vCash: 500
Good for him...

he missed an entire season, basically. Hartford isn't going to give him 18 minutes because he's a top pick if he's not up to speed. This won't hurt him at all.

Fletch is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 12:57 PM
  #15
DarthSather99
Registered User
 
DarthSather99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 3,262
vCash: 500
I think it's a great move. Now if Montoya does the same thing we'll be in business. These guys should be able to dominate in the NCAA's, especially Montoya. Jessiman's development I believe should not be based on statistics. Jessiman is the best player on Darmouth and he WILL be blanketed by the defense. He'll have two - three guys around him at all times and I believe will give him the chance to develope much better stick handling in traffic. He's got the size, great hands, good passer. Controlling the puck in traffic is something he'll need to master in order to have success in the NHL. He'll learn to use his size and power to shield the puck. Regardless of the talent level between the AHL and NCAA, learning to beat two players down low is much harder than one player.

..and I agree with the previous poster than he'll get prime minutes in the NCAA as opposed to limited minutes with Hartford. He missed a year and needs lots of playing time.

DarthSather99 is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 01:28 PM
  #16
Bluenote13
Believe In Henke
 
Bluenote13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 23,764
vCash: 500
I like it. He missed a year and needs to get back on track, meaning he'll need the icetime Dartmouth affords him. Plus he'll be matched up with Winger Nick Johnson who was a point per game player as a Freshmen, damn our team for letting him get drafted by Pittsburgh

Bluenote13 is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 01:54 PM
  #17
NYR469
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,785
vCash: 500
keep in mind too that he was telling people at dartmouth that he is leaning toward staying...i'll bet you any amount of $$ that if he was asked that same question at a rangers fan forum in front of rangers fans his answer would have been completely different and he would have said something like "i'm really excited about the opportunity to be part of the rebuild and to play at msg. and i hope to sit down with the rangers this summer and see what they feel is the best move"

he isn't going to sit in front of everyone at dartmouth and say "eff you all i'm out" he is too nice a guy to do that...

he might really be leaning toward staying, but until he officially announces it nothing is certain.

NYR469 is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 03:17 PM
  #18
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,469
vCash: 500
Nyr...

I think if he wasn't sure he'd give the same answer in front of any forum, which I hope would be 'no comment,' or 'I haven't yet decided'.

Fletch is offline  
Old
05-30-2005, 05:00 PM
  #19
Kovy274Hart
Registered User
 
Kovy274Hart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Shaolin
Country: United States
Posts: 1,498
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Kovy274Hart
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ola
I don't like it at all. I mean, he wants to dominate? Well thats something he'll never do the second he leaves Darthmouth anyway... He will be 21 y/o next year and is planning on playing in a below avg. College league.

Whats gooing to make him successful in the NHL is his size, ability to play in traffic ect. Then he have the skills to go along. But the determing factor how good this kid is gooing to be will be how well he handles the physical game. The way I see Hugh will have missed two years of developing because of his decisions...

Again. That's jumping to conclusions. The Rangers didn't select him unless they thought he had the potential to be a dominate big man. If he is to succeed in the NHL, then he'll be a big scorer. If he doesn't, then he'll be a bust.

Kovy274Hart is offline  
Old
05-31-2005, 07:42 AM
  #20
Ola
Registered User
 
Ola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 17,802
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kovy274Hart
Again. That's jumping to conclusions. The Rangers didn't select him unless they thought he had the potential to be a dominate big man. If he is to succeed in the NHL, then he'll be a big scorer. If he doesn't, then he'll be a bust.
You have to give me a defenition of what a big scorer is. Its reasonable to expect at the best that Jessiman in a good year will get 50-60 points.(or top 30 in the league depending on how the game turns out) And now I am talking career high. If that is what you mean with a big scorer I agree with you. I don't think anyone ever in the organization thought that he would be a Bertuzzi/Tkachuk type of scorer. Jessiman is big and have good hands, every thing else that is mentioned about him in a positive matter you have to add for a big man after. Like he skates well(for a big man). He moves well(for a big man).

A good year there is one player in the entire 1st round that becomes a top scorer. Thats why we selected Jessiman. Jessiman could be a tremendous suppliment player for a talented center for example. If anyone belives that he will be a franchise winger or anything in the neighborhood they need to think again...

Though the organization should do everything possible to get him out of Dartmouth and the ECAC and into the AHL.

Ola is offline  
Old
05-31-2005, 08:11 AM
  #21
Barnaby
Registered User
 
Barnaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Jefferson, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 4,559
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kovy274Hart
Again. That's jumping to conclusions. The Rangers didn't select him unless they thought he had the potential to be a dominate big man. If he is to succeed in the NHL, then he'll be a big scorer. If he doesn't, then he'll be a bust.
If by big scorer you mean top 10 in the league then I disagree. His size and desire seem like two things that could really help him succeed even if his numbers are just average for a 2nd liner. I think he could be a real asset to a slick center. I'm glad he's staying at Hartford after missing a season. He can get back on track then step to the AHL next year... I'd rather him not be rushed. We won't contend for the playoffs for another 2-3 seasons anyway.

Barnaby is offline  
Old
05-31-2005, 08:37 AM
  #22
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,988
vCash: 500
jessiman has the potential to be more than a 50-60 point guy...key word potential. who knows if he reaches it

Levitate is offline  
Old
05-31-2005, 10:58 AM
  #23
NYRangers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,853
vCash: 500
At least he has the attitude. I've said this many times. People said "Who knows if David Wright (Mets) will reach his potential." when he was first drafted. He isn't the biggest, strongest, fastest. But the kid has taught me something. Good character and terrific work ethic will get you there. From what I've seen with Jessiman, he has the same mentality.

NYRangers is offline  
Old
05-31-2005, 11:56 AM
  #24
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 20,988
vCash: 500
yeah and that's why i still think he'll become something even with the setbacks he's had. i wouldn't be dissapointed with jessiman being a 60 point second liner really, but i think he's capable of more and maybe he'll reach it with the hard work he seems willing to put in. but sometimes even with hard work things just don't line up right

hopefully it will for him.

jessiman IMO is the kind of prospect that you don't give up on quickly...it could take him till his mid 20's to make an impact, but it could be a real nice impact.

Levitate is offline  
Old
05-31-2005, 12:11 PM
  #25
Barnaby
Registered User
 
Barnaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Jefferson, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 4,559
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ola
I don't think anyone ever in the organization thought that he would be a Bertuzzi/Tkachuk type of scorer.
Then why did they have him ranked 4th overall on their charts? They obviously feel/felt he could be a dominate player. You don't rank a guy 4th to be a decent 2nd liner especially in a draft like that.

Barnaby is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.