HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Minnesota Wild
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2013 Minnesota #1 Prospect

View Poll Results: Who is the best Minnesota Wild prospect?
Brett Bulmer 0 0%
Raphael Bussieres 0 0%
Charlie Coyle 32 27.35%
Mathew Dumba 7 5.98%
Kurtis Gabriel 1 0.85%
Mikael Granlund 63 53.85%
Johan Gustafsson 0 0%
Erik Haula 1 0.85%
Dylan Labbe 0 0%
Mario Lucia 0 0%
Nino Niederreiter 10 8.55%
Gustav Olofsson 1 0.85%
Zack Phillips 0 0%
Jason Zucker 2 1.71%
Other (please explain) 0 0%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-23-2013, 09:40 PM
  #1
GopherState
Repeat Offender...
 
GopherState's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: X Marks The Spot
Posts: 22,841
vCash: 500
2013 Minnesota #1 Prospect

It's that time of the year everyone has been waiting for: prospect ranking season.

For the fourth straight year, HF Wild is ranking the Minnesota prospect pool from 1-20.

Here is what we did last year:
1. Mikael Granlund
2. Jonas Brodin
3. Charlie Coyle
4. Mathew Dumba
5. Johan Larsson
6. Jason Zucker
7. Matt Hackett
8. Brett Bulmer
9. Zack Phillips
10. Mario Lucia
11. Johan Gustafsson
12. Raphael Bussieres
13. Erik Haula
14. Steven Kampfer
15. Darcy Kuemper
16. Nick Seeler
17. Tyler Cuma
18. John Draeger
19. Daniel Gunnarsson
20. Tyler Graovac

(Here is what we ended up with in 2011 and 2010. Kind of depressing to see Cody Almond as high as #5.)

First off, I have to apologize because last year it was said that three-time #1 choice Mikael Granlund would not be a prospect come 2013. That was wrong. Sorry. FBJ still is one as is Charlie Coyle, Jason Zucker, Zack Phillips, Tyler Cuma and newly acquired forward Nino Niederreiter.

However, #2 prospect Jonas Brodin has graduated. So has Steven Kampfer. For the most part we follow the Hockey's Future "what makes a prospect" criteria although there are exceptions. The general consensus seemed to be that this Lockout-shortened season should be adjusted over an 82 game schedule. At the same time, it made more sense to have both Coyle and Nieddereiter be considered prospect even though they are up against the 65 game buffer.

As far as prospect choices go, I took the top 10 eligible choices from last year (Johan Larsson and Matthew Hackett both left the organization via trade), the top 3 picks from 2013 (Gustav Olofsson, Kurtis Gabriel and Dylan Labbe) and Niederreiter. There is an "other" selection as well so if you have a prospect or player who you believe is worthy of consideration, go for it - just say it in the comments so I know.

Same thing goes for rookie users who can't vote in polls and want their voice heard.

This poll will be open for 48 hours, at which time the #2 poll will be posted (and so on) until there is a top 20.

__________________
Blog: First Round Bust: A Cast of Thousands celebrating a rather dodgy track record of Minnesota Wild Drafting.

"Will beats skill when skill doesn't have enough will."
-Doug Woog
1974 1976 1979 2002 2003 2014?
GopherState is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 09:50 PM
  #2
AKL
#AnyoneButThem
 
AKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Anywhere but Minny
Country: Nauru
Posts: 7,103
vCash: 500
Still Granlund, since Brodin has graduated.

AKL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 09:58 PM
  #3
Engebretson
Another GopherClone
 
Engebretson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 6,999
vCash: 1460
Coyle for me.

Granlund might end up being the better player when all is said and done but Coyle did much more with his NHL time this year than Granlund did.

Feels weird to not vote for Granlund to be #1 for the first time in years.

Engebretson is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:00 PM
  #4
GopherState
Repeat Offender...
 
GopherState's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: X Marks The Spot
Posts: 22,841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engebretson View Post
Coyle for me.

Granlund might end up being the better player when all is said and done but Coyle did much more with his NHL time this year than Granlund did.

Feels weird to not vote for Granlund to be #1 for the first time in years.
Felt weird leaving off Brodin and keeping Granlund. Says something about FBJ expectations, but I figured he would be first to graduate or best-case scenario both would leave the prospect pool hand-in-hand together

GopherState is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:04 PM
  #5
MuckOG
The Brodin Effect
 
MuckOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: In a tree stand.
Country: United States
Posts: 6,479
vCash: 300
I went with Coyle...

MuckOG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:12 PM
  #6
TaLoN
All Hail the FBJ!
 
TaLoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Farmington, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 14,284
vCash: 500
Coyle may be the more ready prospect (mostly due to his size), but Granlund's ceiling is still far higher IMO and is still the top prospect as a result. No other player has the dynamic ability that we've already seen Granlund flash from time to time.

TaLoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:15 PM
  #7
Minnesota
Global Moderator
L'Étoile du Nord
 
Minnesota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 16,864
vCash: 1100
Granlund...

Taking his sweet time.

Minnesota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:16 PM
  #8
tyratoku
Registered User
 
tyratoku's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Country: United States
Posts: 7,236
vCash: 500
Granlund. His upside is still just too high compared to the rest. I'm not worried about him at all.

tyratoku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:25 PM
  #9
Randy BoBandy
Cheeseburger Party
 
Randy BoBandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sunnyvale
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,264
vCash: 500
Coyle is poised to have a great year. Granlund is going to be fighting with Haula for a center spot which I doubt either are ready for. I see Coyle winning the 2nd line center spot pretty easily once real hitting and NHL gameplay is involved.

Granlund spends another year in the AHL so it doesn't really matter what his upside is. He isn't ready.

Randy BoBandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:29 PM
  #10
Minnesota
Global Moderator
L'Étoile du Nord
 
Minnesota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 16,864
vCash: 1100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy BoBandy View Post
Granlund spends another year in the AHL so it doesn't really matter what his upside is. He isn't ready.
Being NHL-ready doesn't make Coyle a better prospect.

Granlund's potential is still miles ahead of Coyle's.

Minnesota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:34 PM
  #11
TaLoN
All Hail the FBJ!
 
TaLoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Farmington, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 14,284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnesota View Post
Being NHL-ready doesn't make Coyle a better prospect.

Granlund's potential is still miles ahead of Coyle's.
Completely agree. NHL ready does not change what a player's top potential is, and it's that top potential that makes a better prospect IMO.

That'd be like drafting Crosby, and if he's not NHL ready and you have someone like Clutterbuck who is, you rate Clutterbuck ahead of him because of it?

I know that's an extreme example, but the point remains.

TaLoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:44 PM
  #12
Tuomaz
Registered User
 
Tuomaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: Cape Verde
Posts: 5,760
vCash: 500
Granlund's upside still at a different level than our other prospects (now that Brodin has graduated). I believe in him.

Tuomaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:46 PM
  #13
State of Hockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minny
Country: United States
Posts: 11,209
vCash: 500
Coyle now.

While in previous years I thought we had good top-end talent to choose from, with this list that's all gone. Coyle is a very good prospect, that 2nd line winger type, but not what you want at #1.

State of Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:47 PM
  #14
Generic User
Moderator
Generic Moderator
 
Generic User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Country: United States
Posts: 7,325
vCash: 500
Love this time of year. I had such a hard time between Granlund, Coyle and Zucker. Ultimately I chose Granlund. I still don't know who I'm gonna choose between Zucker and Coyle if Granlund wins this poll. Too close. Not a bad problem to have.

Generic User is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:52 PM
  #15
Randy BoBandy
Cheeseburger Party
 
Randy BoBandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sunnyvale
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,264
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnesota View Post
Being NHL-ready doesn't make Coyle a better prospect.

Granlund's potential is still miles ahead of Coyle's.
IMO it does, given what I believe Granlund's actual potential is.

Do you really see Granlund being anymore than Bouchard was in his prime? I don't. He doesn't have the speed Bouchard has. Both are equally creative, but Bouchard has better skills. Granlund's ceiling is Bouchard imo.

on the other hand you have Coyle whos potential in my opinon is something like Nathan Horton or David Backes. Big strong two way players. Something the Wild need to compete in our new division.

The argument is over what Granlund's ceiling actually is. I argue it is much lower that what ever you guys think it is.

Randy BoBandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:55 PM
  #16
TaLoN
All Hail the FBJ!
 
TaLoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Farmington, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 14,284
vCash: 500
Bouchard's ceiling wasn't even Bouchard... that's the problem. Bouchard limited his game due to lack of situational awareness (still have bad memories of Butch wasting away a good minute and a half of a 5min 5 on 3 just skating around the zone in the last 3 mins of regulation when the team was down a goal a few yrs ago) and inability to get to high percentage areas.

Granlund's hockey IQ is off the charts good, and he's not afraid to draw in defenders to make a play.

TaLoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:56 PM
  #17
Giles Ferrell
#believeinyeo
 
Giles Ferrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 197
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnesota View Post
Being NHL-ready doesn't make Coyle a better prospect.

