HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

In your opinion what is this current roster's biggest need or an area that should be

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-29-2003, 07:05 AM
  #1
JR#9*
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,733
vCash: 500
In your opinion what is this current roster's biggest need or an area that should be

upgraded?

To me I like the 4 lines and top 6 at this point as well as having some decent depth both upfront and on defense with guys that will be 13-14th forwards and 7-8th dmen so I would sit tight but just curious what spots other feel need to be upgraded upon or a specific area we should look to address either now or at some point during the season since it's so dead here today.

JR#9* is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 07:11 AM
  #2
#37-#93-#27*
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 3,079
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to #37-#93-#27*
Defense!

I like our forwards and can live with what we have on D until they start sucking which is a given.

#37-#93-#27* is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 07:13 AM
  #3
LiquidClown
Registered User
 
LiquidClown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Huntsville, Al
Country: Germany
Posts: 6,640
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to LiquidClown Send a message via AIM to LiquidClown
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR#9
upgraded?

To me I like the 4 lines and top 6 at this point as well as having some decent depth both upfront and on defense with guys that will be 13-14th forwards and 7-8th dmen so I would sit tight but just curious what spots other feel need to be upgraded upon or a specific area we should look to address either now or at some point during the season since it's so dead here today.
A good solid defensive defenseman.... we still lack one.

Leetch, Malakhov, Bobo, De Vries, Purinton, Poti

Not a single true stay at home defenseman in that group. Purinton is the closest thing but not exactly a great caliber player if you get my drift. (Not a knock against him, it's just not who he is). Ever since Beuk went down we've really lacked that stay at home guy that is just mean and hits hard.

LiquidClown is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 07:16 AM
  #4
Lundyfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 338
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Lundyfan
A good defenseman. I like the forwards but the D could still use help.

Lundyfan is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 07:16 AM
  #5
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,829
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR#9
upgraded?

To me I like the 4 lines and top 6 at this point as well as having some decent depth both upfront and on defense with guys that will be 13-14th forwards and 7-8th dmen so I would sit tight but just curious what spots other feel need to be upgraded upon or a specific area we should look to address either now or at some point during the season since it's so dead here today.

The top two lines are set IMO.

I would like to get one more good defensive forward to play with Holik and Lundmark. With the likes of Barnaby, LaCouture, Simon, and Petrovicky all being marginal players and probably better suited for the fourth line, I would like to get that one more defensive wing to sure up the checking line.

deVries has been a real nice surprise IMO. I did not have high hopes for him but he has shown me something by going to teammates defense and for being a stable partner for Poti and Tyutin. With that said, I would love to package Malakhov and a prospect for a big defenseman.
I would offer Malakhov (1M paid) and Garth Murray to Boston for Hal Gill and a fourth rd pick.

__________________
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 07:16 AM
  #6
Kodiak
Registered User
 
Kodiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ranger fan in Philly
Posts: 2,185
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Kodiak Send a message via AIM to Kodiak Send a message via Yahoo to Kodiak
Defensive forwards.

Of all of our 3rd/4th line wingers (Lundmark, Barnaby, Simon, Petro, Scott, LaCouture), LaCouture is the only one that is good defensively. The rest can range from decent to downright awful on any given day.

Kodiak is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 07:18 AM
  #7
tony
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: new jersey
Posts: 194
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR#9
upgraded?

To me I like the 4 lines and top 6 at this point as well as having some decent depth both upfront and on defense with guys that will be 13-14th forwards and 7-8th dmen so I would sit tight but just curious what spots other feel need to be upgraded upon or a specific area we should look to address either now or at some point during the season since it's so dead here today.
a mojo penalty killer would be nice.

tony is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 07:26 AM
  #8
Bacchus
Registered User
 
Bacchus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dickes B
Country: Germany
Posts: 2,444
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidClown
Not a single true stay at home defenseman in that group. Purinton is the closest thing but not exactly a great caliber player if you get my drift. (Not a knock against him, it's just not who he is). Ever since Beuk went down we've really lacked that stay at home guy that is just mean and hits hard.
Exactly my thoughts!

Bacchus is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 07:57 AM
  #9
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,012
vCash: 500
I still think that this group is short a defensive defenseman who is nasty to play against. They still need another crease clearer. All of our current top 6 (including Leetch & the M&M boys and excluding Dale because it looks like he is slated for #7), still think of personall points first instead of clearing the crease). But it's an area that would be hard to fill unless either of Poti, Malacough, & Bobo get traded. The likelihood of there being a huge marker for the Ambiguosly Defenseless Russian Duo
is slim and I still cannot see Sather trading Poti after giving up York for him.

True Blue is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 08:02 AM
  #10
Jackson Ranger
Registered User
 
Jackson Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 2,571
vCash: 500
TEAM DEFENSE!

Goaltending: As well as Dunham played last year, he needs to duplicate it this year or do even better.

Defense: Too much age, not enough discipline (Kasper, Mironov).

