HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Philly-Vancouver

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-17-2013, 10:20 PM
  #1
JayRosehillforMVP
snubbed again
 
JayRosehillforMVP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 571
vCash: 500
Philly-Vancouver

Edler+Kassian for Couturier, Coburn, Read, 11th overall, and a 2nd (or 2014 1st?)
Vancouver gets younger at the expense of two very good players. Flyers use their depth to upgrade Coburn to Edler, and get bigger+tougher up front from Read to Kassian. Laughton takes Couturier's spot as 3C. Is this far off? Just for fun. No need to get mad if it is.

JayRosehillforMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:22 PM
  #2
StringerBell
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,000
vCash: 500
Too much going on. I think it's good value for Vancouver, but it's a bit much to consider for me.

StringerBell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:23 PM
  #3
Frozen Failure
Best Threadkiller
 
Frozen Failure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,430
vCash: 2111
Send a message via AIM to Frozen Failure Send a message via Yahoo to Frozen Failure
Not enough from Vancouver imo...

Frozen Failure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:24 PM
  #4
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,364
vCash: 5555
Too much quantity for quality imo. Valuewise it might even favour us, but it doesn't make much sense for us.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:25 PM
  #5
sobrien
RAFFLCOPTER
 
sobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Jersey/Memphis
Country: United States
Posts: 6,599
vCash: 500
should we send Giroux, LeSean McCoy, and a few cheesesteaks too?

sobrien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:26 PM
  #6
ZKass The Bass
Registered User
 
ZKass The Bass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: London
Country: England
Posts: 579
vCash: 500
No from Vancouver

ZKass The Bass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:26 PM
  #7
Devonator
Registered User
 
Devonator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Proud Darul Harbian
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,085
vCash: 500
A big no from the Flyers...Kassian is next to worthless and you are not getting that much for Elder...no thanks!

Devonator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:27 PM
  #8
flyershockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,800
vCash: 50
Way too much leaving the roster to make a move like this. I'm not going to get into a value battle, but the Flyers don't have enough organizational depth to lose that much NHL talent at one time.

flyershockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:30 PM
  #9
Confound
-Vindicated-
 
Confound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maine
Country: United States
Posts: 17,640
vCash: 500
Overpayment by the Flyers.

Confound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:30 PM
  #10
hockeyfreak7
Registered User
 
hockeyfreak7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlottesville
Posts: 8,277
vCash: 500
Having a hard time seeing how Vancouver fans are turning this down. It's atrocious for the Flyers.

Let's just say Read+2nd is equal to Kassian for the sake of the discussion here. That leaves Couturier+Coburn+11th overall for Edler? Seriously?

hockeyfreak7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:31 PM
  #11
JayRosehillforMVP
snubbed again
 
JayRosehillforMVP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 571
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyershockey View Post
Way too much leaving the roster to make a move like this. I'm not going to get into a value battle, but the Flyers don't have enough organizational depth to lose that much NHL talent at one time.
I explained why we would have the depth in the OP. Plus, considering our young core it's not as if we'd be declining anytime soon.


A lot of people are missing that I'm a Flyers fan hahahah. Adding Edler at the expense of Coburn would make our D a strength for the time being IMO.

JayRosehillforMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:35 PM
  #12
tuckrr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,556
vCash: 500
Take out couturier, throw 2014 1st in.

As is: no chance

tuckrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:35 PM
  #13
Phillyfan28
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 216
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringBackBob View Post
I explained why we would have the depth in the OP. Plus, considering our young core it's not as if we'd be declining anytime soon.


A lot of people are missing that I'm a Flyers fan hahahah. Adding Edler at the expense of Coburn would make our D a strength for the time being IMO.
This trade is horrible for the Flyers

Phillyfan28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:38 PM
  #14
flyershockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,800
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringBackBob View Post
I explained why we would have the depth in the OP. Plus, considering our young core it's not as if we'd be declining anytime soon.


A lot of people are missing that I'm a Flyers fan hahahah. Adding Edler at the expense of Coburn would make our D a strength for the time being IMO.
Roster this year as it stands:

Hartnell-Giroux-Voracek
Read-Schenn-Simmonds
Gagne(likely)-Couturier-McGinn
Rinaldo-Laughton-Talbot

Timonen-Schenn
Streit-Coburn
Gus/Mez-Grossmann

After the trade:

Hartnell-Giroux-Voracek
Kassian-Schenn-Simmonds
Gagne-Laughton-McGinn
Rinaldo-Talbot-?

Timonen-Edler
Streit-Schenn
Gus/Mez-Grossmann

I'm not sure that's a better roster in the short term or in the long run since we're losing the 11th and another pick. We just don't have the depth in the minors, on the wings in particular, to make a move of that magnitude.

flyershockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:39 PM
  #15
y2kcanucks
Cult of Personality
 
y2kcanucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 46,448
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfreak7 View Post
Having a hard time seeing how Vancouver fans are turning this down. It's atrocious for the Flyers.

Let's just say Read+2nd is equal to Kassian for the sake of the discussion here. That leaves Couturier+Coburn+11th overall for Edler? Seriously?
This.

No idea why some Canuck fans are turning this down, it's absolutely lopsided in our favour. Some people just need to realize that Zack Kassian isn't Cam Neely.

