HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Toronto-Edmonton(Franson-Schultz)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-27-2013, 09:03 AM
  #1
frankthetank91
Registered User
 
frankthetank91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,731
vCash: 500
Toronto-Edmonton(Franson-Schultz)

This probably won't happen but assuming talks with Franson go sour what would have to be done to swap Franson and Schultz? Both are young RHD. Would be cool to re-unite Gardiner-Schultz pairing.

To Toronto:

Schultz
?

To Edmonton:
Franson
?

What trade could be worked out with these two as the center pieces?

frankthetank91 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:04 AM
  #2
DKQ
Generic User Title
 
DKQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Press Box
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,121
vCash: 500
I'm gonna guess that if Franson is going to be involved in a trade for Schultz, he won't be the biggest piece going Edmonton's way

DKQ is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:06 AM
  #3
GordieHoweHatTrick
Registered User
 
GordieHoweHatTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,704
vCash: 500
This won't end well.

GordieHoweHatTrick is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:17 AM
  #4
Maplelaughs97
The Kids Are Alright
 
Maplelaughs97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Barrie
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,500
vCash: 500
Yah apologies Edmonton, Franson is a good player but Schultz is pretty well at his level currently offensively and his skating really sets him apart. Schultz>Franson and younger.....and it's looking like he's going to be significantly cheaper (at least the next few years)

Maplelaughs97 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:18 AM
  #5
Maplelaughs97
The Kids Are Alright
 
Maplelaughs97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Barrie
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,500
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKQ View Post
I'm gonna guess that if Franson is going to be involved in a trade for Schultz, he won't be the biggest piece going Edmonton's way
and this

Maplelaughs97 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:18 AM
  #6
frankthetank91
Registered User
 
frankthetank91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,731
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maplelaughs97 View Post
Yah apologies Edmonton, Franson is a good player but Schultz is pretty well at his level currently offensively and his skating really sets him apart. Schultz>Franson and younger.....
I'm not proposing them straight up. I know we'd have to add but what?

frankthetank91 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:22 AM
  #7
The Nuge
Farewell Smytty
 
The Nuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,572
vCash: 1026
Not happening. Only Schultz you're getting is Nick

The Nuge is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:22 AM
  #8
VoicexOfxReason
you cant do that
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Away from Cor
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,412
vCash: 500
I dont really want Schultz. He didn't want to sign here the first time, what makes anyone think he'll resign here?

VoicexOfxReason is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:22 AM
  #9
Maplelaughs97
The Kids Are Alright
 
Maplelaughs97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Barrie
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,500
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankthetank91 View Post
I'm not proposing them straight up. I know we'd have to add but what?
Maybe Franson, Percy and Biggs for Schultz and Jarry.....not sure about valuation, I just don't see them moving him unless something silly is offered.

Maplelaughs97 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:27 AM
  #10
frankthetank91
Registered User
 
frankthetank91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,731
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maplelaughs97 View Post
Maybe Franson, Percy and Biggs for Schultz and Jarry.....not sure about valuation, I just don't see them moving him unless something silly is offered.
I'd do something like that, just not Jarry we really don't need any more goalies. Another prospect with the same value in a different position maybe.

frankthetank91 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:29 AM
  #11
supert
Registered User
 
supert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,402
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankthetank91 View Post
This probably won't happen but assuming talks with Franson go sour what would have to be done to swap Franson and Schultz? Both are young RHD. Would be cool to re-unite Gardiner-Schultz pairing.

To Toronto:

Schultz
?

To Edmonton:
Franson
?

What trade could be worked out with these two as the center pieces?
I do this deal as an Oiler fan . No trade backs . Nick Schultz will look good in the TML blue

supert is online now  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:30 AM
  #12
New Liskeard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,789
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKQ View Post
I'm gonna guess that if Franson is going to be involved in a trade for Schultz, he won't be the biggest piece going Edmonton's way
I'm not going to guess that Schultz, doesn't have the same body of work and results as Franson. Thanks but no thanks, rather keep Franson.

New Liskeard is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:33 AM
  #13
Isaak16
The Universe Is Here
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 311
vCash: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Liskeard View Post
I'm not going to guess that Schultz, doesn't have the same body of work and results as Franson. Thanks but no thanks, rather keep Franson.
Sure you would.....


Last edited by Isaak16: 07-27-2013 at 09:39 AM.
Isaak16 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:38 AM
  #14
supert
Registered User
 
supert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,402
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Liskeard View Post
I'm not going to guess that Schultz, doesn't have the same body of work and results as Franson. Thanks but no thanks, rather keep Franson.
Ok then we will trade you Nick Schultz for Gardiner . I guessing he does not have the same body of work and results as Nick .

supert is online now  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:38 AM
  #15
The Nuge
Farewell Smytty
 
The Nuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,572
vCash: 1026
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maplelaughs97 View Post
Maybe Franson, Percy and Biggs for Schultz and Jarry.....not sure about valuation, I just don't see them moving him unless something silly is offered.
And why does Pittsburgh do that?

