HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Dennis Wideman

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-02-2013, 02:06 PM
  #1
Vesa Awesaka
#KeepTheSenate
 
Vesa Awesaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Country: Belarus
Posts: 18,127
vCash: 500
Dennis Wideman

With Calgary's future still a few years away what would it take to get them to trade. I personally think he's slightly over paid and his NTC is problematic but imo he still a good 3-4 RHD.


Last edited by Vesa Awesaka: 09-02-2013 at 02:14 PM.
Vesa Awesaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 02:17 PM
  #2
herashak
Registered User
 
herashak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,361
vCash: 50
probably wont be traded for a couple years. but if the flames arent getting a 1st round pick or a solid young prospect its not worth it.

herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 02:44 PM
  #3
mrdonkey
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 705
vCash: 500
I have no problem keeping Wideman. When he was signed and everyone was crapping on Feaster for how badly he overpaid I feared the worst, but his defensive zone woes were massively overstated from what I saw. I'd rather not ice an entire lineup of rookies, so I don't see any reason to trade him considering the offers will probably not be that great anyway.

mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 02:50 PM
  #4
Johnny Hoxville
Moderator
Tkachuk = Cowbell
 
Johnny Hoxville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 26,981
vCash: 2403
Would take an over payment for sure. We need him, we don't have 1 legit top pairing dman so we can't really move one of our top 4 without another coming back.

Johnny Hoxville is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 03:00 PM
  #5
Vesa Awesaka
#KeepTheSenate
 
Vesa Awesaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Country: Belarus
Posts: 18,127
vCash: 500
Personally i had suggested
Pumepel
Wikstrand/hoffman
3rd
For
Wideman
but it sounds like wideman's cost would be more then im willing to pay.

Vesa Awesaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 04:12 PM
  #6
herashak
Registered User
 
herashak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,361
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vesa Awesaka View Post
Personally i had suggested
Pumepel
Wikstrand/hoffman
3rd
For
Wideman
but it sounds like wideman's cost would be more then im willing to pay.
something around stone? flames need RW talent.

herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 04:15 PM
  #7
MuffinMerc
Come watch TV
 
MuffinMerc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,063
vCash: 294
The Flames need Wideman right now. The organization is better off moving Cammallari, Stempniak, and Stajan as of the moment, and maybe even Hudler.

MuffinMerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 04:16 PM
  #8
GeeoffBrown
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,349
vCash: 500
If the Flames were to move Wideman, I'd hope we'd get someone who can play in the NHL in return. Flames line-up is embarrassing enough as it is. >_<

GeeoffBrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 04:20 PM
  #9
Vesa Awesaka
#KeepTheSenate
 
Vesa Awesaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Country: Belarus
Posts: 18,127
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by herashak View Post
something around stone? flames need RW talent.
Stone is our best non NHL prospect. I can't imagine we'd move him. Most sens fans immediately shoot down any deal involving him. I myself am more open to trading him but i'd rather do it for a younger defense men. I would have a hard time offering more tbh, as i said the asking price might be too much.

Vesa Awesaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 04:49 PM
  #10
Mystifo
No more Mr.FightGuy
 
Mystifo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: YYT
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,822
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MVW View Post
Would take an over payment for sure. We need him, we don't have 1 legit top pairing dman so we can't really move one of our top 4 without another coming back.
I think Gio is a solid top pairing not a #1 but a solid #2 D man.

Mystifo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 04:57 PM
  #11
Johnny Hoxville
Moderator
Tkachuk = Cowbell
 
Johnny Hoxville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 26,981
vCash: 2403
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystifo View Post
I think Gio is a solid top pairing not a #1 but a solid #2 D man.
Ideally, Gio is a top notch #3 that can play on a top pairing when needed. He's not a huge min logger like Jbo.

I view Wideman much of the same mold, but Gio is better defensively.

Johnny Hoxville is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2013, 05:07 PM
  #12
Vesa Awesaka
#KeepTheSenate
 
Vesa Awesaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Country: Belarus
Posts: 18,127
vCash: 500
On a good team with an established first pairing they'd both make good second pairing d imo

Vesa Awesaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2017 All Rights Reserved.