__________________
http://www.vancitynitetours.com
y2kcanucks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:39 PM
  #16
Wiqkid*
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ann Arbor
Country: United States
Posts: 672
vCash: 500
ROFL that is atrocious for the Flyers. Lmao at the Vancouver fans saying no. Smh

Wiqkid* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:43 PM
  #17
cheesesteak
Registered User
 
cheesesteak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,025
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringBackBob View Post
I explained why we would have the depth in the OP. Plus, considering our young core it's not as if we'd be declining anytime soon.


A lot of people are missing that I'm a Flyers fan hahahah. Adding Edler at the expense of Coburn would make our D a strength for the time being IMO.
So are you saying that you are trying to trade Couturier, 2013 11th overall, Read, and a 2014 2nd(maybe a first) for Kassian?

I'm confused and can't believe nucks fans turned this down

cheesesteak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:45 PM
  #18
CanucksSayEh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,544
vCash: 500
I fear I wouldn't be able to catch my breath in time from laughing so hard to say PLEASE GOD YES!

CanucksSayEh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:46 PM
  #19
Mason10
Bacon
 
Mason10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,933
vCash: 500
Where do I sign?!

Mason10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:48 PM
  #20
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,364
vCash: 5555
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfreak7 View Post
Having a hard time seeing how Vancouver fans are turning this down. It's atrocious for the Flyers.

Let's just say Read+2nd is equal to Kassian for the sake of the discussion here. That leaves Couturier+Coburn+11th overall for Edler? Seriously?
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kcanucks View Post
This.

No idea why some Canuck fans are turning this down, it's absolutely lopsided in our favour. Some people just need to realize that Zack Kassian isn't Cam Neely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiqkid View Post
Oh and BTW, this is the worst trade I've ever seen. Still laughing at the Canucks fans saying no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesesteak View Post
I'm confused and can't believe nucks fans turned this down
What if we offered Philly Bieksa + 1st + Hansen + Tanev + 2nd for Voracek + Laughton?

Valuewise Philly should run away laughing, right? But of course, it just doesn't make sense for them to move a piece like Voracek in a deal like that.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 10:49 PM
  #21
JayRosehillforMVP
snubbed again
 
JayRosehillforMVP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 571
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyershockey View Post
Roster this year as it stands:

Hartnell-Giroux-Voracek
Read-Schenn-Simmonds
Gagne(likely)-Couturier-McGinn
Rinaldo-Laughton-Talbot

Timonen-Schenn
Streit-Coburn
Gus/Mez-Grossmann

After the trade:

Hartnell-Giroux-Voracek
Kassian-Schenn-Simmonds
Gagne-Laughton-McGinn
Rinaldo-Talbot-?

Timonen-Edler
Streit-Schenn
Gus/Mez-Grossmann

I'm not sure that's a better roster in the short term or in the long run since we're losing the 11th and another pick. We just wouldn't have the depth, on the wings in particular, to make a move of that magnitude.
I'd say Voracek/Hartnell/Simmonds/Kassian is a pretty good wing core. Mcginn and Cousins seem like they'll definitely be capable 3rd line wingers, and Akesons shown a lot of skill himself. Rinaldo+who cares on the 4th line.

Maybe it's too much going to Vancouver hahahah. Take out a bit from Philly or add from Vancouver. I thought it'd be a decent basis, however.

JayRosehillforMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 11:00 PM
  #22
School of WristShot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 829
vCash: 500
Seems Philly's giving bit more but still No from canucks pov.
Thx Homer for reminding how much of a valuable asset we have in Edler today by giving Streit that idiotic contract. We'd rather bank on Edler becoming true #1 on a sweetheart deal.

School of WristShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 11:06 PM
  #23
hockeyfreak7
Registered User
 
hockeyfreak7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Charlottesville
Posts: 8,277
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
What if we offered Philly Bieksa + 1st + Hansen + Tanev + 2nd for Voracek + Laughton?

Valuewise Philly should run away laughing, right? But of course, it just doesn't make sense for them to move a piece like Voracek in a deal like that.
Really man? Not even close to being close to being the same.

Which one of those pieces is Couturier supposed to be? Tanev?

hockeyfreak7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 11:09 PM
  #24
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,364
vCash: 5555
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfreak7 View Post
Really man? Not even close to being close to being the same.

Which one of those pieces is Couturier supposed to be? Tanev?
I couldn't exactly make it a perfect comparison.

Bieksa > Coburn
24th < 11th
Hansen = Read
Tanev < Couturier
Edler > Voracek
Kassian = Laughton

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-17-2013, 11:13 PM
  #25
DJOpus
Registered User
 
DJOpus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,753
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BringBackBob View Post
Edler+Kassian for Couturier, Coburn, Read, 11th overall, and a 2nd (or 2014 1st?)
Vancouver gets younger at the expense of two very good players. Flyers use their depth to upgrade Coburn to Edler, and get bigger+tougher up front from Read to Kassian. Laughton takes Couturier's spot as 3C. Is this far off? Just for fun. No need to get mad if it is.
I'd do it...make it a 2015 1st + 2014 3rd instead of 2nd/2014 1st.
(Canucks fan)

DJOpus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.