HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

GF, GA, and where the Rangers need to go

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-02-2013, 05:12 PM
  #1
Crease
Registered User
 
Crease's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,833
vCash: 500
GF, GA, and where the Rangers need to go

I did a quick study to see how the Rangers compared to the eventual SC champs and the league average, since 2006, in terms of GF and GA. Everyone who has been watching knows that the Rangers are above-average in their own zone but below-average in the other team's zone. But I wanted to find out how much they need to improve in one or both areas in order to stack up against the best of the best. This is the result. Explanation follows.

Year GFC_Champ GFC_Avg GAC_Champ GAC_Avg
2012-13 0.84 0.99 0.91 1.17
2011-12 1.16 1.01 0.96 1.2
2010-11 0.95 1.02 0.98 1.16
2009-10 0.82 0.95 0.96 1.07
2008-09 0.8 0.88 1.1 1.1
2007-08 0.83 0.93 0.92 1.15
2006-07 0.94 1 0.96 1.12
2005-06 0.87 1.02 1.21 1.18
Average 0.9 0.97 1 1.14

GCF_Champ: "Goals For" compared to SC Champ
GFC_Avg: "Goals For" compared to League Average
GAC_Champ:"Goals Against" compared to SC Champ
GAC_Avg: "Goals Against" compared to League Average

Calculations and how to interpret the table: I promise you this is very straightforward math. A simple "percent of" calculation. So anything greater than "1" means that the Rangers outperformed the benchmark and anything less than "1" means the Rangers underperformed the benchmark.

For example, look at the 2010-2011 GFC_Champ (0.95). The Bruins scored 246 goals that season. The Rangers scored 233 goals that season. 233/246 = 0.95. Or in other words, the Rangers scored 5% less than the eventual SC champs in 2010-2011. Conversely, the Rangers gave up (195/198 = 0.98) 2% more goals than the eventual SC champs in 2010-2011.

What the results indicate: No surprise, but the Rangers need to score more. But it looks like they have to score more without sacrificing much defense. The eventual SC Champs, on average, score 10% more goals while giving up the same amount. Interesting.


Last edited by Crease: 09-02-2013 at 05:17 PM.
Crease is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 05:17 PM
  #2
Megustaelhockey
Global Moderator
Hybrid icing
 
Megustaelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,830
vCash: 500
I think the best the Rangers can hope to do is score 225 and give up 185.

Megustaelhockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 05:20 PM
  #3
Crease
Registered User
 
Crease's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,833
vCash: 500
By the way, here are the raw numbers in case you want to look at it that way:

Year GFChamp GFAvg GFRangers GAChamp GAAvg GARangers
2012-13 265 224 222 174 224 191
2011-12 194 224 226 179 224 187
2010-11 246 229 233 195 229 198
2009-10 271 233 222 209 233 218
2008-09 264 239 210 239 239 218
2007-08 257 228 213 184 228 199
2006-07 258 242 242 208 242 216
2005-06 294 253 257 260 253 215

2012-13 is prorated for 82 games. LA in 2011 was the outlier. All other eventual SC champs are goal-scoring machines with above-average defense.


Last edited by Crease: 09-02-2013 at 05:30 PM.
Crease is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 07:09 PM
  #4
Krampus
Call me Nils
 
Krampus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Country: Austria
Posts: 19,007
vCash: 420
Pretty telling that even with us being way ahead of the league in GA, but still not as good as the champs most years.
Especially since people have recently been arguing that defense isn't as important

__________________
Krampus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 09:17 PM
  #5
Barbara Underhill
Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuke
 
Barbara Underhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Montana
Country: United States
Posts: 13,272
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nils2317 View Post
Pretty telling that even with us being way ahead of the league in GA, but still not as good as the champs most years.
Especially since people have recently been arguing that defense isn't as important
Anyone arguing that is disillusioned, gotta find a balance. However if you can get a increase in GF while only dipping a little in GA you should be fine. Which I think this team is capable of doing, but we'll see.

Barbara Underhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.