Granlund's potential is still miles ahead of Coyle's.
Boom. Well said.

Giles Ferrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:58 PM
  #18
Randy BoBandy
Cheeseburger Party
 
Randy BoBandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sunnyvale
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,264
vCash: 500
Bouchards ceiling wasn't even Bouchard.... what the **** are you talking about?


So what is Granlund's ceiling? Who does he compare to? And don't tell me ****ing Nazem Kadri, because that is just wrong.

Randy BoBandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 10:59 PM
  #19
rynryn
Progress to the Mean
 
rynryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minny
Country: United States
Posts: 22,511
vCash: 50
Granlund.

rynryn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 11:02 PM
  #20
TaLoN
All Hail the FBJ!
 
TaLoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Farmington, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 14,284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy BoBandy View Post
Bouchards ceiling wasn't even Bouchard.... what the **** are you talking about?


So what is Granlund's ceiling? Who does he compare to? And don't tell me ****ing Nazem Kadri, because that is just wrong.
Bouchard never reached his ceiling is what I'm talking about. Butch had a higher ceiling and disappointed. Granlund has a higher ceiling and is less likely to be like Butch ended up IMO.

Bouchard's game was very tentative, Granlund's is not. Bouchard's hockey IQ was average at best, Granlund's is off the charts good.

The ONLY thing Butch had better than Granlund was speed. Granlund's speed is average though and when his mental game is adjusted, you will see it's not at all a liability.

TaLoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 11:02 PM
  #21
Northland Wild Man
Finnesotans?
 
Northland Wild Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Country: United States
Posts: 8,044
vCash: 500
Still Granlund for me just because of his ceiling.

Northland Wild Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 11:04 PM
  #22
Randy BoBandy
Cheeseburger Party
 
Randy BoBandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sunnyvale
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,264
vCash: 500
So an undersized, slow skater, who isn't afraid to initiate contact. Thats gonna turn out well.

But but he has great vision and passing.... please I will believe it when I see it in the NHL as of now he just a prospect with decent upside. If we were voting on upside alone I think Dumba would win this thing given the potential he has.

Randy BoBandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 11:06 PM
  #23
TaLoN
All Hail the FBJ!
 
TaLoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Farmington, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 14,284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy BoBandy View Post
So an undersized, slow skater, who isn't afraid to initiate contact. Thats gonna turn out well.

But but he has great vision and passing.... please I will believe it when I see it in the NHL as of now he just a prospect with decent upside. If we were voting on upside alone I think Dumba would win this thing given the potential he has.
He's got average speed, he's not a slow skater. He looked slow last year because he was trying to adjust his game and wasn't ready yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy BoBandy View Post
please I will believe it when I see it in the NHL
That's the whole point of being a PROSPECT - you are projecting what they "should" be as a player. Prospects are players who are still developing their game.

TaLoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 11:08 PM
  #24
Randy BoBandy
Cheeseburger Party
 
Randy BoBandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sunnyvale
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,264
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaLoN View Post
Bouchard never reached his ceiling is what I'm talking about. Butch had a higher ceiling and disappointed. Granlund has a higher ceiling and is less likely to be like Butch ended up IMO.

Bouchard's game was very tentative, Granlund's is not. Bouchard's hockey IQ was average at best, Granlund's is off the charts good.

The ONLY thing Butch had better than Granlund was speed. Granlund's speed is average though and when his mental game is adjusted, you will see it's not at all a liability.
Yea because Bouchard skated around with possession instead of making a dumb cute play that resulted in a turnover like Granlund does.

This hockey IQ crap is defined how? Being good at hockey haha, understanding the game is measured how. please inform me cause at this point what proof do we have that Granlund has so much better hockey IQ than Butch.

Randy BoBandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-23-2013, 11:10 PM
  #25
TaLoN
All Hail the FBJ!
 
TaLoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Farmington, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 14,284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy BoBandy View Post
Yea because Bouchard skated around with possession instead of making a dumb cute play that resulted in a turnover like Granlund does.

This hockey IQ crap is defined how? Being good at hockey haha, understanding the game is measured how. please inform me cause at this point what proof do we have that Granlund has so much better hockey IQ than Butch.
You're joking right?! Bouchard was the king of the blueline turnover because of his stupid dancing around getting himself cornered.

Hockey IQ is knowing where to be when, knowing where your linemates are going, knowing the situation with the clock etc. Bouchard had very poor situational awareness, Granlund has only displayed excellent awareness and IQ through every level before the NHL thus far, including on the international stage.


Last edited by TaLoN: 07-23-2013 at 11:18 PM.
TaLoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.