Forwards: Messier and Lindros need realize that their is an offensive AND defensive zone.

Defense is where it all starts and usually ends. Until this team commits to a greater team defense, they'll struggle to make the playoffs.

Jackson Ranger is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 08:04 AM
  #11
RANGERDIEHARD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 929
vCash: 500
A big defensive defenseman who can play physical and clear out the crease is priority # 1. Then I would want a fast defensive forward who can play on the checking line with Holik and kill penalties.

RANGERDIEHARD is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 08:31 AM
  #12
RFAN
Registered User
 
RFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 839
vCash: 500
I see everyone saying a stay at home defensemen, which I also agree! The question is who could that be? There are not that many around, but I would be more than happy to give up Poti for one!

RFAN is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 08:37 AM
  #13
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFAN
I see everyone saying a stay at home defensemen, which I also agree! The question is who could that be? There are not that many around, but I would be more than happy to give up Poti for one!
The "who" is certainly an important question. Nick Boyton is one I would certainly look at. He is a Group II free-agent who is still unsigned. Yes he can carry the puck and is a pretty good passer & shooter, however, he plays a pretty physical game and WILL throw down the gloves whenever necessary. Add his size, and he seems to be a perfect combination of grace and brawn. In short, every thing that both of the M&M boys should be, but aren't. Oh, and Boyton also does not take nights off. Personally, I would trade Poti straight up for him in a heartbeat.

True Blue is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 08:41 AM
  #14
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,456
vCash: 500
This group needs to...

realize that to win, you need to work hard. And, once this team does start to win again, I think the postivity from that will flow and will lead ot better play. This team may be capable. The forward lines are quite solid, if used properly. The defense isn't half bad, even if this team is missing a Scott Stevens, or another high-impact defensive defenseman, but that's not needed everywhere. If Kaspar can maul everything in sight and stay out of the box, there's your impact. There seems and sounds to be a system...now if it can be played efficiently, that'll be good thing.

But it comes down to being smart and playing hard. This group has been capable individually over the past several years to do such a thing with various clubs; can they finally bring that all together?

Fletch is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 08:42 AM
  #15
kazo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 959
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway
The top two lines are set IMO.

I would like to get one more good defensive forward to play with Holik and Lundmark. With the likes of Barnaby, LaCouture, Simon, and Petrovicky all being marginal players and probably better suited for the fourth line, I would like to get that one more defensive wing to sure up the checking line.

deVries has been a real nice surprise IMO. I did not have high hopes for him but he has shown me something by going to teammates defense and for being a stable partner for Poti and Tyutin. With that said, I would love to package Malakhov and a prospect for a big defenseman.
I would offer Malakhov (1M paid) and Garth Murray to Boston for Hal Gill and a fourth rd pick.
Malakhov is a 35 year old who has bad knees and who oftentimes plays with indifference. Plus the Bruins would still have to pay Malakhov 3 mil? I can hear Jacobs laughing from here.

The Bruins and the Rangers both need help on D which is what makes them poor trading partners.

kazo is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 08:50 AM
  #16
nyr5186
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans
Country: Madagascar
Posts: 2,702
vCash: 500
Over the past 6 years, the Rangers have been the worst penalty killing team in the league. What has Sather done to improve our PK? Nothing. Until he stops relying on Mess to kill penalties and brings in a real PK specialist/defensive forward, this team will continue to lose games because they cant kill penalties. Or at least make a real effort in practice to improve it.

nyr5186 is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 09:55 AM
  #17
Kodiak
Registered User
 
Kodiak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ranger fan in Philly
Posts: 2,185
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Kodiak Send a message via AIM to Kodiak Send a message via Yahoo to Kodiak
Quote:
Originally Posted by kazo
Malakhov is a 35 year old who has bad knees and who oftentimes plays with indifference. Plus the Bruins would still have to pay Malakhov 3 mil? I can hear Jacobs laughing from here.

The Bruins and the Rangers both need help on D which is what makes them poor trading partners.
Actually, I think a deal like that might not be so bad, if we ate more salary. Malakhov makes 3.5 mil this year and is in the last year of his contract. The Bruins currently have McGillis, Gill, Moran, O'Donnell, Brennan, and Jillson on D until Boynton signs. Aside from Jillson (a rookie), they have NO ONE on D that can move the puck. Malakhov might be a nice fit, if they want him. The only reason the deal even has a chance of going through would be because Gill isn't as good as some people on this board think he is.

Kodiak is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 10:34 AM
  #18
Melrose_Jr.
Registered User
 
Melrose_Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Country: United States
Posts: 10,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyr4life5186
Over the past 6 years, the Rangers have been the worst penalty killing team in the league. What has Sather done to improve our PK? Nothing. Until he stops relying on Mess to kill penalties and brings in a real PK specialist/defensive forward, this team will continue to lose games because they cant kill penalties. Or at least make a real effort in practice to improve it.
Agreed. I like LaCouture, but to say he's the best defensive forward on this team is frightening. I think Nedved is a great killer, but he logs heavy ES and PP minutes already. I also like Petro, Barnaby and Scott, but in addition Simon, that's a lot of players that all do relatively the same job. The team's not built with a strong #1 PK unit it mind.