The Nuge is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:39 AM
  #16
YesYesYall
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 552
vCash: 500
Nope. I've watched quite a few Leafs' games this year to know that Franson is nowhere near Schultz's level. I bet the animated version of MacT in NHL '14 would laugh at this proposal in GM mode.

YesYesYall is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:40 AM
  #17
TorstenFrings
wieder zuhause!!!
 
TorstenFrings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Country: Germany
Posts: 3,575
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maplelaughs97 View Post
Maybe Franson, Percy and Biggs for Schultz and Jarry.....not sure about valuation, I just don't see them moving him unless something silly is offered.
Am I drunk? No wait, don't answer that. How would you know? How did Jarry get involved in this though. Leave Pittsburgh out of it.

TorstenFrings is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:44 AM
  #18
Petes2424
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,797
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankthetank91 View Post
This probably won't happen but assuming talks with Franson go sour what would have to be done to swap Franson and Schultz? Both are young RHD. Would be cool to re-unite Gardiner-Schultz pairing.

To Toronto:

Schultz
?

To Edmonton:
Franson
?

What trade could be worked out with these two as the center pieces?
We're going to get the inevitable underrating of Cody Franson here and it's not going to end well. Edmonton is not moving Schultz. Franson would be a good fit in Edmonton and I'd like to watch him play every night again. That said, he really came on last season and hopefully Nonis doesnt move him. The Leafs are a better team with him.

Petes2424 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:44 AM
  #19
frankthetank91
Registered User
 
frankthetank91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,731
vCash: 500
How about..

Franson and Kulemin for Schultz+2nd

Edmonton gets size and penalty killing and a friend for Yakupov. Toronto gets Ashton or D'Amigo to replace Kulemin(although a major downgrade) but gets some more salary room and can possibly trade Liles for a bottom 6 winger such as Spaling from Nashville.

frankthetank91 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:45 AM
  #20
Seachd
Registered User
 
Seachd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Fail
Posts: 13,374
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by VoicexOfxReason View Post
I dont really want Schultz. He didn't want to sign here the first time, what makes anyone think he'll resign here?
That makes no sense. Have the Leafs ever traded for a player who had previously been a free agent?

Seachd is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:47 AM
  #21
Interactif
Registered User
 
Interactif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 26,153
vCash: 500
I think Edmonton would overpay if Leafs packaged Gardiner and Franson to Edmonton.

Nonis would probably be charged with theft by Edmonton police.

Interactif is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:49 AM
  #22
TorstenFrings
wieder zuhause!!!
 
TorstenFrings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Country: Germany
Posts: 3,575
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankthetank91 View Post
How about..

Franson and Kulemin for Schultz+2nd

Edmonton gets size and penalty killing and a friend for Yakupov. Toronto gets Ashton or D'Amigo to replace Kulemin(although a major downgrade) but gets some more salary room and can possibly trade Liles for a bottom 6 winger such as Spaling from Nashville.
I really think you aren't going to get a "yay" from Oilers fans until you leave out Schultz. There isn't really a way you can dress it up fancy as long as it is Schultz.
Which isn't even due to some kind of underrating of Franson, but simply because Edmonton won't move Schultz and has no reason to either.

TorstenFrings is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 09:56 AM
  #23
New Liskeard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,789
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by supert View Post
Ok then we will trade you Nick Schultz for Gardiner . I guessing he does not have the same body of work and results as Nick .
Why would the Leafs trade Franson for either of those players?? They don't help the team, and the goal one would think is to improve as a team and make the playoffs. Pass, and no thank you please.

New Liskeard is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 10:04 AM
  #24
Quares27
Registered User
 
Quares27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,426
vCash: 500
Why would you even want Schultz? great offensive and a great skater but horrible defensively. The last thing the Leafs need is another OFD.

Quares27 is offline  
Old
07-27-2013, 10:11 AM
  #25
Hotdelaney
Rookie User
 
Hotdelaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 6
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankthetank91 View Post
This probably won't happen but assuming talks with Franson go sour what would have to be done to swap Franson and Schultz? Both are young RHD. Would be cool to re-unite Gardiner-Schultz pairing.

To Toronto:

Schultz
?

To Edmonton:
Franson
?

What trade could be worked out with these two as the center pieces?
Even for the right price Edmonton would not do this. They would much rather see what Justin will become.

Hotdelaney is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.