If it were me, I'd have kept Donato and told Messier to eff himself. I would have found a way to keep Samuelsson in last year's Kovie trade, maybe by dealing Petro instead. That leaves a 4th line of D-Lac/Donato/Sammy. Kill units are D-Lac/Donato, Nedved/Sammy. With a LOT of practice and direction from Renney, I'd like to think that group could put our PK in the top 1/2 of the league.

Melrose_Jr. is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 10:41 AM
  #19
Brooklyn Ranger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn, of course
Posts: 7,764
vCash: 500
Yeah, Petrovicky is every bit as good as Samuelsson was. I'm shocked that Pittsburgh didn't demand him as well!

Brooklyn Ranger is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 10:54 AM
  #20
33teddy33
Registered User
 
33teddy33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 116
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to 33teddy33 Send a message via AIM to 33teddy33 Send a message via Yahoo to 33teddy33
ha.
they need Ted Nolan to come whip their ***** into shape.
hope that they gel this year.
tired of watching playoffs w/out them.

Sather again?

Hope people stay healthy. The moves they made this year to date are solid.

Little something something on Defense would be terrific.

Leetch has good year. we are okay.

Maybe he needs the "C"?

33teddy33 is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 10:57 AM
  #21
kazo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 959
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodiak
Actually, I think a deal like that might not be so bad, if we ate more salary. Malakhov makes 3.5 mil this year and is in the last year of his contract. The Bruins currently have McGillis, Gill, Moran, O'Donnell, Brennan, and Jillson on D until Boynton signs. Aside from Jillson (a rookie), they have NO ONE on D that can move the puck. Malakhov might be a nice fit, if they want him. The only reason the deal even has a chance of going through would be because Gill isn't as good as some people on this board think he is.
The Bruins aren't going to swap defensemen. They gain nothing that way. If they are going to trade they will trade one to their forwards for help on defense. No way they pick up a guy (Malakhov) who might only have a year left in his career (assuming a lockout).

kazo is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 10:59 AM
  #22
_P_
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: huntington , NY
Posts: 423
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to _P_
a shot of youth would great...young hungry guys that are trying to take peoples jobs and verterans will in turn have to look over there shoulder at the kids to keep there jobs...healthy compotition

_P_ is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 11:13 AM
  #23
Melrose_Jr.
Registered User
 
Melrose_Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Country: United States
Posts: 10,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brooklyn Ranger
Yeah, Petrovicky is every bit as good as Samuelsson was. I'm shocked that Pittsburgh didn't demand him as well!
I need a in there if you're being facetious. Tell ya what, the can keep Wilson and I'll STILL give 'em Petro.

My intent was not to open a debate about specific deals. Point is, Sather has not only chose to do nothing about the PK problems, he's consciously parted with anyone who even resembles a sound defensive forward in favor of offense, grit, or in Messier's case, window dressing. Seems to me that the first step in remedying the PK situation would be to retain the services of those who have the ability to do something about it.

Melrose_Jr. is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 12:07 PM
  #24
RANGERDIEHARD
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 929
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFAN
I see everyone saying a stay at home defensemen, which I also agree! The question is who could that be? There are not that many around, but I would be more than happy to give up Poti for one!

The guy I wanted now plays for Detroit.

RANGERDIEHARD is offline  
Old
09-29-2003, 01:18 PM
  #25
Vito Andolini
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 923
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JR#9
upgraded?

To me I like the 4 lines and top 6 at this point as well as having some decent depth both upfront and on defense with guys that will be 13-14th forwards and 7-8th dmen so I would sit tight but just curious what spots other feel need to be upgraded upon or a specific area we should look to address either now or at some point during the season since it's so dead here today.
Jeez...where to start....
First and most importantly, we need YOUNG, impact, diverse, core players who are leaders. This team is never going to be a winner until we develop a young group of guys to carry it.

Second, we need real defensive crease clearing d-men, and I'm not talking about Malacough and Bobo. Consistent defensive play is what is gonna get us back towards respectibility, and we are severely lacking in it. I dont think Purinton fits this bill, atleast not yet. He's decent defensively, but not a defensive work horse, also he's not physical enough in the crease.

Third, we need some defensive forwards. I don't think we have a single one, not since we dealt Samuelsson. This is a huge concern for the same reason as I gave for number 2. Consistent defensive wins in the NHL, and not every player on the ice needs to be a go-to type player. So we need atleast 1 on our top two lines, and 1 or 2 on the bottom two lines.

That being said, it will not be easy to make these changes. It would take a huge commitment by management towards a rebuilding process, and we all know that will never happen in New York, so....

Vito Andolini is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.